Abstracts
Abstract
Science literacy is essential for informed participation in modern society, and undergraduate education plays a critical role in fostering science literacy among science and non-science students. One important component of science literacy is understanding the nature of science (NOS), yet traditional NOS frameworks have been critiqued for oversimplifying scientific practice and neglecting its social and cultural dimensions. While social identity is known to influence student academic engagement and performance, little is known about how identity factors such as gender, age, program and level of study, being a visible minority, or parental education influences NOS beliefs. In this study, 272 undergraduate students from a Canadian liberal arts university completed an online questionnaire assessing NOS knowledge. Students generally demonstrated a solid understanding of NOS, though their comprehension of scientific methods is limited. No significant differences in NOS beliefs were found across social identity groups, but non-science majors were more likely to report uncertainty in their responses compared to science majors. These findings suggest that traditional NOS measures may fail to capture the nuanced ways that social identity shapes science understanding, emphasizing the need for justice-oriented approaches to NOS education.
Keywords:
- nature of science (NOS),
- social identity,
- science education,
- science literacy,
- undergraduate education
Appendices
Bibliography
- Akpınar, E., Yıldız, E., Tatar, N., & Ergin, Ö. (2009). Students’ attitudes toward science and technology: An investigation of gender, grade level, and academic achievement. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 2804–2808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.498
- Allchin, D. (2011). Evaluating knowledge of the nature of (whole) science. Science Education, 95(3), 518–542. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20432
- Allum, N., Besley, J., Gomez, L., & Brunton-Smith, I. (2018). Disparities in science literacy. Science, 360(6391), 861–862. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aar8480
- Allum, N., Sturgis, P., Tabourazi, D., & Brunton-Smith, I. (2008). Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures: A meta-analysis. Public Understanding of Science, 17(1), 35–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662506070159
- Bahtiar, B., Ibrahim, I., & Maimun, M. (2022). Analysis of students’ scientific literacy skills in terms of gender using discovery model science teaching materials assisted by PhET simulation. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 11(3), 371–386. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v11i3.37279
- Bliuc, A.-M., Ellis, R. A., Goodyear, P., & Hendres, D. M. (2011). The role of social identification as university student in learning: Relationships between students’ social identity, approaches to learning, and academic achievement. Educational Psychology, 31(5), 559–574. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2011.585948
- Brownlow, S., Jacobi, T., & Rogers, M. (2000). Science anxiety as a function of gender and experience. Sex Roles, 42(1–2), 119–131. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1007040529319
- Buxner, S. R., Impey, C. D., Romine, J., & Nieberding, M. (2018). Linking introductory astronomy students’ basic science knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, sources of information, and information literacy. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevphyseducres.14.010142
- Cartwright, N. M., Liddle, D. M., Arceneaux, B., Newton, G., & Monk, J. M. (2020). Assessing scientific literacy skill perceptions and practical capabilities in fourth year undergraduate biological science students. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(6), 64–76. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n6p64
- Chung, E., & Milkoreit, M. (2021). Who are your people?–The effect of political ideology and social identity on climate-related beliefs and risk perceptions. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 11(3), 467–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2021.1992287
- Drummond, C., & Fischhoff, B. (2017). Individuals with greater science literacy and education have more polarized beliefs on controversial science topics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(36), 9587–9592. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1704882114
- Duschl, R. A., & Grandy, R. (2013). Two views about explicitly teaching nature of science. Science & Education, 22(9), 2109–2139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-012-9539-4
- Eveland, T. J. (2019). Supporting first-generation college students: Analyzing academic and social support’s effects on academic performance. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44(8), 1039–1051. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877x.2019.1646891
- Greenfield, T. A. (1996). Gender, ethnicity, science achievement, and attitudes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(8), 901–933. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199610)33:8<901::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-%23
- Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 88–140. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543067001088
- Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2007). The nature of science education for enhancing scientific literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), 1347–1362. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690601007549
- Impey, C. (2013). Science literacy of undergraduates in the United States. Organizations, People and Strategies in Astronomy, 3, 353–364.
- Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students’ and teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 331–359. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660290404
- Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2019). Teaching and learning nature of scientific knowledge: Is it Déjà vu all over again? Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0002-0
- Lederman, N. G., Lederman, J. S., & Antink, A. (2013). Nature of science and scientific inquiry as contexts for the learning of science and achievement of scientific literacy. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 1(3), 138–147. https:/files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED543992.pdf
- Makarovs, K., & Allum, N. (2023). Social identity and racial disparities in science literacy. Public Understanding of Science, 32(3), 373–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625221141378
- Mallow, J. V. (1994). Gender-related science anxiety: A first binational study. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 3(4), 227–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01575898
- McComas, W. F., Almazroa, H., & Clough, M. P. (1998). The nature of science in science education: An introduction. Science & Education, 7(6), 511–532. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1008642510402
- Medina, S. R., Ortlieb, E., & Metoyer, S. (2014). Life science literacy of an undergraduate population. The American Biology Teacher, 76(1), 34–41. https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2014.76.1.8
- Megreya, A. M., Szűcs, D., & Moustafa, A. A. (2021). The Abbreviated Science Anxiety Scale: Psychometric properties, gender differences and associations with test anxiety, general anxiety and science achievement. PLoS ONE, 16(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245200
- Meisha, D. E., & Al‐dabbagh, R. A. (2021). Self‐confidence as a predictor of senior dental student academic success. Journal of Dental Education, 85(9), 1497–1503. https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.12617
- Michel, H., & Neumann, I. (2016). Nature of science and science content learning. Science & Education, 25(9–10), 951–975. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-016-9860-4
- Miller, P. H., Blessing, J. S., & Schwartz, S. (2006). Gender differences in high‐school students’ views about science. International Journal of Science Education, 28(4), 363–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500277664
- Morganson, V. J., Jones, M. P., & Major, D. A. (2010). Understanding women’s underrepresentation in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: The role of social coping. The Career Development Quarterly, 59(2), 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.2010.tb00060.x
- Nix, S., & Perez-Felkner, L. (2019). Difficulty orientations, gender, and race/ethnicity: An intersectional analysis of pathways to STEM degrees. Social Sciences, 8(2), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8020043
- Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87(2), 224–240. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10066
- Rudolph, J. L. (2000). Reconsidering the “nature of science” as a curriculum component. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(3), 403–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/002202700182628
- Snow, C. E., & Dibner, K. A. (2016). Science literacy: Concepts, contexts, and consequences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.17226/23595
- Stroupe, D., Suárez, E., & Scipio, D. (2025). Epistemic injustice and the “Nature of Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 62(4), 901–941. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21988
- Strzalkowski, N., & Sobhanzadeh, M. (2023). Views and value of an undergraduate general education on advancing student attitudes and engagement with science. Imagining SoTL, 3(2), 89–119. https://doi.org/10.29173/isotl687
- Terry, D. J., Hogg, M. A., & White, K. M. (1999). The theory of planned behaviour: Self‐identity, social identity and group norms. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38(3), 225–244. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466699164149
- Udo, M. K., Ramsey, G. P., & Mallow, J. V. (2004). Science anxiety and gender in students taking general education science courses. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(4), 435–446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-004-1465-z
- Ustun, U. (2023). Motivation’s role in students’ science literacy and career expectations. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 68(4), 824–841. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2023.2229356
- Verdin, D., & Godwin, A. (2015). First in the family: A comparison of first-generation and non-first-generation engineering college students. 2015 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/fie.2015.7344359
- Walls, L. (2016). Awakening a dialogue: A critical race theory analysis of U.S. nature of science research from 1967 to 2013. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(10), 1546–1570. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21266
- Woitkowski, D., Rochell, L., & Bauer, A. B. (2021). German university students’ views of nature of science in the introductory phase. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 17(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevphyseducres.17.010118
- Woitkowski, D., & Wurmbach, N. L. (2019). Assessing German professors’ views of nature of science. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevphyseducres.15.010108
- Yacoubian, H. A. (2017). Scientific literacy for democratic decision-making. International Journal of Science Education, 40(3), 308–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1420266

