ror.org/0161xgx34
Abstracts
Résumé
Les acteurs engagés dans le processus de construction d’une norme transnationale dans le domaine de la responsabilité des entreprises (rse) effectuent différentes formes de travail institutionnel afin de mener leur projet à terme. En mettant l’accent sur les processus et sur les acteurs, cette recherche compare la mise en oeuvre de deux standards : le Pacte mondial (Global Compact) de l’onu et la norme iso 26000 de l’Organisation internationale de normalisation. L’analyse approfondit notre compréhension des liens entre les types de travail institutionnel et les différentes dimensions de la légitimité. Elle révèle les mécanismes de légitimation dans la construction initiale d’une norme rse. Si le travail institutionnel est toujours d’une importance cruciale, il prend différentes formes selon les conditions propres à chaque initiative.
Mots-clés:
- travail institutionnel,
- légitimation,
- norme rse,
- Pacte mondial de l’onu,
- iso 26000
Abstract
Actors involved in the construction of a transnational standard in the field of corporate responsibility (csr) perform different types of institutional work in order to succeed with their project. This research focuses on processes and actors and compares the initiation of two standards : the un Global Compact and iso 26000. Our research sheds light on the link between types of institutional work and dimensions of legitimacy. This fosters our understanding of legitimation mechanisms in the initial phase of a standardization project. Our analysis reveals that institutional work is paramount in the early construction of a standard and that it can take different forms depending on the specific circumstances of the cases in question.
Keywords:
- Institutional work,
- legitimation,
- csr standard,
- un Global Compact,
- iso 26000
Resumen
Los actores implicados en el proceso de construcción de un estándar transnacional en el área de responsabilidad social empresaria (RSE) hacen diferentes tipos de trabajos institucionales a fin de realizar su proyecto. Poniendo el acento sobre el proceso y los actores, este trabajo compara el inicio de dos estándares : la Global Compact de la ONU y la norma ISO 26000 de la Organización internacional de normalización. EL análisis permite comprender los vínculos entre los tipos de trabajo institucional y las diversas dimensiones de la legitimidad, de modo de identificar los mecanismos de legitimación en la construcción de nuevos estándares de la RSE. Si bien el trabajo institucional es de una importancia crucial en los dos casos, toma formas distintas según las circunstancias particulares de cada iniciativa.
Palabras Clave:
- trabajo institucional,
- legitimación,
- estándares RSE,
- UNGC,
- ISO 26000
Appendices
Bibliographie
-
Abbott Kenneth W. et Duncan Snidal, 2009, « The governance triangle. Regulatory standards institutions and the shadow of the state », dans W. Mattli et N. Woods (dir.), The Politics of Global Regulation, Princeton, Princeton University Press : 44-88.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Annan Kofi, 1999, « Kofi Annan Proposes Global Compact at Davos », New York, United Nations.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Battilana Julie, Bernard Leca et Eva Boxenbaum, 2009, « How Actors Change Institutions. Towards a Theory of Institutional Entrepreneurship », The Academy of Management Annals, vol. 3, no 1 : 65-107.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Bellamy Carol, 1999, « Public, Private and Civil Society », Communication présentée le 16 avril, Cambridge, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Beisheim Marianne et Klaus Dingwerth, 2008, « Procedural Legitimacy and Private Transnational Governance. Are the Good Ones Doing Better ? », SFB Governance Working Paper Series no 14, Berlin, Research Center SFB 700.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Bernstein Steven, 2011, « Legitimacy in intergovernmental and non-state global governance », Review of International Political Economy, vol. 18, no 1 : 17-51.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Bezes Philipp et Patrick LeLidec, 2010, « Ordre institutionnel et genèse des réformes », dans J. Lagroye et M. Offerlé (dir.), Sociologie des institutions, Paris, Belin : 55-73.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Brès Luc et Emmanuel Raufflet, 2011, « Power and Institutions in Global Standardization. The Role and the Importance of Ambiguity in Institutionalizing New Standards of OSR », Zeitschrift fuer Wirtschafts-und Unternehmensethik, vol. 12, no 1 : 32-47.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Bruno Kenny et Joshua Karliner, 2000, Tangled Up In Blue. Corporate Partnerships at the United Nations, San Francisco, ca, TRAC. En ligne [http://s3.amazonaws.com/corpwatch.org/downloads/tangled.pdf].Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Brunsson, Nils et Bengt Jacobsson, 2000, A World of Standards, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Brunsson, Nils, Andreas Rasche et David Seidl, 2012, « The Dynamics of Standardisation. Three Perspectives on Standards in Organization Studies », Organization Studies, vol. 33, no 5-6 : 613-633.10.1177/0170840612450120 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Büthe Tim et Walter Mattli, 2011, The New Global Rulers. The Privatization of Regulation in the World Economy, Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Campbell John L., 2004, Institutional Change and Globalization, Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Capron Michel, Françoise Quairel-Lanoizélée et Marie-France Turcotte (dir.), 2010, iso 26 000 : une Norme hors norme ? Vers une conception mondiale de la responsabilité sociétale, Paris, Economica.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
copolco, 2002, The Desirability and Feasibility of iso Corporate Social Responsibility Standards, Port-of-Spain, copolco 2002 Meeting.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
DiMaggio Paul, 1988, « Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory », dans L. Zucker (dir.). Institutional Patterns and Organizations, Cambridge, Ballinger.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Fligstein Neil, 2001, « Social Skill and the Theory of Fields », Sociological Theory, vol. 19, no 2 : 105-125.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Fouilleux Ève, 2000, « Entre production et institutionnalisation des idées. La réforme de la Politique agricole commune », Revue française de science politique, vol. 50, no 2 : 277-306.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Fransen Luc et Ans Kolk, 2007, « Global Rule-Setting for Business : A Critical Analysis of Multi-Stakeholder Standards », Organization, vol. 14, no 5 : 667-684.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Garud Raghu, Cynthia Hardy et Steve Maguire, 2007, « Institutional Entrepreneurship as Embedded Agency. An Introduction to the Special Issue », Organization Studies, vol. 28, no 7 : 957.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
George Alexander L. et Andrew Bennett, 2005, Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences, Cambridge, ma, The MIT Press.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Graz Jean-Christophe, 2004, « Quand les normes font loi : topologie intégrée et processus différenciés de la normalisation », Études internationales, vol. 35, no 2 : 233-260.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Green Jessica F., 2014, Rethinking Private Authority : Agents and Entrepreneurs in Global Environmental Governance, Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Haas Peter M., 1992, « Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination – ntroduction », International Organization, vol. 46, no 1 : 1-35.10.1017/S0020818300001442 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Helfen Markus et Jörg Sydow, 2013, « Negotiating as Institutional Work : The Case of Labour Standards and International Framework Agreements », Organization Studies, vol. 34, no 8 : 1073-1098.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Helfrich Vincent, 2011, Efficience et efficacité d’une normalisation de sujets sociopolitiques (Thèse de doctorat), Strasbourg, Université de Strasbourg.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Helms Wesley S., Christine Oliver et Kernaghan Webb, 2012, « Antecedents of settlement on a New Institutional Practice. Negotiation of the iso 26000 Standard on Social Responsibility », Academy of Management Journal, vol. 55, no 5 : 1120-1145.10.5465/amj.2010.1045 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Helms Wesley et Kernaghan Webb, 2014, « Perceived Voluntary Code Legitimacy. Towards a Theoretical Framework and Research Agenda », Journal of Management & Organization, vol. 20, no 3 : 287-312.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Hurd Ian, 1999, « Legitimacy and Authority in International Politics », InternationalOrganization, vol. 53, no 2 : 379-408.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
iisd, 2003a, « A Background Paper to the iso’s Strategic Advisory Group on csr », Winnipeg, iisd.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
iisd, 2003b, « Update Briefing. iso Strategic Advisory Group (sag) on SR », Winnipeg, iisd.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
iisd, 2004a, « Update Briefing 8 – iso Strategic Advisory Group (sag) on SR », Winnipeg, iisd.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
iisd, 2004b, « Update Briefing 9 – Proposal for iso 26000 on SR », Winnipeg, iisd.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
iso, 2001, iso Management Systems, vol. 1, no 1, Genève, iso.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
iso, 2002, iso Management Systems, vol. 2, no 5, Genève, iso.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
iso, 2004, New Work Item Proposal SR, Genève, iso.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
iso, 2010, iso 26000 – Lignes directrices relatives à la responsabilité sociétale, Genève, iso.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Kell Georg, 1999, Strategic Note for Davos Speech (document interne), New York, United Nations.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Kell Georg, 2005, « The Global Compact Selected Experiences and Reflections », Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 59, no 1-2 : 69-79.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Kell Georg et John G. Ruggie, 1999, « Global Markets and Social Legitimacy. The Case of the “Global Compact” », Transnational Corporations, vol. 8, no 3 : 101-120.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Kell Georg et David Levin, 2002, The Evolution of the Global Compact Network. An Historic Experiment in Learning and Action, Communication présentée à l’Academy of Management Annual Conference, Denver.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Kingdon John W., 1984, Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, Boston, Little Brown.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Lawrence Thomas B. et Roy Suddaby, 2006, « Institutions and Institutional Work », dans S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. B. Lawrence et W. R. Nord (dir.), The sage Handbook of Organization Studies, Londres, sage : 215-254.10.4135/9781848608030.n7 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Leca Bernhard, 2006, « Pas seulement des “lemmings”. Les relations entre les organisations et leur environnement dans le néo-institutionnalisme sociologique », Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, vol. 9, no 4 : 67-86.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Lawrence Thomas, Cynthia Hardy et Nelson Phillips, 2002, « Institutional effects of interorganizational collaboration. The emergence of proto-institutions », Academy of Management Journal, vol. 45, no 1 : 281-290.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Lawrence Thomas B., Roy Suddaby et Bernard Leca (dir.), 2009, Institutional Work. Actors and Agency in Institutional Studies of Organizations. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Lawrence Thomas B., Roy Suddaby et Bernard Leca, 2011, « Institutional Work. Refocusing Institutional Studies of Organization », Journal of Management Inquiry, vol. 20, no 1 : 52-58.10.1177/1056492610387222 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Mattli Walter et Ngaire Woods (dir.), 2000, The Politics of Global Regulation, Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Murphy Craig N. et JoAnne Yates, 2009, The International Organization for Standardization (iso), New York, Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Paine Ellen, 2000, The Road to the Global Compact, New York, Global Policy Forum.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Patir Ziva, 2005, Demystifying the iso/tmb, Communication présentée à l’ansi Conference, Phoenix.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Pattberg Philipp, 2007, Private Institutions and Global Governance. The New Politics of Environmental Sustainability, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Perez-Batres Louis A., Van V. Miller et Michael J. Pisani, 2011, « Institutionalizing Sustainability. An Empirical Study of Corporate Registration and Commitment to the United Nations Global Compact Guidelines », Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 19, no 8 : 843-851.10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.06.003 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Sethi S. Prakash et Donald H. Schepers, 2014, « United Nations Global Compact. The Promise–Performance Gap », Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 122, no 2 : 193-208.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Rasche Andreas et Georg Kell, 2010, The United Nations Global Compact. Achievements, Trends and Challenges, Cambridge, ma, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Risse Thomas, 2006, « Transnational Governance and Legitimacy », dans A. Benz et I. Papadopoulos (dir.), Governance and Democracy. Comparing National, European and International Experiences, Londres, Routledge : 179-199.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Ruggie John. G., 1982, « International Regimes, Transactions, and Change. Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order », International Organization, vol. 36, no 2 : 379-415.10.1017/S0020818300018993 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Ruggie John G., 1996, Winning the Peace. America and World Order in the New Era, New York, Columbia University Press.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Ruwet Coline, 2010, « Que représentent les stakeholders ? », Revue française de science politique, vol. 60, no 6 : 1115-1135.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Ruwet Coline, 2011, « iso 26000 : vers une démocratisation de la procédure iso ? », dans M. Capron, F. Quairel-Lanoizelée et M.-F. Turcotte (dir.), iso 26000 : une norme hors norme ? Vers une conception mondiale de la responsabilité sociétale, Paris, Économica.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
sag, 2004, Recommendations to the iso Technical Management Board, Genève, sag.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Sales Arnaud et Thomas Beschorner, 2006, « Societal Transformation and Business Ethics. The Expansion of the Private Sector and Its Consequences », dans N. Stehr, C. Henning et B. Weiler (dir.), The Moralization of the Markets, New Brunswick, nj, Transaction : 227-254.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Schmidt Vivien A. et Amandine Crespy, 2014, « Néo-instutionnalisme discursif », dans L. Boussaguet, S. Jacquot et P. Ravinet (dir.), Dictionnaire des politiques publiques, Paris, Presses de Sciences Po.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Schmiedeknecht Maud, 2011, Die Governance von Multistakeholder-Dialogen. Standardsetzung zur gesellschaftlichen Verantwortung von Organisationen : Der ISO 26000-Prozess, Marburg, Metropolis.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Slager Rieneke, Jean-Pascal Gond et Jeremy Moon, 2012, « Standardization as Institutional Work. The Regulatory Power of a Responsible Investment Standard », Organization Studies, vol. 33, no 5-6 : 763-790.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Steffek Jens, 2003, « The Legitimation of International Governance. A Discourse Approach », European Journal of International Relations, vol. 9, no 2 : 249.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Strange Susan, 1996, The Retreat of the State. The Diffusion of Power in the World Economy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Suchman Mark C., 1995, « Managing Legitimacy. Strategic and Institutional Approaches », Academy of Management Review, vol. 20, no 3 : 571-610.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Tamm Hallström Kristina, 2006, « iso Enters the Field of Social Responsibility. Construction and Tension of Global Governance », dans G. F. Schuppert (dir.), Global Governance and the Role of Non-State Actors (vol. 5), Baden-Baden, Nomos : 117-156.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Tamm Hallström Kristina, 2010, « The Use of Democratic Values in the iso 26000 Process on Social Responsibility », dans G. Sundström, L. Soneryd et S. Furusten (dir.), Organizing Democracy. The Construction of Agency in Practice, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Tamm Hallström Kristina et Magnus Boström, 2010, Transnational Multi-Stakeholder Standardization. Organizing Fragile Non-State Authority, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Tesner Sandra et Georg Kell, 2000, The United Nations and Business. A Partnership Recovered, New York, St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Utting Peter, 2000, UN-Business Partnerships. Whose Agenda Counts, Communication présentée au Seminar on Partnerships for Development or Privatization of the Multilateral System, Oslo, Norvège.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Vogel David, 2006, The Market for Virtue. The Potential and Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility, Washington, dc, The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Webb Kernaghan, 2005, « Sustainable Governance in the Twenty-First Century. Moving beyond Instrument Choice », dans P. Eliadis, M. M. Hill et M. Howlett (dir.), Designing Government. From Instruments to Governance, Montréal, McGill-Queen’s University Press : 242-280.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Webb Kernaghan, 2012, « iso 26000 : Bridging the Public/Private Divide in Transnational Business Governance Interactions », Osgoode clpe Research Paper (21).Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Yaghfouri Yassir, 2012, Relational Leadership in Global Multistakeholder Groups (Thèse de doctorat), Aberdeen, Écosse, Robert Gordon University.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Zietsma Charlene et Brent McKnight, 2009, « Building the Iron Cage. Institutional Creation Work in the Context of Competing Proto-Institutions », dans T. Lawrence, R. Suddaby et B. Leca, Institutional Work. Actors and Agency in Institutional Studies of Organizations, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar