ror.org/04dawnj30
Abstracts
Abstract
This study investigated online faculty familiarity, course design use, and professional development interest regarding universal design for learning (UDL) guidelines. The researchers surveyed all 2017 to 2018 online faculty at a large university in the southeastern United States. Findings included 71.6% of faculty reporting familiarity with at least one UDL guideline, with most respondents indicating familiarity with guidelines relating to perception, expression, and communication. Faculty reported the highest implementation of UDL guidelines was for those suggesting options for comprehension as well as expression and communication; the lowest implementation was for those suggesting options for physical action as well as language and support. Survey results also indicated high to moderate interest in learning more about all UDL guidelines, with emphasis on comprehension, persistence, and expression. This study suggests that faculty members desire UDL training and offers possibilities for planning and implementing such professional development in areas targeted to best meet the needs of online faculty.
Keywords:
- online teaching,
- faculty development,
- higher education,
- universal design for learning
Appendices
Bibliography
- Al-Azawei, A., Serenelli, F., & Lundqvist, K. (2016). Universal design for learning (UDL): A content analysis of peer-reviewed journal papers from 2012 to 2015. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 16(3), 39-56. doi: 10.14434/josotl.v16i3.19295
- Allen, I. E. & Seaman. J. (2016). Online report card: Tracking online education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research Group, LLC. Retrieved from http://onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/onlinereportcard.pdf
- Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990, Pub. L. No. 101‐336, § 2, 104 Stat 328 (1991).
- Barnard-Brak, L., & Sulak, T. (2010). Online versus face-to-face accommodations among college students with disabilities. American Journal of Distance Education, 24, 81-91. doi: 10.1080/08923641003604251
- Bauder, D., & Simmons, T. (2017). Digital pedagogy: Embedding universal design for learning (UDL) strategies in online courses. In P. Resta & S. Smith (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 127-132). Austin, TX: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
- Capp, M. J. (2017). The effectiveness of universal design for learning: A meta-analysis of literature between 2013 and 2016, International Journal of Inclusive Education, 21, 791-807. doi: 10.1080/13603116.2017.1325074
- Capp, M. J. (2018). Teacher confidence to implement the principles, guidelines, and checkpoints of universal design for learning. International Journal of Inclusive Education. Advanced online publication. doi: 10.1080/13603116.2018.1482014
- Casper, B., & Leuichovious, D. (2005). Universal design for learning and the transition to a more challenging academic curriculum: Making it in middle school and beyond. Teacher Education and Special Education. 36, 7-27. doi: 10.1177/0888406412446178
- CAST. (2018). Universal design for learning guidelines version 2.2. Retrieved from http://udlguidelines.cast.org
- Cho, M. H., & Shen, D. (2013). Self-regulation in online learning. Distance Education, 34, 290-301. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2013.835770
- Dell, C. A., Dell, T. F., & Blackwell, T. L. (2015). Applying universal design for learning in online courses: Pedagogical and practical considerations, Journal of Educators Online, 12, 166-192. Retrieved from https://www.thejeo.com/archive/archive/2015_122/dell_articlepdf
- Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (4th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
- Eberle, J., & Childress, M. (2006). Universal design for culturally diverse online learning. In A. Edmundson (Ed.), Globalized e-learning cultural challenges (pp. 239-254). Hershey, PA: Idea Group, Inc.
- Hall, T. E., Cohen, N., Vue, G., & Ganley, P. (2015). Addressing learning disabilities with UDL and technology: Strategic reader. Learning Disability Quarterly, 38, 72-83. doi: 10.1177/0731948714544375
- He, Y. (2014). Universal design for learning in an online teacher education course: Enhancing learners’ confidence to teach online. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10, 283-297. Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org/vol10no2/he_0614.pdf
- Katz, J. (2012). Teaching to diversity: The three-block model of universal design for learning. Winnipeg, MB: Portage and Main Press.
- Keeler, C. G. & Horney, M. (2007). Online course designs: Are special needs being met?, The American Journal of Distance Education, 21, 61-75. doi: 10.1080/08923640701298985
- Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610. doi: 10.1177/001316447003000308
- Kumar, K. L., & Wideman, M. (2014). Accessible by design: Applying UDL principles in a first year undergraduate course. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 44(1), 125-147. Retrieved from http://journals.sfu.ca/cjhe/index.php/cjhe/article/view/183704/184422
- Morra, T., & Reynolds, J. (2010). Universal design for learning: Application for technology-enhanced learning. Inquiry: The Journal of the Virginia Community Colleges, 15(1), 43-51. Retrieved from https://commons.vccs.edu/inquiry/vol15/iss1/5
- Quality Matters. (2018). Specific review standards from the quality matters higher education rubric (6th ed.). Retrieved from https://www.qualitymatters.org/sites/default/files/PDFs/StandardsfromtheQMHigherEducationRubric.pdf
- Rao, K., Ok, M. W., & Bryant, B. R. (2014). A review of research on universal design educational models. Remedial and Special Education, 35, 153-166. doi: 10.1177/0741932513518980
- Rao, K., & Tanners, A. (2011). Curb cuts in cyberspace: Universal instructional design for online courses. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 24, 211-229. Retrieved from http://www.ahead-archive.org/uploads/publications/JPED/jped_24_3/JPED%2024_3_FULL%20DOCUMENT.pdf
- Robinson, D. E., & Wizer, D. R. (2016). Universal design for learning and the quality matters guidelines for the design and implementation of online learning events. International Journal of Technology in Teaching & Learning, 12(1), 17-32.
- Ryan, J. (2007). Learning disabilities in Australian universities: Hidden, ignored, and unwelcomed. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40, 436-442. doi: 10.1177/00222194070400050701
- The University of North Carolina at Charlotte. (2014). Mission statement. Retrieved from https://chancellor.uncc.edu/institutional-planning/mission-statement
- Tobin, T.J. (2014). Increase online student retention with universal design for learning. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 15, 13-48.
- Wiggins, G. & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. doi: 10.14483/calj.v19n1.11490