Résumés
Abstract
This paper investigates evolutions in and alternatives to the “sustainable development” paradigm and examines these new trends. It offers a review of the social science literature that focuses on the language of the “sustainable city” used by researchers and experts in sociology, geography and urban studies since 2009. First, five main variants of “sustainable city” discourses are evidenced by the statistical and lexical analyses: the “recyclable city”, the “compact city”, the “green city”, the “just city” and the “participatory city”. They are often in conflict and subject to debate. Then, four main “alternatives” are identified: degrowth, resilience, sustainable transformation and transition. Yet they remain specific to restricted sectors or characterized by a binary vision.
Keywords:
- sustainable city,
- urban,
- environment,
- literature review,
- statistical and lexical analysis
Résumé
L’article examine les évolutions et/ou alternatives au paradigme du « développement durable » en mobilisant une revue de la littérature de sciences sociales sur les énoncés de la « ville durable » parmi les chercheurs et experts en sociologie, géographie et études urbaines, depuis 2009. À partir d’analyses statistiques et lexicales, se dégagent, d’une part, cinq déclinaisons principales de la « ville durable » : « ville recyclable », « ville compacte », « ville verte », « ville juste » et « ville participative », souvent en tension et suscitant des controverses ; et, d’autre part, quatre principales « alternatives » : décroissance, résilience, transformation durable et transition, qui apparaissent propres à des lectures sectorielles ou marquées par une vision binaire.
Mots-clés :
- ville durable,
- urbain,
- environnement,
- revue de littérature,
- analyse statistique et lexicale
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Aguirre, B.E. (2002). “‘Sustainable Development’ as Collective Surge”, Social Science Quaterly, p. 101–118.
- Atkinson, G., S. Dietz and E. Neumayer (eds.) (2007). Handbook of Sustainable Development, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 489 p.
- Audet, R. (2015). “Le champ des sustainability transitions : origines, analyses et pratiques de recherche”, Cahiers de recherche sociologique, 58, p. 73–93.
- Baker, S. and K. Eckerberg (eds.) (2008). In Pursuit of Sustainable Development: New Governance Practices at the Sub-national Level in Europe, London, Routledge, 256 p.
- Blok, A. (2012). “Greening Cosmopolitan Urbanism? On the Transnational Mobility of Low-carbon Formats in Northern European and East Asian Cities”, Environment and Planning A, 44 (10), p. 2327–2343.
- Boissonade, J. (ed.) (2015). La ville durable controversée, Paris, Petra, 487 p.
- Bothwell, K. (2015). “Sustainable Architecture”, in Redclift, M. and D. Springett (eds.), Routledge International Handbook of Sustainable Development, London, Routledge, p. 147–163.
- Bourg, D. and A. Fragnière (eds.) (2014). La pensée écologique. Une anthologie, Paris, Presses universitaires de France, 876 p.
- Bridge, G. and S. Watson (eds.) (2011). The New Blackwell Companion to the City, Malden, Wiley-Blackwell, 768 p.
- Bullard, R.D. (2000). Dumping in Dixie: Race, Class and Environmental Quality, Boulder, Co., Westview Press, 256 p. (original, 1990).
- Burton, E. (2000). “The Compact City: Just or Just Compact? A Preliminary Analysis”, Urban Studies , 37 (11), p. 1969–2006.
- Cao, B. (2015). Environment and Citizenship, London, Routledge, 290 p.
- Choné, A., I. Hajek and P. Hamman (eds.) (2016). Guide des Humanités environnementales, Villeneuve d’Ascq, Presses universitaires du Septentrion, 630 p.
- Choné, A., I. Hajek and P. Hamman (eds.) (2017). Rethinking Nature, Challenging Disciplinary Boundaries, London, Routledge, 264 p.
- Christen, G. and P. Hamman (2015). Transition énergétique et inégalités environnementales, Strasbourg, Presses universitaires de Strasbourg, 228 p.
- Cook, I.R. and E. Swyngedouw (2014). “Cities, Nature and Sustainability”, in Paddison R. and E. McCann (eds.), Cities & Social Change, London, Sage, p. 168–185.
- Emelianoff, C. and R. Stegassy (eds.) (2010). Les pionniers de la ville durable. Récits d’acteurs, portraits de villes en Europe, Paris, Éditions Autrement, 304 p.
- Fischer-Kowalski, M. et al. (1997). Gesellschaftlicher Stoffwechsel und Kolonisierung von Natur, Wien, G+B Verlag, 292 p.
- Flipo, F. (2014). Nature et politique, Paris, Éditions Amsterdam, 438 p.
- Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1971). The Entropy Law and the Economic Process, Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 457 p.
- Hajek, I., P. Hamman and J.‑P. Lévy (eds.) (2015). De la ville durable à la nature en ville. Regards croisés Nord/Sud, Villeneuve d’Ascq, Presses universitaires du Septentrion, 316 p.
- Hamman, P. (2009). “Urban Sustainable Development and the Challenge of French Metropolitan Strategies”, Urban Research and Practice, 2 (2), p. 138–157.
- Hamman, P. (2012). Sociologie urbaine et développement durable, Bruxelles, De Boeck, 200 p.
- Hamman, P. (2015). “Negotiation and Social Transactions in Urban Policies: the Case of the Tramway Projects in France”, Urban Research and Practice, 8 (2), p. 196–217.
- Haughton, G. (1997). “Developing Sustainable Urban Development Models”, Cities, 14 (4), p. 189–195.
- Holling, C.S. (1973). “Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems”, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4, p. 1–23.
- Jackson, T. (2009). Prosperity without Growth? The Transition to a Sustainable Economy, Sustainable Development Commission Report, available from: http://www.sd-commission.org.uk/publications.php?id=914 [Accessed 06 February 2017].
- Kamalski, J. and A. Kirby (2012). “Bibliometrics and Urban Knowledge Transfer”, Cities, 29, Supplement 2, p. S3–S8.
- K’Akumu, O.A. (2007). “Sustain No City: An Ecological Conceptualization of Urban Development”, City, 11 (2), p. 221–228.
- Kirby, A. (2012). “Current Research on Cities and its Contribution to Urban Studies”, Cities, 29, Supplement 1, p. S3–S8.
- Lafferty, W.M. (ed.) (2001). Sustainable Communities in Europe, New York, Earthscan Publications, 240 p.
- Larrère, C. and R. Larrère (2015). Penser et agir avec la nature, Paris, La Découverte, 334 p.
- Lévêque, C. (2013). L’écologie est-elle encore scientifique ?, Versailles, Quae, 143 p.
- Liu, X., S. Hong and Y. Liu (2012). “A Bibliometric Analysis of Twenty Years of Globalization Research: 1990-2009”, Globalizations, 9(2), p. 195-210.
- Lockie, S., D.A. Sonnenfeld and D.R. Fisher (eds.) (2014). The Routledge International Handbook of Social and Environmental Change, London, Routledge, 338 p.
- Martin, L.J., B. Blossey and E. Ellis (2012). “Mapping where Ecologists Work: Biases in the Global Distribution of Terrestrial Ecological Observations”, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10 (4), p. 195–201.
- Martinez-Alier, J. (2014). L’écologisme des pauvres. Une étude des conflits environnementaux dans le monde, Paris, Les petits matins, 671 p. (original, 2002, The Environmentalism of the Poor, Northampton, Edward Elgar).
- Mathevet, R. and F. Bousquet (2014). Résilience et environnement. Penser les changements socio-écologiques, Paris, Buchet-Chastel, 170 p.
- McManus, P. (1996). “Contested Terrains: Politics, Stories and Discourses of Sustainability”, Environmental Politics, 5 (1), p. 48–73.
- Paddison, R. and E. McCann (2014). Cities & Social Change, London, Sage, 273 p.
- Palm, J. (2006). “Development of Sustainable Energy Systems in Swedish Municipalities: A Matter of Path Dependency and Power Relations”, Local Environment, 11 (4), p. 445–457.
- Pearsall, H., J. Pierce and R. Krueger (2012). “Whither Rio+20? Demanding a Politics and Practice of Socially Just Sustainability”, Local Environment, 17 (9), p. 935–941.
- Pouchepadass, J. (1995). “Colonialism and Environment in India: Comparative Perspective”, Economic and Political Weekly, 30 (33), p. 2059–2067.
- Redclift, M. and D. Springett (eds.) (2015). Routledge International Handbook of Sustainable Development, London, Routledge, 447 p.
- Rydin, Y. (2007). “Sustainable Cities and Local Sustainability”, in Atkinson, G., S. Dietz and E. Neumayer (eds.), Handbook of Sustainable Development, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, p. 347–361.
- Swyngedouw, E. (2009). “The Antinomies of the Postpolitical Cities: In Search of a Democratic Politics of Environmental Protection”, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33 (3), p. 601–620.
- Theys, J. (2014). “L’approche territoriale du ‘développement durable‘, condition d’une prise en compte de sa dimension sociale”, Développement durable et territoires [online], 5 (1), available from: http://developpementdurable.revues.org/10196 [Accessed 06 February 2017].
- Wang, H., Q. He, X. Liu, Y. Zhuang and S. Hong (2012). “Global Urbanization Research from 1991 to 2009: A Systematic Research Review”, Landscape and Urban Planning, 104, p. 299–309.
- Žižek, S. (2009). The Ticklish Subject: The Absent Centre of Political Ontology, London, Verso, 499 p. (original, 1999).
10.7202/1036207ar