Résumés
Résumé
La responsabilité sociale des entreprises (RSE) est un sujet de société en vogue qui suscite de nombreux débats tant chez les universitaires que les praticiens. La présente étude propose une analyse sociohistorique et épistémologique de la RSE afin d’en cerner la construction et de reconstituer une partie de sa généalogie. Notre étude soulève deux contributions principales. La première explicite trois tendances qui ont marqué l’évolution de la production de connaissances en RSE. La seconde contribution suggère que le projet épistémologique qu’incarne la théorisation de la RSE est en constante évolution à l’image du champ plus large des théories des organisations.
Mots-clés :
- responsabilité sociale des entreprises,
- épistémologie,
- évolution théorique,
- théorie des organisations
Abstract
This study provides an epistemological and sociohistorical analysis of the corporate social responsibility (CSR) literature to identify its construction and part of its genealogy. This study offers two main contributions. First, it elucidates three tendencies that mark the evolution of CSR knowledge production. Second, it suggests that the epistemological project that embodies the theorization of CSR is constantly evolving. Indeed, this epistemological analysis highlights that, given the proliferation of critical and interpretative studies on CSR, research in this field is currently in the middle of two tendencies epitomized by the wider field of organizational theory.
Keywords:
- corporate social responsibility,
- epistemology,
- theoretical evolution,
- organization theory
Resumen
Este estudio proporciona un análisis epistemológico y socio-histórico de la literatura de responsabilidad social de las empresas (RSE) para identificar su construcción, partiendo de su genealogía. Este estudio ofrece dos contribuciones principales. En primer lugar, elabora tres tendencias que marcan la evolución de la producción de conocimiento en materia de RSE. En segundo lugar, este estudio sugiere que el proyecto epistemológico que encarna la teorización de la RSE está en constante evolución. De hecho, este análisis epistemológico pone de manifiesto que, dada la proliferación de estudios críticos e interpretativos sobre RSE, la investigación en este campo se encuentra actualmente en medio de dos tendencias que se resumen en el campo más amplio de la teoría organizacional.
Palabras clave:
- responsabilidad social empresaria,
- epistemología,
- desarrollo teórico,
- teoría organizacional
Parties annexes
Bibliographie
- Ackerman, R. et Bauer, R. A. (1976). Corporate Social Responsiveness : Modern Dilemma. Virginia : Reston Publishing Company.
- Acquier, A. et Aggeri, F. (2008). Une généalogie de la pensée managériale sur la RSE. Revue Française de Gestion, 1(180), 131-157.
- Acquier, A. et Gond, J.-P. (2007). Aux sources de la Responsabilité Sociale de l’Entreprise : (re)lecture et analyse d’un ouvrage séminal : Social Responsibilities of the Businessman d’Howard Bowen. Finance Contrôle Stratégie, 10(2), 5-35.
- Acquier, A., Valiorgue, B., & Daudigeos, T. (2015). Sharing the Shared Value: A Transaction Cost Perspective on Strategic CSR Policies in Global Value Chains. Journal of Business Ethics. doi: doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2820-0
- Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, D. E., Williams, C. A., & Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: a multilevel theory of social change in organizations. The Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 836-863.
- Andrews, K. R. (1971). The concept of corporate strategy. Dow Jones-Irwin.
- Ansoff, I. H. (1965). Corporate Strategy. US : McGraw-Hill.
- Baba, S., Moustaquim, R. et Bégin, É. (2016). Responsabilité sociale des entreprises : un regard historique à travers les classiques en management stratégique. VertigO, 16(2), [En ligne] URL : http://vertigo.revues.org/17715; DOI : 17710.14000/vertigo.17715
- Baba, S. et Raufflet, E. (2015). L’acceptabilité sociale : une notion en consolidation. Management International, 19(3).
- Banerjee, S. B. (2000). Whose Land Is It Anyway ? National Interest, Indigenous Stakeholders, and Colonial Discourses. Organization & Environment, 13(3-38).
- Banerjee, S. B. (2003). Who Sustains Whose Development ? Sustainable Development and the Reinvention of Nature. Organization Studies, 24(1), 143-180.
- Banerjee, S. B. (2008). Corporate social responsibility : The good, the bad and the ugly. Critical Sociology, 34(1), 51-79.
- Barnett, M. L. (2007). Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 794-816
- Bear, S., Rahman, N. et Post, C. (2010). The Impact of Board Diversity and Gender Composition on Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(2), 207-221.
- Berkowitz, L., & Daniels, L. R. (1964). Affecting the salience of the social responsibility norm: effects of past help on the response to dependency relationships. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 68(3), 275.
- Berle, A. et Means, G. (1932). The Modern Corporation and Private Property. New York : Macmillan.
- Blowfield, M. et Frynas, J. G. (2005). Setting new agendas : Critical perspectives on corporate social responsibility in the developing world. International Affairs, 81, 499-513.
- Boltanski, L. et Chiapello, E. (1999). Le nouvel esprit du capitalisme. Paris : Gallimard.
- Bowen, F. (2007). Corporate Social Strategy: Competing Views from Two Theories of the Firm. Journal of Business Ethics, 75(1), 97-113.
- Bowen, F., Newenham-Kahindi, A. M. et Herremans, I. (2008). Engaging the Community : A Systematic Review (Vol. 1, p. 39). London, Canada : Research Network for Business Sustainability.
- Bowen, F., Newenham-Kahindi, A. M. et Herremans, I. (2010). When Suits Meet Roots : The Antecedents and Consequences of Community Engagement Strategy. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(2), 297-318.
- Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social responsibilities of the businessman. New York : Harper and Row.
- Brammer, S., Jackson, G., & Matten, D. (2012). Corporate Social Responsibility and institutional theory: new perspectives on private governance. Socio-Economic Review, 10(1), 3-28.
- Brown, J. A. et Forster, W. R. (2013). CSR and Stakeholder Theory : A Tale of Adam Smith. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(2), 301-312.
- Bruijn, E. et Whiteman, G. (2010). That Which Doesn’t Break Us : Identity Work by Local Indigenous ‘Stakeholders’. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(3), 479-495.
- Burrell, G. et Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological Paradigms and Organization Analysis. Elements of the Sociology of Corporate Life. Newcastle : Athenaeum Press.
- Cai, Y., Jo, H. et Pan, C. (2011). Vice or Virtue ? The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Executive Compensation. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(2), 159-173.
- Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4, 497-505.
- Carroll, A. B. (1989). Business & Society : Ethics & stakeholder management. Cincinnati : South-Western Pub. Co.
- Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate Social Responsibility : Evolution of a Definitional Construct. Business & Society, 38(3), 268-295.
- Carroll, A. B. (2008). A history of corporate social responsibility : concepts and practices. Dans A. Crane, D. Matten, A. McWilliams, J. Moon & D. S. Siegel (dir.), The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility (p. 19-46). Oxford : Oxford University Press.
- Carroll, A. B., Lipartito, K. J., Post, J. E., Werhane, P. H. et Goodpaster, K. E. (2012). Corporate Responsibility : The American Experience. Cambridge University Press.
- Clark, M. J. (1916). The Changing Basis of Economic Responsibility. Journal of Political Economy, 24(3), 209-229.
- Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92-117.
- Cochran, P. L. (2007). The evolution of corporate social responsibility. Business Horizons, 50, 449-454.
- Cragg, W., Schwartz, M. S. et Weitzner, D. (2009). Corporate Social Responsibility. England : Ashgate Publishing Limited.
- Crane, A., Matten, D. et Moon, J. (2008). Corporations and Citizenship. Cambridge : University Press.
- Dare, M., Schirmer, J., & Vanclay, F. (2014). Community engagement and social licence to operate. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 32(3), 188-197. doi: 10.1080/14615517.2014.927108
- Davidson, L. (2010). A Quest for Harmony : The Role of Music in Robert Owen’s New Lanark Community. Utopian Studies, 21(2), 232-251.
- Davis, K. (1960). Can business afford to ignore social responsibilities ?. California Management Review, 2(3), 70-76.
- Davis, K. (1968). Understanding the social responsibility puzzle. Business Horizons, 10(4), 45-50.
- Delannon, N., Bénard, J., Verreault, I., & Raufflet, E. (2011). What do companies achieve in terms of corporate-community relations? [Original title: Que font les entreprises en matière de relations avec les communautés ?]. Gestion, 36(2), 29-38.
- Delannon, N., Raufflet, E. et Baba, S. (2016). Corporate community engagement strategies and organizational arrangements : a multiple case study in Canada. Journal of Cleaner Production, 129, 714-723.
- Déry, R. (2013). Les fondements de la gestion des connaissances. Québec, Canada : Les Éditions JFD.
- Dodd, M. E. (1932). For Whom are Corporate Managers Trustees ? Harvard Law Review, 45, 1145-1163.
- Donaldson, T. et Preston, L. E. (1995). The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation : Concepts, Evidence, and Implications. The Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65-91.
- Donnachie, I. (2003). Robert Owen : Owen of New Lanark and New Harmony. Utopian Studies, 14(2), 159-161.
- Drucker, P. (1993). Post-capitalist Society. New York : Harper Business.
- Drucker, P. F. (1984). The New Meaning of Corporate Social Responsibility. California Management Review, 26, 53-63.
- Du, S., Bhattacharya, C., & Sen, S. (2010). Maximizing Business Returns to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): The Role of CSR Communication. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 8-19.
- Freeman, E. R. (1984). Strategic Management : A Stakeholder Approach. Boston : Pitman
- Friedman, M. (1970). The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Its Profits, New York Times Magazine, p. 122-126.
- Garriga, E. et Melé, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories : Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53, 51-71.
- Gendron, C. (2000). Le questionnement éthique et social de l’entreprise dans la littérature managériale [No ET0004]. Document inédit.
- Gendron, C. (2014). Penser l’acceptabilité sociale : au-delà de l’intérêt, les valeurs. Revue internationale Communication sociale et publique(11), 117-129.
- Gond, J.-P. (2011). La responsabilité sociale de l’entreprise au-delà du fonctionnalisme : un cadre d’analyse pluraliste de l’interface entreprise-société. Finance Contrôle Stratégie, 14(2), 37-66.
- Gond, J.-P. et Igalens, J. (2008). La responsabilité sociale de l’entreprise. Puf.
- Gond, J.-P. et Matten, D. (2007). Rethinking the business-society interface : Beyond the functionalist trap. ICCSR Research paper series, 47.
- Gond, J.-P., Moon, J. et Kang, N. (2011). The government of self-regulation : on the comparative dynamics of corporate social responsibility. Economy and Society, 40(4), 640-671.
- Gond, J.-P. et Mullenbach, A. (2006). Les fondements théoriques de la responsabilité sociétale de l’entreprise. Revue des Sciences de Gestion, 205, 93-116.
- Gond, J.-P., Palazzo, G. et Basu, K. (2009). Reconsidering Instrumental Corporate Social Responsibility through the Mafia Metaphor. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19(1), 55-85.
- Habisch, A., Jonker, J., Wegner, M. et Schmidpeter, R. (2005). Corporate social responsibility across Europe. Springer.
- Hafsi, T., & Turgut, G. (2013). Boardroom Diversity and its Effect on Social Performance: Conceptualization and Empirical Evidence. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(3), 463-479.
- Harrison, J. S. (2011). Stakeholder Theory in Strategic Management : A Retrospective. Dans R. A. Phillips (dir.), Stakeholder Theory : Impact and Prospects. Cheltenham, UK : Edward Elgar.
- Heald, M. (1970). The social responsibilities of business, company, and community, 1900-1960. Transaction Publishers.
- Hemingway, C. A. et Maclagan, P. W. (2004). Managers’ Personal Values as Drivers of Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 50(1), 33-44.
- Homburg, C., Stierl, M., & Bornemann, T. (2013). Corporate Social Responsibility in Business-to-Business Markets: How Organizational Customers Account for Supplier Corporate Social Responsibility Engagement. Journal of Marketing, 77(6), 54-72.
- Husted, B. W. (2000). A Contingency Theory of Corporate Social Performance. Business & Society, 39(1), 24-48.
- Jamali, D., & Neville, B. (2011). Convergence Versus Divergence of CSR in Developing Countries: An Embedded Multi-Layered Institutional Lens. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(4), 599-621
- Jones, S. (2016). Utopian socialism reconsidered. Dans R. Samuel (dir.), People’s History and Socialist Theory (p. 138-145) : Routledge.
- Jones, T. M. (1980). Corporate social responsibility revisited, redefined. California Management Review, 22(3), 59-67.
- Kakabadse, N. K., Rozuel, C., & Lee-Davies, L. (2005). Corporate social responsibility and stakeholder approach: a conceptual review. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 1(4), 277-302.
- Lantos, G. P. (2001). The boundaries of strategic corporate social responsibility. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(7), 595-632.
- Lee, M.-D. P. (2008). A review of the theories of corporate social responsibility : Its evolutionary path and the road ahead. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10(1), 53-73.
- Levitt, T. (1958). The Dangers of Social Responsibility. Harvard business review, 36(5), 41-50.
- Logsdon, J. M., & Wood, D. J. (2002). Business Citizenship: From Domestic To Global Level of Analysis. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2).
- Ma, Z. (2009). The Status of Contemporary Business Ethics Research : Present and Future. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(3), 255-265.
- Mahoney, L. S. et Thorn, L. (2006). An Examination of the Structure of Executive Compensation and Corporate Social Responsibility : A Canadian Investigation. Journal of Business Ethics, 69(2), 149-162.
- Maignan, I., & Ralston, D. A. (2002). Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe and the U.S.: Insights from Businesses’ Self-presentations. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(3), 497-514.
- Maignan, I., Ferell, L., & Hult, T. M. (1999). Corporate citizenship: Cultural antecedents and business benefits. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(4), 455-469.
- Marcus, A. A., & Anderson, M. H. (2006). A General Dynamic Capability: Does it Propagate Business and Social Competencies in the Retail Food Industry?. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 19-46.
- Margolis, J. D., Elfenbein, H. A. et Walsh, J. P. (2007). Does it pay to be Good ? A Meta-Analysis and Redirection of Research on the Relationship between Corporate Social and Financial Performance. Communication présentée Academy of Management, Philadelphia.
- Margolis, J. D. et Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery Loves Companies : Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268-305.
- Marquis, C. et Battilana, J. (2009). Acting globally but thinking locally ? The enduring influence of local communities on organizations. Research in Organizational Behavio, 29, 283-302.
- Matten, D. et Crane, A. (2005). Corporate citizenship : towards an extended theoretical conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 166-179.
- Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). "Implicit" and "Explicit" CSR: A Conceptual Framework for a Comparative Understanding of Corporate Social Responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404-424.
- McGuire, J., Dow, S., & Argheyd, K. (2003). CEO Incentives and Corporate Social Performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 45(4), 341-359.
- McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of management review, 26(1), 117-127.
- McWilliams, A., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, P. M. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility: Strategic Implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 1-18.
- Melé, D., & Armengou, J. (2016). Moral Legitimacy in Controversial Projects and Its Relationship with Social License to Operate: A Case Study. Journal of Business Ethics, 136(4), 729-742. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2866-z 45
- Mercier, S. (2001). L’apport de la théorie des parties prenantes au management stratégique : une synthèse de la littérature. Communication présentée Xième Conférence de l’Association Internationale de Management Stratégique Québec.
- Meyskens, M. et Paul, K. (2010). The Evolution of Corporate Social Reporting Practices in Mexico. Journal of Business Ethics, 91(2), 221-227.
- Miles, M. P., Munilla, L. S., & Darroch, J. (2006). The Role of Strategic Conversations with Stakeholders in the Formation of Corporate Social Responsibility Strategy. Journal of Business Ethics, 69(2), 195-205.
- Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts. The Academy of Management Review 22(4), 853-886.
- Muthuri, J., Chapple, W. et Moon, J. (2009). An Integrated Approach to Implementing ‘Community Participation’ in Corporate Community Involvement : Lessons from Magadi Soda Company. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(2), 431-444.
- N'Goala, G. (2007). Customer switching resistance (CSR): The effects of perceived equity, trust and relationship commitment. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 18(5), 510-533.
- Ocler, R. (2009). Discourse analysis and corporate social responsibility: a qualitative approach. Society and Business Review, 4(3), 175-186
- Owen, R. (1969). Robert Owen on Education. London, UK : Cambridge University Press.
- Palazzo, G. et Scherer, A. G. (2011). The New Political Role of Business in a Globalized World : A Review of a New Perspective on CSR and its Imlications for the Firm, Governance, and Democracy. Jounal of Management Studies, 48(4), 899-922.
- Pasquero, J. (2004). De l’éthique du marché à l’éthique de la responsabilité. Dans D.-G. Tremblay & D. Rolland (dir.), Responsabilité sociale d’entreprise et finance responsable : quels enjeux ? (p. 35-62). Québec : Presses de l’Université du Québec.
- Pasquero, J. (2005). La responsabilité sociale de l’entreprise comme objet des sciences de gestion : le concept et sa portée. Dans M.-F. Bouthillier-Turcotte & A. Salmon (dir.), Responsabilité sociale et environnementale de l’entreprise (p. 112-143). Sillery, QC : Presses de l’Université du Québec.
- Pasquero, J. (2008). Entreprise, développement durable et théorie des parties prenantes : esquisse d’un arrimage socio-constructionniste. Management international, 12(2), 27-48.
- Pedersen, E. R. (2006). Making Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Operable : How Companies Translate Stakeholder Dialogue into Practice. Business and Society Review, 111(2), 137-163.
- Phillips, R., Freeman, R. E. et Wicks, A. C. (2003). What stakeholder theory is not. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(4), 479-502.
- Piaget, J. (1970). La situation des sciences de l’homme dans le système des sciences : introduction Tendances principales de la recherche dans les sciences sociales et humaines, première partie : Sciences sociales (p. 1-65). Paris; La Haye : Mouton.
- Pomering, A., & Dolnicar, S. (2009). Assessing the Prerequisite of Successful CSR Implementation: Are Consumers Aware of CSR Initiatives? Journal of Business Ethics, 85(2), 285-301.
- Popoli, P. (2011). Linking CSR strategy and brand image : Different approaches in local and global markets. Marketing Theory, 11(4), 419-433.
- Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and Society: The Link Between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78-92.
- Preston, L. E. (1975). Corporation and society : the search for a paradigm. Journal of Economic Literature, 13, 434-453.
- Raufflet, E., Baba, S., Perras, C., & Delannon, N. (2013). Social Licence. Dans N. C. S. O. Idowu, L. Zu, & A. S. Gupta (dir.), Encyclopedia of Corporate Social Responsibility (p. 2223-2230). Heidelberg, Germany: The Springer.
- Raufflet, E., Berranger, A. et Gouin, J.-F. (2008). Innovation in business-community partnerships : evaluating the impact of local enterprise and global investment models on poverty, bio-diversity and development. Corporate Governance, 8(4), 546-556.
- Rodrigo, P. et Arenas, D. (2008). Do Employees Care About CSR Programs ? A Typology of Employees According to their Attitudes. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(2), 265-283.
- Roeck, K. D., & Delobbe, N. (2012). Do Environmental CSR Initiatives Serve Organizations’ Legitimacy in the Oil Industry? Exploring Employees’ Reactions Through Organizational Identification Theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 110(4), 397-412.
- Rosé, J.-J. et Lépineux, F. (2015). Résoudre l’oxymore de la RSE et de la business ethics - un chemin inspiré par Smith, Durkheim et Aristote. Recherches en Sciences de Gestion, 4(109), 125-146.
- Rouleau, L. (2011). Théories des organisations : approches classiques, contemporaines et de l’avant-garde. Québec, Canada : Presses de l’Université du Québec.
- Rowley, T. (1997). Moving beyond Dyadic Ties : A Network Theory of Stakeholder Influences. The Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 887-910.
- Rowley, T. et Berman, S. (2000). A Brand New Brand of Corporate Social Performance. Business Society, 39(4), 397-418.
- Rupp, D. E., Ganapathi, J., Aguilera, R. V., & Williams, C. A. (2006). Employee reactions to corporate social responsibility: an organizational justice framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(4), 537-543.
- Savall, H. et Zardet, V. (1987). Maîtriser les coûts et les performances cachés. Le contrat d’activité périodiquement négociable. Paris, France : Éditions Economica.
- Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2011). The New Political Role of Business in a Globalized World: A Review of a New Perspective on CSR and its Implications for the Firm, Governance, and Democracy. Journal of Management Studies, 48(4), 899-931.
- Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G. et Matten, D. (2009). Editor’s introduction : Globalization as a challenge for business responsibility. Business Ethics Quarterly (Special Issue on “The Changing Role of Business in a Global Society : New Challenges and Responsibilities”), 19(3), 327-348.
- Sethi, S. P. (1975). Dimensions of Corporate Social Performance : An Analytical Framework. California Management Review, 17(3), 58-64.
- Shamir, R. (2005). Mind the Gap : The Commodification of Corporate Social Responsibility. Symbolic Interaction, 28(2), 229-253.
- Shaw, W. H. (2009). Marxism, Business Ethics, and Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(4), 565-576.
- Singhapakdi, A., Lee, D.-J., Sirgy, M. J. et Senasud, K. (2015). The impact of incongruity between an organization’s CSR orientation and its employees’ CSR orientation on employees’ quality of work life. Journal of Business Research, 68(1), 60-66.
- Smith, A. (1776). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. London, UK : W. Strahan and T. Cadell.
- Steiner, G. et Steiner, J. (2011). Business, Government and Society : A Managerial Perspective. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
- Sternberg, E. (1999). The Stakeholder Concept: A Mistaken Doctrine. Document inédit.
- Thomson, I., & Boutilier, R. G. (2011). Modelling and Measuring the Social License to Operate: Fruits of a Dialogue between Theory and Practice. Repéré le 10 September 2013 à http://socialicense.com/publications/Modelling%20and%20Measuring%20the%20SLO.pdf
- Tremblay, D.-G. et Rolland, D. (2004). Responsabilité sociale d’entreprise et finance responsable : quels enjeux ? Québec : Presses de l’Université du Québec.
- UNESCO. (2014). La Liste du Patrimoine mondial : New Lanark. Repéré 2014
- Voegtlin, C. et Greenwood, M. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and human resource management : A systematic review and conceptual analysis. Human Resource Management Review, 26(3), 181-197.
- Waldman, D. A., Siegel, D. S. et Javidan, M. (2006). Components of CEO Transformational Leadership and Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Management Studies, 43(8), 1703-1725.
- Wallich, H. C. et McGowan, J. J. (1970). Stockholder interest and the corporation’s role in social policy. Dans W. J. Baumol (dir.), A New Rationale for Corporate Social Policy. New York : NY : Committee for Economic Development.
- Wartick, S. L. et Cochran, P. L. (1985). The Evolution of the Corporate Social Performance Model. Academy of Management Review, 10, 758-769.
- Whiteman, G. (2004). The Impact of Economic Development in James Bay, Canada. The Cree Tallymen Speak Out. . Organization & Environment, 17(4), 425-448.
- Whiteman, G. (2009). All My Relations : Understanding Perceptions of Justice and Conflict between Companies and Indigenous Peoples. Organization Studies, 30(1), 101-120.
- Wilson, E. (2016). What is the social licence to operate? Local perceptions of oil and gas projects in Russia's Komi Republic and Sakhalin Island. Extractive Industries and Society-an International Journal, 3(1), 73-81. doi: 10.1016/j.exis.2015.09.001
- Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate Social Performance Revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16, 691-718.
- Wood, D. J. et Jones, R. E. (1995). Stakeholder mismatching : a theoretical problem in empirical research on corporate social performance. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 3(3), 229-267.
- Yang, X., & Rivers, C. (2009). Antecedents of CSR Practices in MNCs’ Subsidiaries: A Stakeholder and Institutional Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 86(2), 155-169.