Résumés
Abstract
This article concerns young adults’ institutional encounters with professionals in the context of youth services. The encounters are analyzed as institutional social control — the practices and mechanisms that steer young people’s conduct in accordance with the normative order. We make visible young adults’ acts of everyday resistance as they negotiate, problematize, and challenge aspects of institutional social control. The data consist of 17 life-course interviews with young adults aged 18 to 24 who visited youth shelters organized by the Finnish Red Cross. Participants expressed criticism of the normative expectations and the categorizing and controlling practices that they encountered. However, there is a danger that in the institutional encounters, their acts of everyday resistance are not acknowledged as political agency; instead, stereotypical notions strengthen the interpretation of the young adults as problematic or in need of protection. This lack of recognition may contribute to increased vulnerability in the young people the institutions are intended to support them.
Keywords:
- citizenship,
- everyday resistance,
- institutions,
- social control,
- young adults,
- youth
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Aaltonen, S., Berg, P., & Ikäheimo, S. (2015). Nuoret luukulla. Kolme näkökulmaa syrjäytymiseen ja nuorten asemaan palvelujärjestelmässä [Youth at the agency hatch. Three perspectives on exclusion and the position of young people in the service system]. Nuorisotutkimusverkosto/Nuorisotutkimusseura, julkaisuja, 160. https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-302-442-7
- Allardt, E. (1993). Having, loving, being: An alternative to the Swedish model of welfare research. In A. Sen & M. C. Nussbaum (Eds.), The quality of life (pp. 88–94). World Institute for Development Economics Research. Clarendon Press.
- Anttonen, A., Häikiö, L., & Stefánsson, K. (2012). The future of the welfare state: Rethinking universalism. In A. Anttonen, L. Häikiö, & K. Stefansson (Eds.), Welfare state, universalism and diversity (pp. 187–196). Edward Elgar.
- Atkinson, P., Coffey, A., & Delamont, S. (2003). Key themes in qualitative research: Continuities and changes. AltaMira Press.
- Blackman, S., & Rogers, R. (Eds.). (2017). Youth marginality in Britain: Contemporary studies of austerity. Policy Press.
- Braun, V., & Clarke V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
- Brunila, K., & Lundahl, L. (2020). Introduction. In K. Brunila & L. Lundahl (Eds.), Youth on the move: Tendencies and tensions in youth policies and practices (pp. 1–14). Helsinki University Press.
- Campbell, M., & Gregor, F. (2015). Mapping social relations: A primer in doing institutional ethnography. University of Toronto Press.
- Clarke, R. (2010). Intentional omissions. Noûs, 44(1), 158–177. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0068.2009.00735.x
- Cohen, S. (1985). Visions of social control: Crime, punishment and classification. Polity Press.
- Davies, B. (2019). Austerity, youth policy and the deconstruction of the youth service in England. Palgrave Macmillan.
- Esping-Andersen, G. (2013). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Polity.
- Eurostat. (2019). Estimated average age of young people leaving the parental household by sex. Retrieved on December 17, 2020, from https://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=yth_demo_030&lang=en
- Finnish Red Cross. (2021). Tilastokirja vuodelta 2020 [Statistical yearbook 2020]. Retrieved on March 7, 2022 from https://rednet.punainenristi.fi/system/files/page/Tilastokirja2020.pdf
- Gilliom, J., & Monahan, T. (2012). Everyday resistance. In K. Ball, K. Haggerty, & D. Lyon (Eds.), Routledge handbook of surveillance studies (pp. 405–411). Routledge.
- Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. Doubleday Anchor Books.
- Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of a spoiled identity. Penguin Books.
- Gough, I. (2017). Heat, greed and human need: Climate change, capitalism and sustainable wellbeing. Edward Elgar.
- Harris, A., Wyn, J., & Younes, S. (2007). Young people and citizenship. An everyday perspective. Youth Studies Australia, 26(3), 19–27.
- Head, E. (2009). The ethics and implications of paying participants in qualitative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 12(4), 335–344. doi:10.1080/13645570802246724
- Hiitola, J., Turtiainen, K., & Vuori, J. (2020). Small agency and precarious residency in Afghan refugee families. In J. Hiitola, K. Turtiainen, S. Gruber, & J. Vuori (Eds.), Family life in transition: Borders, transnational mobility and welfare society in Nordic countries (pp. 177–188). Routledge.
- Hollander, J. A., & Einwohner, R. L. (2004). Conceptualizing resistance. Sociological Forum, 19(4), 533–554. doi:10.1007/s11206-004-0694-5
- Honkasalo, M.-L. (2013). Katveessa: Pieni toimijuus kriittisenä avauksena toiminnan teoriaan [In the dead zone: The small action as a critical opening to the theory of action]. Tiede Ja Edistys, 1, 42–61.
- Honkatukia, P., & Keskinen, S. (2018). The social control of young women’s clothing and bodies: A perspective of differences on racialization and sexualization. Ethnicities, 18(1), 142–161. doi:10.1177/1468796817701773
- Honkatukia, P., Nyqvist, L., & Pösö, T. (2007). Violence talk and gender in youth residential care. Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention, 8(1), 56–76. doi:10.1080/14043850701276402
- Honneth, A. (1995). The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts. Polity Press.
- Hughes, G., Cooper, C., Gormally, S., & Rippingale, J. (2014). The state of youth work in austerity England: Reclaiming the ability to ‘care’. Youth & Policy, 113, 1–14.
- Ikonen, R., Hietamäki, J., Laakso, R., Heino, T., Seppänen, J., & Halme, N. (2017). Sijoitettujen lasten ja nuorten hyvinvointi. Kouluterveyskyselyn tuloksia [Welfare of children and adolescents in custody. School Health Survey]; Tutkimuksesta tiiviisti 21. Terveyden ja hyvinvoinnin laitos.
- Isin, E. F. (2008). Theorizing acts of citizenship. In E. F. Isin & G. M. Nielsen, (Eds.), Acts of citizenship (pp. 15–43). Zed Books.
- Johansson, A., & Vinthagen, S. (2016). Dimensions of everyday resistance: An analytical framework. Critical Sociology, 42(3), 417–435. doi:10.1177/0896920514524604
- Johansson, A., & Vinthagen, S. (2020). Conceptualizing “everyday resistance”: A transdisciplinary approach. Routledge.
- Johansson, T., & Lalander, P. (2012). Doing resistance: Youth and changing theories of resistance. Journal of Youth Studies, 15(8), 1078–1088. doi:10.1080/13676261.2012.693591
- Kallio, K. P., Wood, B. E., & Häkli, J. (2020). Lived citizenship: Conceptualising an emerging field. Citizenship Studies, March, 1–17. doi:10.1080/13621025.2020.1739227
- Leskošek, V., & Zidar, R. (2017). Food poverty between charity and the human right to food. In A.-L. Matthies & K. Närhi (Eds.), The ecosocial transition of societies: The contribution of social work and social policy (pp. 251–268). Routledge.
- Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. Russell Sage Foundation.
- Lister, R. (2008). Unpacking children’s citizenship. In A. Invernizzi & J. Williams (Eds.), Children and citizenship (pp. 23–32). SAGE.
- Lister, R., Smith, N., Middleton, S., & Cox, L. (2003). Young people talk about citizenship: Empirical perspectives on theoretical and political debates. Citizenship Studies, 7(2), 235–253. doi:10.1080/1362102032000065991
- Louhela, H. (2019). Sexual violence: Voiced and silenced by girls with multiple vulnerabilities. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Oulu]. http://jultika.oulu.fi/files/isbn9789526224152.pdf
- McAllister, M. (2003). Multiple meanings of self harm: A critical review. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 12(3), 177–185. doi:10.1046/j.1440-0979.2003.00287.x
- Myllyniemi, S., & Suurpää, L. (2009). Nuoret aikuiset itsellisyyden ja riippuvuuden noidankehässä [Young adults in the vicious circle of independence and dependency]. Hyvinvointikatsaus, 1, 2–4.
- Mäkinen, S., & Halonen, T. (2017). Januskasvoinen portinvartija: Ohjaus tukena ja kontrollina julkisissa palveluissa [Two-faced gatekeeper: Guidance as support and control in public services]. In S. Aaltonen & A. Kivijärvi, (Eds.), Nuoret aikuiset hyvinvointipalvelujen käyttäjinä ja kohteina. [Young adults as users and objects of welfare services.] Nuorisotutkimusverkosto/Nuorisotutkimusseura, Julkaisuja, 198, 151–172.
- Scott, J. C. (1985). Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. Yale University Press.
- Scott, J. C. (2020). Foreword. In A. Johansson & S. Vinthagen, Conceptualizing “everyday resistance”: A transdisciplinary approach (pp. ix–xi). Routledge.
- Scott, S. (2018). A sociology of nothing: Understanding the unmarked. Sociology, 52(1) 3–19. doi:10.1177/0038038517690681
- Smith, D. E. (1987). The everyday world as a problematic: A feminist sociology. University of Toronto Press.
- Smith, D. E. (1999). Writing the social: Critique, theory, and investigations. University of Toronto Press.
- Smith, D. E. (2005). Institutional ethnography: A sociology for people. AltaMira.
- Suikkanen, A., & Viinamäki, L. (1999). Life paths and labour market citizenship. In J. Christiansen, P. Koistinen, & A. Kovalainen (Eds.), Working Europe. Reshaping European employment systems (pp. 189–209). Ashgate.
- Thomson, R., Bell, R., Holland, J., Henderson, S., McGrellis, S., & Sharpe, S. (2002). Critical moments: Choice, chance and opportunity in young people’s narratives of transition. Sociology, 36(2), 335–354. doi:10.1177/0038038502036002006
- Thurlby-Campbell, I., & Bell, L. (2017). Agency, structure and the NEET policy problem: The experiences of young people. Bloomsbury Academic.
- Weitz, R. (2001). Women and their hair: Seeking power through resistance and accommodation. Gender and Society, 15(5), 667–686. doi:10.1177/089124301015005003
- Whittaker, L. (2010). Structures of recognition: A dialogical analysis of the experiences of a group of young people within a Scottish local authority access programme. International Journal for Dialogical Science, 4(2), 75–93.
- Wood, B. E. (2016). A genealogy of the “everyday” within young people's citizenship studies. In K. P. Kallio, S. Mills, & T. Skelton, (Eds.), Politics, citizenship and rights (pp. 383–399). Springer.
- Wyn, J. (2020). Introduction. In J. Wyn, H. Cahill, D. Woodman, H. Cuervo, C. Leccardi. & J. Chesters (Eds.), Youth and the new adulthood: Generations of change (pp. 1–12). Springer.