Résumés
Abstract
This paper explores some common theoretical points between the sociologist Georg Simmel (1858-1918) and Max Horkheimer (1895-1973), the director of the Institut für Sozialforschung, “spiritus rector” and a key figure of the early Frankfurt School. In addition to some biographical connections linking Horkheimer to Simmel, they share particular views about the profound transformations in social and cultural life brought about by modernity. Both Simmel and Horkheimer focus on socialization processes resulting from rationalization, as well as the increasing individualization that characterize the stage of social agency. They both believe that modern life is defined by new forms of rational organization, largely influenced by the “metropolization” of social and cultural life. Horkheimer refers to this as “instrumental reason,” while Simmel describes it as the “intellectualization of life.” Moreover, they emphasize the concept of the “objectification of culture” - the growing necessity for individuals to engage with and incorporate the “objective” products of culture in order to affirm their identities (this is compounded by what Simmel calls the “externalization of life”). These last aspects for both authors may lead to new forms of social pathologies and alienation. Ultimately, this paper demonstrates Horkheimer’s reliance on Simmel’s social philosophy as he seeks to formalize his Critical Theory program.
Keywords:
- Simmel,
- Horkheimer,
- Critical Theory,
- subjectivity,
- rationality
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Abromeit, J. (2012). Max Horkheimer and the Foundations of the Frankfurt School. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Amat, M. (2018). Le Relationnisme philosophique de Georg Simmel : une idée de la culture. Paris : Honoré Champion.
- Barbosa, S.H. (2024). Exciting the Body. Sensoriality and Capitalism in Modern Culture. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Bueno, A. (2021). Pathology and vitality: on the crisis of modern life-forms, in H.Rosa, C.Henning, A.Bueno (eds.), Critical Theory and New Materialisms. New York-London: Routledge, pp. 123-140
- Carnevali, B.-Pinotti, A. (2020). Social Aesthetics, in G.Fitzi (ed.), The Routledge International Handbook of Simmel Studies, London-New York: Routledge, pp. 170-183.
- Dahme, H.-J. (1990). On the Current Rediscovery of Georg Simmel’s Sociology – a European Point of View. In M. Kaern, B. Philipps, R. Cohen (eds.), Georg Simmel and contemporary sociology, Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer, pp. 13-38.
- Esposito, E. (2020). Unpredictability, in N.B.Thylstrup, D.Agostinho, A.Ring, C.D’Ignazio, K.Veel (eds.), Uncertain Archives. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 533 – 540
- de la Fuente, E. (2008). The Art of Social Forms and the Social Forms of Art: The Sociology-Aesthetics Nexus in Georg Simmel’s Thought, in “Sociological Theory”, 26(4), pp. 344-362.
- Fitzi, G. (2018). Introduction: Ways Out of the European War, in “Simmel Studies”,22 (2), pp. 9-16.
- Frisby, D. (1986). Fragments of modernity. Theories of Modernity in the Work of Simmel, Kracauer and Benjamin. New York: Taylor&Francis.
- Goodstein, E. S., Harrington, A., Kemple, T., & Marcucci, N. (2022). A symposium on Georg Simmel: Essays on art and aesthetics, in “Thesis Eleven”, 173(1), pp. 111-126.
- Gordon, P.E, (2020). Migrants in the Profane. Critical Theory and the Question of Secularization. New Haven-London: Yale University Press.
- Habermas, J. (1993). Remarks on the developments of Horkheimer’s work, in S.Benhabib, W.Bonß, J.McCole (eds.), On Max Horkheimer. New Perspectives, Cambridge-London: MIT Press, pp. 49-65.
- Habermas, J. (1996). Georg Simmel on Philosophy and Culture: Postscript to a Collection of Essays, in “Critical Inquiry”, 22(3), pp. 403-414.
- Hałas, E. – Manterys, A. (eds.) (2021). Relational Reason, Morals and Sociality. Berlin-New York: Peter Lang.
- Helle, H. J. (2001). Georg Simmel: Introduction to his Theory and Method. Wien/München: R.Oldenburg Verlag.
- Honneth, A. (2004). Organized Self-Realization: Some Paradoxes of Individualization, in “European Journal of Social Theory”, 7(4), pp. 463-478.
- Honneth, A. (2006). Die Unhintergehbarkeit des Fortschritts. Kants Bestimmungen des Verhaltnissen von Moral und Geschichte, in Pathologien der Vernunft. Geschichte und Gegenwart der Kritischen Theorie, Berlin: Suhrkamp, pp. 9-26
- Honneth, A. (2009). Pathologies of reason. On the Legacy of Critical Theory. New York: Columbia University Press.
- Horkheimer, M. (1987). “Dialektik der Aufklärung” und Schriften 1940-1950, GS 5. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.
- Horkheimer, M. (1991). Zur Kritik der instrumentellen Vernunf. Notizen 1949-1969, GS 6, Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.
- Horkheimer, M. (1985a). Vorträge und Aufzeichnungen 1949-1973: 1. Philosophisches; 2. Würdigungen; 3. Gespräche, GS 7, Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.
- Horkheimer, M. (1985b). Vorträge und Aufzeichnungen 1949-1973: 4. Soziologisches; 5. Universität und Studium, GS 8, Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.
- Horkheimer, M. (2002). Critical Theory. Selected essays. New York: The Continuum Publishing Company.
- Horkheimer M., Adorno, T.W. (2007). Dialectic of Enlightenment. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
- Jaeggi, R. (2015). Towards an Immanent Critique of Forms of Life, in “Raisons politiques”, 1 (57), pp. 13-29.
- Jaeggi, R. (2016). Alienation. New York: Columbia University Press.
- Jaeggi, R. (2018). Critique of Forms of Life. Cambridge/London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
- James, D. (2025). The Social Truth of Schopenhauer’s ‘Metaphysics of Pity’: Compassion and Critical Theory, in “European Journal of Philosophy”, e13085. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.13085
- Jaworski, Gary (1997). Georg Simmel and the American Prospect. New York: State University of New York Press.
- Jay, M. (1973). The Dialectical Imagination. A History of the Frankfurt School and the Institute of Social Research, 1923-1950, University of California Press, Berkeley-Los Angeles-London.
- Jay, M. (1976). The Extraterritorial Life of Siegfried Kracauer, in “Salmagundi”, 31/32, pp. 49-106.
- Jay, M. (1978). Adorno and Kracauer. Notes on a Troubled Friendship, in “Salmagundi”, 40, pp. 42-66.
- King, V., Gerisch, B., Rosa, H. (eds.) (2019) ‘Lost in perfection’: Impacts of Optimisation on Culture and Psyche. London: Routledge.
- King, V., Gerisch, B., Rosa, H. (2025). The Measured Life in the Digital Age: Optimization by Numbers. London: Routledge.
- Köhnke, K.C. (1996). Der junge Simmel – in Theoriebeziehungen und sozialen Bewegungen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
- Kusch, M. (2019). Georg Simmel and Pragmatism, in “European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy” [Online], XI-1, Online since 19 July 2019, connection on 21 December 2020. http://journals.openedition.org/ejpap/1490
- Lenhard, P. (2024). Café Marx. Das Institut für Sozialforschung von den Anfängen bis zur Frankfurter Schule, München: C.H.Beck.
- Luhmann, N. (1993). Gesellschaftsstruktur und Semantik. Studien zur Wissenssoziologie der modernen Gesellschaft. Band 2. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
- Maccarini, A. M. (2024). Imagine, predict or perform? Reclaiming the future in sociology beyond scientism and catastrophism, in “Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour”, 54(3), pp. 319–335.
- Mele, V. (2020). Georg Simmel and critical theory, in G.Fitzi (ed.), The Routledge International Handbook of Simmel Studies, London-New York: Routledge, pp. 261-275.
- Moebius, S. (2023). Georg Simmel’s political thought: Socialism and Nietzschean aristocratism, in “Journal of Classical Sociology”, vol. 23(1), pp. 20-62.
- Nedelmann, B. (1992). Geld und Lebensstil. Rhytmisch-symmetrische und individualistischspontane Lebensführung. in “Annali di Sociologia”, 8(2), pp. 89–101
- Nedelmann, B. (1993). Geld und Lebensstil: Georg Simmel - ein Entfremdungstheoretiker? In J.Kintzelé-P.Schneider (eds.), Georg Simmels Philosophie des Geldes, Frankfurt am Main: Hain,pp. 398-418.
- Podoksik, E. (2016). Neo-Kantianism and Georg Simmel's Interpretation of Kant, in “Modern Intellectual History”, 13(3), pp. 597-622.
- Podoksik, E. (2021). Georg Simmel and German Culture. Unity, Variety, and modern Discontent. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Rosa, H. (2013). Social Acceleration. A new Theory of Modernity. New York: Columbia University Press.
- Rosa, H. (2019). Resonance. A Sociology of Our Relationship to the World. New York: Polity Press.
- Rosa, H. (2020). Unverfügbarkeit. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
- Röß, J. (2023). Zwischen Freiheit und Entfremdung: Eine Sozialphilosophie des Geldes nach Georg Simmel. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.
- Ruggieri, D. (2015). Schopenhauer’s legacy and Critical Theory. Reflections on Max Horkheimer's unpublished archive material, in “Schopenhauer-Jahrbuch”, 96, pp. 93-108.
- Ruggieri, D. (2019). “Constructing a New Storey Beneath Historical Materialism”: Georg Simmel and the Foundations of a “Relational” Critical Theory, in “Berlin Journal of Critical Theory”, 3 (2), pp. 61-90.
- Ruggieri, D. (2020). The Unpublished Correspondence between Hans Simmel and Max Horkheimer (1936–1943). Some Remarks on Critical Theory, Georg Simmel’s Sociology, and the Tasks of the Institute for Social Research, in “Simmel Studies”, vol. 4 (1), pp. 127-158.
- Schmidt, A. (1993). Max Horkheimer’s intellectual physiognomy, in S.Benhabib, W.Bonß, J.McCole (eds.), On Max Horkheimer. New Perspectives, Cambridge-London: MIT Press, pp. 25-48.
- Schmidt, A. (2004). Tugend und Weltlauf. Vorträge und Aufsätze über die Philosophie Schopenhauers (1960-2003). Berlin-New York: Peter Lang.
- Simmel, G. (1958). The conflict in modern culture, and other essays, New York: Teacher College Press.
- Simmel, G. (1992a). Über eine Beziehung der Selektionslehre zur Erkenntnistheorie [1895], in Aufsätze und Abhandlungen 1894-1900, GSG 5, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 62-75.
- Simmel, G. (1992b). Socialismus und Pessimismus [1900], in Aufsätze und Abhandlungen 1894-1900, GSG 5, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 552–559.
- Simmel, G. (1997). Simmel on Culture: Selected Writings, ed. by D.Frisby and M.Featherstone. London: SAGE.
- Simmel, G. (2009). Sociology. Inquiries into the Construction of Social Forms, Leiden-Boston: Brill.
- Simmel, G. (2010). Tendencies in German life and thought since 1870 [1902], in Englischsprachige Veröffentlichungen. 1893-1910, GSG 18, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 167–202.
- Simmel, G. (2011). Philosophy of Money. New York: Taylor&Francis.
- Simmel, G. (2020). Essays on Arte and Aesthetics. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
- Stuart Hughes, H. (2008) [1958]. Consciousness and Society: The Reorientation of European Social Thought 1890–1933. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
- Wiggershaus, R. (1995). The Frankfurt School: Its History, Theories, and Political Significance Studies in Contemporary German Social Thought. Cambridge: MIT Press.
- Wood, A. (1991). Unsocial sociability: the Anthropological basis of Kantian Ethics, in “Philosophical Topics”, 19(1), 325-351.
- Zanfi, C. (2014). Bergson dans la philosophie allemande. Introduction aux textes de Driesch, Scheler, Simmel et Horkheimer. Dans François, A., Riquier, C., Zanfi, C. et Kisukidi, Y. (dir.), Annales bergsoniennes, VII Bergson, l'Allemagne, la guerre de 1914, Presses Universitaires de France, pp. 21-38.
10.7202/1058555ar