ror.org/01kg8sb98
Abstracts
Abstract
This study explores the activities, tools, and resources that instructors of massive open online courses (MOOCs) use to improve the personalization of their MOOCs. Following email interviews with 25 MOOC and open education leaders regarding MOOC personalization, a questionnaire was developed. This questionnaire was then completed by 152 MOOC instructors from around the world. While more than 8 in 10 respondents claimed heavy involvement in designing their MOOCs, only one-third placed extensive effort on meeting unique learner needs during course design, and even fewer respondents were concerned with personalization during course delivery. An array of instructional practices, technology tools, and content resources were leveraged by instructors to personalize MOOC-based learning environments. Aligning with previous research, the chief resources and tools employed in their MOOCs were discussion forums, video lectures, supplemental readings, and practice quizzes. In addition, self-monitoring and peer-based methods of learner feedback were more common than instructor monitoring and feedback. Some respondents mentioned the use of flexible deadlines, proposed alternatives to course assignments, and introduced multimedia elements, mobile applications, and guest speakers among the ways in which they attempted to personalize their massive courses. A majority of the respondents reported modest or high interest in learning new techniques to personalize their next MOOC offering.
Keywords:
- massive open online courses (MOOCs),
- personalization,
- instructional design,
- MOOC instructors
Appendices
Bibliography
- Aleven, V., Stahl, E., Schworm, S., Fischer, F., & Wallace, R. (2003). Help seeking and help design in interactive learning environments. Review of Educational Research, 73(3), 277-320. doi: 10.3102/00346543073003277
- Balch, T. (2013). About MOOC completion rates: The importance of student investment. The Augmented Trader [Weblog post]. Retrieved from https://augmentedtrader.com/2013/01/06/about-mooc-completion-rates-the-importance-of-investment/
- Bates, T. (2012, August 5). What's right and what's wrong about Coursera-style MOOCs. Learning and Distance Education Resources Blog [Weblog post]. Retrieved from http://www.tonybates.ca/2012/08/05/whats-right-and-whats-wrong-about-coursera-style-moocs/
- Bethke, R. (2016, June 17). Trend: Online learning going personal. eCampus News. Retrieved from http://www.ecampusnews.com/technologies/personalized-learning-online
- Bonk, C. J., Lee, M. M., Reeves, T. C., & Reynolds, T. H. (Eds.). (2015). MOOCs and open education around the world. NY: Routledge.
- Bonk, C. J., Lee. M. M., Reeves, T. C., & Reynolds, T. H. (2018). The emergence and design of massive open online courses. In R. A. Reiser & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (4th Ed.), (pp. 250-258). New York, NY: Pearson Education.
- Bowman, K. D. (2012, Summer). Winds of change: Is higher education experiencing a shift in delivery? Public Purpose Magazine (from the American Association of State Colleges and Universities). Retrieved from http://www.aascu.org/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=5570
- Brown, J., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42. doi: 10.3102/0013189X018001032
- Cho, H., & LaRose, R. (1999). Privacy issues and Internet surveys. Social Science Computer Review, 17(4), 421-434. doi: 10.1177/089443939901700402
- Daniel, J. (2012). Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox, and possibility. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 3. Retrieved from http://jime.open.ac.uk/articles/10.5334/2012-18/
- Davis, H., Dickens, K., León Urrutia, M., Sánchez Vera, M. del M., & White, S. (2014). MOOCs for universities and learners: An analysis of motivating factors. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computer Supported Education. Barcelona. Retrieved from http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/363714/1/DavisEtAl2014MOOCsCSEDUFinal.pdf
- de Oliveira Fassbinder, A. G., Fassbinder, M., & Barbosa, E. F. (2015, October). From flipped classroom theory to the personalized design of learning experiences in MOOCs. Proceedings of Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 32614, 1-8.
- Deng, R., & Benckendorff, P. (2017). A contemporary review of research methods adopted to understand students' and instructors' use of massive open online courses (MOOCs). International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 7(8). doi: 10.18178/ijiet.2017.7.8.939
- Downes, S. (2016, February 17). Personal and personalized learning. European Multiple MOOCs Aggregator Newsletter. Retrieved from http://www.downes.ca/post/65065
- Fan, H., & Poole, M. S. (2006). What is personalization? Perspectives on the design and implementation of personalization in information systems. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 16(3-4), 179-202. doi: 10.1080/10919392.2006.9681199
- Fini, A. (2009). The technological dimension of a massive open online course: The case of the CCK08 course tools. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10(5), 14-26. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/643/1402
- Fournier, H., & Kop, R. (2015). MOOC learning experience design: Issues and challenges. International Journal on E-Learning, 14(3), 289-304. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/150661/
- Green, H., Facer, K., Rudd, T., Dillon, P., & Humphreys, P. (2005). Personalisation and Digital Technologies. Bristol: Futurelab.
- Hayworth, R. (2016). Personal learning environments: A solution for self-directed learners. TechTrends, 60, 359-364. doi: 10.1007/s11528-016-0074-z
- Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2014). Students' and instructors' use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): Motivations and challenges. Educational Research Review, 12, 45-58. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2014.05.001
- Heutte, J., Kaplan, J., Fenouillet, F., Caron, P. A., & Rosselle, M. (2014) MOOC user persistence. In L. Uden, J. Sinclair, T.H. Tao, & D. Liberona (Eds.), Learning technology for education in cloud. MOOC and big data. LTEC 2014. Communications in computer and information science (Vol 446, pp. 13-24). New York, NY: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-10671-7_2
- Jagannathan, S. (2015). Harnessing the power of open learning to share global prosperity and eradicate poverty. In C. J. Bonk, M. M. Lee, T. C. Reeves, & T. H. Reynolds (Eds.), MOOCs and open education around the world (pp. 218-231). New York: Routledge.
- Jordan, K. (2014). Initial trends in enrolment and completion of massive open online courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(1), 133-160. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1651/2774
- Kelly, R. (2016, July). 7 universities receive grants to implement adaptive learning at scale. Campus Technology. Retrieved from https://campustechnology.com/articles/2016/07/14/7-universities-receive-grants-to-implement-adaptive-learning-at-scale.aspx
- Kim, P., & Chung, C. (2015). Creating a temporary spontaneous mini-ecosystem through a MOOC. In C. J. Bonk, M. M. Lee, T. C. Reeves, & T. H. Reynolds (Eds.), MOOCs and open education around the world (pp. 157-168). New York, NY: Routledge.
- Kop, R. (2011). The challenges to connectivist learning on open online networks: Learning experiences during a massive open online course. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), 19-38. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/882/1689
- Kop, R., Fournier, H., & Mak, J. S. F. (2011, November). A pedagogy of abundance or a pedagogy to support human beings? Participant support on massive open online courses. International Review of Research on Open and Distance Learning, 12(7). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1041/2025
- Kop, R., & Fournier, H. (2015). Peer2peer and open pedagogy of MOOCs to support the knowledge commons. In C. J. Bonk, M. M. Lee., T. C. Reeves, & T. H. Reynolds (Eds.), MOOCs and open education around the world (pp. 303-314). NY: Routledge.
- Lederman, D. (2018, February 14). MOOCs: Fewer new students, but more are paying. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/digital-learning/article/2018/02/14/moocs-are-enrolling-fewer-new-students-more-are-paying-courses
- Levy, D. (2011). Lessons learned from participating in a connectivist massive online open course (MOOC). In Y. Eshet-Alkalai, A. Caspi, S. Eden, N. Geri, & Y. Yair (Eds.), Proceedings of the Chais Conference on Instructional Technologies Research 2011: Learning in the Technological Era (pp. 31-36). Raanana: The Open University of Israel.
- Liyanagunawardena, T. R., Adams, A. A., & Williams, S. A. (2013). MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008-2012. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(3), 202-227. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v14i3.1455
- McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. (2010). Personalised and self-regulated learning in the Web 2.0 era: International exemplars of innovative pedagogy using social software. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(1), 28-43. Retrieved from https://ajet.org.au/index.php/AJET/article/view/1100/355
- Metz, C., & Satariano, A. (2018, July 3). Silicon Valley's giants take their talent hunt to Cambridge. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/03/technology/cambridge-artificial-intelligence.html
- MOOC @ Edinburgh 2013 - Report #1 (2013). MOOC @ Edinburgh 2013 - Report #1. University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland. Retrieved from https://www.era.lib.ed.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1842/6683/Edinburgh_MOOCs_Report2013_no1.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
- Nkuyubwatsi, B. (2013, October). Evaluation of massive open online courses (MOOCs) from the learner's perspective. Proceedings of the12th European Conference on e-Learning, Sophie Antipolis, France, 12, 340-346. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2381/28553
- Pappano, L. (2012, November 2). The year of the MOOC. The New York Times, 2(12). Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/04/education/edlife/massive-open-online-courses-are-multiplying-at-a-rapid-pace.html
- Prain, V., Cox, P., Deed, C., Dorman, J., Edwards, D., Farrelly, C., & Waldrip, B. (2013). Personalised learning: Lessons to be learnt. British Educational Research Journal, 39(4), 654-676. doi: 10.1080/01411926.2012.669747
- Reeves, T. C., & Hedberg, J. G. (2014). MOOCs: Let's get REAL. Educational Technology, 54(1), 3-8. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44430228.pdf
- Reigeluth, C. M., Aslan, S., Chen, Z., Dutta, P., Huh, Y., Lee, D., & Watson, W. R. (2015). Personalized integrated educational system: Technology functions for the learner-centered paradigm of education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 53(3), 459-496. doi: 10.1177/0735633115603998
- Reigeluth, C. M., Myers, R. D., & Lee, D. (2017). The learner-centered paradigm of education. In C. M. Reigeluth, B. J. Beatty, & R. D. Myers (Eds.), Instructional-Design Theories and Models (pp. 5-32). Hillsdale, NJ: Routledge.
- Rodriguez, O. C. (2012). MOOCs and the AI-Stanford like courses: Two successful and distinct course formats for massive open online courses. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 1(2), 1-13. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ982976.pdf
- Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeships in thinking. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Saadatdoost, R., Sim, A. T. H., Jafarkarimi, H., & Hee, J. M. (2015). Exploring MOOC from education and information systems perspectives: A short literature review. Educational Review, 67(4), 505-518. doi: 10.1080/00131911.2015.1058748
- Schaffhauser, D. (2014, October 1). Gates Foundation picks seven to vie for $20 million digital courseware investments. Campus Technology. Retrieved from https://campustechnology.com/Articles/2014/10/01/Gates-Foundation-Picks-Seven-To-Vie-for-$20-million-Digital-Courseware-Investments.aspx?p=1
- Severance, C. (2015). Learning about MOOCs by talking to students. In C. J. Bonk, M. M. Lee, T. C. Reeves, & T. H. Reynolds, T. H. (Eds.), MOOCs and open education around the world (pp. 169-179). New York: Routledge.
- Shah, D. (2015). By the numbers: MOOCs in 2015. Class Central. Retrieved from https://www.class-central.com/report/moocs-2015-stats/
- Shah, D. (2016). By the numbers: MOOCs in 2016. Class Central. Retrieved from https://www.class-central.com/report/mooc-stats-2016/
- Shah, D. (2018, January 22). A product at every price: A review of MOOC stats and trends in 2017. Class Central. Retrieved from https://www.class-central.com/report/moocs-stats-and-trends-2017/
- Siemens, G. (2007). PLEs - I acronym, therefore I exist. Elearnspace: Learning, Networks, Knowledge, Technology, Community [weblog]. Retrieved from http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/archives/002884.html
- Siemens, G. (2012a, January 19). Connectivist learning theory. Retrieved from the P2P Foundation Wiki: http://p2pfoundation.net/Connectivist_Learning_Theory_-_Siemens
- Siemens, G. (2012b, June 3). What is the theory that underpins our moocs? E-LearningSpace. Retrieved from http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/2012/06/03/what-is-the-theory-that-underpins-our-moocs/
- Singer, N. (2017, June 6). The Silicon Valley billionaires remaking America's schools. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/06/technology/tech-billionaires-education-zuckerberg-facebook-hastings.html
- Sneddon, S. (2015, March 31 - April 2). Could you make it a bit more MOOCy? Paper presented at the Socio Legal Studies Association Annual Conference. University of Warwick, England.
- Straumsheim, C. (2016, June 23). Learning to adapt. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2016/06/23/study-finds-inconclusive-results-about-efficacy-adaptive-learning
- Veletsianos, G., & Shepherson, P. (2016). A systematic analysis and synthesis of the empirical MOOC literature published in 2013-2015. International Review of Research on Open and Distributed Learning, 17(2), 198-221. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/2448/3655
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Watson, W. R., & Watson, S. L. (2017). Principles for personalized instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth, B. J. Beatty, & R. D. Myers (Eds.), Instructional-design theories and models (pp. 93-120). Hillsdale, NJ: Routledge.
- Xu, D., Huang, W. W., Wang, H., & Heales, J. (2014). Enhancing e-learning effectiveness using an intelligent agent-supported personalized virtual learning environment: An empirical investigation. Information & Management, 51(4), 430-440. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2014.02.009
- Yuan, L., Powell, S., & Olivier, B. (2014). Beyond MOOCs: Sustainable online learning in institutions - A white paper. Cetis - Centre for Educational Technology, Interoperability, and Standards. University of Bolton, UK. Retrieved from http://publications.cetis.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Beyond-MOOCs-Sustainable-Online-Learning-in-Institutions.pdf
- Zhu, M., Sari, A., & Lee, M. M. (2018). A systematic review of research methods and topics of the empirical MOOC literature (2014-2016). The Internet and Higher Education, 37, 31-39.