Abstracts
Abstract
A “floating collection” is a popular approach to public library collection management where materials are shelved where they are returned rather than sent back to a “home” location. While it has been suggested that this approach refreshes local branch collections and reduces transit costs, it is unclear whether these benefits are realized. Concerns about this approach have also emerged as it relies on customer-initiated item movement such as holds, yet item movement resulting from holds fulfilment may exacerbate inequitable access to popular materials. In this analysis of a large and diverse urban library system, we show that floating does not appear to refresh local branch collections nor significantly impact transited materials. Our analysis also suggests that items seem to stay within a geographic area and gravitate towards branches with a higher volume of holds, meaning that items are unlikely to naturally return to branches with a lower volume of holds. Additionally, for items returned from elsewhere, a subsequent checkout at the return branch was more likely at branches with a high volume of holds.
Keywords:
- Collection management,
- public libraries,
- floating collections
Résumé
Une « collection flottante » est une approche populaire de la gestion des collections en bibliothèque publique, selon laquelle les documents sont rangés à l’endroit où ils sont retournés plutôt que renvoyés à un emplacement « d’origine ». Bien que l’on suggère que cette approche renouvelle les collections des succursales locales et réduise les coûts de transit, il demeure incertain que ces avantages se concrétisent. Des préoccupations ont également émergé, puisque cette approche repose sur les déplacements d’articles initiés par les usagers, notamment les réservations; or, les mouvements d’articles liés au traitement des réservations pourraient exacerber les inégalités d’accès aux documents populaires. Dans cette analyse d’un vaste réseau de bibliothèques urbaines diversifié, nous montrons que la collection flottante ne semble ni renouveler les collections locales ni avoir un impact significatif sur les documents en transit. Notre analyse suggère également que les documents tendent à demeurer dans une zone géographique donnée et à graviter vers les succursales ayant un volume élevé de réservations, ce qui signifie qu’ils sont peu susceptibles de retourner naturellement vers les succursales ayant un volume plus faible de réservations. De plus, pour les documents retournés depuis une autre succursale, un prêt subséquent au point de retour était plus probable dans les succursales où le volume de réservations est élevé.
Mots-clés :
- gestion de collection,
- bibliothèques publiques,
- collections flottantes
Appendices
Bibliography
- Bartlett, W. K. (2014). Floating collections: A collectiondevelopment model for long-term success. Libraries Unlimited.
- Canty, A, Frolek, L.C., Thornley, R.P., Andriats, C.J., Bombak, L.K., Lay, C.R., & Dell, M. (2012). Floating collections at Edmonton Public Library. Evidence-Based Library and Information Practice, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.18438/B8SC93
- Cessak-Obydzińska, B. A. (2016). Floating collections – An alternative concept in library collection management. Folia Bibliologica, 58, https://doi.org/10.17951/fb.2016.58.119
- Delf, L. (2024). Diverse and equitable collections at PLA 2024.Public Libraries Online. https://publiclibrariesonline.org/2024/05/diverse-and-equitable-collections-at-pla-2024/
- Lilijegren, L. (2022). Easier material management – at what cost? Nordic Journal of Library and Information Studies, 3(2), 33-53. https://doi.org/10.7146/njlis.v3i2.128547
- Liu, Z., Rankin, S., & Garg, N. (2024). Identifying and addressing disparities in public libraries with Bayesian latent variable modeling. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 38(20), 22258-22265.https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v38i20.30231
- Mattern, S. (2015, June 24). Middlewhere: Landscapes of library logistics.Urban Omnibus. https://urbanomnibus.net/2015/06/middlewhere-landscapes-of-library-logistics/
- Multnomah County Library. (n.d.). A new library Operations Center! https://multcolib.org/articles/new-library-operations-center
- Riebe, N. (2024, March 7). Edmonton’s population is booming and one city councillor wonders if we’re ready. CBC News. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/edmonton-s-population-is-booming-and-one-city-councillor-wonders-if-we-re-ready-1.7136203
- Rutherford, N. (2016, April 15). To float or not to float. Library Journal. https://www.libraryjournal.com/story/to-float-or-not-to-float-collection-management
- Rutherford, N. (2024, August 13). Are floating collections the answer? collectionHQ. https://www.collectionhq.com/are-floating-collections-the-answer/
- Weber, K. (2014). The benefits and drawbacks of working with floating collections: The perceptions of public librarians. [Master’s thesis, University of North Carolina]. https://doi.org/10.17615/yjdh-8626

