Résumés
Abstract
This article explores how Norwegian resettlement officers navigate moral dilemmas when selecting refugees who are deemed both deserving of protection and too vulnerable, costly, or risky to resettle. It analyzes resettlement officers’ moral distress, discretionary power, and coping strategies and develops a moral economy perspective on refugee resettlement in a universalist welfare state. The analysis reveals that these dilemmas reflect fundamental contradictions within the resettlement system, at the intersection of humanitarian commitment, national legal and social norms, and municipal capacity. These moral tensions create a space where human suffering is neither ignored nor easily resolved but continuously present.
Keywords:
- Norway,
- resettlement,
- moral economy,
- moral dilemma,
- human suffering
Résumé
Cet article explore la manière dont les agents chargés de la réinstallation en Norvège se chargent de dilemmes moraux lors de la sélection de réfugié.e.s qui sont jugés à la fois dignes de protection et trop vulnérables, trop coûteux ou trop risqués à réinstaller. L’article analyse la détresse morale, le pouvoir discrétionnaire et les stratégies d’adaptation des agents chargés de la réinstallation, et développe une perspective d’économie morale sur la réinstallation des réfugiés dans un État-providence universaliste. L’analyse montre que ces dilemmes reflètent les contradictions fondamentales au sein du système de réinstallation, et ce à la jonction entre l’engagement humanitaire, les normes juridiques et sociales nationales et les capacités municipales. Ces tensions morales créent un espace où la souffrance humaine n’est ni ignorée ni facilement résolue, mais reste constamment présente.
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Afroz, S. (2023). Status framework of hierarchy. Journal of Undergraduate Studies at Trent (JUST), 8(1), 76–81. https://ojs.trentu.ca/index.php/just/article/view/534
- Askim, J., & Steen, A. (2020). Trading refugees: The governance of refugee settlement in a decentralized welfare state. Scandinavian Political Studies, 43(1), 24–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.12158
- Bendixsen, S., Bringslid, M. B., & Vike, H. (2017). Egalitarianism in Scandinavia: Historical and contemporary perspectives. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59791-1
- Bjørkhaug, I., & Brækkevold, K. M. (2025). Navigating vulnerability and integration: Refugee resettlement from Rwanda to third countries under the medical needs category. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 44(1), 106–125. https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdae017
- Böhm, F., Ramsøy, I. J., & Suter, B. (2021). Norms and values in refugee resettlement: A literature review of resettlement to the EU (Current Themes in IMER Research 21:1). Malmø University. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1537530/FULLTEXT01.pdf
- Brekke, J.-P., Paasche, E., Espegren, A., & Sandvik, K. B. (2021). Selection criteria in refugee resettlement: Balancing vulnerability and future integration in eight resettlement countries (Report no. 2021:3). Institutt for Samfunnsforskning. https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2758744
- Brochmann, G., & Hagelund, A. (2011). Migrants in the Scandinavian welfare state: The emergence of a social policy problem. Nordic Journal of Migration Research, 1(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10202-011-0003-3
- Brodkin, E. Z. (1997). Inside the welfare contract: Discretion and accountability in state welfare administration. Social Service Review, 71(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1086/604228
- Brodkin, E. Z. (2012). Reflections on street‐level bureaucracy: Past, present, and future. Public Administration Review, 72(6), 940–949. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02657.x
- De Boer, T., & Zieck, M. (2020). The legal abyss of discretion in the resettlement of refugees: Cherry-picking and the lack of due process in the EU. International Journal of Refugee Law, 32(1), 54–85. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/eeaa005
- Fassin, D. (2009). Les économies morales revisitées. Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales, 64(6), 1235–1266. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0395264900027499
- Fassin, D. (2011). A contribution to the critique of moral reason. Anthropological Theory, 11(4), 481–491. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499611429901
- Fassin, D. (2012). Humanitarian reason: A moral history of the present (R. Gomme, Trans.). University of California Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/j.ctt1pptmk
- Huysmans, J. (2000). The European Union and the securitization of migration. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 38(5), 751–777. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00263
- Jameton, A. (1984). Nursing practice: The ethical issues. Prentice-Hall.
- Leboeuf, L., Brun, C., Lidén, H., Marchetti, S., Nakache, D., & Sarolea, S. (Eds.). (2025). Between protection and harm: Negotiated vulnerabilities in asylum laws and bureaucracies. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-69808-8
- Lillevik, R., Weiss, N., & Bjørkhaug, I. (2025). Inter-organizational decision-making in Norwegian refugee resettlement. Nordic Welfare Research, 10(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.18261/nwr.10.4.6
- Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public service (30th anniv. ed.). Russell Sage Foundation. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7758/9781610446631
- Maynard-Moody, S., & Musheno, M. (2003). Cops, teachers, counselors : Stories from the front lines of public service. University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.11924
- Maynard‐Moody, S., & Portillo, S. (2010). Street‐level bureaucracy theory. In R. F. Durant (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of American bureaucracy (pp. 252–277). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199238958.003.0011
- McCarthy, J. (2013). Nursing Ethics and moral distress: The story so far. Nursing Ethics, 20(2). https://journals.sagepub.com/page/nej/collections/special-issues/moral-distress
- Paasche, E., Soennecken, D., & Tanotra, R. (2025). Selecting refugees for resettlement to Norway and Canada: Vulnerability, integration and discretion. I L. Leboeuf, C. Brun, H. Lidén, S. Marchetti, D. Nakache, & S. Sarolea (Eds.), Between protection and harm: Negotiated vulnerabilities in asylum laws and bureaucracies (pp. 117–139). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-69808-8_6
- Schultz, J. (2022). The temporary turn in Norwagian asylum law and practice (CMI report no. 5). Chr. Michelsen Institute. https://www.cmi.no/publications/8445-the-temporary-turn-in-norwegian-asylum-law-and-practice
- Thunman, E. (2016). Coping with moral stress in the Swedish public services. Old Site of Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 6(3), 59–77. https://doi.org/10.19154/njwls.v6i3.5528
- Tjelmeland, H., & Brochmann, G. (2003). Norsk innvandringshistorie: I globaliseringens tid, 1940–2000 [Norwegian history of migration: In times of globalization]. Pax Forlag.
- Tummers, L. L. G, Bekkers, V., Vink, E., & Musheno, M. (2015). Coping during public service delivery: A conceptualization and systematic review of the literature. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(4), 1099–1126. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muu056
- UNHCR. (n.d.). Refugee data finder. Accessed March 18, 2026, from https://www.unhcr.org/refugee-statistics/download?url=crQc2t
- UNHCR. (2021). Country chapter—Norway. In UNHCR resettlement handbook. https://www.unhcr.org/media/unhcr-resettlement-handbook-country-chapter-norway
- UNHCR. (2023). Resettlement handbook. https://www.unhcr.org/resettlement-handbook/
- UNHCR. (2024). UNHCR projected global resettlement needs: 2025. https://www.unhcr.org/sites/default/files/2024-05/projected-global-resettlement-needs-2025.pdf
- Weiss, N., Djuve, A. B., Hamelink, W., & Zhang, H. (2017). Opphold i asylmottak. Konsekvenser for levekår og integrering [Staying in asylums: Consequences for living condtions and integration]. Fafo. https://www.udi.no/globalassets/global/forskning-fou_i/asylmottak/opphold-i-asylmottak.pdf
- Welfens, N., & Bonjour, S. (2021). Families first? The mobilization of family norms in refugee resettlement. International Political Sociology, 15(2), 212–231. https://doi.org/10.1093/ips/olaa022
- Wohlforth, W. C., de Carvalho, B., Leira, H., & Neumann, I. B. (2018). Moral authority and status in international relations: Good states and the social dimension of status seeking. Review of International Studies, 44(3), 526–546. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210517000560

