ror.org/03c4mmv16
Abstracts
Résumé
Quels liens peut-on établir entre les Études globales (EG), les Affaires internationales (AI) et les Études internationales (ÉI) ? S’agit-il de rupture, d’élargissement ou de renouvellement ? Nous souhaitons montrer dans ce texte comment les EG et les AI, deux nouveaux programmes de formation universitaire qui se veulent interdisciplinaires et qui traitent eux aussi des enjeux internationaux, transnationaux et globaux, offrent une solution de rechange aux Études internationales. Si l’apport des Affaires internationales se situe au niveau de la professionnalisation de la formation, celui des Études globales loge du côté des perspectives théoriques et analytiques. À partir d’une étude de vingt programmes de maîtrise, nous montrerons comment les conditions d’émergence, l’organisation et l’évolution de ces programmes leur ont permis de se forger une identité qui les distingue des Études internationales.
Mots-clés:
- affaires internationales,
- études internationales,
- études globales
Abstract
What kind of links can be established between Global Studies, International Affairs and International Studies ? A rupture, a renewal or a enlargement ? This paper discusses how these two new academic programs, defining themselves as interdisciplinary and working on international, transnational and global issues, offer a double alternative to International Studies. If professionalization is the best way to define the added value of International affairs, new analytical and theoretical perspectives define the contribution of Global Studies. Through a study of twenty master programs, we will explore how their conditions of emergence, their organisation and their evolution help them to create their own identity, setting themselves apart from International Studies.
Keywords:
- global studies,
- international affairs,
- international studies
Resumen
Qué vínculos se pueden entablar entre los Estudios Globales, los Affaires internacionales y los Estudios Internacionales ? Ruptura, ampliación o renovación ? Mostraremos en este texto como estos dos nuevos programas de formación universitaria, que se pretenden interdisciplinarios y que analizan las cuestiones internacionales, transnacionales y globales, ofrecen una doble alternativa a los Estudios Internacionales. Si la profesionalización de la formación es el aporte de los Affaires internacionales, el de los Estudios Globales radica en las perspectivas teóricas y analíticas. A partir de un estudio de una veintena de programas de maestría, mostraremos como las condiciones de emergencia, organización y evolución de los mismos permitieron forjar una identidad que los distingue de los Estudios Internationales.
Palabras clave:
- estudios globales,
- affaires internacionales estudios internacionales
Appendices
Bibliographie
-
Association of Professional School of International Affairs, 2015, About APSIA. Consulté sur Internet (www.apsia.org/about-us) le 27 juin 2015.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Blanton Robert G., 2009, « Surveying International Studies Programs. Where Do We Stand ? », International Studies Perspectives, vol. 10, no 2 : 224-240.10.1111/j.1528-3585.2009.00372.x Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Bourdoncle Raymond et Claude Lessard, 2003, « Qu’est-ce qu’une formation professionnelle universitaire ? Les caractéristiques spécifiques : programmes, modalités et méthodes de formation », Revue française de pédagogie, no 142 : 131-181.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Brown Jonathan, Scott Pegg et Jacob W. Shively, 2006, « Consensus and Divergence in International Studies. Survey Evidence from 140 International Studies Curriculum Programs », International Studies Perspectives, vol. 7, no 3 : 257-286.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Campbell Patricia J., Aran MacKinnon et Christy R. Stevens, 2010, An Introduction to Global Studies, Oxford, Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
DeLeon Peter, 2008, « The Historical Roots of the Field », dans M. Moran, M. Rein, R. E. Goodin (dir.), The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy, New York, Oxford University Press : 39-57.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Forest Patrick, Mathieu Tremblay et Philippe Le Prestre, 2009, « Des relations internationales aux études internationales : éléments de construction d’un champ de recherche et d’action interdisciplinaire », Études internationales, vol. 40, no 3 : 417-440.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
George Alexander L, 1994, « The Two Cultures of Academia and Policy-Making : Bridging the Gap », Political Psychology, vol. 15, no 1 : 143-172.10.2307/3791443 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Goheen Robert F., 1987, Education in U.S. School of InternationalAffairs, Washington, APSIA.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Guilhot Nicolas (dir.), 2011, The Invention of International Relations Theory. Realism, the Rockefeller Foundation, and the 1954 Conference on Theory, New York, Columbia University Press.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Gutner Tammi, 1987, Story of SAIS, Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Hey Jeanne A. K., 2004, « Can International Studies Research Be the Basis for an Undergraduate International Studies Curriculum ? A Response to Ishiyama and Breuning », International Studies Perspectives, vol. 5, no 4 : 395-399.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Hur Yongbeom et Merl Hackbart, 2009, « MPA vs. MPP : A Distinction Without a Difference ? », Journal of Public Affairs Education, vol. 15, no 4 : 397-424.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Infeld Donna Lind et William C. Adams, 2011, « MPA and MPP Students : Twins, Siblings, or Distant Cousins ? », Journal of Public Affairs Education, vol. 17, no 2 : 277-303.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Ishiyama John et Marijke Breuning, 2004, « A Survey of International Studies Programs at Liberal Arts Colleges and Universities in the Midwest : Characteristics and Correlates », International Studies Perspectives, vol. 5, no 2 : 134-146.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Jackson Patrick Thaddeus, 2015, « Must International Studies Be a Science ? », Millennium - Journal of International Studies, vol. 43, no 3 : 942-965.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Juergensmeyer Mark, 2011, « What Is Global Studies ? », Global-E : A Global Studies Journal, Consulté sur Internet (global-ejournal.org/2011/05/06/what-is-global-studies-3) le 23 juin 2015.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Juergensmeyer Mark, 2013, « What Is Global Studies ? », Globalizations, vol. 10, no 6 : 765-769.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Kelleher Ann, 2005, « Does International Studies Have a Common Core ? An Analysis of Seventy-Three Curriculum Programs », Présentation à la conférence annuelle de l’International Studies Association, Honolulu.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Lepgold Joseph, 2001, Beyond the Ivory Tower : International Relations Theory and the Issue of Policy Relevance, New York, Columbia University Press.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Naidoo Rajani et Joanna Williams, 2015, « The Neoliberal Regime in English Higher Education. Charters, Consumers and the Erosion of the Public Good », Critical Studies in Education, vol. 56, no 2 : 208-223.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Nye Joseph S., 2008, « Bridging the Gap Between Theory and Policy », Political Psychology, vol. 29, no 4 : 593-603.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Pieterse Jan Nederveen, 2013, « What is Global Studies ? », Globalizations, vol. 10, no 4 : 499-514.10.1080/14747731.2013.806746 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Rosow Stephen J., 2003, « Toward an Anti-Disciplinary Global Studies », International Studies Perspective, vol. 4, no 1 : 1-14.10.1111/1528-3577.04101 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Steger Manfred B., 2013, « It’s About Globalization, After All : Four Framings of Global Studies. A Response to Jan Nederveen Pieterse’s ‘What Is Global Studies ?’ », Globalizations, vol. 10, no 6 : 771-777.10.1080/14747731.2013.845958 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Suganami Hidemi, 1978, « A Note on the Origin of the Word ‘International’ », British Journal of International Studies, vol. 4, no 3 : 226-232.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Walt Stephen, 2005, « The Relationship Between Theory and Policy in International Relations », Annual Review of Political Science, vol. 8 : 23-48.10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.012003.104904 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Wilson Ernest, 2007, « Is There Really a Scholar-Practitioner Gap ? An Institutional Analysis », PS : Political Science & Politics, vol. 40, no 1 : 147-151.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar