Abstracts
Résumé
À partir de la théorie sociologique du contrecoup (backlash), cet article montre comment il s’est développé un mouvement d’opposition presque généralisé au sein de la classe politique canadienne contre l’utilisation de la taxe carbone aux particuliers. Il s’agit de montrer comment l’anxiété économique des dernières années a été un élément déclencheur auprès de l’opinion publique qui s’est mise à réévaluer son appui, non pas à la lutte contre les changements climatiques, mais à l’utilisation de la taxe carbone. Par la suite, le texte examine comment s’est développé ce contrecoup qui repose sur un processus de délégitimation qui est essentiel pour comprendre ce phénomène. Le texte montre quels sont les acteurs qui y ont contribué ainsi que les valeurs de rechange proposées par les opposants.
Mots-clés :
- contrecoup,
- taxe carbone,
- anxiété économique,
- délégitimation,
- conservateurs
Abstract
Starting from the sociological theory of backlash, this article shows how a movement opposing the Carbon Tax on Individuals first developed, then spread, to become policy across the quasi-totality of the Canadian political class. The article explains how growing economic anxiety, over the last few years, triggered a re-evaluation of the public’s support, not of climate-change policy per se, but specifically of the tax as a tool to fight climate change. Further, the article examines how this backlash took hold, starting with a process of delegitimization, which is essential to understand this phenomenon. The article identifies contributing actors, as well as the alternatives values proposed by the opponents of the tax.
Keywords:
- backlash,
- carbon tax,
- economic anxiety,
- delegitimization,
- conservatives
Appendices
Bibliographie
- Abacus. (2018). Polling results: Perceptions of carbon pricing in Canada. Repéré à https://ecofiscal.ca/reports/polling-results-perceptions-carbon-pricing-canada/.
- Angus Reid. (2025). Centre-left support for carbon tax still strong as concern over climate change declines from four years ago. Repéré à https://angusreid.org/carbon-tax-climate-change-poilievre-freeland-carney-trudeau/.
- Alter, K. J., et Zürn, M. (2020). Conceptualising backlash politics: Introduction to a special issue on backlash politics in comparison. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 22(4), 563-584. Repéré à https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1369148120947958.
- Association canadienne des producteurs pétroliers. (2022). Mémoire soumis au Comité permanent de l’environnement et du développement durable Technologies propres au Canada. Repéré à https://www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Committee/441/ENVI/Brief/BR12034965/br-external/CanadianAssociationOfPetroleumProducers-10694049-f.pdf.
- Barasko, M., Sabet D. M., et Schaffner, D. (2014). Understanding Political Science Research Methods. The challenge of inference, New York, Routledge.
- Ewald, J., Sterner T., et Sterner, E. (2022). Understanding the resistance to carbon taxes: Drivers and barriers among the general public and fuel-tax protesters, Resource and Energy Economics, 70, 1-19.
- Ipsos. (2023). Six in Ten (59 %, +3 pts) Canadians Agree That if Canada's Government Does Not Act Now to Combat Climate Change, It Will Be Failing the People of Canada. Repéré à https://www.ipsos.com/en-ca/six-in-ten-canadians-agree-if-canadas-government-does-not-act-now-combat-climate-change-failing.
- Patterson, J. J. (2023). Backlash to Climate policy. Global Environmental Politics, 23(1), 68-90. Repéré à https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00684.
- Stephenson, A. (2024). Oil and gas lobby group says emissions cap could cost sector $75B in lost investment, CBC News. Repéré à https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/oil-and-gas-lobby-group-says-emissions-cap-could-cost-sector-75b-in-lost-investment-1.7216525.
- Switzer, J. W. (1997). Green Backlash. The History and Politics Environmental Opposition in the U.S. Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers.

