Abstracts
Abstract
This participatory action research (PAR) study is of an innovative virtual pilot practicum program developed through a university – school board partnership to provide relevant experiential learning for social work students pursuing their bachelor’s and master’s degrees while delivering social work services to the community. The Support and Aid to Families Electronically (SAFE) program employed technology novel to the School of Social Work, supported a service user population new to its students, engaged students in ground-up policy and protocol development, and instituted in-house practicum supervision for the first time. PAR was incorporated at the outset, along with an integrated knowledge translation (iKT) approach. The principal investigator supported the student-researcher participants to develop and conduct their own research on this learning opportunity, facilitating co-ownership and co-authorship of this work (Lind, 2007). Over 312 pages of data were collected through journaling and a group chat initiated by the social work students out of a need for connection during this novel virtual practicum. Using reflexive thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2021), the students identified four main themes: program development, collaboration and problem-solving, peer support, and the importance of community creation. These themes told a story of a community of learning, as the seven students turned to each other for expertise within the group rather than viewing educators as the only experts able to provide knowledge (Brown & Campione, 2013). This mutual support among the student-researchers facilitated a sense of power and authority while actively engaged in the processes of learning (Groundwater-Smith & Mockler, 2016). This co-constructed research facilitated the co-construction of the practicum to the benefit of both students and service users.
Keywords:
- community of learning,
- integrated knowledge translation,
- participatory action research,
- social work education,
- experiential learning
Résumé
Cette étude de recherche-action participative (RAP) porte sur un programme pilote virtuel novateur développé dans le cadre d’un partenariat entre une université et un conseil scolaire afin d’offrir un apprentissage expérientiel pertinent aux étudiants en travail social de niveau baccalauréat et maîtrise, tout en leur permettant de fournir des services sociaux à la communauté. SAFE a utilisé une technologie nouvelle pour l’École de travail social, a pris en charge une population d’utilisateurs de services nouvelle pour ses étudiants, a impliqué les étudiants dans l’élaboration de politiques et de protocoles à partir de zéro et a mis en place pour la première fois une supervision interne des stages. La PAR a été intégrée dès le début, ainsi qu’une approche intégrée de transfert des connaissances (iKT). Le chercheur principal a aidé les étudiants-chercheurs-participants à développer et à mener leurs propres recherches sur cette opportunité d’apprentissage, facilitant ainsi la copropriété et la co-rédaction de ce travail (Lind, 2007). Plus de 312 pages de données ont été collectées grâce à la tenue d’un journal et à un chat de groupe initié par les étudiants en travail social, qui avaient besoin de créer des liens pendant ce stage virtuel inédit. À l’aide d’une analyse thématique réflexive (Braun & Clarke, 2021), les étudiants ont identifié quatre thèmes principaux : le développement du programme, la collaboration et la résolution de problèmes, le soutien entre pairs et l’importance de la création d’une communauté. Ces thèmes ont permis de mettre en évidence une communauté d’apprentissage, les sept étudiants se tournant vers leurs pairs pour bénéficier de leur expertise au sein du groupe plutôt que de considérer les enseignants comme les seuls experts capables de transmettre des connaissances (Brown & Campione, 2013). Ce soutien mutuel entre les étudiants chercheurs a favorisé un sentiment de pouvoir et d’autorité tout en s’engageant activement dans les processus d’apprentissage (Groundwater-Smith & Mockler, 2016). Cette recherche co-construite a facilité la co-construction du stage au profit des étudiants et des utilisateurs des services.
Mots-clés :
- communauté d’apprentissage,
- application intégrée des connaissances,
- recherche-action participative,
- formation en travail social,
- apprentissage par l’expérience
Appendices
Bibliography
- Aaen, J., & Dalsgaard, C. (2016). Student Facebook groups as a third space: Between social life and schoolwork. Learning, Media and Technology, 41(1), 160–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2015.1111241
- Albright, T. (2023). Youth participatory action research: Schooling, learning, and entangled lines of flight. Educational Action Research, 0(0), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2023.2197610
- Apgar, D. (2022). Reflective journaling: An effective pedagogical tool to enhance undergraduate social work student experiences when learning research. Social Work Education, 0(0), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2022.2088728
- Bogo, M. (2018). Social work practice: Integrating concepts, processes, and skills. Columbia University Press.
- Bowen, S., & Graham, I. D. (2009). Chapter 1.2 Integrated knowledge translation. In S. E. Straus, J. Tetroe, & I. D. Graham (Eds.), Knowledge translation in health care moving from evidence to practice (pp. 14–23). Wiley-Blackwell.
- Bragg, S. (2007). ‘But I listen to children anyway!’—Teacher perspectives on pupil voice. Educational Action Research, 15(4), 505–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650790701663973
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage Publications Ltd. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/thematic-analysis/book248481
- Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (2013). Communities of learning and thinking, or a context by any other name. In P. Woods (Ed.), Contemporary Issues in Teaching and Learning (pp. 120–126). Routledge.
- Bryant, L., Garnham, B., Tedmanson, D., & Diamandi, S. (2018). Tele-social work and mental health in rural and remote communities in Australia. International Social Work, 61(1), 143–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872815606794
- Bullock, A. N., & Colvin, A. D. (2015). Communication technology integration into social work practice. Advances in Social Work, 16(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.18060/18259
- Call-Cummings, M. (2018). Claiming power by producing knowledge: The empowering potential of PAR in the classroom. Educational Action Research, 26(3), 385–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2017.1354772
- CASWE-ACFTS. (2020). Statement on the Critical Role of Field Education in Social Work Education | CASWE-ACFTS (p. 1). https://caswe-acfts.ca/statement-on-the-critical-role-of-field-education-in-social-work-education/
- Ceylan, E., & Comoglu, I. (2023). Action research in initial EFL teacher education: Emerging insights from a CAR project. Educational Action Research, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2023.2187854
- Christensen, H., Farrer, L., Batterham, P. J., Mackinnon, A., Griffiths, K. M., & Donker, T. (2013). The effect of a web-based depression intervention on suicide ideation: Secondary outcome from a randomised controlled trial in a helpline. BMJ Open, 3(6), e002886. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002886
- Collins, S. (2004). Ecology and ethics in participatory collaborative action research: An argument for the authentic participation of students in eduational research. Educational Action Research, 12(3), 347–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650790400200255
- Csiernik, R., Furze, P., Dromgole, L., & Rishchynski, G. M. (2008). Information technology and social work — The dark side or light side? Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 3(3–4), 9–25. https://doi.org/10.1300/J394v03n03_02
- Csiernik, R., O’Regan, T., Forchuk, C., & Rudnick, A. (2018). Nursing students’ perceptions of participatory action research. The Journal of Nursing Education, 57(5), 282–286. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20180420-05
- CSWE. (2015). Educational policy and accreditation standards. Council on Social Work Education.
- Davis, A. (2016). Journaling together: The antiracism project in social work doctoral education. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 86(4), 355–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/00377317.2016.1222132
- Davis, C., & Parmenter, L. (2021). Student-staff partnerships at work: Epistemic confidence, research-engaged teaching and vocational learning in the transition to higher education. Educational Action Research, 29(2), 292–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2020.1792958
- Dickson, E., Magarati, M., Boursaw, B., Oetzel, J., Devia, C., Ortiz, K., & Wallerstein, N. (2020). Characteristics and practices within research partnerships for health and social equity. Nursing Research (New York), 69(1), 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0000000000000399
- Dombo, E. A., Kays, L., & Weller, K. (2014). Clinical social work practice and technology: Personal, practical, regulatory, and ethical considerations for the twenty-first century. Social Work in Health Care, 53(9), 900–919. https://doi.org/10.1080/00981389.2014.948585
- Drolet, J., Alemi, M., Bogo, M., Chilanga, E., Clark, N., St. George, S., Charles, G., Hanley, J., McConnell, S., McKee, E., Walsh, C. A., & Wulff, D. (2021). Transforming field education during COVID-19. Field Educator, 10(2). https://fieldeducator.simmons.edu/article/transforming-field-education-during-covid-19/
- Dumitru, C. (2021). Building Virtual Teams: Trust, Culture, and Remote Working. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003095781
- Earle, M. J., & Freddolino, P. P. (2022). Meeting the practice challenges of COVID-19: MSW students’ perceptions of e-therapy and the therapeutic alliance. Clinical Social Work Journal, 50(1), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-021-00801-3
- Forchuk, C., Csiernik, R., & Jensen, E. (2011). Creating a process of inquiry and change. In C. Forchuk, R. Csiernik, & E. Jensen (Eds.), Homelessness, housing, and mental health: Finding truths, creating change (pp. 3–12). Canadian Scholars’ Press.
- Freire, P. (1996). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Penguin.
- Goodnough, K. (2014). Examining the potential of youth-led community of practice: Experience and insights. Educational Action Research, 22(3), 363–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2013.872573
- Gray, K., Annabell, L., & Kennedy, G. (2010). Medical students’ use of Facebook to support learning: Insights from four case studies. Medical Teacher, 32(12), 971–976. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2010.497826
- Grise-Owens, E., Miller, J., Escobar-Ratliff, L., Addison, D., Marshall, M., & Trabue, D. (2016). A field practicum experience in designing and developing a wellness initiative: An agency and university partnership. Field Educator, 6(2), 1–20. http://search.proquest.com/docview/1837033220/abstract/85F3AA42BDB84575P
- Groundwater-Smith, S., & Mockler, N. (2016). From data source to co-researchers? Tracing the shift from ‘student voice’ to student–teacher partnerships in Educational Action Research. Educational Action Research, 24(1), 159–176.
- Jull, J., Giles, A., & Graham, I. D. (2017). Community-based participatory research and integrated knowledge translation: Advancing the co-creation of knowledge. Implementation Science, 12(1), 150. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0696-3
- Kember, D., Jones, A., Loke, A., McKay, J., Sinclair, K., Tse, H., Webb, C., Wong, F., Wong, M., Yan, P. W., & Yeung, E. (1996). Developing curricula to encourage students to write reflective journals. Educational Action Research, 4(3), 329–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965079960040304
- Lewis, L. A., Kusmaul, N., Elze, D., & Butler, L. (2016). The role of field education in a university–community partnership aimed at curriculum transformation. Journal of Social Work Education, 52(2), 186–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2016.1151274
- Lind, C. (2007). The power of adolescent voices: Co-researchers in mental health promotion. Educational Action Research, 15(3), 371–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650790701514309
- Mallonee, J., Gergerich, E., Gherardi, S., & Allbright, J. (2022). The impact of COVID-19 on social work mental health services in the United States: Lessons from the early days of a global pandemic. Social Work in Mental Health, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332985.2022.2028272
- Mantulak, A. P., Arundel, M. K., & Csiernik, R. (2021). A creative solution to the social work practicum amid a pandemic: The Remote Learning Plan. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 41(5), 535–549. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841233.2021.1986196
- Mishna, F., Bogo, M., Root, J., Sawyer, J.-L., & Khoury-Kassabri, M. (2012). “It just crept in”: The digital age and implications for social work practice. Clinical Social Work Journal, 40(3), 277–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-012-0383-4
- Mishna, F., Fantus, S., & McInroy, L. B. (2017). Informal use of information and communication technology: Adjunct to traditional face-to-face social work practice. Clinical Social Work Journal, 45, 49–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-016-0576-3
- Mishna, F., Milne, B., Sanders, J. E., & Greenblatt, A. (2021). Social work practice during COVID-19: Client needs and boundary challenges. Global Social Welfare, 9, 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40609-021-00219-2
- Mishna, F., Milne, E., Bogo, M., & Pereira, L. F. (2021). Responding to COVID-19: New trends in social workers’ use of information and communication technology. Clinical Social Work Journal, 49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-020-00780-x
- Mishna, F., Sanders, J. E., Daciuk, J., Milne, E., Fantus, S., Bogo, M., Fang, L., Greenblatt, A., Rosen, P., Khoury-Kassabri, M., & Lefevre, M. (2022). #socialwork: An international study examining social workers’ use of information and communication technology. The British Journal of Social Work, 52(2), 850–871. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcab066
- Mishna, F., Sanders, J. E., Fantus, S., Fang, L., Greenblatt, A., Bogo, M., & Milne, B. (2021). #socialwork: Informal use of information and communication technology in social work. Clinical Social Work Journal, 49(1), 85–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-019-00729-9
- Mishna, F., Schwan, K. J., Lefebvre, R., Bhole, P., & Johnston, D. (2014). Students in distress: Unanticipated findings in a cyber bullying study. Children and Youth Services Review, 44, 341–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.04.010
- Mok, A. (1997). Student empowerment in an English language enrichment programme: An action research project in Hong Kong. Educational Action Research, 5(2), 305–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650799700200024
- Morley, C., & Clarke, J. (2020). From crisis to opportunity? Innovations in Australian social work field education during the COVID-19 global pandemic. Social Work Education, 39(8), 1048–1057. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2020.1836145
- Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
- Preyde, M., Ardal, F., Chevalier, P., Sulman, J., & Savage, D. (2013). Integrated knowledge translation: Hospital-based social work. Social Work Research, 37(4), 339–347. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/svt027
- Pyhältö, K., Stubb, J., & Lonka, K. (2009). Developing scholarly communities as learning environments for doctoral students. International Journal for Academic Development, 14(3), 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/13601440903106551
- Sanders, J. E., Antia, H., Bernal, E., Landon, J., Reed, A. J., Seale, A. A., Sullivan, H., Sutton, E., Arundel, M. K., & Csiernik, R. (2022). Support and aid to families electronically (SAFE): Addressing intersecting academic and community needs. Journal of Social Work Education, 59(4), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2022.2089305
- Sanders, J. E., Carrothers, E., Gamble, O., Neeb, D., & Arundel, M. K. (2025). The cost of caregiving: The disproportionate and invisible impact of covid-19 on women. Affilia, 0(0), 08861099251317493. https://doi.org/10.1177/08861099251317493
- Sanders, J. E., Seale, A., Lewis, V., Arundel, M. K., & Csiernik, R. (2024). A feasibility study of the safe pilot program: A university–school board partnership in Ontario. Research on Social Work Practice, 34(2), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497315231159059
- Sanders, J. E., Seale, A., Wilton, L., Carrothers, E., Siddall, M., Pereira, Z., Watson, E., Bernardi, K., Arundel, M. K., & Csiernik, R. (2024). “A better me for my children”: A call for systemic relational family work in child and youth mental health. Families in Society, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/10443894241261743
- Sperstad, R., Pehler, S. R., Ackerson, S., Brunsell, K., Gyorog, E., & Sisto, H. (2020). Student voices during action research impact outcomes in nursing quality improvement project. The Journal of Nursing Education, 59(1), 42–45. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20191223-10
- Toker, S., & Baturay, M. H. (2019). What foresees college students’ tendency to use Facebook for diverse educational purposes? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0139-0
- Valtchuk, O., & Class, B. (2021). ‘It really suits the objectives of the master’s’: How a student Facebook group chat contributes to situated learning in an interpreter training programme. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer, 15(3), 378–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750399X.2021.1885231
- Waring, J. J., & Bishop, S. (2010). “Water cooler” learning: Knowledge sharing at the clinical “backstage” and its contribution to patient safety. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 24(4), 325–342. https://doi.org/10.1108/14777261011064968
- Warren, C. A., & Marciano, J. E. (2018). Activating student voice through Youth Participatory Action Research (YPAR): Policy-making that strengthens urban education reform. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 31(8), 684–707. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2018.1478154
- White, G. W., Suchowierska, M., & Campbell, M. (2004). Developing and systematically implementing participatory action research. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 85, 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2003.08.109
- Yarberry, S., & Sims, C. (2021). The impact of COVID-19-prompted virtual/remote work environments on employees’ career development: social learning theory, belongingness, and self-empowerment. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 23(3), 237–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/15234223211017850
