Résumés
Abstract
During the COVID-19 pandemic, more than 300,000 students in Peru dropped out of the school system. Most of the students were rural Indigenous students. A lack of infrastructure and connectivity, as well as a lack of contextualized and appropriate educational resources, made it virtually impossible for rural students to engage in formal learning. The pandemic has made clear the need and viability for distributed e-learning in rural communities. However, creating e-learning content that is contextualized to support vulnerable students’ learning has been a challenge. Little to no research has discussed how to contextualize e-learning to address both its promises and challenges. In this research note, we discuss an initiative to bring together advances in contextualized learning and e-learning to address problems with access to quality materials and curriculum in rural Peruvian schools. We highlight how interdisciplinary collaborations can support innovations and improve educational access for low-income students from remote regions through distributed learning. While research have found significant promise in contextualized education, the processes of engaging in contextualized digital learning and in low-income communities have proven difficult to implement. We discuss the concepts, research base, processes, and technology required to address these needs, as well as the curricular and pedagogical approach we take in this initiative.
Keywords:
- digital learning,
- contextualized learning,
- e-learning,
- Indigenous education
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Amineh, R. J., & Asl, H. D. (2015). Review of constructivism and social constructivism. Journal of Social Sciences, Literature and Languages, 1(1), 9–16.
- Berns, R. G., & Erickson, P. M. (2001). Contextual teaching and learning: Preparing students for the new economy. The Highlight Zone: Research @ Work, 5, 2–9. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED452376.pdf
- Brasof, M., & Levitan, J. (Eds.). (2022). Student voice research: Theory, methods, and innovations from the field. Teachers College Press. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED623849
- Brydon-Miller, M., Kral, M., & Ortiz Aragón, A. (2020). Participatory action research: International perspectives and practices. International Review of Qualitative Research, 13(2), 103–111. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1940844720933225
- Castagno, A. E., & Brayboy, B. M. J. (2008). Culturally responsive schooling for Indigenous youth: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 941–993. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308323036
- Cote-Meek, S., & Moeke-Pickering, T. (2020). Decolonizing and indigenizing education in Canada. Canadian Scholars Press. https://www.canadianscholars.ca/books/decolonizing-and-indigenizing-education-in-canada
- Cueto, S., Balarin, M., Saavedra, M., & Sugimaru, C. (2023). Ed-tech in the Global South: Research gaps and opportunities. (Occasional paper no. 91). Southern Voice. https://southernvoice.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Ed-tech-Global-South-Cueto-et-al.-2023.pdf
- Dewey, J. (1997). Experience and education (Reprint edition). New York: Touchstone. https://openlibrary.org/books/OL15492565M/Experience_and_education
- Espinal-Meza, S. (2024). Critical pedagogies for reappraising Indigenous knowledge and diversity in rural Peru: The voices of two rural teachers. Australian and International Journal of Rural Education, 34(2), 71–86.
- García, M. E. (2003). The politics of community: Education, indigenous rights, and ethnic mobilization in Peru. Latin American Perspectives, 30(1), 70–95.
- García, M. E. (2005). Making indigenous citizens: Identities, education, and multicultural development in Peru. Stanford University Press.
- Haßler, B., Major, L., & Hennessy, S. (2016). Tablet use in schools: A critical review of the evidence for learning outcomes. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(2), 139-156. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12123
- Haerazi, H., Prayati, Z., & Vikasari, R. M. (2019). Practicing contextual teaching and learning (CLT) approach to improve students’ reading comprehension in relation to motivation. English Review: Journal of English Education, 8(1), 139–146. https://journal.uniku.ac.id/index.php/ERJEE/article/view/2011
- Hynsjö, D., & Damon, A. (2016). Bilingual education in Peru: Evidence on how Quechua-medium education affects indigenous children’s academic achievement. Economics of Education Review, 53, 116–132.
- Johnson, K. M. & Levitan, J. (2021). Learning on the mountain: Illuminating educational inequities during COVID-19 in Peru to develop community-informed policy, NORRAG Special Issue 06, 22-25. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356082922_Learning_on_the_Mountain_COVID-19_Educational_Inequities_and_Community-Informed_Policy_in_Peru
- Johnson, K. M., & Levitan, J. (2022). Rural indigenous students in Peruvian Urban higher education: interweaving ecological systems of coloniality, community, barriers, and opportunities. Diaspora, Indigenous, and Minority Education, 16(1), 21-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/15595692.2021.1974383
- Ladson‐Billings, G. (1995). But that’s just good teaching! The case for culturally relevant pedagogy. Theory Into Practice, 34(3), 159–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849509543675
- Levitan, J., & Post, D. (2017). Indigenous student learning outcomes and education policies in Peru and Ecuador. Indigenous education policy, equity, and intercultural understanding in Latin America, 27-49. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59532-4_2
- Levitan, J. (2018). The danger of a single theory: Understanding students’ voices and social justice in the Peruvian Andes. Teachers College Record, 120(2), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811812000208
- Levitan, J., & Johnson, K. M. (2020). Salir adelante: Collaboratively developing culturally grounded curriculum with marginalized communities. American Journal of Education, 126(2), 195-230. https://doi.org/10.1086/706921
- Meza Lovon, G. L. (2023, July 30). La brecha digital del Perú: Remedios que no la cierran [The digital gap in Peru: Treatments that do not close it]. Departamento de Ciencia de la Computación de la Universidad Católica San Pablo. https://ucsp.edu.pe/brecha-digital-peru-remedios-que-no-la-cierran/
- MINEDU. (2016, June 2). Currículo nacional de la educación básica [National curriculum for basic education]. http://www.minedu.gob.pe/curriculo/pdf/curriculo-nacional-de-la-educacion-basica.pdf
- MINEDU. (2021). Lineamientos para la diversificación curricular en la educación básica [Guidelines for diversifying the basic education curriculum]. https://cdn.www.gob.pe/uploads/document/file/2014807/RVM%20N%C2%B0%20222-2021-MINEDU.pdf.pdf
- MINEDU. (2022). Guía docente para la planificación curricular de las experiencias de aprendizaje [Teaching guide for curriculum planning and the learning experience]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12799/7813
- OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
- O’Sullivan, M. (2006). Lesson observation and quality in primary education as contextual teaching and learning processes. International Journal of Educational Development, 26(3), 246–260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2005.07.016
- Paris, D. (2012). Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational Researcher, 41(3), 93–97. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12441244
- Rodriguez Paredes, N. P., Duran Llaro, K. L., & Marquez Yauri, H. Y. (2023). Peruvian National Strategy for Educational Reinsertion and Continuity: An Analysis of Post-Pandemic School Dropout Reduction. Migration Letters, 20(4), 1357-1378. https://repositorio.ucv.edu.pe/handle/20.500.12692/145313
- Sumida Huaman, E. A. (2013). Conversations on Indigenous education, progress, and social justice in Peru. International Journal of Multicultural Education, 15(3), 10–25. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1105091
- Sumida Huaman, E. A. (2020). Small Indigenous schools: Indigenous resurgence and education in the Americas. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 51(3), 262–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/aeq.12335
- Suryawati, E., Osman, K., & Meerah, T. S. M. (2010). The effectiveness of RANGKA contextual teaching and learning on students’ problem solving skills and scientific attitude. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 1717–1721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.389
- Tabibnia, G., & Lieberman, M. D. (2007). Fairness and cooperation are rewarding: Evidence from social cognitive neuroscience. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1118(1), 90–101. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1412.001
- Tamur, M., Jehadus, E., Nendi, F., Mandur, K., & Murni, V. (2020). Assessing the effectiveness of the contextual teaching and learning model on students’ mathematical understanding ability: A meta-analysis study. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1657(1), 1–8. https://www.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1657/1/012067
- The Indigenous World. (2024). The Indigenous World 2024 - 38th Edition. International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs. https://iwgia.org/en/resources/publications/5508-the-indigenous-world-2024.html
- UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education – A tool on whose terms? https://doi.org/10.54676/UZQV8501
- Zavala, V. (2014). What is Quechua literacy for? Ideological dilemmas in intercultural bilingual education in the Peruvian Andes. In M. Prinsloo & C. Stroud (Eds.), Educating for language and literacy diversity: Mobile selves (pp. 45–72). Palgrave Macmillan UK.