Résumés
Abstract
This paper examines the Confucian concept of learning, or xue (學) , from the perspective of ecological humanism. Through a comparative interpretation, this paper attempts to disclose the significance of Confucian xue conceived as a practice of aesthetic appreciation and creativity, emphasizing in particular its function within an eco-centric worldview. The author reviews the relevant concepts of ecological humanism as expressed in the ideas of John Dewey and Thomas Alexander, then applies these as a theoretical framework for interpreting xue and its related concepts and practices as they appear in the Confucian text the Lunyu (論語). It is argued that xue is a process of developing and expressing virtuosity and artistry in the “arts of life,” and that its practice was understood as a direct participation in the creative development of nature. The significance of such a concept of learning for contemporary educational philosophy is discussed in conclusion.
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Affifi, R. (2017a). More-than-humanizing the Anthropocene. The Trumpeter, 32(2), 155–175. https://doi.org/10.7202/1042991arX
- Affifi, R. (2017b). The Metabolic Core of Environmental Education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 36(3), 315–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-016-9555-yX
- Affifi, R. (2020). Anthropocentrism’s fluid binary. Environmental Education Research, 26(9–10), 1435–1452. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2019.1707484X
- Affifi, R., Blenkinsop, S., Humphreys, C., & Joldersma, C. W. (2017). Introduction to ecologizing philosophy of education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 36(3), 229–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-017-9574-3X
- Alexander, T. M. (1987). John Dewey’s theory of art, experience, and nature: The horizons of feeling. Albany: State University of New York Press.
- Alexander, T. M. (2013). The human eros: Eco-ontology and the aesthetics of existence (1st ed.). New York: Fordham University Press.
- Ames, R. T. (2002). Observing ritual “propriety Li” as focusing the “familiar” in the affairs of the day. Dao-a Journal of Comparative Philosophy, 1(2), 143–156.
- Ames, R. T. (2003). Confucianism and Deweyan pragmatism: A dialogue. Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 30(3-4), 403–417. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6253.00128X
- Ames, R. T. (2010). Confucian role ethics: A vocabulary. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.
- Ames, R. T. (2014). Collaterality in early Chinese cosmology: An argument for Confucian harmony (he 和) as creatio in situ. Early China, 37, 445–470. https://doi.org/10.1017/eac.2014.2X
- Ames, R. T. (2015). “Bodyheartminding”(xin 心): Reconceiving the inner self and the outer world in the language of holographic focus and field. Frontiers of Philosophy in China, 10(2), 167–180.
- Ames, R. T., Chen, Y., & Hershock, P. D. (Eds.). (2021). Confucianism and Deweyan pragmatism: Resources for a new geopolitics of interdependence. University of Hawai‘i Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780824888572X
- Bonnett, M. (2016). Environmental consciousness, sustainability, and the character of philosophy of education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 36(3), 333–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-016-9556-xX
- Ceballos, G., Ehrlich, P. R., Barnosky, A. D., García, A., Pringle, R. M., & Palmer, T. M. (2015). Accelerated modern human-induced species losses: Entering the sixth mass extinction. Science Advances, 1(5), e1400253. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1400253X
- Confucius. (n.d.). Lunyu.
- Confucius. (1999). The analects of Confucius: A philosophical translation (1st trade pbk. ed.; R. T. Ames & H. Rosemont, Trans.). New York: Ballantine Books.
- Confucius. (2014). Lunyujizhu [Lunyu commentaries] (B. Seong, Trans.). Seoul: Jeontong Munhwa Yeonguhoe.
- Dewey, J. (1905). The postulate of immediate empricism. Journal of Philosophy, Psychology, and Scientific Methods, 2(15), 393–399.
- Dewey, J. (1929). Experience and nature. London: George Allen And Unwin, Limited.
- Dewey, J. (1938). Logic: The theory of inquiry. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
- Dewey, J. (1998). The essential Dewey, Volume 1: Pragmatism, education, democracy (Vol. 1; L. A. Hickman & T. M. Alexander, Eds.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
- Dewey, J. (2005). Art as experience (trade paperback ed.). New York: Berkeley Publishing Group/Perigree Books.
- Dewey, J., & Bentley, A. F. (1949). Knowing and the known. Boston: Beacon Press.
- Grange, J. (2003). John Dewey and Confucius: Ecological philosophers. Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 30(3–4), 419–431. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6253.00129X
- Humphreys, C., & Blenkinsop, S. (2017). White paper concerning philosophy of education and environment. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 36(3), 243–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-017-9567-2X
- Hwang, K. (2010). Jisokganeunghan miraereul wihan maeumgyoyuk [Heart-mind education for a sustainable future]. Gyoyukcheolhak, 49, 199–228.
- Hwang, K. (2014). Hakiran mueosinga: Areumdapgo widaehan bonseongi chehyeon [What is learning: Embodying the great and beautiful original nature]. Paju: Geulhangari.
- Hwang, K., & Meyer, D. S. (2019). Relations as the aim of education in Joseon neo-Confucianism: The case of the five relationships. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 51(9), 936–948. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2018.1431120X
- Kahn, R. (2008). From education for sustainable development to ecopedagogy: Sustaining capitalism or sustaining life? Green Theory & Praxis: The Journal of Ecopedagogy, 4(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3903/gtp.2008.1.1X
- Laird, S. (2017). Learning to live in the Anthropocene: Our children and ourselves. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 36(3), 265–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-017-9571-6X
- Lamont, C. (1961). New light on Dewey’s common faith. Journal of Philosophy, 58(1), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.2307/2023566X
- Meyer, D. S. (2021). Learning as inhabitation: A reinterpretation of Dewey’s concept of learning through Alexander’s ecological humanism. PhD thesis, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
- Morgan, P. (1996). Reconceiving the foundations of education: An ecological model. Philosophy of Education Archive, 294–302.
- Ni, P. (2021). Life as aesthetic creativity and appreciation: The Confucian aim of learning. In P. D. Hershock & R. T. Ames (Eds.), Human beings or human becomings? A conversation with Confucianism on the concept of person (pp. 169–186). Albany: State University of New York Press.
- Shusterman, R. (2009). Pragmatist aesthetics and Confucianism. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 43(1), 18–29.
- Tang, C. (1988). Zhōng Xi Zhé Xué Sī Xiǎng Zhī Bǐ Jiào Lùn Wén Jí [A collection of comparative essays on Chinese and Western philosophical thought]. Taipei: Xué Shēng Shū Jú.
- Waters, C. N., Zalasiewicz, J., Summerhayes, C., Barnosky, A. D., Poirier, C., Ga uszka, A., … Wolfe, A. P. (2016). The Anthropocene is functionally and stratigraphically distinct from the Holocene. Science, 351(6269). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad2622X
10.7202/1042991ar