Abstracts
Résumé
Cet article examine les nombreuses contradictions de la législation en matière de santé mentale au Canada et tente de discerner des moyens de réorienter le politique générale du gouvernement. Dans un premier temps, l’auteur présente un aperçu des traits principaux des lois provinciales et territoriales en santé mentale, qui s’avèrent pour la plupart coercitives. L’article examine ensuite l’échec de la Charte canadienne quant à ses promesses aux personnes atteintes de troubles mentaux. L’auteur soutient que la législation en santé mentale reste ancrée dans le modèle médical, alors que d’autres paradigmes qui font la promotion des droits humains pourraient transformer le programme législatif.
Abstract
This article explores several conundrums and attempts to identify ways of redirecting the Canadian ship of state. It first presents an overview of some of the salient features of the array of mainly coercive provincial and territorial mental health statutes. The failure in the main of the Charter to deliver on its early ostensible promises for people with mental health problems is assessed. Next, the author argues that extant legislation remains anchored in the medical model, when other human rights promoting paradigms transforms the statutory agenda.
Resumen
Este artículo examina las numerosas contradicciones de la legislación en materia de salud mental en Canadá e intenta discernir los medios para reorientar la política general del gobierno. En un primer tiempo, el autor presenta un resumen de los rasgos principales de las leyes provinciales y territoriales en salud mental, que son en su mayoría coercitivas. El artículo examina enseguida el fracaso de la Carta Canadiense de los Derechos y Libertades en cuanto a sus promesas a las personas que sufren de trastornos mentales. El autor sostiene que la legislación en salud mental permanece anclada al modelo médico, mientras que otros paradigmas que promueven los derechos humanos podrían transformar el programa legislativo.
Resumo
Este artigo examina as numerosas contradições da legislação em matéria de saúde mental no Canadá e tenta discernir os meios de reorientar a política geral do governo. Primeiramente, o autor apresenta uma visão geral das principais características das leis provinciais e territoriais em saúde mental, que são, em sua maioria, coercitivas. O artigo examina em seguida, a derrota da Carta canadense quanto a suas promessas às pessoas que sofrem transtornos mentais. O autor afirma que a legislação em saúde mental continua ancorada no modelo médico, enquanto que outros paradigmas, que fazem a promoção dos direitos humanos, poderiam transformar o programa legislativo.
Appendices
Références
-
Armstrong, S., 2003, Disability advocacy in the Charter era, Journal of Law and Equality, 2, 1, 33.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Atkin, P. A., 2002, A paradigm shift in the medical literature, British Medical Journal, 325, 1450-1.10.1136/bmj.325.7378.1450 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Bracken, P. J., Thomas, P., 2009, Postpsychiatry, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Carver, P., 2007, Mental health in Canada, in Downie, J., Caulfield, T., Flood, C., eds., Canadian Health Law and Policy, Lexis Nexis, Markham, 3rd edition, 399-436.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
CBC News, 2009, Judge’s report calls for sweeping changes to N.B. mental health system, http://www.cbc.ca/health/story/2009/02/27/nb-mental-health.htmlGoogle Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Chouinard, V., 2001, Legal peripheries : struggles over disabled Canadians’ places in law, society and space, Canadian Geographic, 45, 1, 187.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Commission on the Future of Health Care in Canada, Building on Values, Final Report, (Romanow Report).Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Civil Code of Quebec, R.S.Q., c. C-1991, ss. 26-31.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Department of Health : New Brunswick, 2008, Issues and Options For Engagement Discussions Leading to a Mental Health Strategy.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Donoghue, C., 2003, Challenging the Authority of the Medical Definition of Disability : an analysis o the resistance to the social constructionist paradigm, Disability and Society, 18, 2, 199.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Frazee, K., 2003, Disability studies : the unexpected guest in health law discourse, Health Law Journal, 257.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Friedli, L., 2009, Mental Health, Resilience and Inequalities, WHO Europe, Copenhagen.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Gable, S., Peters, S., 2004, Presage of a paradigm shift ? Beyond the social model of disability toward resistance theories of disability, Disability and Society, 19, 6, 585.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Gordon, R. M., 2005, Out to pasture : a case for the retirement of canadian mental health legislation, in Peay, J., ed., Seminal Issues in Mental Health Law, Ashgate, Burlington.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Government of Alberta, 2009, Health Action Plan, Annual Report.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Grant, I., 1991, Mental Health Law and the Courts, Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 29, 747.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Jongbloed, L., 2003, Disability policy in Canada : an overview, Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 13, 203.10.1177/104420730301300402 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Kaiser, H. A., 2003 Special Edition, Imagining an equality promoting alternative to the status quo of Canadian Mental Health Law, Health Law Journal, 185-206.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Kämph, A., 2008, The disabilities convention and its consequences for mental health laws in Australia, in McSherry, B., ed., International Trends in Mental Health Laws, Law in Context, 26, 10-36, NSW, The Federation Press, Annandale.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Kaplan, D., 2009, The Definition of Disability, Center for an Accessible Society, www.accessiblesociety.orgGoogle Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Kisely, S. R., Campbell, L. A., Preston, N. J., 2005, Compulsory community and involuntary outpatient treatment for people with severe mental disorders (Review), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2005, 3, The Cochrane Library at 1-11.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Kisely, S. R., Campbell, L. A., O’Reilly, R., 2006, In Debate exchange between Steve R. Kisely and Leslie Anne Campbell, as opponents of CTO’s and Richard O’Reilly, as a defender, The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 51, 11, 683.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Levy, R. M., Rubenstein, L. S., 1996, The Rights of People with Mental Disabilities, Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale and Edwardville.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
McKee, M., 2009, Together Into the Future ; A Transformed Mental Health System for New Brunswickhttp://www.gnb.ca/cnb/Promos/MentalHealth/NBMHS-e.pdfGoogle Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
McSherry, B., Opening Minds, Not Closing Doors : Rethinking Mental Health Laws, Monash University 50th Anniversary Public Lecture Series delivered at Monash University Law.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
McSherry, B., Rethinking Mental Health Laws : An Integrated Approach, www.law.monash.edu.au/rmhl/Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Perlin, M. L., 1998, Mental Disability Law ; Civil and Criminal, Lexis, Charlottesville, 2d ed., Vol. 1.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Pothier, D., 1998, Eldridge et al. v. B.C. (A.G.) : How the deaf were heard in the Supreme court of Canada, National Journal of Constitutional Law, 9, 263.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Prince, M. J., 2004, Canadian Disability Policy : Still a Hit-and-Miss Affair, Canadian Journal of Sociology, 29, 1, 59.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Reddin, C. J., 2002, Health care as citizenship development : examining social rights and entitlement, Canadian Journal of Political Science, 35, 1, 103.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Smart, J., 2006-7, Challenges to the biomedical model of disability, Advances in Medical Psychotherapy and Psychodiagnosis, 12, 1.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
The Supreme Court of Canada, 2005, Remarks of the Right Honorable Beverley McLachlin, P.C., Medicine and the Law : the Challenges of Mental Illness.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Unsworth, C., 1987, The Politics of Mental Health Legislation, Clarenden Press, Oxford.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Werneck, C., 2005, People School-Communication for Inclusion, Manual on Disabilities and Inclusive Development for the Media and Social Communications Professionals (Draft), World Bank, 7, The World Bank Group, Disability Paradigms and Philosophies, www.worldbank.org.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar