Abstracts
Résumé
L’objectif de cette étude est de réaliser une analyse logique afin d’évaluer le potentiel du programme La Cour d’école à prévenir la violence en milieu scolaire chez des jeunes de 5e année du primaire. L’analyse logique se fait en trois étapes : (1) élaboration de la théorie du programme ; (2) construction du cadre conceptuel, où des données sur les effets attendus de différents programmes de prévention sont colligées ; et (3) comparaison du programme de prévention avec les données colligées afin de se prononcer sur le potentiel du programme de prévention. Afin de réaliser l’analyse logique, des documents officiels et les concepteurs de La Cour d’école ont été consultés afin de bâtir la théorie du programme. Ensuite, un bilan des synthèses systématiques (SS) a été réalisé. Les résultats des synthèses systématiques ont ensuite été comparés aux composantes de La Cour d’école. Ces résultats indiquent que La Cour d’école offre des activités pertinentes à la prévention de la violence en milieu scolaire. Afin d’en bonifier l’efficacité, les écoles qui participent à ce programme pourraient envisager d’offrir des services particuliers aux auteurs et aux victimes d’agression, de même qu’aux enseignants et aux parents, en vue d’en bonifier les effets.
Mots-clés :
- Violence,
- école,
- prévention,
- analyse logique,
- évaluation,
- jeunes
Abstract
The objective of this study was to conduct a logic analysis to assess the Cour d’École program’s potential for preventing school violence among youth aged 10 to 11. This logic analysis was carried out in three steps : (1) formulation of the program theory, (2) construction of a conceptual framework based on data collected regarding the expected effects of various prevention programs, and (3) comparison of the prevention program with the collected data to assess the relevance and soundness of the initiative. To conduct this logic analysis, official documents and the Cour d’École project developers were consulted. Additionally, a review of systematic reviews was carried out, with the findings from these reviews then compared with the components of Cour d’École. The results suggest that Cour d’École offers activities likely to prevent school violence. To enhance its effectiveness, schools participating in the program could consider offering specific services to both victims and authors of violence. Services could also be provided to teachers and parents to amplify the program’s impact.
Keywords:
- Violence,
- school,
- prevention,
- logic analysis,
- evaluation,
- youth
Resumen
El objetivo de este estudio fue realizar un análisis lógico con el fin de evaluar el potencial del proyecto La Cour d’école para prevenir la violencia en el entorno escolar entre jóvenes de 10 a 11 años. El análisis lógico se lleva a cabo en tres etapas : 1) elaboración de la teoría del programa, 2) construcción del marco conceptual en el que se recopilan datos sobre los efectos esperados de distintos proyectos de prevención, y 3) comparación del proyecto de prevención con los datos recopilados con el fin de pronunciarse sobre la pertinencia del proyecto. Para realizar el análisis lógico, se consultaron documentos oficiales y a los diseñadores de La Cour d’école ; se llevó a cabo una revisión de síntesis sistemáticas y se compararon los resultados de dichas síntesis con los componentes de. Los resultados indican que La Cour d’école ofrece actividades susceptibles de prevenir la violencia en el entorno escolar. Con el fin de mejorar su eficacia, las escuelas que participan en el proyecto podrían considerar ofrecer servicios específicos a las víctimas y los agresores. Asimismo, podrían ofrecerse servicios a docentes y padres para potenciar sus efectos.
Palabras clave:
- Violencia,
- escuela,
- prevención,
- análisis lógico,
- evaluación,
- jóvenes
Appendices
Références
- Alford, A. A., et Derzon, J. (2012). Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of School-Based Programs to Reduce Multiple Violent and Antisocial Behavioral Outcomes. Dans S.R. Jimerson, A.B. Nickerson, M.J. Mayer et M.J. Furlong (dirs.), Handbook of School Violence and School Safety : International Research and Practice (p. 593‑606). New York : Routledge.
- Blais, É., et Poirier, B. (2019). Les évaluations de l’efficacité des interventions policières : Résultats des synthèses systématiques. Dans M. Cusson, O. Ribaux, É. Blais, et Raynaud, Michel-Max (dirs.), Nouveau traité de sécurité intérieure : Sécurité intérieure et sécurité urbaine (p. 139‑148). Québec : Hurtubise et Septentrion.
- Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development : Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge : Harvard University Press.
- Brousselle, A., et Champagne, F. (2011). Program theory evaluation : Logic analysis. Evaluation and Program Planning, 34(1), 69‑78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.04.001
- Champagne, F., Brousselle, A., Contandriopoulos, A.-P., et Hartz, Z. (2011). L’analyse logique. Dans A. Brousselle, F. Champagne, A-P. Contandriopoulos, et Z. Hartz (dirs.), L’évaluation : Concepts et méthodes (p. 117‑126). Montréal : Presses de l’Université de Montréal. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv69t34x.9
- Chi, B., et Middaugh, E. (2005). Project LEAD (Legal Enrichment And Decision-making) Program Evaluation Report.
- Clarke, R. V. (2018). The links between realistic evaluation and situational crime prevention. Dans G. Farrell et A. Sidebottom (dirs.), Realist Evaluation for Crime Science (p. 47‑57). London : Routledge.
- Delahais, T., et Toulemonde, J. (2012). Applying contribution analysis : Lessons from five years of practice. Evaluation, 18(3), 281‑293.
- Directeur des poursuites criminelles et pénales. (2024). La Cour d’école-Synopsis.
- Doty, J. L., Girón, K., Mehari, K. R., Sharma, D., Smith, S. J., Su, Y.-W., Ma, X., Rijo, D., et Rousso, B. (2022). The Dosage, Context, and Modality of Interventions to Prevent Cyberbullying Perpetration and Victimization : A Systematic Review. Prevention Science, 23(4), 523‑537. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-021-01314-8
- Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., et Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning : A meta‐analysis of school‐based universal interventions. Child development, 82(1), 405‑432.
- Eck, J. E. (2006). When is a bologna sandwich better than sex ? A defense of small-n case study evaluations. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 2(3), 345‑362.
- Fagan, A. A. (2021). Developmental prevention programs intended to change peer risk and protective factors : A review of the evaluation literature. Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology, 7, 87‑111.
- Fagan, J., et Tyler, T. R. (2005). Legal socialization of children and adolescents. Social Justice Research, 18, 217‑241.
- Farrington, D. P. (2003). Methodological quality standards for evaluation research. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 587(1), 49‑68.
- Farrington, D. P., et Ttofi, M. M. (2009). School‐based programs to reduce bullying and victimization. Campbell systematic reviews, 5(1), i‑148.
- Farrington, D. P., Gaffney, H., Lösel, F., et Ttofi, M. M. (2017). Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of developmental prevention programs in reducing delinquency, aggression, and bullying. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 33, 91‑106.
- Farrington, David P., Denise C. Gottfredson, Lawrence W. Sherman, et Brandon C. Welsh. (2002). The Maryland Scientific Methods Scale. Dans (dir. L.W. Sherman, D.P. Farrington, B.C. Welsh, et D.L. MacKenzie), Evidence‐Based Crime Prevention, pp. 13-21. New York : Routledge.
- Fazel, S., Burghart, M., Wolf, A., Whiting, D., et Yu, R. (2024). Effectiveness of violence prevention interventions : Umbrella review of research in the general population. Trauma, Violence, et Abuse, 25(2), 1709‑1718.
- Fraguas, D., Díaz-Caneja, C. M., Ayora, M., Durán-Cutilla, M., Abregú-Crespo, R., Ezquiaga-Bravo, I., Martín-Babarro, J., et Arango, C. (2021). Assessment of school anti-bullying interventions : A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. JAMA pediatrics, 175(1), 44‑55.
- Gaffney, H., Farrington, D. P., Espelage, D. L., et Ttofi, M. M. (2019a). Are cyberbullying intervention and prevention programs effective ? A systematic and meta-analytical review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 45, 134‑153.
- Gaffney, H., Ttofi, M. M., et Farrington, D. P. (2019b). Evaluating the effectiveness of school-bullying prevention programs : An updated meta-analytical review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 45, 111‑133.
- Gaffney, H., Ttofi, M. M., et Farrington, D. P. (2021a). Effectiveness of school‐based programs to reduce bullying perpetration and victimization : An updated systematic review and meta‐analysis. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 17(2), e1143.
- Gaffney, H., Ttofi, M. M., et Farrington, D. P. (2021b). What works in anti-bullying programs ? Analysis of effective intervention components. Journal of School Psychology, 85, 37-56.
- Gates, M., Gates, A., Pieper, D., Fernandes, R. M., Tricco, A. C., Moher, D., Brennan, S. E., Li, T., Pollock, M., et Lunny, C. (2022). Reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions : Development of the PRIOR statement. BMJ, 378.
- Grant, M. J., et Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews : An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information et Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91‑108.
- Grant, T. A. (2012). A meta-analysis of school-based interventions for middle schoolers : Academic, behavioral, and social outcomes. Thesis. Fordham University.
- Hajnal, A. (2021). Cyberbullying Prevention : Which Design Features Foster the Effectiveness of School-Based Programs ? Intersections. East European Journal of Society and Politics, 7(1), 40‑58.
- Hensums, M., De Mooij, B., Kuijper, S. C., Fekkes, M., et Overbeek, G. (2023). What works for whom in school-based anti-bullying interventions ? An individual participant data meta-analysis. Prevention Science, 24(8), 1435‑1446.
- Homel, R. (2013). Developmental crime prevention. Dans N. Tilley (dir.), Handbook of crime prevention and community safety (p. 97‑132). London : Willan.
- Jiménez-Barbero, J. A., Ruiz-Hernández, J. A., Llor-Zaragoza, L., Pérez-García, M., et Llor-Esteban, B. (2016). Effectiveness of anti-bullying school programs : A meta-analysis. Children and Youth Services Review, 61, 165‑175.
- Kennedy, R. S. (2020). A meta-analysis of the outcomes of bullying prevention programs on subtypes of traditional bullying victimization : Verbal, relational, and physical. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 55, 101485.
- Khandker, S. R., Koolwal, G. B., et Samad, H. A. (2009). Handbook on Impact Evaluation : Quantitative Methods and Practices. World Bank Publications.
- Lee, S., Kim, C.-J., et Kim, D. H. (2015). A meta-analysis of the effect of school-based anti-bullying programs. Journal of Child Health Care, 19(2), 136‑153.
- Limber, S. P. (2011). Development, evaluation, and future directions of the Olweus Bullying Prevention Program. Journal of School Violence, 10(1), 71‑87.
- Limber, S. P., Olweus, D., Wang, W., Masiello, M., et Breivik, K. (2018). Evaluation of the Olweus Bullying Prevention Program : A large scale study of US students in grades 3–11. Journal of School Psychology, 69, 56‑72.
- Mayne, J. (2001). Addressing attribution through contribution analysis : Using performance measures sensibly. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 16(1), 1-24.
- Mayne, J. (2017). Théories du changement : Comment élaborer des modèles utiles. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 32(2), 174‑201. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.31144
- Mayne, J. (2020). Assumptions in theories of change. Evaluation and Program Planning, 98, 102 276.
- McKeown, S., et Mir, Z. M. (2021). Considerations for conducting systematic reviews : Evaluating the performance of different methods for de-duplicating references. Systematic Reviews, 10, 1‑8.
- Merrell, K. W., Gueldner, B. A., Ross, S. W., et Isava, D. M. (2008). How Effective Are School Bullying Intervention Programs ? A Meta-Analysis of Intervention Research. School Psychology Quarterly, 23(1), 26‑42. https://doi.org/10.1037/1045-3830.23.1.26
- Mula-Falcón, J., et González, C. C. (2023). Effectiveness of cyberbullying prevention programmes on perpetration levels : A meta-analysis. Revista Fuentes, 25(1), 12‑25.
- Ng, E. D., Chua, J. Y. X., et Shorey, S. (2022). The effectiveness of educational interventions on traditional bullying and cyberbullying among adolescents : A systematic review and meta-analysis. Trauma, Violence, et Abuse, 23(1), 132‑151.
- Olweus, D. (1994). Bullying at school : Basic facts and effects of a school based intervention program. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 35(7), 1171‑1190.
- Olweus, D., et Limber, S. P. (2009). The Olweus bullying prevention program : Implementation and evaluation over two decades. Dans S.R. Jimerson, S.M. Swearer, et D.L. Espelage (dirs.), Handbook of bullying in schools (p. 377‑399). New York : Routledge.
- Ouimet, A.-M., et Morin, D. (2017). L’analyse logique comme outil de soutien à l’application des connaissances dans le domaine psychosocial. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 32(1), 131‑142.
- Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., et Brennan, S. E. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement : An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372.
- Park‐Higgerson, H., Perumean‐Chaney, S. E., Bartolucci, A. A., Grimley, D. M., et Singh, K. P. (2008). The evaluation of school‐based violence prevention programs : A meta‐analysis. Journal of School Health, 78(9), 465‑479.
- Pawson, R., et Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic evaluation. Sage.
- Polanin, J. R., Espelage, D. L., Grotpeter, J. K., Ingram, K., Michaelson, L., Spinney, E., Valido, A., Sheikh, A. E., Torgal, C., et Robinson, L. (2022). A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions to decrease cyberbullying perpetration and victimization. Prevention Science, 23(3), 439‑454.
- Rey, L., Brousselle, A., et Dedobbeleer, N. (2012). Logic analysis : Testing program theory to better evaluate complex interventions. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 26(3), 61‑89.
- Rispens, J., Aleman, A., et Goudena, P. P. (1997). Prevention of child sexual abuse victimization : A meta-analysis of school programs. Child Abuse et Neglect, 21(10), 975‑987.
- Roman, C. G., Klein, H. J., et Wolff, K. T. (2018). Quasi-experimental designs for community-level public health violence reduction interventions : A case study in the challenges of selecting the counterfactual. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 14, 155‑185.
- Rossi, M. F., Beccia, F., Cittadini, F., Amantea, C., Aulino, G., Santoro, P. E., Borrelli, I., Oliva, A., Ricciardi, W., et Moscato, U. (2023). Workplace violence against healthcare workers : An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Public Health, 221, 50‑59.
- Runyan, C. W. (2003). Introduction : Back to the future—Revisiting Haddon’s conceptualization of injury epidemiology and prevention. Epidemiologic Reviews, 25(1), 60‑64.
- Runyan, C.W. (1998). Using the Haddon matrix : introducing the third dimension, Injury Prevention, 4, 302-307.
- Saunders, J., Robbins, M., et Ober, A. (2017). Moving from efficacy to effectiveness : Implementing the drug market intervention across multiple sites. Criminology et Public Policy, 16 (3), 787-814.
- Shen, L., Jiang, S., et Tan, S. (2025). The Effectiveness of School-Based Programs on Aggressive Behaviors among Children and Adolescents : A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Research on Social Work Practice, 35(2), 149‑169.
- Sherman, L. W., Gottfredson, D. C., MacKenzie, D. L., Eck, J., Reuter, P., et Bushway, S. (1997). Preventing crime : What works, what doesn’t, what’s promising : A report to the United States Congress. National Institute of Justice Washington, DC.
- Skeen, S., Laurenzi, C. A., Gordon, S. L., Du Toit, S., Tomlinson, M., Dua, T., Fleischmann, A., Kohl, K., Ross, D., et Servili, C. (2019). Adolescent mental health program components and behavior risk reduction : A meta-analysis. Pediatrics, 144(2), e20183488.
- Taxman, F.S. (2025). Implementation science (IS) – A game changer for criminology and criminal justice. Criminology and Public Policy, 24(2), 151-164.
- Taxman, F.S., Henderson, C., Young, D.W., et Farrell, J. (2014). The impact of training interventions on organizational readiness to support innovations in juvenile justice offices. Administration of Mental Health Policy and Mental Health Services Research, 41(2), 177-188.
- Tobler, N. S., et Stratton, H. H. (1997). Effectiveness of school-based drug prevention programs : A meta-analysis of the research. Journal of primary prevention, 18, 71‑128.
- Traoré, I., Simard, M., et Julien, D. (2024). Enquête québécoise sur la santé des jeunes du secondaire : Résultats de la troisième édition – 2022-2023 (p. 759). Institut de la statistique du Québec.
- Ttofi, M. M., et Farrington, D. P. (2011). Effectiveness of school-based programs to reduce bullying : A systematic and meta-analytic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7, 27‑56.
- Ttofi, M., et Farrington, D. (2009). What works in preventing bullying : Effective elements of anti‐bullying programmes. Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research, 1(1), 13‑24.
- Wilson, S. J., Lipsey, M. W., et Derzon, J. H. (2003). The effects of school-based intervention programs on aggressive behavior : A meta-analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71(1), 136.