Résumés
Abstract
Extended reality (XR), which encompasses virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), and mixed reality (MR), offers powerful affordances for improving teaching and learning experiences in a post-pandemic world. Increasingly, many governments and institutions around the world are making major investments in XR technologies to prepare education systems for the future. However, many of these investments remain isolated pilot projects which, while they attest to the potential of XR in education, are unlikely to be scaled up due to lack of sustainability and collaboration. Based on literature and empirical evidence, I have identified major barriers to the wider adoption of XR in education, including the lack of (a) open content, tools, and skills; (b) sound pedagogy and instructional design; and (c) scalability and sustainability. As a potential solution, I introduce the Open XR for Education Framework (OXREF), an empirical framework that proposes a holistic solution to XR object creation, implementation, and deployment, while covering pedagogical, technological, and policy perspectives. The contribution of the OXREF is its ability to build fit-for-purpose XR experiences in a scalable, sustainable, and collaborative manner while promoting openness, accessibility, equity, and reuse. The novelty of the proposed framework is its use of open educational resources (OER), open educational practices (OEP), as well as free and open-source software (FOSS) tools and platforms. Its cloud-based infrastructure and open licenses support viable operationalization strategies that can be implemented by educational institutions and governments.
Keywords:
- OXREF,
- open XR,
- XR for education,
- XR framework,
- extended reality,
- XR scalability,
- XR sustainability,
- VR,
- AR,
- OER,
- OEP,
- open licenses
Veuillez télécharger l’article en PDF pour le lire.
Télécharger
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Abeywardena, I. S. (2012). A report on the re-use and adaptation of open educational resources (OER): An exploration of technologies available. Commonwealth of Learning. http://hdl.handle.net/11599/233
- Abeywardena, I. S. (2017). An empirical framework for mainstreaming OER in an academic institution. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 12(2), 230–242. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-11-2017-0036
- Abeywardena, I. S. (2021, December). Open extended reality for education framework (OXREF): Mainstreaming XR through institutional collaboration [Conference session]. Waterloo Information Technology and Information Systems (WatITis) Conference. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356878877_OXREF_Open_Extended_Reality_for_Education_Framework
- Abeywardena, I. S., & Chan, C. S. (2013). Review of the current OER search dilemma [Conference session]. Proceedings of the 57th World Assembly of International Council on Education for Teaching, (ICET 2013, pp. 25–28). Nonthaburi, Thailand. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ishan-Abeywardena/publication/240310607_Review_of_the_Current_OER_Search_Dilemma/links/02e7e51c54e3671bc4000000/Review-of-the-Current-OER-Search-Dilemma.pdf
- Abeywardena, I. S., Raviraja, S., & Tham, C. Y. (2012). Conceptual framework for parametrically measuring the desirability of open educational resources using D-index. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(2), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i2.1177
- Abeywardena, I. S., Uys, P. M., & Fifita, S. (2019). OER mainstreaming in Tonga. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i1.3924
- Afzal, A., Firdousi, S. F., Waqar, A., & Awais, M. (2022). The influence of Internet penetration on poverty and income inequality. SAGE Open, 12(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221116104
- Alizadehsalehi, S., Hadavi, A., & Huang, J. C. (2020). From BIM to extended reality in AEC industry. Automation in Construction, 116, 103254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103254
- Beça, P., Ribeiro, S., Santos, R., Aresta, M., Veloso, A. I., & Ortet, C. (2020). Design and initial evaluation of an online portal-repository: The case of Gamers4Nature project. In N. Martins & D. Brandão, (Eds.), Proceedings of Advances in Design and Digital Communication (Digicom 2020). Springer Series in Design and Innovation (Vol. 12, pp. 137–147). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61671-7_13
- Cronin, C. (2017). Openness and praxis: Exploring the use of open educational practices in higher education. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(5), 15–34. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.3096
- Dash, S., & Pani, S. K. (2016). E-Governance paradigm using cloud infrastructure: Benefits and challenges. Procedia Computer Science, 85, 843–855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.05.274
- Dibbern, C., Uhr, M., Krupke, D., & Steinicke, F. (2018). Can WebVR further the adoption of virtual reality? In S. Hess & H. Fischer (Eds.), Humans and Computers 2018: Usability Professionals, (pp. 377–384). https://doi.org/10.18420/muc2018-up-0249
- Doolani, S., Wessels, C., Kanal, V., Sevastopoulos, C., Jaiswal, A., Nambiappan, H., & Makedon, F. (2020). A review of extended reality (xr) technologies for manufacturing training. Technologies, 8(4), 77–97. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies8040077
- EDUCAUSE. (2018, May). eXtended reality (XR): How AR, VR, and MR are extending learning opportunities. https://events.educause.edu/eli/focus-sessions/2018/extended-reality-xr-how-ar-vr-and-mr-are-extending-learning-opportunities
- Fernandez, M. (2017). Augmented virtual reality: How to improve education systems. Higher Learning Research Communications, 7(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.18870/hlrc.v7i1.373
- Friesen, N. (2009). Open educational resources: New possibilities for change and sustainability. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10(5). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v10i5.664
- Garcia Estrada, J., & Prasolova-Førland, E. (2022). Running an XR lab in the context of COVID-19 pandemic: Lessons learned from a Norwegian university. Education and Information Technologies, 27(1), 773–789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10446-x
- Garnett, A., Leahey, A., Savard, D., Towell, B., & Wilson, L. (2017). Open metadata for research data discovery in Canada. Journal of Library Metadata, 17(3–4), 201–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/19386389.2018.1443698
- Glasserman-Morales, L. D., Ruiz-Ramírez, J. A., & Estrada, F. J. (2022). Transforming higher education using WebVR: A case study. IEEE Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias del Aprendizaje, 17(3), 230–234. https://doi.org/10.1109/RITA.2022.3191257
- Guilbaud, P., Guilbaud, T. C., & Jennings, D. (2021). Extended reality, pedagogy, and career readiness: A review of literature. Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality: Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 595–613). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77599-5_41
- Hogg, R., & Hogg, M. (1995). Continuous quality improvement in higher education. International Statistical Review, 63(1), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.2307/1403776
- Höhl, W. (2020). Official survey data and virtual worlds: Designing an integrative and economical open source production pipeline for XR-applications in small and medium-sized enterprises. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 4(4), 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc4040026
- India Blooms News Service. (2017, December 16). Samsung India partners with UNESCO to launch VR content and 360-degree videos. https://www.indiablooms.com/finance-details/8251/samsung-india-partners-with-unesco-to-launch-vr-content-and-360-degree-videos.html
- Khan, T., Johnston, K., & Ophoff, J. (2019). The impact of an augmented reality application on learning motivation of students. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, 2019, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7208494
- Kluge, M. G., Maltby, S., Keynes, A., Nalivaiko, E., Evans, D. J., & Walker, F. R. (2022). Current state and general perceptions of the use of extended reality (XR) technology at the University of Newcastle: Interviews and surveys from staff and students. SAGE Open, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221093348
- Koseoglu, S., & Bozkurt, A. (2018). An exploratory literature review on open educational practices. Distance Education, 39(4), 441–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1520042
- Lai, J. W., & Cheong, K. H. (2022). Adoption of virtual and augmented reality for mathematics education: A scoping review. IEEE Access, 10, 13693–13703. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3145991
- MacKinnon, T., Pasfield-Neofitou, S., Manns, H., & Grant, S. (2016). A meta-analysis of open educational communities of practice and sustainability in higher educational policy. Apprentissage des Langues et Systèmes d’Information et de Communication, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.4000/alsic.2908
- McGreal, R. (2017). Special report on the role of open educational resources in supporting the sustainable development goal 4: Quality education challenges and opportunities. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(7). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i7.3541
- Meccawy, M. (2022). Creating an immersive XR learning experience: A roadmap for educators. Electronics, 11(21), 3547. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11213547
- Mourchid, Y., Renoust, B., Cherifi, H., & El Hassouni, M. (2018). Multilayer network model of movie script. In L. Aiello, C. Cherifi, H. Cherifi, R. Lambiotte, P. Lió & L. Rocha (Eds.), Complex Networks and Their Applications (Vol. 812, pp. 782–796). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05411-3_62
- Murray, J. T., & Johnson, E. K. (2021). XR content authoring challenges: The creator-developer divide. In J. A. Fisher (Ed.), Augmented and Mixed Reality for Communities (pp. 245–264). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003052838
- Niederhauser, D. S., Howard, S. K., Voogt, J., Agyei, D. D., Laferriere, T., Tondeur, J., & Cox, M. J. (2018). Sustainability and scalability in educational technology initiatives: Research-informed practice. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 23(3), 507–523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9382-z
- Pomerantz, J., & Rode, R. (2020). Exploring the future of extended reality in higher education. EDUCAUSE. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/6/exploring-the-future-of-extended-reality-in-higher-education
- Razzouk, R., & Shute, V. (2012). What is design thinking and why is it important? Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 330–348. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312457429
- Renz, A., & Hilbig, R. (2020). Prerequisites for artificial intelligence in further education: Identification of drivers, barriers, and business models of educational technology companies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00193-3
- Rocha Estrada, F. J., Ruiz-Ramírez, J. A., George-Reyes, C. E., & Glasserman-Morales, L. (2022). Evaluation of a virtual campus adapted to WebVR spaces: Assessments of teachers and students. Frontiers in Education, 7, 396. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.918125
- Rokhsaritalemi, S., Sadeghi-Niaraki, A., & Choi, S. M. (2020). A review on mixed reality: Current trends, challenges and prospects. Applied Sciences, 10(2), 636–662. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10020636
- Schwaiger, M. (2021). Europe needs to integrate immersive learning quickly at all education levels—But how? What to learn from 25 EU projects in this field. Journal of Elementary Education, 14(Special Issue), 63–85. https://doi.org/10.18690/rei.14.Spec.Iss.63-85.2021
- Simon-Liedtke, J. T., Baraas, R., & Regnesentral, N. (2022). The future of extended reality in primary and secondary education. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 297, 549–556. https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI220886
- Spinellis, D. (2012). Git. IEEE Software, 29(3), 100–101. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6188603
- Steuer, J. (1992). Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. Journal of Communication, 42(4), 73–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00812.x
- Taibi, D., & Dietze, S. (2016). Towards embedded markup of learning resources on the web: An initial quantitative analysis of LRMI terms usage. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web (pp. 513–517). https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/2872518.2890464?casa_token=VvysNQ6m2qMAAAAA:4uM2l6SBqIOVTXGfjKQkjRJ1lD5ew_GQYFb_5CyYXLFyyU3IFMP538QeLy0f3bCF_TVjwxqXdNt6
- The Shady Bunch. (2018, December 24). Voyager: Virtual reality (VR) journey through space [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/Tn1TqYHPrUM
- Tlili, A., Nascimbeni, F., Burgos, D., Zhang, X., Huang, R., & Chang, T. W. (2021). The evolution of sustainability models for open educational resources: Insights from the literature and experts. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1839507
- United Nations Virtual Reality. (2017, June 17). Refugee realities: Bringing individual refugee stories to the OECD. Retrieved December 28, 2022 from http://unvr.sdgactioncampaign.org/2017/06/14/refugee-realities-bringing-individual-refugee-stories-to-the-oecd/#.ZGubKX3MK5c
- Wang, M., Ryoo, J., & Winkelmann, K. (2020). Preface to the special issue on cross reality (XR) and immersive learning environments (ILE) in education. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(5), 539–542. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1696845
- Yanckello, R. (2022, October 28). Hype cycle for higher education, 2022 [Conference session]. EDUCAUSE Annual Conference 2022. https://events.educause.edu/annual-conference/2022/agenda/hype-cycle-for-higher-education-2022
- Yang, K., Zhou, X., & Radu, I. (2020). XR-ed framework: Designing instruction-driven and learner-centered extended reality systems for education. ArXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2010.13779
- Ziker, C., Truman, B., & Dodds, H. (2021). Cross reality (XR): Challenges and opportunities across the spectrum. In J. Ryoo & K. Winkelmann (Eds.), Innovative learning environments in STEM higher education: Opportunities, challenges, and looking forward (pp. 55–78). Springer Briefs in Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58948-6_4