Abstracts
Résumé
L’évaluation de la performance institutionnelle et individuelle de la recherche s’est trouvée des assisses objectives et mesurables dans la bibliométrie. Les agences gouvernementales s’y remettent pour justifier la répartition des fonds de recherche, les universités pour évaluer ses chercheurs, les chercheurs pour décrocher un emploi ou la titularisation. La macro et la micro-évaluation se distinguent par des méthodes d’agrégation des données et par des indicateurs spécifiques. Les bibliothèques universitaires québécoises cherchent, à tâtons, à comprendre les attentes à leur endroit en matière de bibliométrie évaluative et à développer les compétences nécessaires pour les combler.
Abstract
The evaluation of institutional and individual research performance has found an objective and measurable basis in bibliometrics. Government agencies rely on it to justify the allocation of research funds, universities to evaluate their researchers, and researchers to secure employment or tenure. Macro and micro evaluation are distinguished by methods of aggregating data and by specific indicators. Quebec university libraries are groping to understand what is expected of them in terms of evaluative bibliometrics and to develop the necessary skills to meet these expectations.
Appendices
Bibliographie
- Abel, R., & Newlin, L. W. (Éds.). (2002). Scholarly publishing : Books, journals, publishers, and libraries in the twentieth century. Wiley.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Åström, F., Hansson, J., & Olsson, M. (2011). Bibliometrics and the changing role of the university libraries.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Bornmann, L. (2017). Measuring impact in research evaluations : A thorough discussion of methods for, effects of and problems with impact measurements. Higher Education, 73(5) : 775-787. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-9995-x10.1007/s10734-016-9995-x Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Bornmann, L., Mutz, R., Neuhaus, C., & Daniel, H.-D. (2008). Citation counts for research evaluation : Standards of good practice for analyzing bibliometric data and presenting and interpreting results. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, 8(1) : 93-102. DOI : https://doi.org/10.3354/esep0008410.3354/esep00084 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Buela-Casal, G., & Zych, I. (2012). What do the scientists think about the impact factor ? Scientometrics, 92(2) : 281-292. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0676-y10.1007/s11192-012-0676-y Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Colwell, R., Blouw, M., & Butler, L. (2012). Informing Research Choices : Indicators and Judgment / Éclairer les choix en matière de recherche : Indicateurs et décisions. Expert Panel on Science Performance and Research Funding. Repéré à https://www.rapports-cac.ca/reports/eclairer-les-choix-en-matiere-de-recherche-indicateurs-et-decisions/Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Corrall, S., Kennan, M. A., & Afzal, W. (2013). Bibliometrics and research data management services : Emerging trends in library support for research. Library Trends, 61(3) : 636-674.10.1353/lib.2013.0005 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Cox, A., Gadd, E., Petersohn, S., & Sbaffi, L. (2019). Competencies for bibliometrics. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 51(3) : 746-762. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1177/096100061772811110.1177/0961000617728111 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- de Solla Price, D. J. (1986). Little science, big science...and beyond. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis : An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133 : 285-296. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.07010.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Furner, J. (2014). The Ethics of Evaluative Bibliometrics. In B. Cronin & C. R. Sugimoto (Éds.), Beyond bibliometrics : Harnessing multidimensional indicators of scholarly impact : 85-107. The MIT Press. Repéré à http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/servlet/opac?bknumber=6825200Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Garfield, E. (1955). Citation Indexes for Science : A New Dimension in Documentation through Association of Ideas. Science. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1126/science.122.3159.10810.1126/science.122.3159.108 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Gingras, Y. (2014). Criteria for Evaluating Indicators. In B. Cronin & C. R. Sugimoto (Éds.), Beyond bibliometrics : Harnessing multidimensional indicators of scholarly impact : 109-125. The MIT Press. Repéré à http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/servlet/opac?bknumber=6825200Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Gingras, Y. (2016). Bibliometrics and research evaluation : Uses and abuses. The MIT Press. Repéré à http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/bkabstractplus.jsp?bkn=784517310.7551/mitpress/10719.001.0001 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Glänzel, W. (2003). Bibliometrics as a research field : A course on theory and application of bibliometric indicators. Course Handouts.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Jappe, A., & Heinze, T. (2021). Jurisdiction of Bibliometrics. In Handbook of Bibliometrics (p. 91-98). De Gruyter Saur. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110646610-01010.1515/9783110646610-010 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Kousha, K., & Thelwall, M. (2014). Web Impact Metrics for Research Assessment. In B. Cronin & C. R. Sugimoto (Éds.), Beyond bibliometrics : Harnessing multidimensional indicators of scholarly impact (p. 289-306). The MIT Press. Repéré à http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/servlet/opac?bknumber=6825200Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Larivière, V., Sugimoto, C. R., & Chisogne, S. (2018). Mesurer la science. Les presses de l’université de Montréal.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Mittermaier, B. (2020). Peer Review and Bibliometrics. In R. Ball, Handbook of Bibliometrics : 77-90. de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110646610-009 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Moed, H. F. (2007). The future of research evaluation rests with an intelligent combination of advanced metrics and transparent peer review. Science and Public Policy, 34(8) : 575-583.10.3152/030234207X255179 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Petersohn, S. (2016). Professional competencies and jurisdictional claims in evaluative bibliometrics : The educational mandate of academic librarians. Education for Information, 32(2) : 165-193. DOI : https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-15097210.3233/EFI-150972 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of documentation, 25(4) : 348-349.10.1108/eb026482 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Rostaing, H. (1996). La bibliométrie et ses techniques. Sciences de la Société. Repéré à https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01579948Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- St-Onge, S., Forgues, É., Larivière, V., Riddles, A., & Volkanova, V. (2021). Portrait et défis de la recherche en français en contexte minoritaire au Canada. Acfas. Repéré à https://www.ost.uqam.ca/en/publications/portrait-et-defis-de-la-recherche-en-francais-en-contexte-minoritaire-au-canada/Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- van Leeuwen, T. (2005). Descriptive Versus Evaluative Bibliometrics. In H. F. Moed, W. Glänzel, & U. Schmoch (Éds.), Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research : The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems : 373-388. Springer Netherlands. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2755-9_1710.1007/1-4020-2755-9_17 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Vial, S. (2015). Revue des revues de recherche scientifique en design. Sciences du Design, 1(1) : 120. DOI ; https://doi.org/10.3917/sdd.001.012010.3917/sdd.001.0120 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Visser, M., van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2021). Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources : Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic. arXiv :2005.10732 [cs]. Repéré à http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.1073210.1162/qss_a_00112 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Waltman, L. (2016a). A review of the literature on citation impact indicators. Journal of Informetrics, 10(2) : 365-391. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.02.00710.1016/j.joi.2016.02.007 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Waltman, L. (2016b, octobre 31). Citation analysis : State of the art, good practices, and future developments. Bibliometrics & Research Assessment : A Symposium for Librarians & Infomation Professionals, Bethesda, Maryland.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Warren, J.-P., & Larivière, V. (2018). La diffusion des connaissances en langue française en sciences humaines et sociales. Les défis du nouvel environnement international. Recherches sociographiques, 59(3) : 327-337. DOI : https://doi.org/10.7202/1058717ar
10.7202/1058717ar Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Wildgaard, L., Schneider, J. W., & Larsen, B. (2014). A review of the characteristics of 108 author-level bibliometric indicators. Scientometrics, 101(1) : 125-158. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1423-310.1007/s11192-014-1423-3 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Wouters, P. (2014). The Citation : From Culture to Infrastructure. In B. Cronin & C. R. Sugimoto (Éds.), Beyond bibliometrics : Harnessing multidimensional indicators of scholarly impact (p. 47-66). The MIT Press. Repéré à http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/servlet/opac?bknumber=6825200Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Wouters, P., Sugimoto, C. R., Larivière, V., McVeigh, M. E., Pulverer, B., de Rijcke, S., & Waltman, L. (2019). Rethinking impact factors : Better ways to judge a journal. Nature, 569(7758) : 621-623. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-01643-310.1038/d41586-019-01643-3 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
