Résumés
Abstract
In response to considerable critique of its rigour and relevance, the field of educational research has sought to prove its validity, both in terms of its scientific legitimacy and its relevance to policy and practice. One result of this has been a heightened concern with methodology, to the extent that a form of methodolatry has developed. In conjunction with wider changes in the governance of research, from disciplinary to thematic foci, educational research seems also prone to adisciplinarity. Critiques from philosophy of education of the privileging of gold-standard methodologies point to the empiricism that characterises the field and how this can overlook questions of value and meaning. It is arguably not the empiricism as such that is problematic, but its unmooring from the theoretical and the educational. The possibility of an anthropologically informed educational philosophy is explored as a way out of the impasse.
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Ball, S. J. (1995). Intellectuals or technicians? The urgent role of theory in educational studies. British Journal of Educational Studies, 43(3), 255–271.
- British Educational Research Association. (2023, July 26). Education: the state of the discipline. Retrieved March 26, 2024, from https://www.bera.ac.uk/project/education-the-state-of-the-discipline
- Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality. London: Penguin.
- Biesta, G. J. J. (2007). Why “what works” won’t work: Evidence-based practice and the democratic deficit in educational research. Educational Theory, 57(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.2006.00241.x
- Biesta, G. J. J. (2010). Why “what works” still won’t work: From evidence-based education to value-based education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 26, 492–503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-010-9191-x
- Carr, W. (2006). Education without theory. British Journal of Educational Studies, 54(2), 136–159, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8527.2006.00344.x
- Chamberlain K. (2000). Methodolatry and qualitative health research. Journal of Health Psychology, 5(3), 285–296. doi:10.1177/135910530000500306
- Das, V. (2020). Textures of the ordinary: Doing anthropology after Wittgenstein. New York: Fordham University Press.
- Department for Education. (2011). Teachers’ standards. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/teachers-standards
- Department for Education. (2019). Core content framework. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6061eb9cd3bf7f5cde260984/ITT_core_content_framework_.pdf
- Economic and Social Research Council. (2005). Postgraduate training guidelines (4th ed.). Retrieved June 4, 2009, from http://www.esrcsocietytoday.ac.uk/ESRCInfoCentre/Images/Postgraduate_Training_Guidelines_2005_tcm6-9062.pdf
- Gustavsson, M. (2013). Methodomania. In Y. Hasselberg, S. Rider, & A. Waluszewski (Eds.), Transformations in research, higher education and the academic market: The breakdown of scientific thought (pp. 157-170). Dordrecht: Springer.
- Hargreaves, D. H. (2007). Teaching as a research-based profession: possibilities and prospects. In M. Hammersley (Ed.), Educational research and evidence-based practice (pp. 3-17). Milton Keynes: Open University. (Original work published 1996)
- Harrington, B. (2003). The social psychology of access in ethnographic research. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 32, 592–626.
- Hasselberg, Y., Rider, S., & Waluszewski, A. (Eds.) (2013). Transformations in research, higher education and the academic market: The breakdown of scientific thought. Dordrecht: Springer.
- Hillage, J., Pearson, R., Anderson, A., & Tamkin, P. (1998, August). Excellence in research on schools. Department for Education and Employment. https://dera.ioe.ac.uk/id/eprint/9856/1/RR74.pdf
- Hodgson, N., & Standish, P. (2006). Induction into educational research networks: the striated and the smooth. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 40(4), 563–574. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9752.2006.00533.x
- Hyslop-Marginson, E., & Nasseem, M. (2007). Scientism and education: Empirical research as neo-liberal ideology. Dordrecht: Springer.
- Ingold, T. (2018). Anthropology as education. London: Routledge.
- Jerrim, J., & Vignoles, A. (2016). The link between East Asian “mastery” teaching methods and English children's mathematics skills. Economics of Education Review, 50, 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2015.11.003
- Kaplan, A. (1964). The conduct of inquiry: Methodology for behavioural science. Scranton, PA: Chandler.
- Macfarlane, B. (2022). Methodology, fake learning, and emotional performativity. ECNU Review of Education, 5(1), 140–155.
- Malinowski B. (1961). Argonauts of the western Pacific. New York: Dutton & Co. (Original work published 1922)
- Murdock-Perriera, L. A., & Sedlacek, Q. C. (2018). Questioning Pygmalion in the twenty-first century: The formation, transmission, and attributional influence of teacher expectancies. Social Psychology of Education, 21(3), 691–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-018-9439-9.
- National Research Council. (2002). Scientific research in education. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- Oancea, A. (2005). Criticisms of educational research: key topics and levels of analysis. British Educational Research Journal, 31(2), 157–183.
- Packer, M. (2010). Educational research as a reflexive science of constitution. Teachers College Record, 112(13), 17–33.
- Phillips, D. C. (2006). A guide for the perplexed: Scientific educational research, methodolatry, and the gold versus platinum standards. Educational Research Review, 1(1), 15–26.
- Standish, P. (2002). Data return: The sense of the given in educational research. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 35(3), 497–518. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.00240
- Tooley, J., & Darby, D. (1998). Educational research: a critique: A survey of published educational research. London: Office for Standards in Education.
- Vlieghe, J. (2020). Philosophy as education: A post-critical approach to the position and future of an academic discipline. In N. Hodgson, J. Vlieghe, & P. Zamojski (Eds.), Post-critical perspectives on higher education (pp. 145-157). Cham: Springer.
- Weaver, J., & Snaza, N. (2017). Against methodocentrism in educational research. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49(11), 1055–1065.