Abstracts
Abstract
Objective – Seeing an absence of training opportunities for librarians supporting evidence synthesis outside of the health sciences, a collaborative team of librarians sought grant funding, developed a curriculum, and facilitated community building to provide this training.
Methods – The present case study describes the identification of a training gap, multi-faceted efforts made to fill that gap, and evaluation via pretests and post-tests to continuously improve the program.
Results – The Evidence Synthesis Institute (ESI) was launched in 2020. An application process is used to select the 50-person ESI cohort, with an average acceptance rate of 37%. To date, over 500 individuals have attended the Evidence Synthesis Institutes. Pre- and post-institute surveys show consistent gains in confidence to perform a variety of evidence synthesis skills. Additionally, we developed a self-paced online course which has over 750 enrolled learners with 118 having completed at least 90% of the course.
Conclusion – This case study provides a model for designing, implementing, and assessing a training program and community of practice for an emergent skillset in academic librarianship. As shown by the program’s acceptance rate, demand remains high for participation in evidence synthesis training. Future programming could build on past success, such as continuing to offer synchronous virtual Institutes, training additional instructors, and expanding the asynchronous online course to include more content and summative assessments.
Appendices
Bibliography
- Aamodt, M., Huurdeman, H., & Strømme, H. (2019). Librarian co-authored systematic reviews are associated with lower risk of bias compared to systematic reviews with acknowledgement of librarians or no participation by librarians. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 14(4), 103–127. https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip29601
- Aloe, A. M., Dewidar, O., Hennessy, E. A., Pigott, T., Stewart, G., Welch, V., Wilson, D. B., & Campbell MECCIR Working Group. (2024). Campbell standards: modernizing Campbell's methodologic expectations for Campbell Collaboration Intervention Reviews (MECCIR). Campbell Systematic Reviews, 20(4), e1445. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1445
- Bahureksa, L. (2024, October 18). Evidence synthesis in my discipline: yes, no, maybe so? [Conference presentation]. Upstate NY Science Librarians Meeting 2024, Cortland, NY, United States.
- Boden, C., Bolton, S., & Gerrard, A. (2025). Health sciences and beyond: An investigation into Canadian librarian participation in systematic reviews across disciplines. College & Research Libraries, 86(1), 79. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.86.1.79
- Chalmers, I., Hedges, L. V., & Cooper, H. (2002). A brief history of research synthesis. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 25(1), 12-37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278702025001003
- Evidence synthesis articles. (n.d.). Zotero. https://www.zotero.org/groups/2418750/evidence_synthesis_articles/library
- Evidence Synthesis Institute. (n.d.). Evidence synthesis institute. Pressbooks. https://pressbooks.umn.edu/evidencesynthesisinstitute/
- Evidence synthesis institute. (n.d.). University Libraries. https://z.umn.edu/esinstitute
- Evidence synthesis institute Canada. (2025, December 18). University of Victoria Libraries. https://libguides.uvic.ca/c.php?g=731009&p=5367754
- Expertsearching. (n.d.). Medical Library Association. Retrieved February 14, 2025, from https://pss.mlanet.org/mailman/listinfo/expertsearching_pss.mlanet.org
- Ghezzi‐Kopel, K., Ault, J., Chimwaza, G., Diekmann, F., Eldermire, E., Gathoni, N., Kelly, J., Kinengyere, A. A., Kocher, M., Lwoga, E. T., Page, J., Young, S., & Porciello, J. (2022). Making the case for librarian expertise to support evidence synthesis for the sustainable development goals. Research Synthesis Methods, 13(1), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1528
- Information Training and Outreach Centre for Africa. (2025, May 5). Evidence synthesis training for African librarians. https://itoca.org/workshop/8
- International Institute for Sustainable Development. (n.d.). CERES2030: Sustainable solutions to end hunger. https://www.iisd.org/projects/ceres2030-sustainable-solutions-end-hunger
- Knowledge Synthesis Interest Group. (n.d.). CHLA-ABSC. Retrieved February 14, 2025, from https://ksig.chla-absc.ca/
- Kocher, M., Kelly, J., & Riegelman, A. (2020). Advancing Systematic Review Practices beyond the Health Sciences: Training Librarians to Support Evidence Synthesis in Emerging Contexts (RE-246347-OLS-20). IMLS. https://hdl.handle.net/11299/269446
- Kocher, M, Riegelman, A., Kibbee, M., Young, S., Bostrom, M., Marsalis, S., & Premji, Z. (2025). Evidence synthesis for librarians and information specialists [Online course]. Open Learning Initiative. https://oli.cmu.edu/courses/evidence-synthesis-for-librarians-and-information-specialists-o-f/
- Koffel, J. B. (2015). Use of recommended search strategies in systematic reviews and the impact of librarian involvement: A cross-sectional survey of recent authors. PLOS ONE, 10(5), e0125931. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125931
- Kogut, A., Ramirez, D., & Foster, M. J. (2022). Systematic review training model for education librarians: A case study. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 28(2), 205–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2020.1784761
- Lafferty, M., Premji, Z., Herold, P., Kocher, M., & Marsalis, S. (2024). Evidence synthesis instructional offerings in library and information science programs. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 19(4), 18–38. https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip30554
- Lê, M. L., Neilson, C. J., & Winkler, J. (2024a). Benchmarking librarian support of systematic reviews in the sciences, humanities, and social sciences. College & Research Libraries, 85(4), 606. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.85.4.606
- Lê, M. L., Winkler, J., & Neilson, C. J. (2024b). Training needs and preferences for librarians supporting systematic reviews in the sciences, humanities, and social sciences. College & Research Libraries, 85(7), 978. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.85.7.978
- Medical Library Association. (n.d.). Systematic review services specialization. https://www.mlanet.org/Specializations/systematic-review-services-specialization/
- Meert, D., Torabi, N., & Costella, J. (2017). Impact of librarians on reporting of the literature searching component of pediatric systematic reviews. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 104(4). https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2016.139
- Pawliuk, C., Cheng, S., Zheng, A., & Siden, H. (2024). Librarian involvement in systematic reviews was associated with higher quality of reported search methods: A cross-sectional survey. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 166, 111237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.111237
- Premji, Z., Splenda, R., & Young, S. (2022). An exploration of business librarian participation in knowledge synthesis reviews. College & Research Libraries, 83(2). https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.83.2.314
- Rethlefsen, M. L., Farrell, A. M., Osterhaus Trzasko, L. C., & Brigham, T. J. (2015). Librarian co-authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies in general internal medicine systematic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 68(6), 617–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.025
- Slebodnik, M., Cahoy, E. S., & Jacobsen, A. L. (2022). Evidence synthesis: Coming soon to a library near you? portal: Libraries and the Academy, 22(2), 273–280. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2022.0016
- umnLibraries. (n.d.). Evidence synthesis institute [YouTube playlist]. Retrieved January 16, 2026, from https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsqxtHlAYQnYM0A_aLNa9GeWMY_E2ijTP
- University of Michigan Library. (n.d.). Systematic reviews workshop. https://www.lib.umich.edu/research-and-scholarship/library-workshops-and-credit-courses/systematic-reviews-workshop

