Résumés
Abstract
Online higher education provides exceptional flexibility in learning but demands high self-regulated learning skills. The deficiency of self-regulated learning skills in many students highlights the need for support. This study introduces a confidence-based adaptive practicing system as an intelligent assessment and tutoring solution to enhance self-regulated learning in STEM disciplines. Unlike conventional intelligent tutoring systems that depend entirely on machine control, confidence-based adaptive practicing integrates learner confidence and control options into the AI-based adaptive mechanism to improve learning autonomy and model efficiency, establishing an AI-learner shared control approach. Based on Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development (ZPD) concept, an innovative knowledge-tracing framework and model called ZPD-KT was designed and implemented in the confidence-based adaptive practicing system. To evaluate the effectiveness of the ZPD-KT model, a simulation of confidence-based adaptive practicing was conducted. Findings showed that ZPD-KT significantly improves the accuracy of knowledge tracing compared to the traditional Bayesian knowledge-tracing model. Also, interviews with experts in the field underlined the potential of the confidence-based adaptive practicing system in facilitating self-regulated learning and the interpretability of the ZPD-KT model. This study also sheds light on a new way of keeping humans apprised of adaptive learning implementation.
Keywords:
- adaptive practicing,
- confidence-based assessment,
- knowledge tracing,
- question sequencing,
- self-regulated learning,
- wheel-spinning
Résumé
L’enseignement supérieur en ligne offre une flexibilité exceptionnelle dans l’apprentissage, mais il exige des compétences élevées en termes d’apprentissage autorégulé. Le manque de compétences d’apprentissage autorégulé chez de nombreuses personnes étudiantes met en évidence la nécessité du soutien. Cette étude présente un système de pratique adaptative basé sur la confiance en tant que solution intelligente d’évaluation et de tutorat pour améliorer l’apprentissage autorégulée dans les disciplines STIM. Contrairement aux systèmes de tutorat intelligents conventionnels qui dépendent entièrement du contrôle de la machine, la pratique adaptative basée sur la confiance intègre la confiance de la personne apprenante et les options de contrôle dans le mécanisme adaptatif basé sur l’intelligence artificielle (IA) pour améliorer l’autonomie d’apprentissage et l’efficacité du modèle, établissant ainsi une approche de contrôle partagé entre l’IA et la personne apprenante. Basés sur le concept de zone de développement proximal de Vygotsky (ZPD), un cadre et un modèle innovant de traçage des connaissances appelé ZPD-KT ont été conçus et mis en œuvre dans le système de pratique adaptative basé sur la confiance. Pour évaluer l’efficacité du modèle ZPD-KT, une simulation de pratique adaptative basée sur la confiance a été effectuée. Les résultats ont démontré que le modèle ZPD-KT a considérablement amélioré la précision de la traçabilité des connaissances par rapport au modèle traditionnel de traçage des connaissances bayésiennes. De plus, les entrevues avec des experts dans le domaine ont souligné le potentiel du système de pratique adaptative pour faciliter l’apprentissage autorégulé et l’interprétabilité du modèle ZPD-KT. Cette étude a également mis en lumière une nouvelle façon de tenir les humains informés de la mise en oeuvre de l’apprentissage adaptatif.
Mots-clés :
- Apprentissage autorégulé,
- Évaluation basée sur la confiance,
- pratique adaptative,
- rouet,
- séquence de questions,
- traçage des connaissances
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- Beck, J. E., & Gong, Y. (2013). Wheel-spinning: Students who fail to master a skill. In H. C. Lane, K. Yacef, J. Mostow, & P. Pavlik (Eds.), Artificial intelligence in education. AIED2013 (pp. 431–440). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39112-5_44
- Bjork, R. A., Dunlosky, J., & Kornell, N. (2013). Self-regulated learning: Beliefs, techniques, and illusions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 417–444. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143823
- Broadbent, J., & Poon, W. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies and academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.007
- Broadbent, J. (2017). Comparing online and blended learners’ self-regulated learning strategies and academic performance. The Internet and Higher Education, 33, 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.01.004
- Brusilovsky, P. (2007). Adaptive navigation support. In P. Brusilovsky, A. Kobsa, & W. Nejdl (Eds.), The adaptive web (pp. 263–290). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72079-9_8
- Brusilovsky, P. (2024). AI in education, learner control, and human-AI collaboration. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 34, 122–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-023-00356-z
- Clement, B., Roy, D., Oudeyer, P.-Y., & Lopes, M. (2015). Multi-armed bandits for intelligent tutoring systems. Journal of Educational Data Mining, 7(2), 20–48. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1310.3174
- Corbett, A. T., & Anderson, J. R. (1994). Knowledge tracing: Modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 4, 253–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01099821
- Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26(3-4), 325–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653137
- Doignon, J.-P., & Falmagne, J.-C. (1999). Knowledge spaces. Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-58625-5
- Doroudi, S., Aleven, V., & Brunskill, E. (2019). Where’s the reward? International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 29, 568–620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-019-00187-x
- Ebbinghaus, H. (1913). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology. Annals of Neurosciences, 20(4), 155–156. https://www.doi.org/10.5214/ans.0972.7531.200408
- Ekstrand, B. (2015). What it takes to keep children in school: A research review. Educational Review, 67(4), 459–482. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2015.1008406
- Gardner-Medwin, T., & Curtin, N. (2007, May 29–31). Certainty-based marking (CBM) for reflective learning and proper knowledge assessment. In REAP International Online Conference on Assessment Design for Learner Responsibility (pp. 1–7). REAP. https://www.ucl.ac.uk/lapt/REAP_cbm.pdf
- Holstein, K., Aleven, V., & Rummel, N. (2020). A conceptual framework for human–AI hybrid adaptivity in education. In I. Bittencourt, M. Cukurova, K. Muldner, R. Luckin, & E. Millán (Eds.), Artificial intelligence in education. AIED 2020 (pp. 240–254). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52237-7_20
- Hsu, H. C. K., Wang, C. V., & Levesque-Bristol, C. (2019). Re-examining the impact of self-determination theory on learning outcomes in the online learning environment. Education and Information Technologies, 24, 2159–2174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09863-w
- Jansen, R. S., van Leeuwen, A., Janssen, J., & Kester, L. (2019). Supporting learners’ self-regulated learning in Massive Open Online Courses. Computers & Education, 146, 103771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103771
- Lehmann, T., Hähnlein, I., & Ifenthaler, D. (2014). Cognitive, metacognitive and motivational perspectives on preflection in self-regulated online learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 313–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.051
- Luo, Y., Lin, J., & Yang, Y. (2021). Students’ motivation and continued intention with online self-regulated learning: A self-determination theory perspective. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 24, 1379–1399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-021-01042-3
- Manouselis, N., Drachsler, H., Vuorikari, R., Hummel, H., & Koper, R. (2011). Recommender systems in technology-enhanced learning. In F. Ricci, L. Rokach, B. Shapira, & P. Kantor (Eds.), Recommender systems handbook (pp. 387–415). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-85820-3_12
- Mosqueira-Rey, E., Hernández-Pereira, E., Alonso-Ríos, D., Bobes-Bascarán, J., & Fernández-Leal, A. (2023). Human-in-the-loop machine learning: A state of the art. Artificial Intelligence Review, 56(4), 3005–3054. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-022-10246-w
- Nkambou, R., Bourdeau, J., & Mizoguchi, R. (Eds.). (2010). Advances in intelligent tutoring systems. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14363-2
- Novacek, P. (2013). Confidence-based assessments within an adult learning environment. In G. Demetrios, J. Sampson, M. Spector, D. Ifenthaler, & P. Isaías (Eds.), IADIS International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age (CELDA 2013) (pp. 403–406). International Association for Development of the Information Society. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED562245
- Nuryadin, A., Lidinillah, D. A. M., Prehanto, A., Maesaroh, S. S., Putri, I. R., & Desmawati, S. A. (2024). Self-regulated learning in STEM education: A bibliometric mapping analysis of research using Scopus database. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 12(4), 919–941. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.4015
- Papoušek, J., & Pelánek, R. (2017). Should we give learners control over item difficulty? In M. Tkalcic, D. Thakker, P. Germanakos, K. Yacef, C. Paris, & O. Santos (Eds.), UMAP ’17: Adjunct publication of the 25th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization (pp. 299–303). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3099023.3099080
- Pelánek, R. (2017). Bayesian knowledge tracing, logistic models, and beyond: An overview of learner modeling techniques. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 27(3), 313–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-017-9193-2
- Preheim, M., Dorfmeister, J., & Snow, E. (2023). Assessing confidence and certainty of students in an undergraduate linear algebra course. Journal for STEM Education Research, 6, 159–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-022-00082-6
- Rahdari, B., Brusilovsky, P., He, D., Thaker, K. M., Luo, Z., & Lee, Y. J. (2022). HELPeR: An interactive recommender system for ovarian cancer patients and caregivers. In J. Golbeck, F. M. Harper, V. Murdock, M. Ekstrand, B. Shapira, J. Basilico, K. Lundgaard, & E. Oldridge (Eds.), RecSys ’22: Proceedings of the 16th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (pp. 644–647). https://doi.org/10.1145/3523227.3551471
- Remesal, A., Corral, M. J., García-Mínguez, P., Domínguez, J., SanMiguel, I., Macsotay, T., & Suárez, E. (2023). Certainty-based self-assessment: A chance for enhanced learning engagement in higher education. An experience at the University of Barcelona. In D. Guralnick, M. E. Auer, & A. Poce (Eds.), Creative approaches to technology-enhanced learning for the workplace and higher education. TLIC 2023 (pp. 689–700). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41637-8_56
- Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, Article 101832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101832
- Smrkolj, Š., Bančov, E., & Smrkolj, V. (2022). The reliability and medical students’ appreciation of certainty-based marking. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(3), Article 1706. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031706
- Sorgenfrei, C., & Smolnik, S. (2016). The effectiveness of e-learning systems: A review of the empirical literature on learner control. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 14(2), 154–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/dsji.12095
- Vainas, O., Bar-Ilan, O., Ben-David, Y., Gilad-Bachrach, R., Lukin, G., Ronen, M., & Sitton, D. (2019). E-Gotsky: Sequencing content using the zone of proximal development. ArXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1904.12268
- Viberg, O., Khalil, M., & Baars, M. (2020). Self-regulated learning and learning analytics in online learning environments: A review of empirical research. In C. Rensing & H. Drachsler (Chairs), LAK ’20: Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge (pp. 524–533). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3375462.3375483
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Harvard University Press.
- Weber, G., & Brusilovsky, P. (2001). ELM-ART: An adaptive versatile system for Web-based instruction. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12, 351–384. https://telearn.hal.science/hal-00197328v1
- Wong, J., Baars, M., Davis, D., Van Der Zee, T., Houben, G. J., & Paas, F. (2019). Supporting self-regulated learning in online learning environments and MOOCs: A systematic review. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 35(4-5), 356–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1543084
- Yan, H., Lin, F., & Kinshuk. (2021). Including learning analytics in the loop of self-paced online course learning design. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 31, 878–895. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-020-00225-z
- Yan, H., Lin, F., & Kinshuk. (2022). Removing learning barriers in self-paced online STEM education. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 48(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.21432/cjlt28264
- Zimmerman, B. J. (2020). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In Handbook of Self-Regulation (3rd ed., pp. 13–39). Elsevier.
- Zohaib, M. (2018). Dynamic difficulty adjustment (DDA) in computer games: A review. Advances in Human‐Computer Interaction, 2018, Article 5681652. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5681652