Abstracts
Abstract
At a recent rally, Donald Trump resumed a habit he had developed during his election-rallies and read out the lyrics to a song. It tells the Aesopian fable of The Farmer and the Snake: A half frozen snake is taken in by a kind-hearted person but bites them the moment it is revived. Trump tells the fable to make a point about Islamic immigrants and undocumented immigrants from Southern and Central America: He claims the immigrants will cause problems and much stricter immigration-policies are needed. I assume that Trump treats the fable as an argumentative device for supporting his stance on immigration. He uses it as a source-analogue both for the conclusion that immigrants will cause problems and for changing the frame in which immigrants and those willing to let them enter are seen. This gives me opportunity to examine the effect fables have as argumentative devices. Fables are a popular and effective choice for political argumentation. They are slimmed down, semi-abstract narratives, well suited for directing the audience's attention to a few properties of an otherwise complex situation. However, this also makes it easy to use them for manipulating an audience into oversimplifying complex contexts and stereotyping human beings.
Appendices
Bibliography
- Aesop. The farmer and the snake. URL accessed 7 July 2017: <http://mythfolklore.net/aesopica/perry/176.htm>
- Aesop. 2017. The fox and the crow. URL accessed 25 July 2017: <http://www.eastoftheweb.com/short-stories/UBooks/FoxCrow.shtml>
- Aristotle. 2010. Rhetoric. Edward Meredith Cope and John Edwin Sandys (transl.) Cambridge: Cambrige University Press.
- Bermejo-Luque, Lilian. 2012. A unitary schema for arguments by analogy. Informal Logic 32(1): 1-24.
- Bex, F. 2009. Analysing stories using schemes. In Legal Evidence and Proof: Statistics, Stories, Logic, eds. H. Kaptein, H. Prakken and B. Verheij, 93-116. Farnham: Ashgate.
- Bex, F. and Verheij. 2011. Arguments, stories and evidence: Critical questions for fact finding. In The Seventh Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (ISSA), eds. F. H. van Eemeren, B. Garssen, D. Godden & G. Mitchell. Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
- Blackham, H.J. 1985. The fable as literature. London: The Athlone Press.
- De Bustos, Eduardo. 2017. Parables: Crossroads between the cognitive theory of metaphor and argumentation theory. In Narration as argument, ed. Paula Olmos, 83-99. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
- Ferris, Joshua. 2008. The dinner party. In The New Yorker, 11 August 2008.
- Fisher, W.R. 1987. Human communication as narration. Toward a philosophy of reason, value, and action. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
- Fontaine, Jean de La. 2001. Fables. Edward Howard Marsh (ed.). New York: Knopf.
- Genter, Dedre. 1983. Structure mapping, A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science 7(2): 155-170.
- Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Reprinted 2010. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
- Govier, Trudy. 1989. Analogies and missing premises. Informal Logic 11(3): 141-152.
- Govier, Trudy and Ayers, Lowell. 2012. Logic, parables and argument. Informal Logic 32(2): 161-189.
- Guarini, Marcello. 2004. A defense of non-deductive reconstructions of analogical arguments. Informal Logic 24(2): 153-168.
- Guarini, Marcello. 2010. Understanding blended multi-source arguments as arguments from partial analogies. Ratio Juris 23(1): 65-100.
- Hansen, Hans. 2017. Narrative arguments as a kind. Presentation at ECA June 2017, Freibourg.
- Holyoak, Keith J. and Thagard, Paul. 1989. Analogical mapping by constraint satisfaction. Cognitive Science 13(3): 295-355.
- Holyoak, Keith, J. and Thagard, Paul. 1995. Mental leaps: Analogy in creative thought. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.
- Hunt, Lester H. 2009. Literature as fable, fable as argument. Philosophy and Literature 33(2): 369-385.
- Juthe, Andre. 2005. Argument by analogy. Argumentation 19(1): 1-27.
- Lakoff, George. 2016. Moral politics: How liberals and conservatives think. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.
- Lessing, Gotthold Ephraim. 1759. Abhandlung über die Fabel. URL accessed 8 August 2017: <http://gutenberg.spiegel.de/buch/abhandlungen-uber-die-fabel-1168/1>
- Mohammed, Dima. 2015. Goals in argumentation: A proposal for the analysis and evaluation of public political arguments. Argumentation 30(3): 221-245.
- Mohammed, Dima. 2016. It is true that security and Schengen go hand in hand. Strategic manoeuvring in the multi-layered activity type of European Parliamentary debates. In Dialogues in Argumentation. Windsor Studies in Argumentation, ed. R. von Borg, URL accessed 18 February 2018: https://windsor.scholarsportal.info/omp/index.php/wsia/catalog/book/12: 232-266.
- Nussbaum, Martha. 1995. Poetic justice. Boston: Beacon Press.
- Olmos, Paula. 2014. Classical fables as arguments: Narration and analogy. In Systematic approaches to argument by analogy, ed. Henrique Jales Ribeiro, 189-208. Cham: Springer.
- Olmos, Paula. 2015. Story credibility in narrative argument. In Reflections on Theoretical Issues in Argumentation Theory. Argumentation Library 28, eds. F.H. van Eemeren and B. Garssen. Cham: Springer.
- Orwell, George. 1945. Animal Farm. Reprinted 2008. London: Penguin Books.
- Perelman, Chaïm. 1982. The realm of rhetoric. London: University Notre Dame Press.
- Perelman, Chaim and Olbrechts-Tyteca, Lucy. 1969. The new rhetoric. Lanham, MD: The University Press of America.
- Plumer, Gilbert. 2015. On novels as arguments. Informal Logic. 35(4): 488–507.
- Plumer, Gilbert. 2016. Argumentatively evil storytelling. In Argumentation and Reasoned Action - Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Argumentation, eds. Dima Mohammed and Marcin Lewinski. London: College Publications.
- Shecaira, Fabio. 2013. Analogical arguments in ethics and law: A defense of a deductivist analysis. Informal Logic 33(3): 406-437.
- Stanley, Jason. 2015. How propaganda works. Princeton, New Jersey/Oxford: Princeton University Press
- Stevens, Katharina. 2017. Does rhetoric have a place in Wohlrapp’s theory of argumentation? Informal Logic 37(3): 183-210.
- Stevens, Katharina. 2018. Case-To-Case Arguments. Argumentation Online first. URL accessed 18 February 2018: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10503-018-9448-z
- Stevenson, C. L. 1938. Persuasive definitions. Mind 47(187): 331-350.
- Tindale, Christopher. 2015. The philosophy of argument and audience reception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Toulmin, S. 1969. The uses of argument, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Trump, Donald. 1/12/2016. Rally in Cedar Falls, Iowa, URL accessed 16 February 2018: <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mqYG2SVpaac>
- Trump, Donald. 9/19/2016. Rally in Estero, Florida. URL accessed 16 February 2018: <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bs_7a4hyqQY>
- Trump, Donald. 4/29/2017. Rally Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. URL accessed 16 February 2018: <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=40iJUAHej14>
- Walton, Douglas. 2005. Deceptive arguments containing persuasive language and persuasive definitions. Argumentation 19(1): 159-186.
- Walton, Douglas, 2010. Similarity, precedent and argument from analogy. Artificial Intelligence and Law 18(3): 217-246.
- Walton, Douglas. 2012. Story similarity in arguments from analogy. Informal Logic 32(2): 190-221.
- Walton, Douglas. 2014. Argumentation schemes for argument from analogy. In: Systematic Approaches to Argument by Analogy, ed. Henrique Jales Ribeiro, 23-40. Cham: Springer.
- Walton, Douglas and Macagno, Fabrizio. 2010. What we hide in words: Emotive words and persuasive definitions. Journal of Pragmatics 42(7): 1997-2013.
- Waller, Bruce N. 2001. Classifying and analyzing analogies. Informal Logic 21(3): 199-218.
- Wilson, Al. 1968. “The Snake”. The Snake. Vinyl. Bell Records.
- Wohlrapp, Harald. 2014. The concept of argument. Dortrecht: Springer.
- Zarefsky, David. 1998. Definitions. Argument in a time of change. In Definitions, frameworks, and critiques, ed. James F. Klumpp. Annandale, VA: National Communication Association: 1–11.
- Zarefsky, David. 2004. Presidential rhetoric and the power of definition. Presidential Studies Quarterly 34(3): 607-619.
- Zarefsky, David. 2006. Strategic maneuvering through persuasive definitions: Implications for dialectic and rhetoric. Argumentation 20(4): 399-416.