ror.org/00wk3s644
Résumés
Abstract
This chapter aims at a better understanding of the dynamics leading firms to create Networks of practice (NoP) to transfer knowledge and know-how between its geographically dispersed business units. In this introduction we focus on the complementarity between communities of practice (CoP) and networks of practice (NoP) inside firms to share knowledge and consolidate organizational learning. We show that informal settings where people interact around their practices, such as CoP facilitate and consolidate knowledge sharing inside firms and enable them to create a larger network. After a literature review on CoP and NoP, the chapter will highlight the role of CoP and boundaries processes (brokers, boundary objects) in the development of NoP.
Keywords:
- Networks of practice,
- communities of practice,
- knowledge sharing,
- brokers,
- boundary objects
Résumé
Ce chapitre a pour objectif une meilleure comprehension des dynamiques conduisant les entreprises à créer des réseaux de pratique pour transférer des connaissances et du savoir-faire entre leurs unités dispersées géographiquement. Dans cette introduction, nous insistons sur la complémentarité entre les communautés de pratique et les réseaux de pratique à l’intérieur des entreprises pour partager les connaissances et consolider l’apprentissage organisationnel. Nous montrons que les lieux informels où les gens interagissent autour de leur pratiques, telles que les communautés de pratique, facilitent et consolident le partage de connaissances dans les entreprises et leur permettent de créer des réseaux plus larges. Après une revue de la literature sur les communautés de pratique et les réseaux de pratique, le chapitre éclairera le rôle des communautés et des processus de frontières (intermédiaires, objets-frontière) dans le développement des réseaux de pratique.
Mots-clés :
- Réseaux de pratique,
- communautés de pratique,
- partage de connaissances,
- intermédiaires,
- objets-frontière
Resumen
Este capítulo tiene como objetivo una mejor comprensión de las dinámicas de las empresas para crear redes de práctica para transferir conocimiento y know-how entre sus unidades de negocio geográficamente dispersas. En esta introducción nos centramos en la complementariedad entre las comunidades de práctica y las redes de práctica dentro de las empresas para compartir conocimiento y consolidar el aprendizaje organizacional. Mostramos que los entornos informales en los que las personas interactúan en torno a sus prácticas, como en las comunidades de práctica, facilitan y consolidan el intercambio de conocimientos dentro de las empresas y les permiten crear una red más amplia. Después de una revisión de la literatura sobre comunidades de práctica y redes de práctica, el capítulo destacará el rol de las comunidades y los procesos frontera (intermediarios, objetos frontera) en el desarrollo de las redes de práctica.
Palabras clave:
- Redes de práctica,
- comunidades de práctica,
- intercambio de conocimientos,
- intermediarios,
- objetos fronter
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Agterberg, L.C.M., Hooff, B.J. van den, Huysman, M.H. & Soekijad, M. (2008). Keeping the wheels turning : Multi-level dynamics in organizing networks of practice. (Working Paper, Research Memorandum, N° 3). Amsterdam: Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde.
- Agterberg, M., VandenHooff, B., Huysman, M., Soekijad, M. (2010), “Keeping the wheels turning: The dynamics of managing networks of practice”, Journal of Management Studies, 47, 1, 85-108.
- Agterberg, L.C.M., Hooff, B.J. van den, Huysman, M.H. (2011). Cracking the core: How core members of Electronic Networks of Practice contribute to organizational learning. San Antonio, Texas, Annual Meeting of the Academy of management.
- Amin, A., Roberts, J., (2008), Community, Economic Creativity, and Organisation, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
- Attour, A., Burger-Helmchen, T. (2015), “Smart cities: business models and ecosystems”, Journal of Strategy and Management, 8, 3, forthcoming.
- Bate, S.P., Robert, G., (2002), “Knowledge management and communities of practice in the private sector: lessons for modernizing the National Health Service in England and Wales”, Public Administration, 80, 643-663.
- Becker, M.C. (2001), “Managing Dispersed Knowledge: Organizational Problems, Managerial Strategies and their Effectiveness”, Journal of Management Studies, 38, 996-1018.
- Boersma, Margreet; Buckley, Peter J; Ghauri, Pervez. (2003). “Trust in international joint venture relationships”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 56, p.1031-1042.
- Boudreau K. J., Lakhani K. R. (2013), “Using the crowd as an innovation partner”, Harvard Business Review, 91, 4, 60-69.
- Brown, J.S. and Duguid, P. (1991), “Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning and innovation”, Organization Science, 2, 40-57.
- Burger-Helmchen, T., Cohendet, P. (2011), “User Communities and Social Software in the Video Game Industry”, Long Range Planning, 44, 5-6, 317-343.
- CastroGonçalves., L., (2012), “Learning Dynamics across Boundaries of IS Context: a Structural perspective to Support Knowledge Management”, Management International, 16, 41-55.
- Chanal V. (2000). Communauté de pratique et management de projet : à propos de l’ouvrage de Wenger (1998) communities of practice : learning, meaning and identity, Management, v. 3, n° 1, p. 1-30.
- Chesbrough H.W. (2003), “The era of Open Innovation, MIT Sloan Management Review, 44, 3, 34-41.
- Cohendet, P., Grandadam, D., Simon, L. (2008), “Réseaux, communautés et projets dans les processus créatifs”, Management international, 13, 1, 29-44.
- Cohendet, P., Llerena, P., Simon, L. (2010) “The Innovative Firm: Nexus of Communities and Creativity”, Revue d’économie industrielle, 129-130, 139-171.
- Cohendet, P., Grandadam, D., Simon, L.; (2011) “Rethinking Urban Creativity: Lessons from Barcelona and Montreal”, City Culture and Society, 2, 3, 151-158.
- Creplet, Frédéric; Dupouet, Olivier; Kern, Francis; Mehmanpazir, Babak, Munier, Francis (2001). “Consultants and experts in management consulting firms”. Research Policy, Vol. 30, p. 1517-1535.
- Curwell, S., Deakin, M., Cooper, I., Paskaleva-Shapira, K., Ravetz, J. and Babicki, D. (2005), “Citizens expectations of information cities: implications for urban planning and design”, Building Research and Information, 22, 1, 55-66.
- Deterding, S., Sicart, M., Nacke, L., O'Hara, K., & Dixon, D. (2011). Gamification. using game-design elements in non-gaming contexts. In CHI'11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (p. 2425-2428). ACM.
- Divay, G and Charbonneau E. (2014) “La municipalité, le ferment d’une “ville intelligente” in “Votre ville est-elle Smart?”, Le sablier, 21, 1, 18-19.
- Doz, Y.K., Wilson, K. (2012) Managing Global Innovations, Harvard Business Review Press.
- Gamification, http://www.capgemini-consulting.com/enterprise-gamification-study
- Goglio-Primard K., Crespin-Mazet F. (2011), “Knowledge transfer within cluster: the catalyst role of private collective support structures”, Management et Avenir, N°50 Boosting territorial multistakeholder cooperation, coordination and collaboration: strategic and managerial issues, p. 190-206.
- Goglio-Primard K., Crespin-Mazet F. (2015), “Organizing Open Innovation in Networks – the role of boundary relations”, Management International, Volume 19 - Numéro special 2015 - Pages 135-147.
- Hildreth, P., Kimble, C., & Wright, P. (2000). Communities of Practice in the Distributed International Environment. Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(1), 27 – 37.
- Jacob, R., Julien, P-A., Raymond, L. (2009), “Compétitivité, savoirs stratégiques et innovation: Les leviers de l’apprentissage collectif en contexte de réseau”, Revue internationale de gestion, 630-646.
- Kimble, C., & Hildreth, P. (2005). Dualities, Distributed Communities of Practice and Knowledge Management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(4), 102 - 113.
- Lave, J., Wenger, E., (1991), Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
- Lindkvist, L., (2005), “Knowledge communities and knowledge collectivities: a typology of knowledge work in groups”, Journal of Management Studies, 42, 6, 1189-1210.
- Lombardi, P., Curwell, S. (2005), “INTELCITY Scenarios for the City of the Future”, In D. Miller and D. Patassini, Beyond Benefit Cost Analysis, Aldershot, Ashgate.
- Orr, Julian E. (1996). Talking About Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job. IRL Press an imprint of Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY/London.
- Pénin J., Burger-Helmchen T., Dintrich A., Guittard C., Schenk E. (2013), Innovation ouverte: Définition, pratique et perspectives, collection Prospective et Entreprises, CCI Paris.
- Pénin J., Burger-Helmchen T. (2012), “Crowdsourcing d’activités inventives et frontières des organisations”, Management International, 16, 101-112.
- Schenk E., Guittard C. (2012), “Une typologie des pratique de crowdsourcing: l’externalisation vers la foule, au-delà du processus d’innovation”, Management International, 16, 89-100.
- Schiavonne, F., Simoni, M., Tresca, R. (2015), The role of vintage communities of practice in technological change, Journal of Innovation Economics & Management, 18, 3, 143-163.
- VonHippel E. (2005). Democratizing innovation, MIT Press.
- Wenger, E. (1998), Communities of practice. Learning, Meaning, and identity, Cambridge University Press.
- Wenger, E. Mc Dermott R., Snyder, W. (2002),. A guide to managing knowledge: Cultivating Communities of practice, Harvard Business School Press.
- Wenger, E., Trayner, B., De Laat M. (2011), Promoting and assessing value creation in communities and networks: a conceptual framework, Ruud de Moor Centrum, Open Universiteit, rdmc.ou.nl.
- Wenger-Trayner E., Fenton-O’Creevy M., Hutchinson S., Kubiak C. (2015), Learning in Landscapes of Practice: Boundaries, identity, and knowledgeability in practice-based learning, Routledge.
10.7202/1012392ar