Le leadership habilitant pour favoriser les comportements d’entraide au travail

Désilets, Sylvain; Boivin, Marie-Pier; Boudrias, Jean-Sébastien

doi:https://doi.org/10.7202/1125443ar

Feuilleter les articles de ce numéro

Exposition indirecte à la nature : une solution prometteuse pour réduire ruminations et anxiété

Cancer pédiatrique au Québec : analyse qualitative des perceptions parentales sur les forces et défis familiaux

Plan de l’article

Retour au début
Résumé
Bibliographie

Boîte à outils

Citer cet article
Partager

Résumés

Résumé

Promouvoir la collaboration en milieu de travail apparait essentiel afin de faire face aux défis économiques et sociaux auxquels font face les organisations. Des recherches précédentes indiquent qu’un leadership habilitant favorise les comportements de citoyenneté organisationnelle, dont font partie les partie les comportements d’entraide. Cette étude, réalisée auprès de 320 travailleurs, vérifie les mécanismes spécifiques reliant le leadership habilitant aux comportements d’entraide. Parmi trois médiateurs étudiés, seule la qualité de la relation avec le supérieur prédit ce type de comportements. Des analyses exploratoires permettent d’expliquer 15 % de la variance des comportements d’entraide au travail.

Mots-clés :

comportements d’entraide,
leadership habilitant,
bien-être psychologique au travail,
engagement organisationnel affectif,
qualité de la relation avec son supérieur

Abstract

Promoting collaboration in the workplace appears essential to effectively address the economic and social challenges faced by our organizations. Previous research indicates that empowering leadership provides a fertile environment for helping behaviors. This study, involving 320 workers, aims to verify the underlying mechanisms linking empowering leadership to helping behaviors. Among three mediators examined, only the quality of the relationship with the superior predicts these behaviors. Additional exploratory analyses explain 15% of the variance in helping behavior in the workplace.

Keywords:

helping behaviours,
empowering leadership,
psychological well-being at work,
affective organizational commitment,
leader-member exchange

L’accès à cet article est réservé aux institutions et personnes abonnées, seul le résumé ou un extrait est affiché.

Consultez nos options d’accès pour obtenir plus d’informations.

Options d’accès

Parties annexes

Bibliographie

Ahearne, M. (2000). An examination of the effects of leadership empowerment behaviors and organizational citizenship behaviors on sales team performance [Thèse de doctorat, Indiana University]. ProQuest. https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/examination-effects-leadership-empowerment/docview/304596181/se-2
Google Scholar
Ahearne, M., Mathieu, J., & Rapp, A. (2005). To empower or not to empower your sales force? An empirical examination of the influence of leadership empowerment behavior on customer satisfaction and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 945−955. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.5.945
10.1037/0021-9010.90.5.945 Google Scholar
Albrecht, S. L., & Andreetta, M. (2011). The influence of empowering leadership, empowerment and engagement on affective commitment and turnover intentions in community health service workers: Test of a model. Leadership in Health Services, 24(3), 228−237. https://doi.org/10.1108/17511871111151126
10.1108/17511871111151126 Google Scholar
Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1−18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x
10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x Google Scholar
Amundsen, S., & Martinsen, Ø. L. (2014). Empowering leadership: Construct clarification, conceptualization, and validation of a new scale. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(3), 487−511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.009
10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.009 Google Scholar
Anderson, S. E., & Williams, L. J. (1996). Interpersonal, job, and individual factors related to helping processes at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(3), 282–296. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.81.3.282
10.1037/0021-9010.81.3.282 Google Scholar
Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Google Scholar
Belsley, D. A., Kuh, E., & Welsch, R. E. (2005). Regression diagnostics: Identifying influential data and sources of collinearity. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Google Scholar
Bosco, F. A., Aguinis, H., Singh, K., Field, J. G., & Pierce, C. A. (2015). Correlational effect size benchmarks. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(2), 431−449. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038047
10.1037/a0038047 Google Scholar
Boudrias, J. S., Montani, F., & Vandenberghe, C. (2021). How and when does psychological wellbeing contribute to proactive performance? The role of social resources and job characteristics. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(5), Article 2492. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052492
10.3390/ijerph18052492 Google Scholar
Boudrias, J. S., Montani, F., Vandenberghe, C., & Battistelli, A. (2023). Are wellbeing dimensions differentially related to employee proactive behavior? The joint moderating effects of knowledge job demands and empowering leadership. Current Psychology, 42(16), 13999−14011. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02638-y
10.1007/s12144-021-02638-y Google Scholar
Boudrias, J., Morin, A. J. S., & Lajoie, D. (2014). Directionality of the associations between psychological empowerment and behavioural involvement: A longitudinal autoregressive cross‐lagged analysis. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87(3), 437−463. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12056
10.1111/joop.12056 Google Scholar
Caillé, A. (2020). Innovation managériale au sein d’une industrie aéronautique : étude de l’effet des pratiques managériales habilitantes sur le bien-être et la performance des salariés [Thèse de doctorat, Université de Nantes]. Hal thèses. https://www.theses.fr/2020NANT1006.pdf
Google Scholar
Chen, G., Sharma, P. N., Edinger, S. K., Shapiro, D. L., & Farh, J. L. (2011). Motivating and demotivating forces in teams: Cross-level influences of empowering leadership and relationship conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(3), 541−557. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021886
10.1037/a0021886 Google Scholar
Chen, S., & Zhang, C. (2021). What happens to a black sheep? Exploring how multilevel leader-member exchange differentiation shapes the organizational altruism behaviors of low leader-member exchange minority. Group & Organization Management, 46(6), 1073−1105. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601121998584
10.1177/1059601121998584 Google Scholar
Chennamaneni, P. R., Echambadi, R., Hess, J. D., & Syam, N. (2016). Diagnosing harmful collinearity in moderated regressions: A roadmap. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 33(1), 172−182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2015.08.004
10.1016/j.ijresmar.2015.08.004 Google Scholar
Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874−900. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279602
10.1177/0149206305279602 Google Scholar
Deckop, J. R., Cirka, C. C., & Andersson, L. M. (2003). Doing unto others: The reciprocity of helping behavior in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 47(2), 101−113. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25075130
10.1023/A:1026060419167 Google Scholar
Duan, J., Wong, M., & Yue, Y. (2019). Organizational helping behavior and its relationship with employee workplace well-being. The Career Development International, 24(1), 18−36. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-01-2018-0014
10.1108/CDI-01-2018-0014 Google Scholar
Gabriel, A. S., Koopman, J., Rosen, C. C., & Johnson, R. E. (2018). Helping others or helping oneself? An episodic examination of the behavioral consequences of helping at work. Personnel Psychology, 71(1), 85−107. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12229
10.1111/peps.12229 Google Scholar
Gilbert, M. H., Dagenais-Desmarais, V., & Savoie, A. (2011). Validation d’une mesure de santé psychologique au travail. European Review of Applied Psychology, 61(4), 195−203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2011.09.001
10.1016/j.erap.2011.09.001 Google Scholar
Girard, S. (2010). Les relations entre les générations, les valeurs au travail et les comportements de citoyenneté organisationnelle [Mémoire de maîtrise, Université de Montréal]. Papyrus. https://umontreal.scholaris.ca/items/c5a3556c-5ca3-4a29-8dfe-3af0841e1aaa
Google Scholar
Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219−247. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048‑9843(95)90036‑5
10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5 Google Scholar
Guo, Y., Peng, Y., & Zhu, Y. (2023). How does empowering leadership motivate employee innovative behavior: A job characteristics perspective. Current Psychology, 42(21), 18280−18290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03000-6
10.1007/s12144-022-03000-6 Google Scholar
Harris, T. B., Li, N., Boswell, W. R., Zhang, X. A., & Xie, Z. (2014). Getting what's new from newcomers: Empowering leadership, creativity, and adjustment in the socialization context. Personnel Psychology, 67(3), 567−604. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12053
10.1111/peps.12053 Google Scholar
Hassan, S., Mahsud, R., Yukl, G., & Prussia, G. E. (2013). Ethical and empowering leadership and leader effectiveness. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 28(2), 133−146. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683941311300252
10.1108/02683941311300252 Google Scholar
Hayes, A. F. (2022). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (3^e éd.). The Guilford Press.
Google Scholar
Hirst, G., Walumbwa, F., Aryee, S., Butarbutar, I., & Chen, C. J. H. (2016). A multi-level investigation of authentic leadership as an antecedent of helping behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 139(3), 485−499. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10551-015-2580-X
10.1007/s10551-015-2580-x Google Scholar
Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513−524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513
10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513 Google Scholar
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1−55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
10.1080/10705519909540118 Google Scholar
Kim, M., & Beehr, T. A. (2017). Self-efficacy and psychological ownership mediate the effects of empowering leadership on both good and bad employee behaviors. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 24(4), 466−478. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051817702078
10.1177/1548051817702078 Google Scholar
Kim, M., & Beehr, T. A. (2018). Organization-based self-esteem and meaningful work mediate effects of empowering leadership on employee behaviors and well-being. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 25(4), 385−398. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051818762337
10.1177/1548051818762337 Google Scholar
Kim, M., & Beehr, T. A. (2023). Empowering leadership improves employees’ positive psychological states to result in more favorable behaviors. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 34(10), 2002−2038. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2022.2054281
10.1080/09585192.2022.2054281 Google Scholar
Kim, M., Beehr, T. A., & Prewett, M. S. (2018). Employee responses to empowering leadership: A meta-analysis. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 25(3), 257−276. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051817750538
10.1177/1548051817750538 Google Scholar
Kline, R. B. (2023). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (5^e éd.). The Guilford Press.
Google Scholar
Lai, F. Y., Lin, C. C., Lu, S. C., & Chen, H. L. (2021). The role of team–member exchange in proactive personality and employees’ proactive behaviors: The moderating effect of transformational leadership. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 28(4), 429−443. https://doi.org/10.1177/15480518211034847
10.1177/15480518211034847 Google Scholar
Leclerc, J. S. (2018). L'apport de la santé psychologique à la performance de tâche et innovante : vérification de mécanismes cognitif, motivationnel et social au sein de divers contextes d'emploi [Thèse de doctorat, Université de Montréal]. Scholaris. https://umontreal.scholaris.ca/server/api/core/bitstreams/f69f39be-4663-4f0f-b149-d1abb0d0b9a3/content
Google Scholar
Lee, A., Willis, S., & Tian, A. W. (2018). Empowering leadership: A meta‐analytic examination of incremental contribution, mediation, and moderation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(3), 306−325. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2220
10.1002/job.2220 Google Scholar
LePine, J. A., Erez, A., & Johnson, D. E. (2002). The nature and dimensionality of organizational citizenship behavior: A critical review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 52−65. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.52
10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.52 Google Scholar
Lin, W., Koopmann, J., & Wang, M. (2020). How does workplace helping behavior step up or slack off? Integrating enrichment-based and depletion-based perspectives. Journal of Management, 46(3), 385−413. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318795275
10.1177/0149206318795275 Google Scholar
MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(1), 99−128. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4
10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4 Google Scholar
Malo, M. (2014). La santé psychologique au travail : une modélisation ancrée dans la théorie de la conservation des ressources [Thèse de doctorat, Université de Montréal]. Scholaris. https://umontreal.scholaris.ca/server/api/core/bitstreams/ee2326c7-9acb-42f8-aae9-e0acdab7da83/content
Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler's (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 11(3), 320−341. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2
10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2 Google Scholar
Maxwell, S. E., & Cole, D. A. (2007). Bias in cross-sectional analyses of longitudinal mediation. Psychological Methods, 12(1), 23−44. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.23
10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.23 Google Scholar
Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., & Smith, C. A. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 538−551. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.4.538
10.1037/0021-9010.78.4.538 Google Scholar
Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(1), 20−52. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2001.1842
10.1006/jvbe.2001.1842 Google Scholar
Organ, D. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (2006). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature, antecedents, and consequences. Sage Publishing.
10.4135/9781452231082 Google Scholar
Oswald, A. J., Proto, E., & Sgroi, D. (2015). Happiness and productivity. Journal of Labor Economics, 33(4), 789−822. https://doi.org/10.1086/681096
10.1086/681096 Google Scholar
Podsakoff, N. P., Whiting, S. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & Blume, B. D. (2009). Individual-and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 122−141. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013079
10.1037/a0013079 Google Scholar
Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (1997). Impact of organizational citizenship behavior on organizational performance: A review and suggestions for future research. Human Performance, 10(2), 133−151. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1207/s15327043hup1002_5
10.1207/s15327043hup1002_5 Google Scholar
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers' trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 1(2), 107−142. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(90)90009-7
10.1016/1048-9843(90)90009-7 Google Scholar
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26(3), 513−563. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600307
10.1177/014920630002600307 Google Scholar
Raub, S., & Robert, C. (2010). Differential effects of empowering leadership on in-role and extra-role employee behaviors: Exploring the role of psychological empowerment and power values. Human Relations, 63(11), 1743−1770. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726710365092
10.1177/0018726710365092 Google Scholar
Riketta, M. (2008). The causal relation between job attitudes and performance: A meta-analysis of panel studies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 472−481. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.472
10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.472 Google Scholar
Rockstuhl, T., Dulebohn, J. H., Ang, S., & Shore, L. M. (2012). Leader–member exchange (LMX) and culture: A meta-analysis of correlates of LMX across 23 countries. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(6), 1097−1130. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029978
10.1037/a0029978 Google Scholar
Rogerson, P. A. (2001). Statistical methods for geography. SAGE Publications.
10.4135/9781849209953 Google Scholar
Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1−36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
10.18637/jss.v048.i02 Google Scholar
Rousseau, V., Aubé, C., Chiocchio, F., Boudrias, J. S., & Morin, E. M. (2008). Social interactions at work and psychological health: The role of leader-member exchange and work group integration. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38(7), 1755−1777. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00368.x
10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00368.x Google Scholar
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68−78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
10.1037//0003-066X.55.1.68 Google Scholar
Ryan, R. M., Duineveld, J. J., Di Domenico, S. I., Ryan, W. S., Steward, B. A., & Bradshaw, E. L. (2022). We know this much is (meta-analytically) true: A meta-review of meta-analytic findings evaluating self-determination theory. Psychological Bulletin, 148(11−12), 813–842. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000385
10.1037/bul0000385 Google Scholar
Smith, C. A., Organ, D. W., & Near, J. P. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68(4), 653–663. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.68.4.653
10.1037/0021-9010.68.4.653 Google Scholar
Stinglhamber, F., Bentein, K., & Vandenberghe, C. (2002). Extension of the three-component model of commitment to five foci: Development of measures and substantive test. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18(2), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.18.2.123
10.1027//1015-5759.18.2.123 Google Scholar
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2014). Using multivariate statistics (6^e éd.). Pearson Education.
Google Scholar
Tuckey, M. R., Bakker, A. B., & Dollard, M. F. (2012). Empowering leaders optimize working conditions for engagement: A multilevel study. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 17(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025942
10.1037/a0025942 Google Scholar
Van Dyne, L., & LePine, J. A. (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 108–119. https://doi.org/10.5465/256902
10.2307/256902 Google Scholar
Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17(3), 601–617. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700305
10.1177/014920639101700305 Google Scholar
Yahia, N. A., Montani, F., & Courcy, F. (2018). Le rôle des stresseurs sur le comportement d’innovation : quand le leadership habilitant du supérieur protège le potentiel d’innovation des travailleurs. Psychologie du travail et des organisations, 24(1), 51–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pto.2017.05.005
10.1016/j.pto.2017.05.005 Google Scholar
Yukl, G., O'Donnell, M., & Taber, T. (2009). Influence of leader behaviors on the leader‐member exchange relationship. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 24(4), 289–299. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940910952697
10.1108/02683940910952697 Google Scholar
Zapf, D., Dormann, C., & Frese, M. (1996). Longitudinal studies in organizational stress research: A review of the literature with reference to methodological issues. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 1(2), 145–169. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.1.2.145
10.1037/1076-8998.1.2.145 Google Scholar
Zhang, Z., Zhang, L., Xiu, J., & Zheng, J. (2020). Learning from your leaders and helping your coworkers: The trickle-down effect of leader helping behavior. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 41(6), 883–894. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-07-2019-0317
10.1108/LODJ-07-2019-0317 Google Scholar
Zou, W.-C., Tian, Q., & Liu, J. (2015). Servant leadership, social exchange relationships, and follower's helping behavior: Positive reciprocity belief matters. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 51, 147–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2015.08.012
10.1016/j.ijhm.2015.08.012 Google Scholar

Le leadership habilitant pour favoriser les comportements d’entraide au travailEmpowering leadership to foster helping behaviors in the workplace[Notice]

Conflits d’intérêts

Sources de financement

Résumé

Abstract

Bibliographie

Résumés

Résumé

Abstract

Parties annexes

Bibliographie

Outils de citation

Citer cet article

Exporter la notice de cet article