Résumés
Résumé
Cet article examine certains défis liés à l’opérationnalisation des services d’accompagnement en gestion des données de recherche en milieu universitaire, principalement au Canada. À partir d’une revue de la littérature, nous montrons que plusieurs défis structurels freinent l'adoption des bonnes pratiques en GDR, notamment en termes de sensibilisation des chercheurs et des étudiants, d'opérationnalisation au niveau institutionnel et d'intégration des bonnes pratiques dans la culture de recherche. En mobilisant des sources empiriques et analytiques de différents contextes nationaux, nous proposons une lecture transversale de la GDR, à l’intersection des logiques institutionnelles, disciplinaires et organisationnelles. Trois grands enjeux sont analysés : (1) les enjeux de la sensibilisation des chercheurs à la GDR; (2) les difficultés organisationnelles et structurelles au sein des universités; (3) le suivi limité de la politique par les organismes subventionnaires fédéraux. Nous proposons également quelques pistes de solutions pour surmonter les défis relevés dans la littérature scientifique.
Mots-clés :
- gestion des données de recherche,
- données ouvertes,
- science ouverte,
- gouvernance universitaire,
- recherche scientifique
Abstract
This article examines some challenges related to the operationalization of research data management services in academia, mainly in Canada. Based on a literature review, we show that several structural challenges hinder the adoption of good practices in RDM, particularly in terms of raising awareness among researchers and students, operationalization at the institutional level and integration of good practices into the research culture. By mobilizing empirical and analytical sources from different national contexts, we propose a transversal reading of RDM, at the intersection of institutional, disciplinary and organizational logics. Three main issues are analyzed: (1) the challenges of raising awareness of RDM among researchers; (2) organizational and structural difficulties within universities; and (3) limited monitoring of the policy by the federal granting agencies. We also propose some possible solutions to overcome the challenges identified in the scientific literature.
Keywords:
- research data management,
- open data,
- university governance,
- scientific research,
- open science
Parties annexes
Bibliographie
- Allen, C., & Mehler, D. M. A. (2019). Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond. PLOS Biology, 17(5), e3000246. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000246
- Altay, S., Berriche, M., & Acerbi, A. (2023). Misinformation on misinformation: Conceptual and methodological challenges. Social Media + Society, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221150412
- Alshawaf, F. (2025). Strategies for embedding research data management through effective communication. Data, 10(6), 83. https://doi.org/10.3390/data10060083
- Andrikopoulou, A., Rowley, J., & Walton, G. (2021). Research data management (RDM) and the evolving identity of academic libraries and librarians: A literature review. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 28(4), 349–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2021.1964549
- Barsky, E., Hill, E., Zaraiskaya, T., Wang, M., & Costanzo, L. (2023). Historique et paysage canadien de la gestion des données de recherche. In K. Thompson, E. Hill, E. Carlisle-Johnston, D. Dennie, & É. Fortin (Eds.), La gestion des données de recherche dans le contexte canadien: Un guide pour la pratique et l’apprentissage. Portage Network. https://doi.org/10.5206/XXFL7946
- Birkbeck, G., Nagle, T., & Sammon, D. (2022). Challenges in research data management practices: A literature analysis. Journal of Decision Systems, 31(sup1), 153–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2022.2074653
- Borghi, J., & Van Gulick, A. (2022). Promoting open science through research data management. Harvard Data Science Review, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.9497f68e
- Borgman, C. L. (2012). The conundrum of sharing research data. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(6), 1059–1078. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22634
- Bruyère, M. (2018). Les pratiques exemplaires en gestion de données de recherche en vue d’établissement de services de gestion de données de recherche en milieu collégial [Projet dirigé, École de bibliothéconomie et des sciences de l’information, Université de Montréal]. Université de Montréal. http://hdl.handle.net/1866/22290
- Burt-D’Agnillo, M., & Thuna, M. (2024). Open science at the University of Toronto: An exploration of researcher, administrator, and librarian perspectives. Partnership, 19(2), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.21083/partnership.v19i2.7847
- Carroll, S. R., Garba, I., Figueroa Rodríguez, O. L., Holbrook, J., Lovett, R., Materechera, S., Parsons, M., Raseroka, K., Rodriguez Lonebear, D., Rowe, R., Sara, R., Walker, J., Anderson, J., & Hudson, M. (2020). The CARE principles for Indigenous data governance. Data Science Journal, 19, Article 43. https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2020-043
- Cheung, M., Cooper, A., Dearborn, D., Hill, E., Johnson, E., Mitchell, M., & Thompson, K. (2022). Practices before policy: Research data management behaviours in Canada. Partnership, 17(1), 1–80. https://doi.org/10.21083/partnership.v17i1.6779
- Christou, E., & Piller, F. (2024). Organizational transformation: A management research perspective. In Transformation towards sustainability (pp. 303–330). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54700-3_11
- Choudhury, G. S. (2016). Data management at scale. Information Services and Use, 36(1–2), 27–33. https://doi.org/10.3233/ISU-160795
- Cobey, K., Armond, A. C. V., & Ripp, C. (2025). Bridging the research data management gap: How Canadian institutions are transforming to new data policies. Canadian Science Publishing. https://blog.cdnsciencepub.com/bridging-the-research-data-management-gap/
- Cox, A. M., & Pinfield, S. (2014). Research data management and libraries: Current activities and future priorities. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 46(4), 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000613492542
- Cox, A. M., Kennan, M. A., Lyon, L., & Pinfield, S. (2017). Developments in research data management in academic libraries: Towards an understanding of research data service maturity. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(9), 2182–2200. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23781
- Da Sylva, L. (2017). Les données et leurs impacts théoriques et pratiques sur les professionnels de l’information. Documentation et bibliothèques, 63(4), 5–34.
- Da Sylva, L., Maurel, D., Bruyère, M., St-Germain, M., & Gareau, G. (2019). Écosystème de la gestion de données de recherche et professionnels de l’information. Études de communication, 52, 51–70.
- D’Anna, F., Jareborg, N., Jetten, M., et al. (2024). A research data management (RDM) community for ELIXIR. F1000Research, 13, 230. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.146301.2
- De Bruin, B., & Floridi, L. (2017). The ethics of cloud computing. Science and Engineering Ethics, 23(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9759-0
- Dhudasia, M. B., Grundmeier, R. W., & Mukhopadhyay, S. (2023). Essentials of data management: An overview. Pediatric Research, 93(1), 2–3. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-021-01389-7
- Fecher, B., Friesike, S., & Hebing, M. (2015). What drives academic data sharing? PLOS ONE, 10(2), e0118053. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118053
- Federer, L. M., Lu, Y.-L., Joubert, D. J., Welsh, J., & Brandys, B. (2015). Biomedical data sharing and reuse: Attitudes and practices of clinical and scientific research staff. PLOS ONE, 10(6), e0129506. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129506
- Federer, L. (2018). Defining data librarianship: A survey of competencies, skills, and training. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 106(3), 294–303. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2018.306
- Fraga-González, G., van de Wiel, H., Garassino, F., Kuo, W., de Zélicourt, D., Kurtcuoglu, V., Held, L., & Furrer, E. (2025). Affording reusable data: Recommendations for researchers from a data-intensive project. Scientific Data, 12(1), 258. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-025-04565-0
- Gaftandzhieva, S., Hussain, S., Hilcenko, S., Doneva, R., & Boykova, K. (2023). Data-driven decision making in higher education institutions: State-of-play. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 14(6). https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2023.0140642
- Gewin, V. (2016). Data sharing: An open mind on open data. Nature, 529(7584), 117–119. https://doi.org/10.1038/nj7584-117a
- Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K., & Suddaby, R. (2011). The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism. SAGE Publications.
- Gregory, K. (2020). A dataset describing data discovery and reuse practices in research. Scientific Data, 7, 232. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0569-5
- Grynoch, T. (2020). Implementing research data management services in a Canadian context. Dalhousie Journal of Interdisciplinary Management, 12, Article 1. https://doi.org/10.5931/djim.v12i1.6458
- Guindon, A. (2013). La gestion des données de recherche en bibliothèque universitaire. Documentation et bibliothèques, 59(4), 189–200.
- Hansen, J. S., Gadegaard, S., Hansen, K. K., Larsen, A. V., Møller, S., Thomsen, G. S., & Holmstrand, K. F. (2021). Research data management challenges in citizen science projects and recommendations for library support services. Data Science Journal, 20(25). https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2021-025
- Hubbart, J. A. (2024). A primer for organizational change: Key models, theories, and practices. Austin Journal of Business Administration and Management, 8. https://www.austinpublishinggroup.com/business-administration-and-management/fulltext/ajbam-v8-id1068.pdf
- Hwang, K. (2023). The relevance of neo-institutionalism for organizational change. Cogent Politics & International Relations, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2284239
- Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada. (2025). What we heard report: Engagement on the data deposit requirement of the Tri-Agency Research Data Management Policy. https://ised-isde.canada.ca/site/science/en/interagency-research-funding/policies-and-guidelines/research-data
- Johnston, L., & Jeffryes, J. (2014). Data management skills needed by structural engineering students: Case study at the University of Minnesota. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 140(2). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000154
- Jones, S., Pryor, G., & Whyte, A. (2013). How to develop research data management services: A guide for HEIs. Digital Curation Centre. http://www.dcc.ac.uk/resources/how-guides
- Kanza, S., & Knight, N. J. (2022). Behind every great research project is great data management. BMC Research Notes, 15, 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-022-05908-5
- Khair, S., Dara, R., Haigh, S., Leggott, M., Milligan, I., Moon, J., Payne, K., Portales-Casamar, E., Roquet, G., & Wilson, L. (2020). The current state of research data management in Canada: An update to the LCDRI data management position paper. Digital Research Alliance of Canada. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6564659
- Kim, Y., & Stanton, J. M. (2016). Institutional and individual factors affecting scientists’ data-sharing behaviors: A multilevel analysis. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(4), 776–799. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23424
- Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Harvard Business School Press.
- Kukutai, T., & Taylor, J. (Eds.). (2016). Indigenous data sovereignty: Toward an agenda (Vol. 38). ANU Press. https://doi.org/10.22459/CAEPR38.11.2016
- Lisée, C., & Robert, É. (2022). Gestion des données de recherche et mouvement de la science ouverte: positions et enjeux. In K. Thompson, E. Hill, E. Carlisle-Johnston, D. Dennie, & É. Fortin (Eds.), La gestion des données de recherche dans le contexte canadien: Un guide pour la pratique et l’apprentissage. Portage Network. https://doi.org/10.5206/NOQD6943
- Llebot, C., & Rempel, H. G. (2021). Why won’t they just adopt good research data management practices? An exploration of research teams and librarians’ role in facilitating RDM adoption. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 9, eP2321. https://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.2321
- Love, R. P., Hardy, B. J., Heffernan, C., Heyd, A., Cardinal-Grant, M., Sparling, L., Healy, B., Smylie, J., & Long, R. (2022). Developing data governance agreements with Indigenous communities in Canada: Toward equitable tuberculosis programming, research, and reconciliation. Health and Human Rights, 24(1), 21–33. https://www.hhrjournal.org/2022/06/developing-data-governance-agreements-with-indigenous-communities-in-canada/
- McNutt, M. (2014). Reproducibility. Science, 343(6168), 229. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1250475
- Medina, J., Ziaullah, A. W., Park, H., Castelli, I. E., Shaon, A., Bensmail, H., & El-Mellouhi, F. (2022). Accelerating the adoption of research data management practices. Data Intelligence, 4(3), 495–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matt.2022.10.007
- Minion, J. T. (2023). Une perspective pratique sur le domaine évolutif de la gestion des données de recherche. In K. Thompson, E. Hill, E. Carlisle-Johnston, D. Dennie, & É. Fortin (Eds.), La gestion des données de recherche dans le contexte canadien (Chap. 18). eCampusOntario Pressbooks.
- Odebrecht, C. (2025). Research data governance: The need for a system of cross-organisational responsibility for the researcher’s data domain. Data Science Journal, 24, Article 12. https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2025-012
- OpenAIRE. (2025). How to comply with Horizon Europe mandate for research data management. https://www.openaire.eu/how-to-comply-with-horizon-europe-mandate-for-rdm
- Perrier, L., Blondal, E., Ayala, A. P., Dearborn, D., Kenny, T., Lightfoot, D., Reka, R., Thuna, M., Trimble, L., & MacDonald, H. (2017). Research data management in academic institutions: A scoping review. PLOS ONE, 12(5), e0178261. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178261
- Peters, C., & Dryden, A. R. (2011). Assessing the academic library’s role in campus-wide research data management: A first step at the University of Houston. Science & Technology Libraries, 30(4), 387–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194262X.2011.626340
- Prosser, A. M. B., Hamshaw, R. J. T., Meyer, J., Bagnall, R., Blackwood, L., Huysamen, M., Jordan, A., Vasileiou, K., & Walter, Z. (2023). When open data closes the door: A critical examination of the past, present and the potential future for open data guidelines in journals. British Journal of Social Psychology, 62(4), 1635–1653. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12576
- Read, K. B., Gibson, G., Leahey, A., Peterson, L., Rutley, S., Shi, J., Smith, V., & Stathis, K. (2024). Understanding the challenges associated with finding and accessing restricted data in Canada: A mixed-methods study. FACETS, 9, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2023-0102
- Read, K. B., & Rutley, S. (2025). Implementing and learning from a summer research data management training program for student researchers. Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research, 19(2), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.21083/partnership.v19i2.7753
- Redden, M., & Kwan Lafond, D. (2023). Indigenous data sovereignty: Moving toward self-determination and a future of good data. In K. Thompson, E. Hill, E. Carlisle-Johnston, D. Dennie, & É. Fortin (Eds.), Research data management in the Canadian context. eCampusOntario. https://doi.org/10.5206/OMRK6926
- Reichmann, S., Klebel, T., Hasani-Mavriqi, I., & Ross-Hellauer, T. (2021). Between administration and research: Understanding data management
- Ripp, C., Armond, A. C., Albert, M. A., Apavaloae, A., Cooper, A., Costanzo, L., … Cobey, K. D. (2024). Mapping Canadian institutional research data management strategies: A cross-sectional study. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/tnkp9_v1
- Rod, A. B., Zhou, B., & Rousseau, M. (2023). There’s no “I” in research data management: Reshaping RDM services toward a collaborative multi-stakeholder model. Journal of eScience Librarianship, 12(1), e624. https://doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.624
- Ross, G. (2024). Rorqual: A supercomputer welcomed by the research community. Digital Research Alliance of Canada. https://www.alliancecan.ca/en/latest/news/rorqual-supercomputer-welcomed-research-community
- Rowlands, J. (2017). Academic governance within university power and authority relationships. In Academic governance in the contemporary university. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2688-1_9
- Sayogo, D. S., & Pardo, T. A. (2013). Exploring the determinants of scientific data sharing: Understanding the motivation to publish research data. Government Information Quarterly, 30(Suppl. 1), S19–S31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.011
- Scaramozzino, J. M., Ramírez, M. L., & McGaughey, K. J. (2012). A study of faculty data curation behaviors and attitudes at a teaching-centered university. College & Research Libraries, 73(4), 349–365. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl-255
- Schmidt, B., & Shearer, K. (2016). Librarians’ competencies profile for research data management. Joint Task Force on Librarians’ Competencies in Support of E-Research and Scholarly Communication. https://web.archive.org/web/20180413235418id_/https://www.coar-repositories.org/files/Competencies-for-RDM_June-2016.pdf
- Smale, N. A., Unsworth, K., Denyer, G., Magatova, E., & Barr, D. (2020). A review of the history, advocacy and efficacy of data management plans. International Journal of Digital Curation, 15(1), 30. https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v15i1.525
- Stradiotová, Ž. (2024). Data management plan: Bureaucratic burden or the first real step towards open science? https://research.vse.cz/news/data-management-plan-bureaucratic-burden-or-the-first-real-step-towards-open-science
- Tenopir, C., Allard, S., Douglass, K., Aydinoglu, A. U., Wu, L., Read, E., Manoff, M., & Frame, M. (2011). Data sharing by scientists: Practices and perceptions. PLOS ONE, 6(6), e21101. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021101
- Tenopir, C., Dalton, E. D., Allard, S., Frame, M., Pjesivac, I., Birch, B., et al. (2015). Changes in data sharing and data reuse practices and perceptions among scientists worldwide. PLOS ONE, 10(8), e0134826. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134826
- Van Tuyl, S., & Whitmire, A. L. (2016). Water, water, everywhere: Defining and assessing data sharing in academia. PLOS ONE, 11(2), e0147942. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147942
- Vicente-Saez, R., & Martinez-Fuentes, C. (2018). Open science now: A systematic literature review for an integrated definition. Journal of Business Research, 88, 428–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.043
- Wallis, J. C., Rolando, E., & Borgman, C. L. (2013). If we share data, will anyone use them? Data sharing and reuse in the long tail of science and technology. PLOS ONE, 8(7), e67332. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067332
- Wang, M., & Savard, D. (2023). Les principes FAIR et la gestion des données de recherche. In K. Thompson, E. Hill, E. Carlisle-Johnston, D. Dennie, & É. Fortin (Eds.), La gestion des données de recherche dans le contexte canadien (Chapitre 3). https://doi.org/10.5206/LOJM2483
- Whaanga, H., & Mato, P. (2021). The Indigenous digital footprint. In B. Hokowhitu, A. Moreton Robinson, L. Tuhiwai Smith, C. Andersen, & S. Larken (Eds.), Handbook of Indigenous Studies (pp. 447–464). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429440229
- Whyte, A., & Tedds, J. (2011). Making the case for research data management (DCC Briefing Papers). Digital Curation Centre. https://www.dcc.ac.uk/resources/briefing-papers
- Wilkinson, M., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I., et al. (2016). The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3, 160018. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18
- Williams, M., Bagwell, J., & Nahm Zozus, M. (2017). Data management plans: The missing perspective. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 71, 130–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2017.05.004
- Wilms, K. L., Stieglitz, S., Buchholz, A., Vogl, R., & Rudolph, D. (2018). Do researchers dream of research data management? In Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 4411–4420). IEEE Computer Society. https://doi.org/10.24251/hicss.2018.556
- Wilms, K. L., Stieglitz, S., Ross, B., & Meske, C. (2020). A value-based perspective on supporting and hindering factors for research data management. International Journal of Information Management, 54, 102174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102174
- Zhang, Q., Brown, S., Colliander, J., Corrie, B., Fichtinger, G., Henwood, S., Leggott, M., Lovekin, C., Pérez-Jvostov, F., Roquet, G., & Rousseau, M.-É. (2021). Évaluation de l’état actuel des logiciels de recherche. Groupe de travail de l’Alliance responsable des logiciels de recherche de pointe. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6584382
10.7202/1042308ar