Empowering Postdoctoral Scholars: Insights From Library Focus Groups

Bohman, Lena; Hertz, Marla I; Vitiello, Regina

doi:https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip30647

Browse the articles in this issue

Library Chat Transcript Evaluation for User Sentiment During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Thank You for Your Suggestion! Analyzing Patron Purchase Requests at the University of Alberta Library

Article outline

Back to top
Abstract
Bibliography

Toolbox

PDFDownload
Cite this article
Share

Abstracts

Abstract

Objective – The goal of this study was to assess how postdoctoral scholars (postdocs) engage with the campus library and identify barriers to access. Postdocs occupy a unique position within the research community, bridging the gap between graduate studies and permanent academic positions. Despite their critical role, there has been little formal research to examine how postdocs interact with library resources and services, likely due in part to their relatively small numbers at academic and research institutions.

Methods – Three focus group interviews were conducted at two research intensive institutions in the United States. The qualitative analysis employed an iterative coding process to explore several themes: self-proclaimed needs to succeed during postdoctoral training; perceptions of library offerings, including space, services, and collections; and barriers to success.

Results – The thematic analysis revealed that postdocs value library resources and are seeking a range of services including financial services, mentorship, and scholarly writing support. There were only minor differences observed between the two institutions. The study identified lack of communication and time as the main barriers postdocs cited for not using the library. Based on participant feedback, we developed recommendations to enhance the postdoctoral experience with library resources and support their career development.

Conclusion – This study contributes valuable insights into optimizing library services for postdocs and highlights opportunities for libraries to better align their offerings with the unique needs and challenges faced by this sector of the academic community. Our approach also serves as a model to assess and improve library offerings to other small communities.

Appendices

Bibliography

Advisory Committee to the Director Working Group on Re-envisioning NIH-Supported Postdoctoral Training. (2023, December 15). Report to the NIH Advisory Committee to the director (ACD). National Institutes of Health. https://acd.od.nih.gov/documents/presentations/12152023_Postdoc_Working_Group_Report.pdf
Google Scholar
Barr-Walker, J. (2013). Creating an outreach program for postdoctoral scholars. Science & Technology Libraries, 32(2), 137–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194262X.2013.789417
10.1080/0194262X.2013.789417 Google Scholar
Bruckmann, C., & Sebestyén, E. (2017). Ten simple rules to initiate and run a postdoctoral association. PLOS Computational Biology, 13(8), e1005664. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005664
10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005664 Google Scholar
Cantwell, B., & Lee, J. J. (2010). Unseen workers in the academic factory: Perceptions of neoracism among international postdocs in the United States and the United Kingdom. Harvard Educational Review, 80(4), 490–516. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.80.4.w54750105q78p451
10.17763/haer.80.4.w54750105q78p451 Google Scholar
Catalano, A. (2013). Patterns of graduate students’ information seeking behavior: A meta‐synthesis of the literature. Journal of Documentation, 69(2), 243–274. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220411311300066
10.1108/00220411311300066 Google Scholar
Curtis, R. B. (1969). The invisible university: Postdoctoral education in the United States: Report of a study conducted under the auspices of the National Research Council. National Academy of Sciences.
Google Scholar
Feldon, D. F., Litson, K., Jeong, S., Blaney, J. M., Kang, J., Miller, C., Griffin, K., & Roksa, J. (2019). Postdocs’ lab engagement predicts trajectories of PhD students’ skill development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(42), 20910–20916. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1912488116
10.1073/pnas.1912488116 Google Scholar
Fong, B. L., Wang, M., White, K., & Tipton, R. (2016). Assessing and serving the workshop needs of graduate students. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 42(5), 569–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2016.06.003
10.1016/j.acalib.2016.06.003 Google Scholar
Forrester, N. (2021). Mental health of graduate students sorely overlooked. Nature, 595(7865), 135–137. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-01751-z
10.1038/d41586-021-01751-z Google Scholar
Gau, K. H., Dillon, P., Donaldson, T., Wahl, S. E., & Iwema, C. L. (2020). Partnering with postdocs: A library model for supporting postdoctoral researchers and educating the academic research community. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 108(3), 480–486. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2020.902
10.5195/jmla.2020.902 Google Scholar
Gunapala, N. (2014). Meeting the needs of the “invisible university:” Identifying information needs of postdoctoral scholars in the sciences. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 77. https://doi.org/10.29173/istl1610
10.29173/istl1610 Google Scholar
Hahnel, M., Smith, G., Schoenenberger, H., Scaplehorn, N., & Day, L. (2023). The state of open data 2023 [Report]. Digital Science. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.24428194.v1
Google Scholar
Heidt, A. (2024). NIH pay rise for postdocs and PhD students could have US ripple effect. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-01242-x
10.1038/d41586-024-01242-x Google Scholar
Ince, S., Hoadley, C., & Kirschner, P. A. (2020). Research workflow skills for education doctoral students and postdocs: A qualitative study. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 46(5), 102172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102172
10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102172 Google Scholar
Is science’s dominant funding model broken? (2024). Nature, 630(8018), 793–793. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-02080-7
10.1038/d41586-024-02080-7 Google Scholar
Kahn, S., & Ginther, D. K. (2017). The impact of postdoctoral training on early careers in biomedicine. Nature Biotechnology, 35(1), 90–94. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3766
10.1038/nbt.3766 Google Scholar
Katz-Buonincontro, J. (2022). How to interview and conduct focus groups. American Psychological Association. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv2sjj0h6
10.1037/0000299-000 Google Scholar
Liénard, J. F., Achakulvisut, T., Acuna, D. E., & David, S. V. (2018). Intellectual synthesis in mentorship determines success in academic careers. Nature Communications, 9(1), 4840. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07034-y
10.1038/s41467-018-07034-y Google Scholar
McAlpine, L. (2018). Postdoc trajectories: Making visible the invisible. In A. Jaeger & A. J. Dinin (Eds.), The postdoc landscape (pp. 175–202). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813169-5.00008-2
10.1016/B978-0-12-813169-5.00008-2 Google Scholar
Morgan, D. L. (1997). The focus group guidebook (1st ed.). SAGE Publications, Incorporated.
Google Scholar
National Science Foundation. (2021). The shifting demographic composition of postdoctoral researchers at federally funded research and development centers in 2021. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf22345
Google Scholar
Nelson, A. (2022). Ensuring free, immediate, and equitable access to federally funded research [Official Memorandum]. White House Office of Science and Technology Policy. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/08-2022-OSTP-Public-Access-Memo.pdf
Google Scholar
Northwell Health. (2025). We are Northwell. https://www.northwell.edu/sites/northwell.edu/files/2025-02/we-are-northwell-fact-sheet-updatefeb2025printer-spreadsv1.pdf
Google Scholar
Nowell, L., Alix Hayden, K., Berenson, C., Kenny, N., Chick, N., & Emery, C. (2018). Professional learning and development of postdoctoral scholars: A scoping review protocol. Systematic Reviews, 7(1), 224. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-018-0892-5
10.1186/s13643-018-0892-5 Google Scholar
O’Grady, T., & Beam, P. S. (2011). Postdoctoral scholars: A forgotten library constituency? Science & Technology Libraries, 30(1), 76–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194262X.2011.545680
10.1080/0194262X.2011.545680 Google Scholar
Ott, N. R., Arbeit, C. A., & Falkenheim, J. (2021). Defining postdocs in the survey of Graduate Students and Postdocs (GSS): Institution responses to the postdoc definitional questions in the GSS 2010–16. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf21327
Google Scholar
Rempel, H. G., Hussong-Christian, U., & Mellinger, M. (2011). Graduate student space and service needs: A recommendation for a cross-campus solution. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 37(6), 480–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2011.07.004
10.1016/j.acalib.2011.07.004 Google Scholar
Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., Nicholls, C. M., & Ormston, R. (2013). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd.
Google Scholar
Smith, B., Alldredge, Elham-Eid, Arbeit, Caren A., & Yamaner, Michael I. (2024). Graduate enrollment in science, engineering, and health continues to increase among foreign nationals, while postdoctoral appointment trends vary across fields (InfoBrief NSF 24-320; National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics). National Science Foundation. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf24320
Google Scholar
Tomaszewski, R. (2012). Information needs and library services for doctoral students and postdoctoral scholars at Georgia State University. Science & Technology Libraries, 31(4), 442–462. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194262X.2012.730465
10.1080/0194262X.2012.730465 Google Scholar
Travis, J. (1992). Postdocs: Tales of woe from the “invisible university.” Science, 257(5077), 1738–1740. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.257.5077.1738
10.1126/science.257.5077.1738 Google Scholar
University of Alabama at Birmingham. (2023). UAB total student demographics. https://www.uab.edu/institutionaleffectiveness/images/documents/student-demographics/Fall-2023-Total-Enrollment.pdf
Google Scholar
Urban Indian Health Institute. (2021). Data genocide of American Indians and Alaska Natives in COVID-19 data. https://www.uihi.org/projects/data-genocide-of-american-indians-and-alaska-natives-in-covid-19-data/
Google Scholar
White, E., & King, L. (2020). Shaping scholarly communication guidance channels to meet the research needs and skills of doctoral students at Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 46(1), 102081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2019.102081
10.1016/j.acalib.2019.102081 Google Scholar
Woolston, C. (2018a). The quest for postdoctoral independence. Nature, 561(7724), 569–571. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-06794-3
10.1038/d41586-018-06794-3 Google Scholar
Woolston, C. (2018b). Why a postdoc might not advance your career. Nature, 565(7737), 125–126. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-07652-y
10.1038/d41586-018-07652-y Google Scholar
Woolston, C. (2020). Postdoc survey reveals disenchantment with working life. Nature, 587(7834), 505–508. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-03191-7
10.1038/d41586-020-03191-7 Google Scholar

Abstracts

Abstract

Appendices

Bibliography

Citation Tools

Cite this article

Export the record for this article