Abstracts
Abstract
This paper reports the findings from cycles three and four in a longitudinal design-based research (DBR) study with K–12 teachers to evaluate their gains in awareness, use, and perceptions about open educational resources (OER) in general and after engaging with the Pathways Project (PP), a repository of 900 world language activities. Two groups of teachers participated in distributed learning with different engagement levels to apply the 5Rs of OER (i.e., retain, reuse, revise, remix, and redistribute), specifically using OER from the PP. The Pathways subscribers (n = 23) attended webinars and received monthly newsletters throughout the project period. A smaller group, referred to as the Pathways training cohort (n = 16), participated in a four-month cohort including a synchronous workshop, monthly synchronous meetings, and asynchronous tasks. The study was conducted in the Mountain West region of the United States, where access to quality teaching materials varies across rural and urban districts, and professional development (PD) opportunities are lacking. The findings revealed that the training cohort self-reported statistically significant increases in awareness of all 5Rs, and increased frequency of revising and remixing OER; their belief in the effectiveness of OER for learning also increased. Conversely, while the subscribers group did show some gains in awareness, use, and perceived value of OER, none of these were statistically significant. These findings suggested that K–12 teachers valued OER but require strategic, long-term PD to achieve gains in awareness, use, and perceived value of OER. This study responded to the challenge of sustaining open pedagogy, particularly for an under-studied K–12 population.
Keywords:
- OER,
- OEP,
- K-12 teachers,
- professional development
Appendices
Bibliography
- Arispe, K., & Hoye, A. (2023a). Accessing and integrating openly licensed digital materials for teaching and learning. In R. E. Ferdig, R. Hartshorne, E. Baumgartner, R. Kaplan-Rakowski & C. Mouza (Eds.), What pre-K–12 teachers should know about educational technology in 2023: A research-to-practice anthology (pp. 417–426). Retrieved July 31, 2023, from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/222690/
- Arispe, K., & Hoye, A. (2023b). Partnering higher education and K–12 institutions in OER: Foundations in supporting teacher OER-enabled pedagogy. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 24(2). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v24i2.6856
- Arispe, K., Hoye, A., & Palmer, K. (2023). The impact of open educational resource professional development for teachers in secondary education. Open Praxis, 15(4), 303–313. https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.15.4.593
- Bannan, B. (2009). The integrative learning design framework: An illustrated example from the domain of instructional technology. In T. Plomp & N. Nieveen (Eds.), An introduction to educational design research (pp. 53–73). SLO-Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development.
- Beaven, T. (2018). ‘Dark reuse’: An empirical study of teachers’ OER engagement. Open Praxis, 10(4), 377–391. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.10.4.889
- Blomgren, C. (2018). OER awareness and use: The affinity between higher education and K–12. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(2), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i2.3431
- de los Arcos, B., Farrow, R., Pitt, R., Weller, M., & McAndrew, P. (2016). Adapting the curriculum: How K–12 teachers perceive the role of open educational resources. Journal of Online Learning Research, 2(1), 23–40. Retrieved May 1, 2024, from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/151664/
- Ganapathi, J. (2019). User-generated content’s impact on the sustainability of open educational resources. Open Praxis, 11(3), 211–225. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.11.2.941
- GoOpen National Network [#GoOpen National Network]. (2024, April 30). Navigating the digital divides: A strategic conversation on implementing the NETP [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/hhbdTrmLtg4?si=DulT6rdstNd51Lcw
- Hegarty, B. (2015). Attributes of open pedagogy: A model for using open educational resources. Educational Technology, 55(4), 3–13. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44430383
- Hoye, A. & Arispe, K. (n.d.). Creating an OER ancillary material repository for K–16 teachers: A design case. Manuscript submitted for publication.
- Institute for the Study of Knowledge Management in Education. (2007). #GoOpen National Network. Retrieved May 1, 2024, from https://oercommons.org/hubs/GoOpen
- Kimmons, R. (2015). OER quality and adaptation in K–12: Comparing teacher evaluations of copyright-restricted, open, and open/adapted textbooks. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(5). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i5.2341
- Open Education Global. (2025, November 10–13). OE Global 2025: Connecting the global open education community. OE Global Conference, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
- Palalas, A., & Hoven, D. (2013). Implications of using DBR to investigate the iterative design of a mobile-enabled language learning system. In J. Rodrigues & C. Pardo-Ballester (Eds.), Design-based research in CALL (CALICO Monograph Series, Vol. 11, pp. 41–66). https://www.academia.edu/3607193/Palalas_A_and_Hoven_D_2013_Implications_of_Using_DBR_to_Investigate_the_Iterative_Design_of_a_Mobile_Enabled_Language_Learning_System
- Seaman, J. E., & Seaman, J. (2023a). Curricula of many sources: Educational resources in U.S. K–12 education, 2023. Bay View Analytics. https://www.bayviewanalytics.com/reports/curricula-of-many-sources-2023.pdf
- Seaman, J. E., & Seaman, J. (2023b). Digitally established: Educational resources in U.S. higher education, 2023. Bay View Analytics. https://www.bayviewanalytics.com/reports/digitallyestablished-2023.pdf
- Tang, H. (2020). A qualitative inquiry of K–12 teachers’ experience with open educational practices: Perceived benefits and barriers of implementing open educational resources. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(3), 211–229. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v21i3.4750
- Tang, H., & Bao, Y. (2021). Latent class analysis of K–12 teachers’ barriers to implementing OER. Distance Education, 42(4), 582–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2021.1986371
- Tang, H., Lin, Y.-J., & Qian, Y. (2021). Improving K–12 teachers’ acceptance of open educational resources by open educational practices: A mixed methods inquiry. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(6), 3209–3232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10046-z
- Van Allen, J., & Katz, S. (2019). Developing open practices in teacher education: An example of integrating OER and developing renewable assignments. Open Praxis, 11(3), 311–319. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.11.3.972
- Walz, A., & Farley, J. (2023). Making open educational resources with and for pre-K12: A collaboration toolkit for higher education. Virginia Tech Libraries. Retrieved May 1, 2024, from https://open.umn.edu/opentextbooks/textbooks/1633
- Wiley, D., Webb, A., Weston, S., & Tonks, D. (2017). A preliminary exploration of the relationships between student-created OER, sustainability, and students’ success. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(4). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i4.3022
- Wiley, D., & Hilton III, J. L. (2018). Defining OER-Enabled Pedagogy. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(4). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i4.3601