ror.org/0161xgx34
Abstracts
Résumé
Au cours des deux dernières décennies, le libre accès a pris de l’importance à travers le monde. Toutefois, son adoption au Canada est à la traîne par rapport à d’autres pays. À l’aide des données de Dimensions et Érudit, cet article donne un aperçu de la diffusion en libre accès au Canada, en se concentrant sur l’effet des institutions, de la langue et du financement. Les articles en français et ceux des universités québécoises sont plus susceptibles d’être en libre accès, tandis que ceux des établissements axés sur le génie sont moins susceptibles d’être disponibles en libre accès. En ce qui concerne les bailleurs de fonds, ceux en sciences de la santé ont une conformité plus élevée au libre accès. L’article conclut en discutant des différences disciplinaires dans la diffusion en libre accès, de la faible conformité aux mandats de libre accès au Canada et du rôle d’Érudit.
Abstract
Over the past two decades, open access has gained prominence around the world. However, its adoption in Canada lags that of other countries. Using data from Dimensions and Érudit, this article provides an overview of open access dissemination in Canada, focusing on the effect of institutions, language, and funding. French-language papers and papers from Quebec universities are more likely to be open access, while papers from engineering-focused institutions are less likely to be open access. With respect to funders, those in the health sciences have a higher compliance with open access. The article concludes by discussing disciplinary differences in open access dissemination, the low compliance with open access mandates in Canada, and the role of Érudit.
Appendices
Bibliographie
- Albert, K. M. (2006). Open access : Implications for scholarly publishing and medical libraries. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 94(3), 253‑262.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Archambault, É., Amyot, D., Deschamps, P., Nicol, A., Provencher, F., Rebout, L., & Roberge, G. (2014). Proportion of Open Access Papers Published in Peer-Reviewed Journals at the European and World Levels—1996-2013 (Rapport No. D 1.8 version : 11p). European Commission. Repéré à science-metrix.com/sites/default/files/science-metrix/publications/d_1.8_sm_ec_dg-rtd_proportion_oa_1996-2013_v11p.pdfGoogle Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Basson, I., Simard, M.-A., Aubierge Ouagré, Z., Sugimoto, C. R., & Larivière, V. (2021). Data sources and their effects on the measurement of open access. Comparing Dimensions with the Web of Science. Dans Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics, (pp. 93‑98). KU Leuven, Belgium. Repéré à issi2021.org/proceedings/Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Beaudry, G., Boucher, M., Niemann, T., & Boismenu, G. (2009). Érudit : Le numérique au service de l’édition en sciences humaines et sociales. Mémoires du livre / Studies in Book Culture, 1(1). Repéré à www.erudit.org/fr/revues/memoires/2009-v1-n1-memoires3559/038637ar/
10.7202/038637ar
Google Scholar
Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Björk, B.-C., & Catani, P. (2016). Peer review in megajournals compared with traditional scholarly journals : Does it make a difference ? Learned Publishing, 29(1), 9‑12. doi.org/10.1002/leap.100710.1002/leap.1007 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Callaway, E. (2020). Will the pandemic permanently alter scientific publishing ? Nature, 582(7811), 167‑168. doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01520-410.1038/d41586-020-01520-4 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Cameron-Pesant, S. (2018). Usage et diffusion des revues savantes québécoises en sciences sociales et humaines : Analyse des téléchargements de la plateforme Érudit. Recherches sociographiques, 59(3), 365‑384. doi.org/10.7202/1058719ar10.7202/1058719ar
Google Scholar
Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Clark, J., & Smith, R. (2015). Firm action needed on predatory journals. BMJ, 350, h210. doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h21010.1136/bmj.h210 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Digital Science & Research Solutions Inc. (2020). Why did we build Dimensions. Dimensions. Repéré à www.dimensions.ai/why-dimensions/Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Direction générale de la recherche et de l’innovation. (2021, 14 novembre). Trends for open access to publications. Commission européenne. Repéré à ec.europa.eu/info/research-and-innovation/strategy/strategy-2020-2024/our-digital-future/open-science/open-science- monitor/trends-open-access-publications_enGoogle Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Domnina, T. N. (2016). A megajournal as a new type of scientific publication. Scientific and Technical Information Processing, 43(4), 241‑250. doi.org/10.3103/S014768821604007910.3103/S0147688216040079 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Elliott, C. (2012, 5 juin). On Predatory Publishers : A Q&A With Jeffrey Beall. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Repéré à www.chronicle.com/blogs/brainstorm/on-predatory-publishers-a-qa-with-jeffrey-beallGoogle Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Evans, J. A., & Reimer, J. (2009). Open access and global participation in science. Science (New York, N.Y.), 323(5917), 1025. doi.org/10.1126/science.115456210.1126/science.1154562 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Fonds de recherche du Québec. (2019, 15 avril). Politique de diffusion en libre accès des Fonds de recherche du Québec. Repéré à www.frqs.gouv.qc.ca/documents/10191/539200/Politique-libre-acces_avril19.pdf/24216d8c-9513-440e-8795-97ea929acb92Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies, Fonds de recherche du Québec – Santé, & Fonds de recherche du Québec – Société et culture. (2022). Politique de diffusion en libre accès (version révisée). Repéré à frq.gouv.qc.ca/app/uploads/2022/06/politique-libre-acces-revisee_vf.pdfGoogle Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Fonds de recherche du Québec - Santé. (2012, 3 juillet). Politique de libre accès aux résultats de recherche publiés. Repéré à www.frqs.gouv.qc.ca/documents/11314/435506/Politique-de-libre-acces-aux-resultats-de-recherche-publies/f0a628b7-f36c-409f-b2b9-4334713e0085Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Gibbs, K. Jr. (2014, 10 septembre). Diversity in STEM : What It Is and Why It Matters. Scientific American. Repéré à blogs.scientificamerican.com/voices/diversity-in-stem-what-it-is-and-why-it-matters/Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Gouvernement du Canada. (2016, 21 décembre). Politique des trois organismes sur le libre accès aux publications. Gouvernement du Canada. Innovation, Sciences et Développement économique Canada. Repéré à science.gc.ca/site/science/fr/financement-interorganismes-recherche/politiques-lignes-directrices/libre-acces/politique-trois-organismes-libre-acces-aux-publicationsGoogle Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Herzog, C., Hook, D., & Konkiel, S. (2020). Dimensions : Bringing down barriers between scientometricians and data. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 387‑395. doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_0002010.1162/qss_a_00020 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Iyandemye, J., & Thomas, M. P. (2019). Low income countries have the highest percentages of open access publication : A systematic computational analysis of the biomedical literature. PLoS ONE, 14(7), e0220229. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.022022910.1371/journal.pone.0220229 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Larivière, V., & Macaluso, B. (2011). Improving the coverage of social science and humanities researchers’ output : The case of the Érudit journal platform. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(12), 2437‑2442. doi.org/10.1002/asi.2163210.1002/asi.21632 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Larivière, V., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2018). Do authors comply when funders enforce open access to research ? Nature, 562(7728), 483‑486. doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-07101-w10.1038/d41586-018-07101-w Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Larivière, V., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2020). Knowledge Synthesis : The past, present and future of scholarly communication [report submitted to the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada].Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- McCabe, M. J., & Snyder, C. M. (2014). Identifiying the effect of open access on citations using a panel of science journals. Economic Inquiry, 52(4), 1284‑1300. doi.org/10.1111/ecin.1206410.1111/ecin.12064 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Ottaviani, J. (2016). The Post-Embargo Open Access Citation Advantage : It Exists (Probably), It’s Modest (Usually), and the Rich Get Richer (of Course). PLOS ONE, 11(8), e0159614. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.015961410.1371/journal.pone.0159614 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Paquet, V., Van Bellen, S., & Larivière, V. (2022). Measuring the prevalence of open access in Canada : A national comparison. The Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 45(1), 1‑21. doi.org/10.5206/cjilsrcsib.v45i1.1414910.5206/cjilsrcsib.v45i1.14149 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Peters, D. (2021, 22 février). Performance-based funding comes to the Canadian postsecondary sector. University Affairs. Repéré à www.universityaffairs.ca/news/news-article/performance-based-funding-comes-to-the-canadian-postsecondary-sector/Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Piwowar, H., Priem, J., Larivière, V., Alperin, J. P., Matthias, L., Norlander, B., … Haustein, S. (2018). The state of OA : A large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles. PeerJ, 6, e4375. doi.org/10.7717/peerj.437510.7717/peerj.4375 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Science benefits from diversity. (2018). Nature, 558(7708), 5‑5. doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-05326-310.1038/d41586-018-05326-3 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Siler, K. (2020). Demarcating spectrums of predatory publishing : Economic and institutional sources of academic legitimacy. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, n/a(n/a), 1‑16. doi.org/10.1002/asi.2433910.1002/asi.24339 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Siler, K., Larivière, V., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2019). The diverse niches of megajournals : Specialism within generalism. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 1‑17. doi.org/10.1002/asi.2429910.31235/osf.io/px8kt Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Spooner, M. (2021, 22 avril). The ugly side of performance-based funding for universities. Academic Matters, (Spring 2021). Repéré à academicmatters.ca/the-ugly-side-of-performance-based-funding-for-universities-2/Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Tennant, J. P., Waldner, F., Jacques, D. C., Masuzzo, P., Collister, L. B., & Hartgerink, Chris. H. J. (2016). The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access : An evidence-based review. F1000Research, 5, 632. doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.8460.310.12688/f1000research.8460.1 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- W. Philipps, K. (2014, 1 octobre). How Diversity Makes Us Smarter. Scientific American. Repéré à www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-diversity-makes-us-smarter/Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Zhu, Y. (2017). Who support open access publishing ? Gender, discipline, seniority and other factors associated with academics’ OA practice. Scientometrics, 111(2), 557‑579. doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2316-z10.1007/s11192-017-2316-z Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar