Résumés
Abstract
James Dwyer’s story about a fictional GAIA Commission highlighted unresolved concerns about the scope of bioethics, specifically regarding the global distribution of, and responsibility for, the health impacts of climate change. This commentary discusses the potential impact of an individual on greenhouse gas emissions and the importance of engaging institutional responses in order to have meaningful impacts.
Keywords:
- climate change,
- individual responsibility,
- collective responsiveness
Résumé
L’histoire de James Dwyer au sujet d’une Commission GAIA fictive met en évidence les préoccupations concernant la portée de la bioéthique, en particulier en ce qui concerne la répartition de la responsabilité au niveau international face aux impacts des changements climatiques sur la santé. Ce commentaire traite de l’impact potentiel d’un individu sur les émissions de gaz à effet de serre et l’importance des réponses institutionnelles afin d’avoir un impact significatif.
Mots-clés :
- changement climatique,
- responsabilité individuelle,
- responsabilité collective
Parties annexes
Bibliography
- 1. Dwyer J. The Gaia commission: Climate Change and Moral Responsibility. BioéthiqueOnline 2014; 3/18
- 2. Macpherson CC, Akpinar-Elci M. Caribbean heat threatens health, well-being, and the future of humanity. Public Health Ethics 2015;
- 3. Macpherson CC. Climate change is a bioethics problem. Bioethics 2013; 27(6): 305-308.
- 4. Macpherson CC. Climate change matters. J Medical Ethics 2014; 40(4): 288-290. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-101084
- 5. Garvey J. The Ethics of Climate Change. Continuum International Press, NY. 2010. 192 p.
- 6. Patz JA, Frumkin H, Holloway T, Vimont DJ, Haines A. Climate Change: Challenges and Opportunities for Global Health. JAMA 2014; 312(15):1565-1580.
- 7. Holland A. Must we give up environmental ethics? In: Environmental Ethics and International Policy. ED HAMJ ten Have. 2006. 117-143. UNESCO.
- 8. Macpherson CC. 2016. Ed. Climate Change and Health: Bioethical Insights into Values and Policy. Public Health Ethics Series. Springer Press, Dordrecht (forthcoming).
- 9. Kingston E. Climate Change as a Three-Part Ethical Problem: A Response to Jamieson and Gardiner. Science and Engineering Ethics 2014; 20(4):1129-1148.