Abstracts
Abstract
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) tools are transforming academic writing support in higher education, but student- and public-facing messaging from Canadian universities, and subsequently their writing centres, has been slow and inconsistent (Cheatle, 2025; Marcel & Kang, 2024; UNESCO, 2024). In the summer of 2024, two writing centre advisors conducted an environmental scan of writing centre websites and publicly available materials related to messages about GenAI literacy support. Documents were collected and assessed for 1) a “statement” or “policy” on GenAI use and assistance in the writing centre and 2) a stance toward using GenAI for writing, which we categorized broadly as able to assist with GenAI writing concerns (i.e., adopt) or disavowing use or assistance in the writing centre (i.e., avoid). Environmental scans facilitate discovery of opportunities and threats during times of change in the interest of making decisions and plans for the future. Our scan provides a snapshot of how writing centres, as well as the institutions they operate within, are positioning themselves within the current GenAI post-secondary landscape. This article contextualizes results within the current post-secondary landscape and offers recommendations and implications for the conceptualization of writing centre work.
Keywords:
- Generative AI (GenAI),
- writing centres,
- academic socialization,
- policy,
- environmental scan
Appendices
Bibliography
- Aguilar, F. (1967). Scanning the business environment. Macmillan.
- Aikens, K, & Wielden, H. (2025). Generative AI tutor education in our writing center: A slow approach. The Peer Review, 9(1). https://thepeerreview-iwca.org/issues/issue-9-1/generative-ai-tutor-education-in-our-writing-center-a-slow-approach/
- AI Task Force. (2025). Toward an AI-ready university. https://www.utoronto.ca/sites/default/ciles/2025-/AI%20Task%20Force_Main%20Report_2.pdf
- Alonso, J. (2025, June 17). Amid AI plagiarism, more professors turn to handwritten work. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/faculty-issues/curriculum/2025/06/17/amid-ai-plagiarism-more-professors-turn-handwritten-work
- Anderson, T. (2015). Seeking internationalization: The state of Canadian higher education. Canadian Journal of Higher Education 45(3). 166–187. https://doi.org/10.47678/cjhe.v45i4.184690
- Barrett, A., Pack, A. (2023). Not quite eye to A.I.: student and teacher perspectives on the use of generative articicial intelligence in the writing process. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(59). 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00427-0
- Bartholomae, D. (1986). Inventing the university. Journal of Basic Writing, 5(1), 4–23. https://doi.org/10.37514/jbw-j.1986.5.1.02
- Bermingham, C. (2023a, May 1). ChatGPT snapshot: University of Waterloo. CWCR/ACCR Blog. https://cwcaaccr.com/2023/05/01/chatgpt-snapshot-university-of-waterloo/
- Bermingham, C. (2023b, August 30). Productive and ethical: Guiding student writers in a GenAI world (Part 1 of 2). CWCR/ACCR Blog. https://cwcaaccr.com/2023/08/30/productive-and-ethical-guiding-student-writers-in-a-genai-world-part-1-of-2/
- Bromley, P. (2017). Locating Canadian writing centres: An empirical investigation. Canadian Journal for Studies in Discourse and Writing/Rédactologie, 27. 24–41. https://doi.org/10.31468/cjsdwr.578
- Brooks, J. (1991). Minimalist tutoring: Making the student do all the work. Writing Lab Newsletter, (6), 1–4.
- Bruffee, K. (1984). Peer tutoring and the “conversation of mankind.” College English, 46, 635–652.
- Bryan, M. D. (2024). Bringing AI to the center: What historical writing center software discourse can teach us about responses to articicial intelligence-based writing tools. The Proceedings of the Annual Computers and Writing Conference, 2023. 15–26. https://doi.org/10.37514/pcw-b.2024.2296.2.02
- Bukowski, N., & Brueggemann, B. J. (2019). Writing center research and disability theory. Theories and Methods of Writing Center Studies, 68–78. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429198755-/WRITING-CENTER-RESEARCH-DISABILITY-THEORY-NOAH-BUKOWSKI-BRENDA-JO-BRUEGGEMANN
- Camarillo, E. C. (2019). Burn the house down: Deconstructing the writing center as cozy home. The Peer Review, 3(1). https://thepeerreview-iwca.org/issues/redecining-welcome/burn-the-house-down-deconstructing-the-writing-center-as-cozy-home/
- Casal, J.E., & Kessler, M. (2023). Can linguists distinguish between ChatGPT/AI and human writing? A study of research ethics and academic publishing. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 2(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2023.100068
- Castner, J. (2000). The asynchronous, online writing session: A two-way stab in the dark? In James A. Inman and Donna Sewell (Eds.) Taking Flight with OWLs: Examining Electronic Writing Center Work (pp. 119–128). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410602121
- Chan, C. K. Y. (2025). Students’ perceptions of ‘AI-giarism’: Investigating changes in understandings of academic misconduct. Education and Information Technology, 30. 8087–8108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13151-7
- Cheatle, J. M. (2025, March 7). TPR AI Special Issue Introduction: No escaping GenAI: Confronting a new writing center reality. The Peer Review, 9(2). https://thepeerreview-iwca.org/issue-9-/introduction/
- Choo, W. C. (2003). The art of scanning the environment. In J. Voros (Ed.), Reframing Environmental Scanning: A Reader on the Art of Scanning the Environment (pp. 7–18). AFI Monograph Series.
- Cohen, B. (May 23, 2025). They were every student’s worst nightmare. Now blue books are back. Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/business/chatgpt-ai-cheating-college-blue-books-e3014a6?reclink=desktopwebshare_permalink
- Costa, J. (1995). An empirically-based review of the concept of environmental scanning. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 7(7). 4–9. https://doi.org/10.1108/09596119510101877
- Canadian Writing Centres Association / association canadienne des centres de redaction. (2023, January 8). CWCA/ACCR Statement on corporate, automated, online tutoring tools. https://cwcaaccr.com/statement-on-corporate-automated-online-tutoring-tools/
- Canadian Writing Centres Association / association canadienne des centres de redaction. (2025, June 12). CWCA/ACCR Statement on precarity & writing support programming. https://cwcaaccr.com/statement-on-precarity-writing-support-programming/
- Dea, S. (2024, December 2). Supporting students in the age of GenAI. University Affairs. https://universityaffairs.ca/opinion/supporting-students-in-the-age-of-genai/
- Deans, T., Praver, N., & Solod, A. (2024, February 26). AI in the writing center: Small steps and scenarios. Another Word. https://dept.writing.wisc.edu/blog/ai-wc/
- Denny, H. (2010). Queering the writing center. Writing Center Journal, 30(1), 95–124 https://doi.org/10.7771/2832-9414.1659
- Denny, H., Nordlof, J., & Salem, L. (2018). “Tell me exactly what it was that I was doing that was so bad”: Understanding the needs and expectations of working-class students in writing centers. The Writing Center Journal, 37(1), 67–100. https://doi.org/10.7771/2832-9414.1866
- Eaton, S. E. (2023). The academic integrity technological arms race and its impact on learning, teaching, and assessment. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 48(2). https://doi.org/10.21432/cjlt28388
- Eckstein, G. (2016). Grammar correction in the writing centre: Expectations and experiences of monolingual and multilingual writers. Canadian Modern Language Review, 72(3), 360–382. http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.3605
- Essid, J., & Cummins, C. (2025, March 6). A future for writing centers? Generative AI and what students are saying. The Peer Review, 9(2). https://thepeerreview-iwca.org/issue-9-2/a-future-for-writing-centers-generative-ai-and-what-students-are-saying/
- Garcı́a, R. (2017). Unmaking Gringo-Centers. The Writing Center Journal, 36(1), 29–60. https://doi.org/10.7771/2832-9414.1814
- Hamerman, E.J., Aggarwal, A. and Martins, C. (2025). An investigation of generative AI in the classroom and its implications for university policy. Quality Assurance in Education, 33(2), 253- https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-08-2024-0149
- Harris, B. and Brooker, J. (2025). Environmental scanning: A look to the future. New Directions in Evaluation, 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20633
- Hicks, M.T., Humphries, J. & Slater, J. (2024). ChatGPT is bullshit. Ethics and Information Technology, 26(38). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-024-09775-5
- Hotson, B. (2023, March 27). Writing centres and ChatGPT: And then all at once. CWCR/ACCR Blog. https://cwcaaccr.com/2023/03/27/writing-centres-and-chatgpt-then-all-at-once/
- Johnson, G. P. (2023). Don’t act like you forgot: Approaching another literacy “crisis” by (re)considering what we know about teaching writing with and through technologies. Composition Studies, 51(1), 169–175. https://compstudiesjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/johnson.pdf
- Johnston, H., Eaton, M., Henry, I., Deeley, E.-M., & Parsons, B. N. (2025). Discovering how students use generative articicial intelligence tools for academic writing purposes. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, 34. https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi34.1301
- Kaliterna, M., Zz uljević, M. F., Ursić, L., Krka, J., & Duplančić , D. (2024). Testing the capacity of Bard and ChatGPT for writing essays on ethical dilemmas: A cross-sectional study. Scientific Reports, 14(1), https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-77576-3
- Kumar, R., & Mindzak, M. (2024). Who wrote this? Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.55016/ojs/cpai.v7i1.77675
- Lin, Z. (2025). Techniques for supercharging academic writing with generative AI. Nature Biomedical Engineering, 9, 426–431. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-024-01185-8
- Lindberg, N. (2025). We should promote GenAI writing tools for linguistic equity. Writing Center Journal, 43(1). https://doi.org/10.7771/2832-9414.2078
- Malik, A. R., Pratiwi, Y., Andajani, K., Numertayasa, I. W., Suharti, S., Darwis, A., & Marzuki (2023). Exploring articicial intelligence in academic essay: Higher education student’s perspective. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 5, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100296
- Marcel, F. & Kang, P. (2024). Examining AI guidelines in Canadian universities: Implications on academic integrity in academic writing. Discourse and Writing/Rédactologie, 34, 93–126. https://doi.org/10.31468/dwr.1051
- Marche, S. (2022, December 16). Will ChatGPT kill the student essay? TheAtlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2022/12/chatgpt-ai-writing-college-student-essays/672371/
- Marken, L. (2023, April 19). ChatGPT snapshot: University of Saskatchewan. CWCR/ACCR Blog. https://cwcaaccr.com/2023/04/19/chatgpt-snapshot-university-of-saskatchewan/
- McDonald, N., Johri, A., Ali, A., & Collier, A. H. (2025). Generative articicial intelligence in higher education: Evidence from an analysis of institutional policies and guidelines. Computers in Human Behavior: Arti^icial Humans, 3, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100121
- McNally, D., & Kooyman, B. (2017). Drawing the line: Views from academic staff and skills advisors on acceptable proofreading with low prociciency writers. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, (1), A145–A158. https://journal.aall.org.au/index.php/jall/article/view/472
- MLA-CCCC Joint Task Force on Writing and AI (2023). MLA-CCCC joint task force on writing and AI working paper: Overview of the issues, statement of principles, and recommendations. https://aiandwriting.hcommons.org/working-paper-1/
- Moorhouse, B. L., Yeo, M. A., & Wan, Y. (2023). Generative AI tools and assessment: Guidelines of the world’s top-ranking universities. Computers and Education Open, 5, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100151
- Moussu, L. (2013). Let’s talk! ESL students’ needs and writing centre philosophy. TESL Canada Journal, 30(2), 55–68. https://teslcanadajournal.ca/index.php/tesl/article/view/1142/968
- Nicolas, M. (2023, November 14). Eliminate the required cirst-year writing course (opinion). Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/opinion/views/2023/11/14/eliminate-required-cirst-year-writing-course-opinion
- North, S. M. (1984). The idea of a writing center. College English, 46(5), 433–446. http://www.jstor.org/stable/377047
- Perkins, M. (2023). Academic integrity considerations of AI Large Language Models in the post-pandemic era: ChatGPT and beyond. (2023). Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.53761/1.20.02.07
- Riyeff, J. (2024, June 27). Gen AI and the problem of (dis)trusting students. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/opinion/views/2024/06/27/gen-ai-and-problem-distrusting-students-opinion
- Sabatino, L., & Herb, M. M. (2021). Turf wars, culture clashes, and a room of one’s own: A survey of centers located in libraries. Praxis, 18(2). https://www.praxisuwc.com/182-sabatino-herb
- Salem, L. (2016). Decisions… decisions: Who chooses to use the writing center? The Writing Center Journal, 35(2), 147–171. https://doi.org/10.7771/2832-9414.1806
- Tai, A. M. Y., Meyer, M., Varidel, M., Prodan, A., Vogel, M., Iorcino, F., & Krausz, R. M. (2023). Exploring the potential and limitations of ChatGPT for academic peer-reviewed writing: Addressing linguistic injustice and ethical concerns. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 17(1), T16-T30. https://journal.aall.org.au/index.php/jall/article/view/903
- Terry, O. K. (2023, May 12). I’m a student. You have no idea how much we’re using ChatGPT. The Chronicle of Higher Education. https://www.chronicle.com/article/im-a-student-you-have-no-idea-how-much-were-using-chatgpt
- Thonus, T. (1993). Tutors as teachers: Assisting ESL/EFL students in the writing center. The Writing Center Journal, 13(2), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.7771/2832-9414.1269
- Towle, B. (2024). Accidental outreach and happenstance stafcing: A cross-institutional study of writing center support of cirst-generation college students. The Writing Center Journal, 41(3). 72 – 86. https://doi.org/10.7771/2832-9414.1000
- UNESCO. (2024, September 18). UNESCO survey: Less than 10% of schools and universities have formal guidance on AI. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/unesco-survey-less-10-schools-and-universities-have-formal-guidance-ai