Abstracts
Abstract
Experiments are considered to be essential components of science learning. This research aimed to investigate trends in the use of science experiments in online learning. A systematic literature review was carried out, with data sourced from the Scopus and Google Scholar databases. The reviewed documents were journal articles published between 2015 and 2022, with the keywords “science practicum,” “science experiments,” “distance learning,” “online learning,” and “hands-on science.” Using Harzing’s Publish or Perish software, 970 articles were found but only 32 were reviewed. The literature review followed a procedure adapted from the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA), with articles reviewed based on predetermined criteria such as the year of publication, article source, practicum topics, research subjects, assessment methods, technology, and experiment design in online learning. In the results, various designs for online learning models, the technology used in science experiments, topics addressed, and appropriate assessment methods were identified. Trends included the extensive use of interactive simulation models in online science experiments, the use of virtual laboratories as a crucial technology, and the use of experiment reports to assess students. The analysis showed a sharp increase in the number of publications since the pandemic (2020) and that online science experiments might be carried out effectively by considering the characteristics of the material, matching the science curriculum, and using assessments that fulfill the objectives of science experiments.
Keywords:
- experiment report,
- online learning,
- science experiment,
- simulation,
- virtual laboratory
Appendices
Bibliography
- Accettone, S. L. W. (2022). Student perceptions of remote chemistry laboratory delivery models. Journal of Chemical Education, 99(2), 654–668. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c00757
- Ali, N., Ullah, S., & Khan, D. (2022). Minimization of students’ cognitive load in a virtual chemistry laboratory via contents optimization and arrow-textual aids. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 7629–7652. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10639-022-10936-6
- Ametepe, J. D., & Khan, N. (2020). Teaching physics during COVID-19 pandemic: Implementation and report of teaching strategies to support student learning. Physics Education, 56(6), Article 065030. https://www.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/ac266f
- Andrews, J. L., de Los Rios, J. P., Rayaluru, M., Lee, S., Mai, L., Schusser, A., & Mak, C. H. (2020). Experimenting with at-home general chemistry laboratories during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(7), 1887–1894. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00483
- Baker, L. A., & Cavinato, A. G. (2020). Teaching analytical chemistry in the time of COVID-19. Analytical Chemistry, 92(15), 10185–10186. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.0c02981
- Baldock, B. L., Fernandez, A. L., Franco, J., Provencher, B. A., & McCoy, M. R. (2021). Overcoming the challenges of remote instruction: Using mobile technology to promote active learning. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(3), 833–842. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00992
- Beck, C. W., & Blumer, L. S. (2012). Inquiry-based ecology laboratory courses improve student confidence and scientific reasoning skills. Ecosphere, 3(12), Article 112. https://doi.org/10.1890/es12-00280.1
- Blumer, L. S., & Beck, C. W. (2019). Laboratory courses with guided-inquiry modules improve scientific reasoning and experimental design skills for the least-prepared undergraduate students. CBE Life Sciences Education, 18(1), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.18-08-0152
- Brevik, E. C., Ulery, A., & Muise, A. S. (2021). Pivoting to online laboratories due to COVID-19 using the Science of Agriculture digital tools: A case study. Natural Sciences Education, 50(1), Article e20045. https://doi.org/10.1002/nse2.20045
- Casaburo, F. (2021). Teaching physics by Arduino during COVID-19 pandemic: The free falling body experiment. Physics Education, 56(6), Article 063001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/ac1b39
- Cesin-AbouAtme, T., Lopez-Almeida, C. G., Molina-Labastida, G., & Ibanez, J. G. (2021). Light-emitting diodes as voltage generators: Demonstrating the fuel cell principle with low-cost, magnetically enhanced, homemade solar electrolysis. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(9), 3045–3049. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c00093
- Damopolii, I., Paiki, F. F., & Nunaki, J. H. (2022). The development of comic book as marker of augmented reality to raise students’ critical thinking. TEM Journal, 11(1), 348–355. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM111-44
- DeBoer, J., Haney, C., Atiq, S. Z., Smith, C., & Cox, D. (2019). Hands-on engagement online: Using a randomised control trial to estimate the impact of an at-home lab kit on student attitudes and achievement in a MOOC. European Journal of Engineering Education, 44(1–2), 234–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2017.1378170
- Domínguez, J. C., Miranda, R., González, E. J., Oliet, M., & Alonso, M. V. (2018). A virtual lab as a complement to traditional hands-on labs: Characterization of an alkaline electrolyzer for hydrogen production. Education for Chemical Engineers, 23, 7–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2018.03.002
- Donkin, R., Askew, E., & Stevenson, H. (2019). Video feedback and e-learning enhances laboratory skills and engagement in medical laboratory science students. BMC Medical Education, 19(1), Article 310. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1745-1
- Faulconer, E. K., & Gruss, A. B. (2018). A review to weigh the pros and cons of online, remote, and distance science laboratory experiences. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(2), 155–168. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i2.3386
- Foo, C.-c., Cheung, B., & Chu, K.-m. (2021). A comparative study regarding distance learning and the conventional face-to-face approach conducted problem-based learning tutorial during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Medical Education, 21(1), Article 141. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02575-1
- Gya, R., & Bjune, A. E. (2021). Taking practical learning in STEM education home: Examples from do-it-yourself experiments in plant biology. Ecology and Evolution, 11(8), 3481–3487. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7207
- Ha, S., & Kim, M. (2020). Challenges of designing and carrying out laboratory experiments about Newton’s second law: The case of Korean gifted students. Science and Education, 29(5), 1389–1416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00155-1
- Hamed, G., & Aljanazrah, A. (2020). The effectiveness of using virtual experiments on students’ learning in the general physics lab. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 19, 977–996. https://doi.org/10.28945/4668
- Hasani, L. M., Santoso, H. B., & Junus, K. (2022). Designing asynchronous online discussion forum interface and interaction based on the community of inquiry framework. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 23(2), 191–213. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v23i2.6016
- Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88(1), 28–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10106
- Huang, A. Y. Q., Lu, O. H. T., & Yang, S. J. H. (2023). Effects of artificial intelligence–enabled personalized recommendations on learners’ learning engagement, motivation, and outcomes in a flipped classroom. Computers & Education, 194, Article 104684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104684
- Ishafit, I., Indratno, T. K., & Prabowo, Y. D. (2019). Arduino and LabVIEW-based remote data acquisition system for magnetic field of coils experiments. Physics Education, 55(2), Article 025003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/ab5ed6
- Ishafit, Mundilarto, & Surjono, H. D. (2020). Development of light polarization experimental apparatus for remote laboratory in physics education. Physics Education, 56(1), Article 015008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/abc4da
- Kader, S. N., Ng, W. B., Tan, S. W. L., & Fung, F. M. (2020). Building an interactive immersive virtual reality crime scene for future chemists to learn forensic science chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 2651–2656. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00817
- Kapici, H. O., Akcay, H., & de Jong, T. (2019). Using hands-on and virtual laboratories alone or together―which works better for acquiring knowledge and skills? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 28(3), 231–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-018-9762-0
- Kapici, H. O., Akcay, H., & de Jong, T. (2020). How do different laboratory environments influence students’ attitudes toward science courses and laboratories? Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52(4), 534–549. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1750075
- Kapici, H. O., Akcay, H., & Koca, E. E. (2022). Comparison of the quality of written scientific arguments in different laboratory environments. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20(1), 69–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10147-w
- Kier, M. W., & Johnson, L. L. (2022). Exploring how secondary STEM teachers and undergraduate mentors adapt digital technologies to promote culturally relevant education during COVID-19. Education Sciences, 12(1), Article 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12010048
- Koretsky, M. D. (2020). Re-flipping in the remote classroom: The surprising uptake of video-recorded worked examples. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 2754–2759. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00711
- Larriba, M., Rodríguez-Llorente, D., Cañada-Barcala, A., Sanz-Santos, E., Gutiérrez-Sánchez, P., Pascual-Muñoz, G., Álvarez-Torrellas, S., Águeda, V. I., Delgado, J. A., & García, J. (2021). Lab at home: 3D printed and low-cost experiments for thermal engineering and separation processes in COVID-19 time. Education for Chemical Engineers, 36, 24–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2021.02.001
- Ma, J., & Nickerson, J. V. (2006). Hands-on, simulated, and remote laboratories: A comparative literature review. ACM Computing Surveys, 38(3), Article 7–es. https://doi.org/10.1145/1132960.1132961
- Malik, A., & Ubaidillah, M. (2020). Students critical-creative thinking skill: A multivariate analysis of experiments and gender. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education, 8(Special issue), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2020-8-SI-49-58
- Malik, A., & Ubaidillah, M. (2021). Multiple skill laboratory activities: How to improve students’ scientific communication and collaboration skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 10(4), 585–595. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v10i4.31442
- Mamlok-Naaman, R., & Barnea, N. (2012). Laboratory activities in Israel. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 8(1), 49–57. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2012.816a
- Manca, S., Persico, D., & Raffaghelli, J. E. (2021). Editorial. Emergency remote education: Methodological, technological, organizational and policy issues. Italian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(2), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.17471/2499-4324/1251
- Marinoni, G., van’t Land, H., & Jensen, T. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on higher education around the world: IAU global survey report. International Association of Universities. https://www.iau-aiu.net/IMG/pdf/iau_covid19_and_he_survey_report_final_may_2020.pdf
- Martin, F., Sun, T., & Westine, C. D. (2020). A systematic review of research on online teaching and learning from 2009 to 2018. Computers and Education, 159, Article 104009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104009
- Mayer, R. E. (2019). Thirty years of research on online learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33(2), 152–159. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3482
- McGreal, R., & Elliott, R. (2008). Technologies of online learning (e-learning). In Theory and practice of online learning (pp. 143–165). https://doi.org/10.15215/aupress/9781897425084.01
- Mistry, N., & Shahid, N. (2021). Design and delivery of virtual inquiry-based organic chemistry experiments. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(9), 2952–2958. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c00571
- Müssig, J., Clark, A., Hoermann, S., Loporcaro, G., Loporcaro, C., & Huber, T. (2020). Imparting materials science knowledge in the field of the crystal structure of metals in times of online teaching: A novel online laboratory teaching concept with an augmented reality application. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 2643–2650. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00763
- Nandana, W. A. R., & de Mel, W. R. (2016). Integrated laboratory experiment setup to empower the engineering education in distance mode. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 11(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-06-2016-0007
- Nasution, A. K. P. (2022). Education technology research trends in Indonesia during the COVID-19 pandemic. Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education, 36(2), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.21315/apjee2021.36.2.4
- Oliveira, A., Feyzi Behnagh, R., Ni, L., Mohsinah, A. A., Burgess, K. J., & Guo, L. (2019). Emerging technologies as pedagogical tools for teaching and learning science: A literature review. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 1(2), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.141
- Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. PLOS Medicine, 18(3), Article e1003583. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003583
- Papaneophytou, C. (2020). A distance learning enzyme assay and kinetics laboratory in the time of COVID-19. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 48(5), 430–432. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.21364
- Park, Y., & Doo, M. Y. (2024). Role of AI in blended learning: A systematic literature review. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 25(1), 164–196. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v25i1.7566
- Potkonjak, V., Gardner, M., Callaghan, V., Mattila, P., Guetl, C., Petrović, V. M., & Jovanović, K. (2016). Virtual laboratories for education in science, technology, and engineering: A review. Computers and Education, 95, 309–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.002
- Prahani, B. K., Ramadani, A. H., Kusumawati, D. H., Suprapto, N., Munasir, Madlazim, M., Jatmiko, B., Supardi, Z. A. I., Mubarok., H., Safitri, N. S., & Deta, A. U. (2020). ORNE learning model to improve problem-solving skills of physics bachelor candidates : An alternative learning in the Covid-19 pandemic. Jurnal Penelitian Fisika Dan Aplikasinya (JPFA), 10(01), 71–80. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpfa.v10n1.p71-80
- Pratidhina, E., Rosana, D., & Kuswanto, H. (2022). Designing physics hands-on experiment for distance learning using Arduino and block-based programing language. TEM Journal, 11(1), 374–378. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM111-47
- Sajka, M., & Rosiek, R. (2021). Analysis of aspects of visual attention when solving multiple-choice science problems. In Applying Bio-Measurements Methodologies in Science Education Research (pp. 185–215). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71535-9_10
- Salta, K., Paschalidou, K., Tsetseri, M., & Koulougliotis, D. (2022). Shift from a traditional to a distance learning environment during the COVID-19 Pandemic: University students’ engagement and interactions. Science and Education, 31(1), 93–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00234-x
- Schmidt, S., Wright, Z. M., Eckhart, K. E., Starvaggi, F., Vickery, W., Wolf, M. E., Pitts, M., Warner, T., Taofik, T., Ng, M., Colliver, C., & Sydlik, S. A. (2021). Hands-on laboratory experience using adhesives for remote learning of polymer chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(10), 3153–3162. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c01374
- Schmuck, V. D. E., Romine, I. C., Sisley, T. A., Immoos, C. E., Scott, G. E., Zigler, D. F., & Martinez, A. W. (2022). At-home microscale paper-based quantitative analysis activity with external standards. Journal of Chemical Education, 99(2), 1081–1086. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c01042
- Schnell, L. J., Simpson, G. L., Suchan, D. M., Quere, W., Weger, H. G., & Davis, M. C. (2021). An at-home laboratory in plant biology designed to engage students in the process of science. Ecology and Evolution, 11(24), 17572–17580. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8441
- Schultz, M., Callahan, D. L., & Miltiadous, A. (2020). Development and use of kitchen chemistry home practical activities during unanticipated campus closures. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 2678–2684. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00620
- Seifan, M., Dada, D., & Berenjian, A. (2019). The effect of virtual field trip as an introductory tool for an engineering real field trip. Education for Chemical Engineers, 27, 6–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2018.11.005
- Selco, J. I. (2020). Using hands-on chemistry experiments while teaching online. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 2617–2623. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0C00424
- Setiaji, B., & Santoso, P. H. (2023). An online physics laboratory delivered through live broadcasting media: A COVID-19 teaching experience. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 24(1), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v24i1.6684
- Sherrer, S. M. (2020). A virtual laboratory module exploring photosynthesis during COVID-19. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 48(6), 659–661. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.21464
- Srisawasdi, N., & Kroothkeaw, S. (2014). Supporting students’ conceptual development of light refraction by simulation-based open inquiry with dual-situated learning model. Journal of Computers in Education, 1(1), 49–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-014-0005-y
- Troussas, C., Krouska, A., & Sgouropoulou, C. (2020). Collaboration and fuzzy-modeled personalization for mobile game-based learning in higher education. Computers & Education, 144, Article 103698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103698
- Tsai, C.-W., & Chiang, Y.-C. (2013). Research trends in problem-based learning (PBL) research in e-learning and online education environments: A review of publications in SSCI-indexed journals from 2004 to 2012. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(6), E185–E190. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12038
- Tsai, C. W., & Fan, Y. T. (2013). Research trends in game-based learning research in online learning environments: A review of studies published in SSCI-indexed journals from 2003 to 2012. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(5), 115–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12031
- Tsai, C.-W., Shen, P.-D., & Chiang, Y.-C. (2013). Research trends in meaningful learning research on e-learning and online education environments: A review of studies published in SSCI-indexed journals from 2003 to 2012. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(6), E179–E184. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12035
- Tsai, C.-W., Shen, P.-D., & Fan, Y.-T. (2013). Research trends in self-regulated learning research in online learning environments: A review of studies published in selected journals from 2003 to 2012. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(5), E107–E110. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12017
- van Leeuwen, A. (2019). Teachers’ perceptions of the usability of learning analytics reports in a flipped university course: When and how does information become actionable knowledge? Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(5), 1043–1064. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-09639-y
- Vasiliadou, R. (2020). Virtual laboratories during coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 48(5), 482–483. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.21407
- Vijayan, R. (2021). Teaching and learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: A topic modeling study. Education Sciences, 11(7), 347. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11070347
- Widarti, H. R., Rokhim, D. A., Muchson, M., Budiasih, E., Sutrisno, Pratama, R. W., & Hakim, M. I. (2021). Developing integrated triplet multi-representation virtual laboratory in analytic chemical materials. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 15(8), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v15i08.21573
- Wieman, C. E., Adams, W. K., & Perkins, K. K. (2008). Physics. PhET: Simulations that enhance learning. Science, 322(5902), 682–683. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1161948
- Zulirfan, Iksan, Z. H., Osman, K., & Salehudin, S. N. M. (2018). Take-home-experiment : Enhancing students’ scientific attitude. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(5), 828–837. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1346817.pdf

