ror.org/04n13w407
Résumés
Abstract
The notion of impact is becoming important for international business schools, which are under increasing pressures related to their legitimacy. Although the term impact has gained in popularity, common approaches to business school impact rely either on academic publications or alumni’s salaries. To help uncover the potential for other approaches, we develop a conceptual framework as a basis for studying business school impact. The pluralism of approaches in terms of business school impact opens new spaces for original strategic choices, therefore limiting pressures for organizational isomorphism. Nevertheless, the notion of impact also has some limitations that need to be considered.
Keywords:
- business school,
- impact,
- legitimacy,
- citizenship
Résumé
La notion d’impact devient importante pour les écoles de commerce internationales, qui subissent des pressions croissantes sur leur légitimité. Bien que le terme d’impact soit devenu fréquent, les approches habituelles de l’impact des écoles de commerce s’appuient soit sur les publications scientifiques, soit sur les salaires des alumni. Afin de découvrir d’autres approches, nous développons un cadre conceptuel permettant d’étudier l’impact des écoles de commerce. Le pluralisme des approches en matière d’impact ouvre de nouvelles perspectives, et permet des choix stratégiques originaux, limitant les pressions à l’isomorphisme organisationnel. Toutefois, la notion d’impact a des limites qui doivent être considérées.
Mots-clés :
- écoles de commerce,
- impact,
- légitimité,
- citoyenneté
Resumen
La noción de impacto es cada vez mas importante para las escuelas de comercio internacionales, que están sometidas a crecientes presiones en cuanto a su legitimidad. Los enfoques habituales sobre el impacto de las escuelas de comercio se apoyan, ya sea, en las publicaciones científicas, o en los salarios de los alumni. Desarrollamos un marco conceptual que permite estudiar el impacto de las escuelas de comercio. El pluralismo de enfoques en materia de impacto de las escuelas de comercio abre nuevas perspectivas para tener opciones estratégicas originales. Sin embargo, la noción de impacto tiene también limitaciones.
Palabras clave:
- escuela comercio,
- impacto,
- legitimidad,
- ciudadanía
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- AACSB (2012), Impact of Research. A Guide for Business Schools. Tampa, FL: AACSB.
- AACSB (2015), Eligibility Procedures and Accreditation Standards for Business Accreditation. Tampa, FL: AACSB.
- Agrawal, A. (2001), “University-to-industry knowledge transfer: literature review and unanswered questions”, International Journal Management Reviews, Vol. 3, N°4, p. 285-302.
- Aguinis, H., Shapiro, D.L., Antonacopoulou, E.P., Cummings, T.G. (2014), “Scholarly impact: a pluralist conceptualization”, Academy of Management Learning & Education, Vol. 13, N°4, p. 623-639.
- Australian Government (2016), Measuring impact and engagement of university research, National Innovation and Science Agenda, retrieved from: http://www.innovation.gov.au/page/measuring-impact-and-engagement-university-research
- Bartunek, J. M. (2007), “Academic-practitioner collaboration need not require joint or relevant research: Toward a relational scholarship of integration”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 11, N°2, p. 244-246.
- Becker, G.S. (1964), Human capital: a theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Bergman, J.Z., Westerman, J.W., Daly, J.P. (2010), “Narcissism in management education”, Academy of Management Learning & Education, Vol. 9, N°1, p. 119-131.
- Berk, R. (2011), “Evidence-based versus junk-based evaluation research: some lessons from 35 years of the Evaluation Review”, Evaluation Review, Vol. 35, N°3, p. 191-203.
- Bradshaw, D. (2014), “EFMD helps business schools measure impact on community”, Financial Times, 30 January 2014, retrieved from: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/7eef430c-8843-11e3-a926-00144feab7de.html#axzz2znQnLh8k
- Bradshaw, D. (2013), “A disregard for business schools”, Financial Times, 15 April 2013, retrieved from: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/3a53012e-8d86-11e2-82d2-00144feabdc0.html?ftcamp=p#axzz2znTWeJaB
- Chakravorti, B. (2014), “How business schools create irresponsible leaders”, Business Week, 21 April 2014, retrieved from: http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2014-04-21/how-business-schools-create-irresponsible-leaders
- Christensen, L.J., Peirce, E., Hartman, L.P., Hoffman, W.M., Carrier J. (2007), “Ethics, CSR and sustainability in the Financial Times top 50 global business schools”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 73, p. 347-368.
- Clark, P. (2014), “Think MBA students are arrogant? Blame their narcissistic teachers”, Business Week, 5 March 2014, retrieved from: http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2014-03-05/think-mba-students-are-arrogant-blame-their-narcissistic-teachers
- Cooke, A., Galt, V. (2010), “The impact of business schools in the UK”, Association of Business Schools.
- Cornuel, E. (2005), “The role of business schools in society”, Journal of Management Development, Vol. 24, N°9, p. 819-829.
- Di Meglio, F. (2013), “Is B-school research an expensive waste?”, Business Week, 22 February 2013, retrieved from: http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-02-22/is-b-school-research-an-expensive-waste
- Donaldson, T., Preston, L.E. (1995), “The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20, N°1, p. 65-91.
- Dwoskin, E. (2012), “Calculating a college degree’s true value”, Business Week, 20 December 2012, retrieved from: http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2012-12-20/calculating-a-college-degrees-true-value
- Eesley, C.E., Miller, W.F. (2012), Stanford University’s economic impact via innovation and entrepreneurship, October, research report retrieved from: https://engineering.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/Stanford_Alumni_Innovation_Survey_Report_102412_1.pdf
- EFMD (2014), The key tool for measuring your business school’s impact on the world around it. Accessed on http://www.efmd.org/bsis on 31 January 2014
- ESRC (2014), Economic and Social Research Council, http://www.esrc.ac.uk, accessed on 15 March 2014.
- Finch, D.J., Varella, P., Foster, W., Sundararajan, B., Bates, K., Nadeau, J., O’Reilly, N., Deephouse, D.L. (2016), “The business school scorecard: Examining the systematic sources of business school value”, Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, Vol. 33, p. 277-289.
- Ghoshal, S. (2005), “Bad management theories are destroying good management practices”, Academy of Management Learning and Education, Vol. 4, N°1, p. 75-91.
- Goulet, L.R., Lopes, K.L., White, J.B. (2016), “Mission-driven expected impact: Assessing scholarly output for 2013 Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business standards”, Journal of Education for Business, Vol. 91, N°1, p. 11-18.
- Hambrick, D.C. (1994), “1993 Presidential Address: What if the Academy actually mattered”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 19, N°1, p. 11-16.
- HEFCE (2014), Higher Education Funding Council for England,http://www.hefce.ac.uk, accessed on 15 March 2014
- Kalika, M., Shenton, G., Dubois, P.H. (2016), “What happens if a business school disappears? The intellectual foundations of BSIS”, Journal of Management Development, Vol. 35, N°7, p. 878-888.
- Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P. (1996), The balanced scorecard: translating strategy into action, Boston: Harvard Business Press.
- Kelly, U., McNicoll, I. (2011), The economic impact of the University of Kent, retrieved from: http://www.kent.ac.uk/about/impactreport-oct11.pdf
- Lavelle, L. (2013), “Dozens of MBA applicants tossed over plagiarism”, Business Week, 7 February 2013, retrieved from: http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-02-07/dozens-of-mba-applicants-tossed-over-plagiarism
- Mintzberg, H. (2004), Developing Managers. Not MBAs. London: FT Prentice Hall.
- Monjon, S., Waelbroeck, P. (2003), “Assessing spillovers from universities to firms: evidence from French firm-level data”, International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol. 21, p. 1255-1270
- Moore, J.F. (1996), The death of competition: Leadership and strategy in the age of business ecosystems. Harper Business.
- O’Brien, J. P., Drnevich, P. L., Crook, T. R., Armstrong, C. E. (2010), “Does business school research add economic value for students?”, Academy of Management Learning & Education, Vol. 9, N°4, p. 638-651.
- Pettigrew, A.M. (2011), “Scholarship with impact”, British Journal of Management, Vol. 22, N°3, p. 347-354.
- Pettigrew, A.M., Starkey, K. (2016), “The legitimacy and impact of business schools – Key issues and a research agenda”, Academy of Management Learning & Education, Vol. 15, N°4, p. 649-664.
- Pfeffer, J. (1977), “Effects of an MBA and socioeconomic origins on business school graduates’ salaries”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 62, N°6, p. 698-705.
- Pfeffer, J., Fong, C. (2002), “The end of business schools? Less success than meets the eye”, Academy of Management Learning & Education, Vol. 1, N°1, p. 78-95.
- Pfeffer, J. (2013), “Does it matter if B-schools produce narcissists?” Business Week, 15 January 2013, retrieved from: http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-01-15/does-it-matter-if-b-schools-produce-narcissists
- REF (2014), Research Excellence Framework, http://www.ref.ac.uk, accessed on 15 March 2014
- Rousseau, D. M. (2012), “Designing a better business school: Channeling Herbert Simon, addressing the critics and developing actionable knowledge for professionalizing managers”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 49, N°3, p. 600-618.
- Rynes, S. L., Bartunek, J. M., Daft, R. L. (2001), “Across the great divide: knowledge creation and transfer between practitioners and academics”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 44, N°2, p. 340-355.
- Shapiro, D.L., Kirkman, B.L., Courtney, H.G. (2007), “Perceived causes and solutions of the translation problem in management research”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 50, N°2, p. 249-266.
- Siegel, D.S., Westhead, P., Wright, M. (2003), “Assessing the impact of university science parks on research productivity: exploratory firm-level evidence from the United Kingdom”, International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol. 2, p. 1357-1369.
- Simon, H.A. (1967), “The business school: a problem in organizational design”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 4, p. 1-16.
- Slater, D.J., Dixon-Fowler, H.R. (2010). “The future of the planet in the hands of MBAs: an examination of CEO MBA education and corporate environmental performance”, Academy of Management Learning & Education, Vol. 9, N°3, p. 429-441.
- Starkey, K., Madan, P. (2001), “Bridging the relevance gap: Aligning stakeholders in the future of management research”, British Journal of Management, Vol. 12, Special Issue: S3-S26.
- Stern, N. (2016), “Building on success and learning from experience, An independent review of the Research Excellence Framework”, retrieved from: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/541338/ind-16-9-ref-stern-review.pdf
- Tourish, D., Craig, R., Amernic, J. (2010), “Transformational leadership education and agency perspectives in business school pedagogy: a marriage of inconvenience?”, British Journal of Management, Vol. 21, p. S40-S59.
- Thomas, H., Thomas, L., Wilson, A. (2013), Promises fulfilled and unfulfilled in management education. Bingley: Emerald.
- Thorpe, R., Rawlinson, R. (2013), “The role of UK business schools in driving innovation and growth in the domestic economy, Association of Business Schools”, retrieved from: http://www.associationofbusinessschools.org/sites/default/files/130516_absinnovation_web.pdf,
- Trieschmann, J., Dennis A., Northcraft, G., Niemi, A. (2000), “Serving multiple constituencies in business schools: MBA program versus research performance”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 43, N°6, p. 1130-1141.
- Wilson, D., McKiernan, P. (2011), “Global mimicry: putting strategic choice back on the business school agenda”, British Journal of Management, Vol. 22, p. 457-469.
- Wilson, D., Thomas, H. (2012), “The legitimacy of the business of business schools: what’s the future?”, Journal of Management Development, Vol. 31, N°4, p. 368-376.
- Worrell, D.L. (2009), “Assessing business scholarship: the difficulties in moving beyond the rigor-relevance paradigm trap”, Academy of Management Learning & Education, Vol. 8, N°1, p. 127-130.
- Zhao, J.J., Truell, A.D., Alexander, M.W., Hill, I.B., D. (2006), “Less success than meets the eye? The impact of master of business administration education on graduates’careers”, Journal of Education for Business, May/June, p. 261-268.