Le comodal en enseignement supérieur : revue de la littérature issue d’une recherche documentaire systémique de 2008 à 2021

Gérin-Lajoie, Serge; Roy, Normand; Diène Fay, Innocent; Beauparlant, René

doi:https://doi.org/10.18162/ritpu-2024-v21n3-03

Abdelmalak, M. (2014). Towards flexible learning for adult students: HyFlex design. Dans M. N. Ochoa et M. Searson (dir.), Proceedings of SITE 2014 – Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education 25th International Conference (p. 706‑712). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). https://www.learntechlib.org/p/130839

Google Scholar

Afacan, Y. (2018). Student experiences of blended learning in interior architecture. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 17(1), 399‑422. https://doi.org/10.28945/4122

10.28945/4122 Google Scholar

Almasi, M. et Zhu, C. (2018). Students’ perceptions of social presence in blended learning courses in a Tanzanian medical college. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 13(9), 107‑122. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v13i09.8566

10.3991/ijet.v13i09.8566 Google Scholar

Álvarez, A., Martín, M., Fernández-Castro, I. et Urretavizcaya, M. (2016). Supporting blended-learning: Tool requirements and solutions with OWLish. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(6), 1176‑1197. https://doi.org/n4tw

10.1080/10494820.2014.965180 Google Scholar

Amemado, D. (2010). Changements et évolution des universités conventionnelles sous l’influence des technologies de l’information et de la communication (TIC) : le cas du contexte universitaire nord-américain [thèse de doctorat, Université de Montréal, Canada]. Papyrus. https://hdl.handle.net/1866/4386

Google Scholar

Amemado, D. (2014). Integrating technologies in higher education: The issue of recommended educational features still making headline news. Open Learning, 29(1), 15‑30. https://doi.org/g8w8s6

10.1080/02680513.2014.908700 Google Scholar

Anderson, L. C. et Krichbaum, K. E. (2017). Best practices for learning physiology: Combining classroom and online methods. Advances in Physiology Education, 41(3), 383‑389. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00099.2016

10.1152/advan.00099.2016 Google Scholar

Angelone, L., Warner, Z. et Zydney, J. M. (2020). Optimizing the technological design of a blended synchronous learning environment. Online Learning, 24(3), 222‑240. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1271880

10.24059/olj.v24i3.2180 Google Scholar

Ashraf, M. I., Jumani, N. B. et Mehmood, A. (2020). The relationship between organizational climate and technology acceptance at university level. Journal of Educational Sciences & Research, 7(2), 49‑70.

Google Scholar

Bates, A. W., Desbiens, B., Donovan, T., Martel, É., Mayer, D., Paul, R., Poulin, R. et Seaman, J. (2017). Tracking online and distance education in Canadian universities and colleges: 2017 [rapport de recherche]. The National Survey of Online and Distance Education in Canadian Post‑Secondary Education. https://cdlra-acrfl.ca/...

Google Scholar

Beatty, B. (2007). Hybrid classes with flexible participation options – If you build it, how will they come? Dans M. Simonson (dir.), Annual Proceedings of Selected Research and Development Papers Presented at the 30th National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology (p. 15‑24). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED499889

Google Scholar

Beatty, B. (2010). Four fundamental principles for HyFlex – The pillars. HyFlex World. https://hyflexworld.wordpress.com/...

Google Scholar

Beatty, B. (2014). Hybrid courses with flexible participation – The HyFlex course design. Dans L. Kyei-Blankson et E. Ntuli (dir.), Practical applications and experiences in K‑20 blended learning environments (p. 153‑177). IGI Global. https://doi.org/n4tx

Google Scholar

Beatty, B. (2019). Hybrid-flexible course design. Implementing student-directed hybrid classes. EdTech Books. https://edtechbooks.org/...

10.59668/33 Google Scholar

Beatty, B. (2020, 2 décembre). How to use the HyFlex method to teach online and in person at the same time. Contact North. https://teachonline.ca/...

Google Scholar

Bell, J. (2016). Prerequisites for psychological involvement with robotic telepresence. Dans P. Kirby et G. Marks (dir.), Proceedings of Global Learn 2016 (p. 440-446). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). https://learntechlib.org/p/172798

Google Scholar

Bournot-Trites, M. et Surtees, V. (2015). A longitudinal investigation of changes in perceived social presence of off-site students in a blended M.Ed. program. Dans D. Rutledge et D. Slykhuis (dir.), Proceedings of SITE 2015 – Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (p. 191‑194). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). http://learntechlib.org/p/149988

Google Scholar

Bower, M., Dalgarno, B., Kennedy, G. E., Lee, M. J. W. et Kenney, J. (2015). Design and implementation factors in blended synchronous learning environments: Outcomes from a cross-case analysis. Computers & Education, 86, 1‑17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.006

10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.006 Google Scholar

Bower, M., Kenney, J., Dalgarno, B., Lee, M. J. W. et Kennedy, G. E. (2014). Patterns and principles for blended synchronous learning: Engaging remote and face-to-face learners in rich-media real-time collaborative activities. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(3). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1697

10.14742/ajet.1697 Google Scholar

Butz, N. T. et Askim-Lovseth, M. K. (2015). Oral communication skills assessment in a synchronous hybrid MBA programme: Does attending face-to-face matter for US and international students? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(4), 624‑639. https://doi.org/gcpht2

Google Scholar

Butz, N. T. et Stupnisky, R. H. (2016). A mixed methods study of graduate students’ self-determined motivation in synchronous hybrid learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 28, 85‑95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.10.003

10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.10.003 Google Scholar

Butz, N. T., Stupnisky, R. H., Pekrun, R., Jensen, J. L. et Harsell, D. M. (2016). The impact of emotions on student achievement in synchronous hybrid business and public administration programs: A longitudinal test of control-value theory. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 14(4), 441‑474. https://doi.org/10.1111/dsji.12110

10.1111/dsji.12110 Google Scholar

Cain, W., Bell, J., Cheng, C., Sawaya, S., Peterson, A., Arnold, B., Good, J., Irvine, V., McCue, R. et Little, T. (2015). Synchronous hybrid learning environments: Perspectives on learning, instruction, and technology in unique educational contexts. Dans D. Rutledge et D. Slykhuis (dir.), Proceedings of SITE 2015 – Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (p. 205‑210). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). http://learntechlib.org/p/149990

Google Scholar

Caravias, V. (2015). Blended learning environments: A phenomenographic study of Australian teachers’ conceptions and approaches. Dans C. Ho et G. Lin (dir.), Proceedings of eLearn 2015 – World Conference on EdTech (p. 285‑295). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). https://learntechlib.org/p/152025

Google Scholar

Cheng, C., Bell, J. et Liu, H. (2018). Toward a framework of embodiment and social presence in synchronous hybrid learning environments: An instructor perspective. Dans E. Langran et J. Borup (dir.), Proceedings of SITE 2018 – Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (p. 1374‑1383). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). https://learntechlib.org/p/182707

Google Scholar

Colasante, M., Bevacqua, J. et Muir, S. (2020). Flexible hybrid format in university curricula to offer students in‑subject choice of study mode: An educational design research project. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.53761/1.17.3.9

10.53761/1.17.3.9 Google Scholar

Collin, S. (2021, 17 janvier). Introduction à l’enseignement comodal : enjeux pédagogiques et technopédagogiques [conférence]. Université du Québec à Montréal. https://enseigner.uqam.ca/...

Google Scholar

Conklin, S., Trespalacios, J. et Lowenthal, P. (2019). Graduate students’ perceptions of interactions in a blended synchronous learning environment: A case study. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 20(4), 45‑59.

Google Scholar

Conseil supérieur de l’éducation. (2015). La formation à distance dans les universités québécoises : un potentiel à optimiser – Avis au ministre de l’Éducation, de l’Enseignement supérieur et de la Recherche. Gouvernement du Québec. https://cse.gouv.qc.ca/...

Google Scholar

Cunningham, U. (2014). Teaching the disembodied: Othering and activity systems in a blended synchronous learning situation. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(6), 33‑51. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i6.1793

10.19173/irrodl.v15i6.1793 Google Scholar

de Castro, A. B., Shapleigh, E., Bruck, A. et Salazar, M. K. (2015). Developing blended online and classroom strategies to deliver an occupational health nursing overview course in a multi‑state region in the United States. Workplace Health & Safety, 63(3), 121‑126. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165079915576919

10.1177/2165079915576919 Google Scholar

Detienne, L., Raes, A. et Depaepe, F. (2018). Benefits, challenges and design guidelines for synchronous hybrid learning: A systematic literature review. Dans T. Bastiaens, J. V. Braak, M. Brown, L. Cantoni, M. Castro, R. Christensen, G. V. Davidson-Shivers, K. DePryck, M. Ebner, M. Fominykh, C. Fulford, S. Hatzipanagos, G. Knezek, K. Kreijns, G. Marks, E. Sointu, E. K. Sorensen, J. Viteli, J. Voogt, … O. Zawacki-Richter (dir.), Proceedings of EdMedia – World Conference on Educational Media and Technology (p. 2004‑2009). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). https://learntechlib.org/p/184440

Google Scholar

Divanoglou, A., Chance-Larsen, K., Fleming, J. et Wolfe, M. (2018). Physiotherapy student perspectives on synchronous dual-campus learning and teaching. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(3), 88‑104. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3460

10.14742/ajet.3460 Google Scholar

Ellis, A. et Fouts, J. (1993). Research on educational innovations. Eye on Education.

Google Scholar

Ellis, A. et Fouts, J. (1994). Research on school restructuring. Eye on Education.

10.4324/9781315850887 Google Scholar

EPPI-Centre. (2010). EPPI-Centre methods for conducting systematic reviews. https://betterevaluation.org/...

Google Scholar

Gagnon, K., Young, B., Bachman, T., Longbottom, T., Severin, R. et Walker, M. J. (2020). Doctor of physical therapy education in a hybrid learning environment: Reimagining the possibilities and navigating a “new normal”. Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Journal, 100(8), 1268‑1277. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzaa096

10.1093/ptj/pzaa096 Google Scholar

Gérin-Lajoie, S., Roy, N., Faye, I. W. D. et Beauparlant, R. (2022). Processus de recension systématique sur l’enseignement comodal en enseignement supérieur 2008‑2021 (version révisée 2023‑03‑21). Borealis. https://doi.org/10.5683/SP3/KWVDEC

Google Scholar

Gleason, B. et Greenhow, C. (2017). Hybrid education: The potential of teaching and learning with robot-mediated communication. Online Learning Journal, 21(4), 159‑176. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1163459

10.24059/olj.v21i4.1276 Google Scholar

Gobeil-Proulx, J. (2019). La perspective étudiante sur la formation comodale, ou hybride flexible. Revue internationale des technologies en pédagogie universitaire, 16(1), 56‑67. https://doi.org/10.18162/ritpu-2019-v16n1-04

10.18162/ritpu-2019-v16n1-04 Google Scholar

González-Zamar, M.‑D., Abad-Segura, E., Luque de la Rosa, A. et López-Meneses, E. (2020). Digital education and artistic-visual learning in flexible university environments: Research analysis. Education Sciences, 10(11), article 294. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10110294

10.3390/educsci10110294 Google Scholar

Grant, M. J. et Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91‑108. https://doi.org/ftbpbr

10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x Google Scholar

Hardy, I. J. (2010). Teacher talk: Flexible delivery and academics’ praxis in an Australian university. International Journal for Academic Development, 15(2), 131‑142. https://doi.org/dn84xj

10.1080/13601441003738277 Google Scholar

He, W., Gajski, D., Farkas, G. et Warschauer, M. (2015). Implementing flexible hybrid instruction in an electrical engineering course: The best of three worlds? Computers & Education, 81, 59‑68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.09.005

10.1016/j.compedu.2014.09.005 Google Scholar

Hébert, M.-H., Gérin-Lajoie, S., Beauparlant, R., Beaudoin, A., Dubé, N. et Papi, C. (2022). Processus de recension systématique sur le plagiat et la tricherie en formation à distance en enseignement supérieur 2010‑2021 (version 2023‑05‑18) [jeu de données]. Borealis. https://doi.org/10.5683/SP3/ZMCUGS

Google Scholar

Heilporn, G. et Lakhal, S. (2021). Converting a graduate-level course into a HyFlex modality: What are effective engagement strategies? International Journal of Management Education, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100454

10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100454 Google Scholar

Irvine, V., Code, J. et Richards, L. (2013). Realigning higher education for the 21st‑century learner through multi-access learning. Journal of Online Learning & Teaching, 9(2), 172‑186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100454

10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100454 Google Scholar

Johnson, N. (2019). Évolution de l’apprentissage en ligne dans les universités et collèges du Canada. Sondage national sur la formation à distance et l’apprentissage en ligne 2019 Association canadienne de recherche sur la formation en ligne. http://cdlra-acrfl.ca/...

Google Scholar

Joy, M., Foss, J., King, E., Sinclair, J., Sitthiworachart, J. et Davis, R. (2014). Incorporating technologies into a flexible teaching space. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(2), 272‑284. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12040

10.1111/bjet.12040 Google Scholar

Karlsudd, P. et Tågerud, Y. (2008). Bridging the gap – Taking the distance out of e‑learning. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 6(1), 43‑52. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1098726

Google Scholar

Keiper, M. C., White, A., Carlson, C. D. et Lupinek, J. M. (2021). Student perceptions on the benefits of Flipgrid in a HyFlex learning environment. Journal of Education for Business, 96(6), 343‑351. https://doi.org/n5c8

10.1080/08832323.2020.1832431 Google Scholar

Ketsman, O. (2015). Using blended learning approach in pre-service technology integration courses. Dans D. Rutledge et D. Slykhuis (dir.), Proceedings of SITE 2015 – Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (p. 2417‑2419). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). http://www.learntechlib.org/p/150331

Google Scholar

Khan, Md. S. H., Bibi, S. et Hasan, M. (2016). Australian technical teachers’ experience of technology integration in teaching. SAGE Open, 6(3). https://doi.org/n5c9

10.1177/2158244016663609 Google Scholar

Koç, E. M. (2016). A critical look at a blended English language teacher education program with an emphasis on the practicum. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(4), 67‑81. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i4.2286

10.19173/irrodl.v17i4.2286 Google Scholar

Lakhal, S., Bateman, D. et Bédard, J. (2017). Blended synchronous delivery mode in graduate programs: A literature review and its implementation in the master teacher program. Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching, 10, 47‑60. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1147188

10.22329/celt.v10i0.4747 Google Scholar

Lakhal, S., Heilporn, G., Mukamurera, J. et Bédard, M.-È. (2021). Choisir le cours comodal : conditions pédagogiques, technologiques et organisationnelles favorables. Pédagogie collégiale, 34(4), 36‑42. https://eduq.info/xmlui/handle/11515/38135

Google Scholar

Lakhal, S., Mukamurera, J., Bédard, M.-E., Heilporn, G. et Chauret, M. (2020). Features fostering academic and social integration in blended synchronous courses in graduate programs. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17, article 5. https://doi.org/gp42tr

10.1186/s41239-020-0180-z Google Scholar

Leijon, M. et Lundgren, B. (2019). Connecting physical and virtual spaces in a HyFlex pedagogic model with a focus on teacher interaction. Journal of Learning Spaces, 8(1). 1‑9. https://libjournal.uncg.edu/jls/...

Google Scholar

Levinsen, K. T., Ørngreen, R. et Buhl, M. (2013). Telepresence as educational practice in the third teaching-room – A study in advanced music education. Dans M. Ciussi et M. Augier (dir.), Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on E-Learning (p. 250‑257). https://researchgate.net/...

Google Scholar

Lockee, B. B. (2021). Online education in the post-COVID era. Nature Electronics, 4, 5‑6. https://doi.org/gnnbmw

10.1038/s41928-020-00534-0 Google Scholar

Macedo-Rouet, M. (2009). La visioconférence dans l’enseignement : ses usages et effets sur la distance de transaction. Distances et savoirs, 7(1), 65‑91. http://cairn.info/...

Google Scholar

Malczyk, B. R. (2019). Introducing social work to HyFlex blended learning: A student-centered approach. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 39(4‑5), 414‑428. https://doi.org/gg2n29

10.1080/08841233.2019.1652226 Google Scholar

Ministère de l’Enseignement supérieur du Québec. (s.d.). Typologie des modes de formation. Gouvernement du Québec. https://cdn-contenu.quebec.ca/...

Google Scholar

Okoye, K., Rodriguez-Tort, J. A., Escamilla, J. et Hosseini, S. (2021). Technology-mediated teaching and learning process: A conceptual study of educators’ response amidst the Covid-19 pandemic. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 7225‑7257. https://doi.org/n5dc

10.1007/s10639-021-10527-x Google Scholar

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo‑Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, article n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

10.1136/bmj.n71 Google Scholar

Parr, M. (2017). Portrait des inscriptions en formation à distance (secondaire, collégial et universitaire) au Québec depuis 1995-1996. Comité de liaison interordres en formation à distance (CLIFAD). https://sofad.qc.ca/...

Google Scholar

Pazich, L. B., Kurzweil, M. et Rossman, D. (2018). Hybrid learning and the residential liberal arts experience. Change, 50(6), 45-51. https://doi.org/n5df

10.1080/00091383.2018.1540829 Google Scholar

Popov, O. (2009). Teachers’ and students’ experiences of simultaneous teaching in an international distance and on-campus master’s programme in engineering. The International Review of Research in Open & Distributed Learning, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v10i3.669

10.19173/irrodl.v10i3.669 Google Scholar

Romero-Hall, E. et Vicentini, C. R. (2017). Examining distance learners in hybrid synchronous instruction: Successes and challenges. Online Learning Journal, 21(4), 141-157. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1163626

10.24059/olj.v21i4.1258 Google Scholar

Santos, G. A. S., Bordignon, A. L., Oliveira, S. L. G., Haddad, D. B., Brandão, D. N. et Belloze, K. T. (2018). A brief review about educational data mining applied to predict student’s dropout. Dans R. E. de Lima Escalfoni et B. P. Toledo Freitas (dir.), Proceedings of the Regional School on Information Systems of Rio de Janeiro (p. 86‑91). https://doi.org/10.5753/ersirj.2018.4660

10.5753/ersirj.2018.4660 Google Scholar

Shea, P. et Bidjerano, T. (2018). Online course enrollment in community college and degree completion: The tipping point. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(2), 282‑293. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i2.3460

10.19173/irrodl.v19i2.3460 Google Scholar

Siraj, K. K. et Al Maskari, A. (2018). Student engagement in blended learning instructional design: An analytical study. Learning & Teaching in Higher Education: Gulf Perspectives, 15(2), 61‑79. https://doi.org/10.18538/lthe.v15.n2.283

10.18538/lthe.v15.n2.283 Google Scholar

Soesmanto, T. et Bonner, S. (2019). Dual mode delivery in an introductory statistics course: Design and evaluation. Journal of Statistics Education, 27(2), 90‑98. https://doi.org/gqjcdh

10.1080/10691898.2019.1608874 Google Scholar

Sowell, K., Saichaie, K., Bergman, J. et Applegate, E. (2019). High enrollment and HyFlex: The case for an alternative course model. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 30(2), 5‑28. https://researchgate.net/...

Google Scholar

Steuber, T. D., Janzen, K. M., Sprunger, T. L. et Nisly, S. A. (2018). Hybrid online delivery of a pharmacy residency and fellowship elective course. INNOVATIONS in Pharmacy, 9(2), article 14. https://doi.org/10.24926/iip.v9i2.1147

10.24926/iip.v9i2.1147 Google Scholar

Stewart, A. R., Harlow, D. B. et DeBacco, K. (2011). Students’ experience of synchronous learning in distributed environments. Distance Education, 32(3), 357‑381. https://doi.org/dbb75r

10.1080/01587919.2011.610289 Google Scholar

Szeto, E. (2014). Bridging the students’ and instructor’s experiences: Exploring instructional potential of videoconference in multi-campus universities. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13(1), 64‑72. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1018175

Google Scholar

Szeto, E. et Cheng, A. Y. N. (2016). Towards a framework of interactions in a blended synchronous learning environment: What effects are there on students’ social presence experience? Interactive Learning Environments, 24(3), 487‑503. https://doi.org/gqtdr8

Google Scholar

Tay, Z. A. et Quek, C. (2019). Adult learners’ self-directed learning in a blended synchronous learning environment. Dans Proceedings of EdMedia – World Conference on Educational Media and Technology. https://researchgate.net/...

Google Scholar

Tik, C. (2017). Lecturer e-training program to support university teaching. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 43(2). https://doi.org/10.21432/T2XH5F

10.21432/T2XH5F Google Scholar

Vale, J., Oliver, M. et Clemmer, R. M. C. (2020). The influence of attendance, communication, and distractions on the student learning experience using blended synchronous learning. Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 11(2), article 11. https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2020.2.11105

10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2020.2.11105 Google Scholar

Van Doorn, J. R. et Van Doorn, J. D. (2014). The quest for knowledge transfer efficacy: Blended teaching, online and in‑class, with consideration of learning typologies for non‑traditional and traditional students. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00324

10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00324 Google Scholar

VanDoorn, G. et Eklund, A. A. (2013). Face to Facebook: Social media and the learning and teaching potential of symmetrical, synchronous communication. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 10(1), article 6. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.10.1.6

10.53761/1.10.1.6 Google Scholar

Vanslambrouck, S., Zhu, C., Pynoo, B., Thomas, V., Lombaerts, K. et Tondeur, J. (2019). An in‑depth analysis of adult students in blended environments: Do they regulate their learning in an ‘old school’ way? Computers & Education, 128, 75‑87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.008

10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.008 Google Scholar

Walker-Gibbs, B., Paatsch, L., Moles, J., Yim, B. et Redpath, T. (2016). A view through the long lens: Pre-service teachers’ perceptions of multi-campus course delivery. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 13(5), article 23. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.13.5.12

10.53761/1.13.5.12 Google Scholar

Wang, Q., Huang, C. et Quek, C. (2018). Students’ perspectives on the design and implementation of a blended synchronous learning environment. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(1). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3404

10.14742/ajet.3404 Google Scholar

Wang, Q., Quek, C. et Hu, X. (2017). Designing and improving a blended synchronous learning environment: An educational design research. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(3), 99‑118. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i3.3034

10.19173/irrodl.v18i3.3034 Google Scholar

Weitze, C. L. (2017). Designing pedagogical innovation for collaborating teacher teams. Journal of Education for Teaching, 43(3), 361‑373. https://doi.org/ghvsvd

10.1080/02607476.2017.1319511 Google Scholar

Wold, K. (2013). Collaborative inquiry: Expert analysis of blended learning in higher education. International Journal on E‑Learning, 12(2), 221‑238. http://editlib.org/p/37485

Google Scholar

Zydney, J. M., McKimmy, P., Lindberg, R. et Schmidt, M. (2019). Here or there instruction: Lessons learned in implementing innovative approaches to blended synchronous learning. TechTrends: Linking Research and Practice to Improve Learning, 63(2), 123‑132. https://doi.org/ghbkvb

10.1007/s11528-018-0344-z Google Scholar

Zydney, J. M., Warner, Z. et Angelone, L. (2020). Learning through experience: Using design based research to redesign protocols for blended synchronous learning environments. Computers & Education, 143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103678

10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103678 Google Scholar

Le comodal en enseignement supérieur : revue de la littérature issue d’une recherche documentaire systémique de 2008 à 2021Comodal Teaching in Higher Education: Literature Review Based on a Systemic Literature Search from 2008 to 2021[Notice]

Disponibilité des données

Résumé

Abstract

Références

Résumés

Résumé

Abstract

Parties annexes

Références

Outils de citation

Citer cet article

Exporter la notice de cet article