Abstracts
Abstract
Citizen science, a core component of the open science movement, emphasizes public participation in scientific research and fosters inclusive, community-driven knowledge production. Libraries are increasingly recognized as critical facilitators of citizen science, offering infrastructure, support, and access to resources. This study investigates the intellectual structure of citizen science within the field of library and information science (LIS) through a co-citation analysis using data retrieved from Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus. The analysis identifies the most frequently co-cited authors and sources, revealing emerging research clusters and thematic trends. Findings show that while citizen science in LIS is a growing area of interest, the field remains relatively fragmented, with limited author interconnectivity and modest citation frequencies. The most frequently co-cited sources include journals focusing on academic and medical librarianship, highlighting the multidimensional relevance of citizen science across subfields. Keyword analysis reveals dominant themes such as open science, crowdsourcing, and digital humanities, which align with libraries’ evolving roles in participatory research. The study provides a comprehensive overview of current research dynamics and collaboration patterns, offering insights into the evolving role of libraries as active participants in citizen science initiatives.
Keywords:
- citizen science,
- open science,
- co-citation analysis,
- libraries,
- bibliometrics
Résumé
La science citoyenne, composante essentielle du mouvement de la science ouverte, met l’accent sur la participation du public à la recherche scientifique et favorise une production de connaissances inclusive et portée par les communautés. Les bibliothèques sont de plus en plus reconnues comme des acteurs clés de la science citoyenne, en offrant des infrastructures, un soutien et un accès aux ressources. Cette étude examine la structure intellectuelle de la science citoyenne dans le domaine des sciences de l’information et des bibliothèques (SIB) au moyen d’une analyse de co‑citations fondée sur des données extraites de Web of Science (WoS) et de Scopus. L’analyse identifie les auteurs et les sources les plus fréquemment co‑cités, révélant l’émergence de clusters de recherche et de tendances thématiques. Les résultats montrent que, bien que la science citoyenne suscite un intérêt croissant dans le domaine des SIB, celui‑ci demeure relativement fragmenté, avec une interconnectivité limitée entre les auteurs et des fréquences de citation modestes. Les sources les plus souvent co‑citées incluent des revues spécialisées en bibliothéconomie universitaire et médicale, soulignant la pertinence multidimensionnelle de la science citoyenne dans divers sous‑domaines. L’analyse des mots‑clés met en évidence des thèmes dominants tels que la science ouverte, le crowdsourcing et les humanités numériques, en cohérence avec l’évolution du rôle des bibliothèques dans la recherche participative. L’étude offre un aperçu complet des dynamiques actuelles de recherche et des modèles de collaboration, apportant un éclairage sur le rôle en transformation des bibliothèques en tant que participantes actives aux initiatives de science citoyenne.
Mots-clés :
- science citoyenne,
- science ouverte,
- analyse de citations,
- bibliothèques,
- bibliométrie
Appendices
Bibliography
- Alfaro-Ponce, B., Durán-González, R., Morales-Maure, L., & Sanabria-Z, J. (2024). Citizen science as a relevant approach to the challenges of complex thinking development in higher education: mapping and bibliometric analysis. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02853-5
- Barui, T., & Mazumder, S. (2023). Mapping Global Scientific Output on Citizen Science from 2012 to 2021: A Scientometric Analysis. Journal of Data Science, Informetrics, and Citation Studies, 2(2), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.5530/jcitation.2.2.10
- Bautista-Puig, N., Orduna-Malea, E., & Mongeon, P. (2024). The participation of public in knowledge production: a citizen science projects overview. ArXiv.org. https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.10829
- Bautista-Puig, N., De Filippo, D., Mauleón, E., & Sanz-Casado, E. (2019). Scientific Landscape of Citizen Science Publications: Dynamics, Content and Presence in Social Media. Publications, 7(1), 12–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7010012
- Bedessem, B., Julliard, R., & Montuschi, E. (2021). Measuring epistemic success of a biodiversity citizen science program: A citation study. PLOS ONE, 16(10), e0258350. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258350
- Birk, K., Tõiste, T., Ignat, T., Kaseorg, S., Neerut, L., Lembinen, L., Rozenberga, G., Tautkevičienė, G., Pranckutė, A., Sabaitytė, G., Bucevičiūtė, L., Zourou, K., Oikonomou, S., & Saviča, M. (2024). Implementing Citizen Science Activities in Baltic University Libraries: On the Road to a Citizen Science Hub. LIBER Quarterly: The Journal of the Association of European Research Libraries, 34(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.53377/lq.19068
- Booney, R. (1996). Citizen science: A Lab Tradition. Living Bird 15, 7–15
- Cavalier, D., Nickerson, C., Salthouse, R., Stanto, D. (2019). The Librarian’s Guide to Citizen Science. https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/orrery-media/misc/CitSci_Librarians_Guide_03_12.pdf?fbclid=IwAR0JMSbBt-rmKhImwndt-
- Chaubey, A. K., & Singh, A. (2021). Analysis of citizen science scientific publications: A scientometric study. DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/5645/
- Cigarini, A., Bonhoure, I., Vicens, J., Perelló, J. 2021. Public libraries embrace citizen science: Strengths and challenges. Library & Information Science Research, 43(2), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. lisr.2021.101090
- Cohen, C. M., Cheney, L., Khue Duong, Lea, B., & Unno, Z. P. (2015). Identifying Opportunities in Citizen Science for Academic Libraries. Issues in Science & Technology Librarianship, 79, 2–2. Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts. https://doi.org/10.29173/istl1629
- De Filippo, D., Lascurain, M. L., Pandiella-Dominique, A., & Sanz-Casado, E. (2020). Scientometric Analysis of Research in Energy Efficiency and Citizen Science through Projects and Publications. Sustainability, 12(12), 5175. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12125175
- Divyashree, R., Nellam, T. (2021). Environment, Citizen Science, libraries: Connecting the dots. U: ICOLAS 2021 – Seventh International Conference of Asian Special Libraries. November 24, 2021. Seoul, South Korea.
- Hacking, N., Lewis, J., & Evans, R. (2024). Mapping Approaches to “Citizen Science” and “Community Science” and Everything In-between: The Evolution of New Epistemic Territory?. Minerva, 62(4), 549–572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-024-09529-z
- Ignat, T., Ayris, P., Labastida I Juan, I., Reilly, S., Dorch, B., Kaarsted, T., & Overgaard, A. K. (2018). Merry work: libraries and citizen science. Insights the UKSG Journal, 31. https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.431
- Irwin, A. (1995). Citizen Science: A Study of People, Expertise, and Sustainable Development; Routledge: London, UK; New York, NY, USA.
- Ivanjko, T., Horvat, Z., & Ajanović, S. (2023). Citizen science in social sciences and humanities – trends and perspectives. ICERI Proceedings, 1, 2330–2336. https://doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2023.0642
- Tomislav Ivanjko, Goran Zlodi, & Horvat, Z. (2024). Građanska znanost. Sveučilište u Zagrebu, Filozofski fakultet - FFPress, Zagreb. https://doi.org/10.17234/9789533791333
- Kullenberg, C., & Kasperowski, D. (2016). What Is Citizen Science? – A Scientometric Meta-Analysis. PLoS ONE, 11(1), e0147152–e0147152. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147152
- Land-Zandstra, A.; Agnello, G.; Gültekin, Y.S. 2021. Participants in Citizen Science. In The Science of Citizen Science; Vohland, K., Land-Zandstra, A., Ceccaroni, L., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland. https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/16993/1/2021_Book_TheScienceOfCitizenScience.pdf
- Mumelaš, D., & Filipeti, A. (2025). Exploring the Perspectives of Croatian Librarians on Citizen Science. LIBER Quarterly the Journal of the Association of European Research Libraries, 35(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.53377/lq.19014
- Mumelaš, D., & Martek, A. (2024). Benefits of Citizen Science for Libraries. Publications, 12(1), 8–8. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications12010008
- Odenwald, S. (2018). A Citation Study of Citizen Science Projects in Space Science and Astronomy. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 3(2), 5. https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.152
- Odenwald, S. F. (2020). A citation study of earth science projects in citizen science. PLOS ONE, 15(7), e0235265. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235265
- Ridge, M. (2021). Why get involved in Citizen Science? A research library perspective. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4770995
- Schoenenberger, N., Zenzerović, P., & Tolić, A. (n.d.). Priručnik za građansku znanost. Retrieved June 6, 2025, from https://izradi.croatianmakers.hr/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Prirucnik-za-gradjansku-znanost-cijela-knjiga-i-korice.pdf
- Small, H. (1980). Co‐citation context analysis and the structure of paradigms. Journal of documentation, 36(3), 183-196.Journal of Documentation, 36(3), 183–196. https://doi.org/10.1108//jd
- Surwase, G., Sagar, A., S, K. B., & Bhanumurthy, K. (2011). Co-citation Analysis: An Overview - E-LIS repository. Rclis.org. http://eprints.rclis.org/17524/1/Co-citation.pdf
- Van Lare, S., Waltman, J., & de Rijke, J. (2023). VOSviewer 1.6.20. https://www.vosviewer.com
- Simine Vazire. (2018). Implications of the Credibility Revolution for Productivity, Creativity, and Progress. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(4), 411–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617751884
- Vicente-Saez, R., & Martinez-Fuentes, C. (2018). Open Science now: A systematic literature review for an integrated definition. Journal of Business Research, 88, 428–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.043
- Wehn, U., Ajates, R., Mandeville, C., Somerwill, L., Kragh, G., & Haklay, M. (2024). Opening science to society: How to progress societal engagement into (open) science policies. Royal Society Open Science, 11, 231309. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.231309
- Wu, Y., & Benaglia, M. F. (2024). Mapping the evolution path of citizen science in education: a bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Science Education, Part B. 14(2), 212-231. https://doi.org/10.1080//21548455.2023.2261600

