Résumés
Résumé
Le test Matrices Progressives de Raven Couleur mesure les capacités de raisonnement analogique des personnes présentant une déficience intellectuelle. Quelques études ont montré la validité de cet outil psychométrique auprès de populations présentant une déficience en comparant les types d’erreurs commises. Nous proposons une analyse complémentaire au travers des types de problèmes résolus. Pour cela, nous avons comparé les types d’erreurs et les types de problèmes d’un groupe d’enfants présentant une déficience intellectuelle (N=22) et ceux d’un groupe d’enfants n’en présentant pas (N=22) appariés sur le score global. Les résultats montrent des patterns similaires tant au niveau des types d’erreurs commises que des types de problèmes résolus. Ces résultats confirment l’intérêt d’une analyse qualitative des performances à un test de raisonnement analogique.
Abstract
Raven’s Coloured Progressive Matrices is usually used to estimated analogical reasoning in intellectual deficiency and normal development. Many studies have demonstrated the validity of this test in adults with intellectual disability by error analysis. The current study aims to assess the types of errors and types of problems resolved by individuals with intellectual disability (N=22) and mental age matched control children (N = 22), in order to demonstrated validity of RCPM. Results show similar pattern of errors and problems resolved in both groups. These results are discussed in regard of previously studies and confirm the interest in a qualitative analysis of analogical reasoning test.
Parties annexes
Bibliographie
- American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5e éd.). Washington, DC: Author.
- Büchel, F. P. (2006). Analogical reasoning in students with moderate intellectual disability: reasoning capacity limitations or memory overload? Educational and Child Psychology, 23, 61-80.
- Carpenter, P. A., Just, M. A., & Shell, P. (1990). What one intelligence test measures: a theorical account of the processing in Raven Progressive Matrices Test. Psychological Review, 97(3), 404-431.
- Corman, L., & Budoff, M. (1975). Factorial composition of Raven’s Progressive Matrices in the Context of learning potential assessment. Studies in Learning Potential, 3(62), 1-12.
- Denaes, C. (2012). Analogical matrices in young children and students with intellectual disability: reasoning by analogy or reasoning by association? Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 25, 271-281.
- Denaes Bruttin, C., Büchel, F. P., Berger, J.-L., & Borel, N. (2010). Raisonnement analogique et mémoire chez des adolescents ayant une déficience intellectuelle. Revue Francophone de la Déficience Intellectuelle, 21, 163-176.
- Facon, B., Magis, D., Nuchadee, M. L., & de Boeck, P. (2011). Do Raven’s Colored Progressive Matrices function in the same way in typical and clinical populations? Insights from the intellectual disability field. Intelligence, 39, 281-291.
- Facon, B., & Nuchadee, M. L. (2010). An item analysis of Raven’s Colored Progressive Matrices among participants with Down syndrome. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 31, 243-249.
- Gunn, D. M., & Jarrold, C. (2004). Raven’s matrices performance in Down syndrome: evidence of unusual errors. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 25, 443-457.
- Hessels-Schlatter, C. (2006). Le développement des compétences dans le raisonnement abstrait chez les personnes présentant une déficience intellectuelle. Pédagogie Spécialisée, 1, 27-31.
- Hulme, C., & Mackensie, S. (1992). Working memory and Severe Learning Difficulties. East Sussex. UK: Lawrence Erlabaum
- Jaeggi, S. M., Buschkuehl, M., Jonides, J., & Perrig, W. J. (2008). Improving Fluid intelligence with training on working memory. PNAS, 105(19), 6829-6833.
- Jaeggi, S. M., Buschkuhel, M., Jonides, J., & Shah, P. (2011). Short – and long term benefits of cognitive training. PNAS, 108(25), 10081-10086.
- Jarrold, C., & Baddeley, A. D. (2001). Short-term memory in Down syndrome: applying the working memory model. Down Syndrome Research and Practice, 7(1), 17-23.
- Jarrold, C., Baddeley, A. D., & Hewes, A. K. (1999). Genetically dissociated components of working memory: evidence from Down’s and Williams syndrome. Neuropsychologia, 37, 637-651.
- Kyllonen, P. C., & Christal, R. E. (1990). Reasoning ability is (little more than) working memory capacity?! Intelligence, 14, 389-433.
- Mann, B. R., & Whitney, D. R. (1947). On a Test of Whether one of Two Random Variables is Stochastically Larger than the Other. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 18(1), 50-60.
- Perrig, W. J., Hoolenstein, M., & Oelhafen, S. (2009). Can we improve fluid intelligence with training on working memory in persons with intellectual disabilities? Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 8(2), 148-164.
- Raven, J. C., Court, J. H., & Raven, J. C. (1998). Manuel des Progressive Matrices Couleur de Raven. Paris, FR: ECPA.
- Snow, R. E., & Lohman, D. F. (1989). Implications of cognitive psychology for educational measurement. Dans R. Linn (Ed), Educational measurement (3e éd., pp. 263-331). New-York, NY, Macmillan.
- Van Herwegen, J., Farran, E., & Annaz, D. (2011). Item and error analysis on Raven’s Coloured Progressive Matrices in Williams syndrome. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32, 93-99.
- Vicari, S., Bellucci, S., & Carlesimo, G. A. (2006). Evidence from two genetic syndromes for the independence of spatial and visual working memory. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 48, 126-131.
- Wechsler, D. (2006). WISC-IV. Echelles d’intelligence de Wechsler pour enfants – 4ème édition. Paris, FR: ECPA.
- Wilcoxon, F. (1945). Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometrics Bulletin, 1(6), 80-83.