Abstracts
Résumé
Parmi les différentes interventions développées dans le domaine de la délinquance sexuelle, le GLM (Good Lives Model), modèle de réhabilitation humaniste et positiviste centré sur l’identification des besoins et le développement des ressources internes et externes de l’individu, connaît un intérêt clinique grandissant. Les fondements du GLM et ceux de la désistance reposent sur une conception positive du changement en se basant sur les ressources de la personne plutôt que sur les risques. Dans le cadre de cette contribution, les différentes étapes d’intervention du GLM (adaptées aux adolescents) seront présentées et illustrées à partir de l’analyse d’un suivi d’un mineur délinquant sexuel. Partant d’une lecture axée sur les besoins, l’intervention permet de développer de nouvelles façons de se percevoir et d’être perçu et, de la sorte, d’influencer positivement une dynamique d’abandon des comportements déviants sur le plan sexuel.
Mots-clés :
- Délinquance sexuelle,
- désistement assisté,
- Good Lives Model,
- adolescence
Abstract
Among the various interventions developed in the field of sexual delinquency, the Good Lives Model (GLM), a humanistic and positivist rehabilitation model that focuses on identifying needs and developing internal and external resources, is of growing clinical interest. The foundations of GLM and of desistance are based on a positive conception of change that is oriented towards the individual’s resources rather than risks. This article presents the different stages of intervention according to GLM (adapted to adolescents) and illustrates them with examples from a follow-up study of juvenile sex offenders. Needs-based analysis and interventions under GLM can have a positive effect on the dynamic of desistance and offer new ways of perceiving oneself and of being perceived, providing an important influence in abandoning sexually deviant behavior.
Keywords:
- Sexual offending,
- desistance,
- Good Lives Model,
- adolescence
Resumen
Entre las diferentes intervenciones desarrolladas en el campo de la delincuencia sexual, el MGL (Modelo Good Lives), un modelo de rehabilitación humanista y positivista centrado en la identificación de las necesidades y el desarrollo de los recursos internos y externos del individuo, conoce un interés clínico creciente. Los fundamentos del MGL y los del desistimiento, se basan en una concepción positivista del cambio, basándose en los recursos de la persona en vez de en los riesgos. En el marco de esta contribución, las diferentes etapas de intervención del MGL (adaptadas a los adolescentes) serán presentadas e ilustradas a partir del análisis del seguimiento de un menor delincuente sexual. Partiendo de una lectura e intervención centrada en las necesidades, la intervención permite desarrollar nuevas formas de percibirse y de ser percibido y así influenciar positivamente una dinámica de abandono de los comportamientos desviados en el plano sexual.
Palabras clave:
- Delincuencia sexual,
- desistimiento asistido,
- Modelo Good Lives,
- adolescencia
Appendices
Références
- Adshead, M., Beech, A., Fisher, D., Griffin, H., Leeson, S., Morgan, J.,… Wylie, L. (2013). The Good Lives Model for adolescents who sexually harm. Brandon, VT : Safer Society Press.
- Burnett, R. et McNeill, F. (2005). The place of the officer-offender relationship in assisting offenders to desist from crime. Probation Journal, 52(3), 221-242.
- Corneille, S. et Devillers, B. (2017). Quand le Good Lives Model rencontre les travailleurs psychosociaux : une invitation à un changement de posture professionnelle. Service social, interventions en matière d’agressions sexuelles, 63(1), 12-28.
- De Vries Robbé, M., Mann, R. E., Maruna, S. et Thornton, D. (2015). An exploration of protective factors supporting desistance from sexual offending. Sexual Abuse, 27(1), 16-33.
- Everhart Newman, J. L., Larsen, J. L., Thompson, K., Cyperski, M. et Burkhart, B. R. (2018). Heterogeneity in male adolescents with illegal sexual behavior : A latent profile approach to classification. Sexual Abuse, 1079063218784554
- F.-Dufour, I., Villeneuve, M.-P. et Perron, C. (2018). Les interventions informelles de désistement assisté : une étude de la portée. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 60(2), 206-240.
- Farmer, M., Beech, A. R. et Ward, T. (2012). Assessing desistance in child molesters : A qualitative analysis. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(5), 930-950.
- Farmer, M., McAlinden, A. M. et Maruna, S. (2015). Understanding desistance from sexual offending : A thematic review of research findings. Probation Journal, 62(4), 320-335.
- Fortune, C. A. (2018). The Good Lives Model : A strength-based approach for youth offenders. Aggression and violent behavior, 38, 21-30.
- Fox, B. et DeLisi, M. (2018). From criminological heterogeneity to coherent classes : Developing a typology of juvenile sex offenders. Youth violence and juvenile justice, 16(3), 299-318.
- Gendreau, P., Little, T. et Goggin, C. (1996). A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism : What works !. Criminology, 34(4), 575-608.
- Glowacz, F. et Born, M. (2013). Do adolescent child abusers, peer abusers, and non-sex offenders have different personality profiles ? European child & adolescent psychiatry, 22(2), 117-125.
- Glowacz, F. (2015). Protection de la Jeunesse de 1965 à 2015 : Évolutions et Limites du droit et des interventions psycho-éducatives au regard de la désistance. Dans L. Bihain (dir.), Protection de la jeunesse : 50 ans, le temps de la maturité et des réformes (p. 3-19). Liège, Belgique : Université de Liège, Atelier des Presses.
- Glowacz, F. et Camarda, S. (2017). Délit sexuel à l’adolescence : quels traitements judicaires ? Revue Internationale de Criminologie et de Police Technique et Scientifique, 70(2), 151-166.
- Göbbels, S., Ward, T. et Willis, G. M. (2012). An integrative theory of desistance from sex offending. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17(5), 453-462.
- Harris, D. A. (2017). Desistance from sexual offending : Behavioral change without cognitive transformation. Journal of interpersonal violence, 32(20), 3049-3070.
- Harris, D. A., Pedneault, A. et Willis, G. (2019). The pursuit of primary human goods in men desisting from sexual offending. Sexual Abuse, 31(2), 197-219.
- Healy, D. (2013). Changing fate ? Agency and the desistance process. Theoretical Criminology, 17(4), 557-574.
- Healy, D. (2014). Becoming a desister : Exploring the role of agency, coping and imagination in the construction of a new self. British Journal of Criminology, 54(5), 873-891.
- Hunter, J. A., Gilbertson, S. A., Vedros, D. et Morton, M. (2004). Strengthening community-based programming for juvenile sexual offenders : Key concepts and paradigm shifts. Child Maltreatment, 9(2), 177-189.
- Hunter, J. et Longo, R. (2004). Relapse prevention with juvenile sexual abusers : A holistic and integrated approach. Dans G. O’Reilly, W. L. Marshall, A. Carr et R. C. Beckett (dir.), The handbook of clinical intervention with young people who sexually abuse (p. 297-314). Hove, Royaume-Uni : Brunner-Routledge.
- Kennealy, P. J., Skeem, J. L., Manchak, S. M. et Eno Louden, J. (2012). Firm, fair, and caring officer-offender relationships protect against supervision failure. Law and Human Behavior, 36(6), 496.
- King, S. (2013). Transformative agency and desistance from crime. Criminology & criminal justice, 13(3), 317-335.
- Kirkwood, S. (2016). Desistance in action : An interactional approach to criminal justice practice and desistance from offending. Theoretical Criminology, 20(2), 220-237.
- Liem, M. et Richardson, N. J. (2014). The role of transformation narratives in desistance among released lifers. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41(6), 692-712.
- Lussier, P. et Blokland, A. (2014). The adolescence-adulthood transition and Robins’s continuity paradox : Criminal career patterns of juvenile and adult sex offenders in a prospective longitudinal birth cohort study. Journal of criminal justice, 42(2), 153-163.
- Lussier, P., Van Den Berg, C., Bijleveld, C. et Hendriks, J. (2012). A developmental taxonomy of juvenile sex offenders for theory, research, and prevention : The adolescent-limited and the high-rate slow desister. Criminal justice and behavior, 39(12), 1559-1581.
- Maruna, S. (2001). Making good : How ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives. Washington, DC : American Psychological Association.
- Maruna, S. et LeBel, T. P. (2003). Welcome home ? Examining the “re-entry court” concept from a strengths-based perspective. Western Criminology Review, 4, 91-107.
- Maruna, S., LeBel, T. P., Mitchell, N. et Naples, M. (2004). Pygmalion in the reintegration process : Desistance from crime through the looking glass. Psychology, Crime & Law, 10(3), 271-281.
- McAlinden, A. M., Farmer, M. et Maruna, S. (2017). Desistance from sexual offending : Do the mainstream theories apply ? Criminology & Criminal Justice, 17(3), 266-283.
- Moffitt, T. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior : A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674-701.
- Mohammed, M. (dir.). (2012). Les sorties de délinquance : théories, méthodes, enquêtes. La Découverte.
- Murphy, W. D. et Page, I. J. (2000). Relapse prevention with adolescent sex offenders. Dans D. R. Laws, S. M. Hudson et T. Ward (dir.), Remaking relapse prevention with sex offenders. A sourcebook (p. 353-368). Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage Publications.
- Noor, K. B. M. (2008). Case study : A strategic research methodology. American journal of applied sciences, 5(11), 1602-1604.
- Nugent, B. et Schinkel, M. (2016). The pains of desistance. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 16(5), 568-584.
- Paternoster, R. et Bushway, S. (2009). Desistance and the feared self : Toward an identity theory of criminal desistance. J. Crim. L. & Criminology, 99(4), 1103-1156.
- Polaschek, D. L. (2012). An appraisal of the risk–need–responsivity (RNR) model of offender rehabilitation and its application in correctional treatment. Legal and criminological Psychology, 17(1), 1-17.
- Polaschek, D. L. (2016). Desistance and dynamic risk factors belong together. Psychology, Crime & Law, 22(1-2), 171-189.
- Print, B. (dir.) (2013). The Good Lives Model for adolescents who sexually harm. Brandon, VT : Safer Society Press.
- Print, B. et O’Callaghan, D. (2004). Essentials of an effective treatment programme for sexually abusive adolescents : Offence specific treatment tasks. Dans G. O’Reilly, W. L. Marshall, A. Carr et R. C. Beckett (dir.), The handbook of clinical intervention with young people who sexually abuse (p. 237-274). Hove, Royaume-Uni : Brunner-Routledge.
- Puglia, R. et Glowacz, F. (2018). Adolescents délinquants en transition vers l’âge adulte : analyse du processus de désistance à partir de leur récit. Approches inductives : Travail intellectuel et construction des connaissances, 5(2), 71-101.
- Ryan, G., Lane, S., Davis, J. et Isaac, C. (1987). Juvenile sex offenders : Development and correction. Child Abuse & Neglect, 11(3), 385-395
- Stoll, A. et Jendly, M. (2018). (Re)connaître les mécanismes de la désistance : un état des savoirs. Jusletter, 1-23.
- Tardif, M., Jacob, M. et Quenneville, R. (2012). La délinquance sexuelle des mineurs. Les Presses de l’Université de Montréal.
- Ward, T. et Laws, D. R. (2010). Desistance from sex offending : Motivating change, enriching practice. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 9(1), 11-23.
- Ward, T., Mann, R. E. et Gannon, T. A. (2007). The Good Lives Model of offender rehabilitation : Clinical implications. Aggression and violent behavior, 12(1), 87-107.
- Ware, J. et Mann, R. E. (2012). How should “acceptance of responsibility” be addressed in sexual offending treatment programs ? Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17(4), 279-288.
- Wylie, L. A. et Griffin, H. L. (2013). G-map’s application of the Good Lives Model to adolescent males who sexually harm : A case study. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 19(3), 345-356.