Abstracts
Résumé
Les études de cas en psychothérapie connaissent une phase de renouveau auprès des chercheurs en psychothérapie et des psychothérapeutes. L’auteur discute de deux paradigmes qui ont grandement influencé ce nouvel intérêt : le paradigme pragmatique et le paradigme qui vise la construction d’une théorie. L’article présente les origines, les développements et les concepts clés des deux paradigmes et leurs spécificités méthodologiques et éthiques. Des exemples d’études de cas ou de modèles au sein des paradigmes sont évoqués. L’influence différentielle des courants postmodernes sur les deux paradigmes, et leurs apports respectifs dans le champ des méthodes d’études de cas, sont discutés et évalués par rapport aux implications pour le chercheur et le psychothérapeute.
Abstract
There is a renewal of interest among psychotherapy researchers and psychotherapists towards psychotherapy case studies. This article presents two paradigms that have greatly influenced this increasing interest in psychotherapy case studies : the pragmatic case study and the theory-building case study paradigm. The origins, developments and key-concepts of both paradigms are presented, as well as their methodological and ethical specificities. Examples of case studies, along with models developed, are cited. The differential influence of the post-modern schools on both paradigms are presented, as well as their contribution to the field of methods of psychotherapy case studies discussed and assessed in terms of relevance for the researcher and the psychotherapist.
Resumen
Los estudios de caso en psicoterapia conocen una fase de renovación entre los investigadores en psicoterapia y los psicoterapeutas. El autor discute los dos paradigmas que han influido grandemente en este nuevo interés: el paradigma pragmático y el paradigma que busca la construcción de una teoría. El artículo presenta los orígenes, desarrollos y conceptos clave de los dos paradigmas así como sus especificaciones metodológicas y éticas. Se evocan ejemplos de estudios de caso o de modelos en el seno de los paradigmas. Se discuten y evalúan la influencia diferencial de las corrientes postmodernas en los dos paradigmas y sus aportaciones respectivas en el campo de los métodos de estudios de caso, en relación con las implicaciones para el investigador y el psicoterapeuta.
Resumo
Os estudos de caso em psicoterapia conhecem uma nova fase junto a pesquisadores em psicoterapia e psicoterapeutas. O autor discute dois paradigmas que influenciaram em muito este novo interesse: o paradigma pragmático e o paradigma que visa a construção de uma teoria. O artigo apresenta as origens, os desenvolvimentos e os principais conceitos dos dois paradigmas e suas especificidades metodológicas e étnicas. São evocados exemplos de estudos de caso ou de modelos junto aos paradigmas. A influência diferencial das correntes pós-modernas nos dois paradigmas e suas contribuições respectivas ao campo dos métodos de estudos de caso são discutidos e avaliados em relatórios com implicações para o pesquisador e o psicoterapeuta.
Appendices
Bibliographie
-
Brinegar, M. G., Salvi, L. M., Stiles, W. B., Greenberg, L. S., 2006, Building a Meaning Bridge : Therapeutic progress from problem formulation to understanding, Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53, 165-180.10.1037/0022-0167.53.2.165 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Bruner, J. S., 2001, Car la culture donne forme à l’esprit : de la psychologie cognitive à la psychologie culturelle, Eshel, Paris.10.1037/0022-006X.66.1.7 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Campbell, D. T., 1979, “Degrees of freedom” and the case study, in Cook, T.D., and Reichardt, C. S., eds., Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Evaluation Research, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, 49-67.10.1080/713869614 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Chambless, D. L., Hollon, S. D., 1998, Defining empirically supported therapies, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 7-18.10.1037/0022-006X.66.1.7 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Eells, T., 2007, Handbook of Psychotherapy Case Formulation (2nd edition), Guilford Press, New York.10.1080/10503300902905947 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Elliot, R., 2002, Hermeneutic single case efficacy design, Psychotherapy Research, 12, 1-20.10.1080/713869614 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Elliot, R., Fischer, C., Rennie, D., 1999, Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields, British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 215-229.10.1348/014466599162782 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Elliot, R., Partyka, R., Alperin, R., Dobrenski, R., Wagner, J., Messer, S. B., Watson, J. C., Castonguay, L. G., 2009, An adjucated hermeneutic single-case efficacy design study of experiential psychotherapy for panic/phobia, Psychotherapy Research, 19, 4-5, 543-557.10.1080/10503300902905947 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Fishman, D. B., 1999, The Case for Pragmatic Psychology, New York University Press, New York.10.1177/0306624X07312779 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Fishman, D. B., 2008, Therapy research and training working together : Establishing the ability to write a pragmatic case study as minimal competence for doctoral practice and as a research resource, Annual Meeting of the Society for Psychotherapy Research, Barcelona, 19-21 juin.10.1080/10503300601032506 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Freud, S., 1954/1909, L’homme aux rats, Presses universitaires de France, Paris.10.1080/14733145.2011.546160 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Freud, S., 1989/1893, Oeuvres complètes. Psychanalyse. Volume II (Le cas d’Anna O.), Presses universitaires de France, Paris.10.1037/10229-000 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Greenberg, L. S., Rice, L. N., Elliot, R., 1993, Facilitating Emotional Change : The Moment-by-Moment Process, Guilford Press, New York.10.1111/j.1467-6494.1988.tb00468.x Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Honos-Webb, L., Lani, J. A., Stiles, W. B., 1999, Discovering Markers of Assimilation Stages : The Fear-of-Control Marker, Journal of Clinical Psychology, 55, 12, 1441-1452.10.1002/(SICI)1097-4679(199912)55:12<1441::AID-JCLP3>3.0.CO;2-K Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Jacobson, N. S., Truax, P., 1991, Clinical significance : A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 12-19.10.1037/0022-006X.59.1.12 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Kendjelic, E. M., Eells, T. D., 2007, Generic Psychotherapy Case Formulation Training improves Formulation Quality, Psychotherapy : Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 44, 1, 66-77.10.1037/0033-3204.44.1.66 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Kramer, U., 2009/a, Individualizing Exposure Therapy for PTSD : A case report, Pragmatic Case Studies in Psychotherapy, 5, 2, 1-24.10.1080/10503300802702113 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Kramer, U., 2009/b, Between manualized treatments and principle-guided psychotherapy : A commentary, Pragmatic Case Studies in Psychotherapy, 5, 2, 45-51.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Kramer, U., Belz, M., Pomini, V., Follack, C., Caspar, F., 2010, L’apport de l’analyse des plans à la pratique psychothérapeutique : études de cas, Revue francophone de clinique cognitivo-comportementale, XV, 3, 19-32.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Kramer, U., Meystre, C., 2010, Assimilation process in a psychotherapy with a client presenting schizoid personality disorder, Swiss Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry, 161, 4, 128-134.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Kramer, U., Zimmermann, G., 2009, Fear and anxiety at the basis of adolescent externalizing and internalizing behaviours, International Journal Of Offender Therapy And Comparative Criminology, 53, 1, 113-120.10.1177/0306624X07312779 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Lambert, M. J., 2007, What have we learned from a decade of research aimed at improving psychotherapy outcome in routine care, Psychotherapy Research, 17, 1, 1-14.10.1080/10503300601032506 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Meystre, C., Kramer, U., De Roten, Y., Michel, L., Despland, J.-N., (soumis), Assimilation des experiences problématiques : Une étude de cas de psychothérapie psychodynamique brève, Santé mentale au Québec.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Michel, L., Kramer, U., De Roten, Y., 2011, Alliance ruptures and resolutions over the course of short-term dynamic psychotherapy : A case study, Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 11, 1, 43-54.10.1080/14733145.2011.546160 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Peterson, D. R., 1997, Educating Professional Psychologists : History and Guiding Conception, American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C.10.1037/10229-000 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Rosenwald, G. C., 1988, A theory of multiple case research, Journal of Personality, 56, 239-264.10.1111/j.1467-6494.1988.tb00468.x Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Sachse, R., 2003, Klärungsorientierte Psychotherapie, Göttingen, Hogrefe.10.14713/pcsp.v5i2.970 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Schielke, H. J., Fishman, J., Osatuke, K., Stiles, W. B., 2009, Developing creative consensus on interpretations of qualitative data : the ward method, Psychotherapy Research, 19, 558-565.10.1080/10503300802621180 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Stiles, W. B., 1999, Signs and voices in psychotherapy, Psychotherapy Research, 9, 1-21.10.4414/sanp.2010.02162 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Stiles, W. B., 2007, Theory-building case studies of counselling and psychotherapy, Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 7, 2, 122-127.10.1080/14733140701356742 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Stiles, W. B., 2009, Logical operations in theory-building case studies, Pragmatic Case Studies in Psychotherapy, 5, 3, 9-22.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Watson, J. C., Goldman, R. N., Greenberg, L. S., 2007, Case studies in emotion-focused treatment of depression : A comparison of good and poor outcome, APA Press, Washington, D. C.10.1037/11586-000 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Williams, E. N., Morrow, S. L., 2009, Achieving Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research : A Pan-paradigmatic Perspective, Psychotherapy Research, 19, 4-5, 576-582.10.1080/10503300802702113 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
