Abstracts
Résumé
Bien que les directives psychiatriques anticipées (DPA) soient ancrées dans l’éthique de l’autonomie, le lien entre les deux reste imprécis. Les DPA sont des documents juridiques qui permettent aux personnes qui vivent avec un problème de santé mentale de spécifier leurs préférences de traitement advenant une incapacité future. Le rapport entre l’autonomie et les DPA a été abordé en termes tant légaux et éthiques que philosophiques, mais il n’a pas été clairement opérationnalisé sur le plan clinique. L’autonomie est une valeur éthique fondamentale qui englobe la notion d’indépendance face à des influences contrôlantes externes, ainsi que la capacité mentale de prendre ses propres décisions. Les personnes qui vivent avec un problème de santé mentale ont parfois besoin d’aide pour bien comprendre leurs droits éthiques et juridiques en matière de choix autonome, alors que les intervenants professionnels doivent être mieux formés quant à l’importance de l’autonomie dans leur pratique clinique. La capacité de consentir au traitement est le préalable d’ordre mental qui assure que les personnes ayant des troubles mentaux sont en mesure de rédiger des DPA en toute connaissance de cause, alors que l’autonomie est la valeur qui leur donne le pouvoir de contribuer à leur rétablissement.
Abstract
Although psychiatric advance directives (PADs) are grounded in the ethics of autonomy, the relationship between the two is unclear. PADs are legal documents that allow individuals with mental illness to record their treatment preferences should they become incompetent in the future. The relationship between autonomy and PADs has been discussed in ethical, legal, and philosophical terms, but has not been clearly operationalized for clinical purposes. Autonomy is a fundamental ethical value that includes having the independence from outside controlling influences and the mental capacity to direct one’s personal actions. Individuals with mental illness sometimes require assistance to understand their ethical and legal rights with respect to autonomous choice, and professional stakeholders need education regarding the importance of autonomy for clinical practice. Competency to consent to treatment is the mental prerequisite that ensures individuals with mental illness are able to complete PADs with insight, whereas autonomy is the value that empowers individuals to work towards their recovery.
Resumen
Aunque las directivas psiquiátricas anticipadas (DPA) se encuentran ancladas en la ética de la autonomía, la relación entre ambas es imprecisa. Las DPA son documentos jurídicos que permiten a las personas que viven con un problema de salud mental especificar sus preferencias de tratamiento en el caso de una incapacidad futura. La relación entre la autonomía y las DPA se aborda en términos tanto legales y éticos como filosóficos, pero no ha sido claramente puesta en operación en el plan clínico. La autonomía es un valor ético fundamental que engloba la noción de independencia frente a las influencias controladoras externas, así como la capacidad mental de tomar sus propias decisiones. Las personas que viven con un problema de salud mental en ocasiones necesitan ayuda para comprender sus derechos éticos y jurídicos en materia de elección autónoma, mientras que los interventores profesionales deben tener una mejor formación en cuanto a la importancia de la autonomía en la práctica clínica. La capacidad de consentir al tratamiento es la condición mental previa que asegura que las personas con trastornos mentales están en condiciones de redactar las DPA con todo conocimiento de causa. La autonomía les otorga el poder de contribuir a su restablecimiento.
Resumo
Apesar das Diretrizes Psiquiátricas Antecipadas (DPA) estarem enraizadas na ética da autonomia, o elo entre os dois ainda é vago. As DPA são documentos jurídicos que permitem às pessoas, que vivem com um problema de saúde mental, especificar suas preferências de tratamento no caso de uma inaptidão futura. A relação entre a autonomia e as DPA foi abordada em termos tanto legais e éticos quanto filosóficos, mas não foi claramente operacionalizada no plano clínico. A autonomia é um valor ético fundamental que engloba a noção de independência diante das influências controladoras externas, assim como a capacidade mental de tomar suas próprias decisões. As pessoas que vivem com um problema de saúde mental precisam, às vezes, de ajuda para compreender bem seus direitos éticos e jurídicos no que diz respeito à escolha autônoma, ao passo que os profissionais devem ser melhor formados quanto à importância da autonomia em sua prática clínica. A capacidade de consentir no tratamento é o requisito de ordem mental que garante que as pessoas que possuem transtornos mentais sejam capazes de redigir suas DPA em conhecimento de causa, já que a autonomia é o valor que lhes dá o poder de contribuir para seu próprio restabelecimento.
Appendices
Références
-
Ambrosini, D. L., Crocker, A. G., Israel, M., Perreault, M., 2008, Attitudes towards psychiatric advance directives among legal and mental health professionals in Ontario and Quebec, (under review).10.1007/s001270050108 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Ambrosini, D. L., Crocker, A. G., Perreault, M., Israel, M., 2008, Perceptions of psychiatric advance directives among legal and mental health professionals in Ontario and Quebec, Journal Ethics in Mental Health, 31, 1, 1-12.10.1192/bjp.186.3.247 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Amering, M., Denk, E., Griengl, H., Sibitz, I., Stastny, P., 1999, Psychiatric wills of mental health professionals : a survey of opinions regarding advance directives in psychiatry, Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 34, 1, 30-34.10.1007/s001270050108 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Amering, M., Stastny, P., Hopper, K., 2005, Psychiatric advance directives : qualitative study of informed deliberations by mental health service users, British Journal of Psychiatry, 186, 247-252.10.1192/bjp.186.3.247 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Appelbaum, P.S., Grisso, T., 2001, MacCAT-CR MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Clinical Research, Professional Resource Press, Sarasota FL.10.1023/A:1012214807933 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Appelbaum, P. S., Redlich, A., 2006, Impact of decisional capacity on the use of leverage to encourage treatment adherence, Community Mental Health Journal, 42, 2, 121-130.10.1007/s10597-005-9015-6 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Ashcraft, L., Anthony, W. A., 2006, A treatment planning reality check, Behavioral Healthcare, 26, 2, 7-8.10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.06.006 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Atkinson, J. M., Garner, H. C., Gilmour, W. H., 2004, Models of advance directives in mental health care : stakeholder views, Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 39, 8, 673-680.10.1007/s00127-004-0788-7 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Backlar, P., McFarland, B. H., Swanson, J. W., Mahler, J., 2001, Consumer, provider, and informal caregiver opinions on psychiatric advance directives, Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 28, 6, 427-441.10.1023/A:1012214807933 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law, 2002 http://www.bazelon.org/ issues/advancedirectives/hargrave.html10.2975/31.1.2007.23.31 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Bravo, G., Dubois, M. F., Paquet, M., 2003, Advance directives for health care and research : prevalence and correlates, Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders, 17, 4, 215-222.10.1097/00002093-200310000-00004 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Bravo, G., Dubois, M. F., Wagneur, B., 2008, Assessing the effectiveness of interventions to promote advance directives among older adults : a systematic review and multi-level analysis, Social Science and Medicine, 67, 7, 1122-1132.10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.06.006 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Calsyn, R. J., Winter, J. P., Morse, G. A., 2000, Do consumers who have a choice of treatment have better outcomes ? Community Mental Health Journal, 36, 2, 149-160.10.1023/A:1001890210218 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Cantor, N. L., 1992a, Advance directives and the pursuit of death with dignity : New Jersey’s new legislation, Rutgers Law Review, 44, 2, 335-403.10.1076/jmep.26.4.417.3009 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Cantor, N. L., 1992b, Prospective autonomy : on the limits of shaping one’s postcompetence medical fate, The Journal of Contemporary Health Law Policy, 8, 13-48.10.1023/A:1004660915824 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Castelein, S., Van der Gaag, M., Bruggeman, R., Van Busschbach, J. T., Wiersma, D., 2008, Measuring empowerment among people with psychotic disorders : a comparison of three instruments, Psychiatric Services, 59, 11, 1338-1342.10.1176/appi.ps.59.11.1338 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Civil Code of Québec, 1991 (CCQ).10.1176/appi.ps.59.1.63 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Code of Ethics, 2005, Montreal, Douglas Mental Health University Institute.10.1111/j.1471-6712.2007.00561.x Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Davidson, L., Tondora, J., O’Connell, M. J., Kirk, T., Jr., Rockholz, P., Evans, A. C., 2007, Creating a recovery-oriented system of behavioral health care : moving from concept to reality, Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 31, 1, 23-31.10.2975/31.1.2007.23.31 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Davis, J. K., 2004, Precedent autonomy and subsequent consent, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice : an International Forum, 7, 3, 267-291.10.1023/B:ETTA.0000042908.13784.00 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Davis, J. K., 2008, How to justify enforcing a Ulysses contract when Ulysses is competent to refuse, Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 18, 1, 87-106.10.1353/ken.0.0001 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
DeWolf Bosek, M. S., Ring, M. E., Cady, R. F., 2008, Do psychiatric advance directives protect autonomy ? JONAS Healthcare Law, Ethics and Regulation, 10, 1, 17-24.10.1097/01.NHL.0000312546.62165.54 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Dunbrack, J., 2006, Advance Care Planning : the Glossary Project, Ottawa, Health Canada.10.1001/jama.283.11.1437 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Ells, C., 2001, Shifting the autonomy debate to theory as ideology, The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 26, 4, 417-430.10.1076/jmep.26.4.417.3009 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Geller, J. L., 2000, The use of advance directives by persons with serious mental illness for psychiatric treatment, Psychiatric Quarterly, 71, 1, 1-13.10.1023/A:1004660915824 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Goss, C., Moretti, F., Mazzi, M. A., Del Piccolo, L., Rimondini, M., Zimmermann, C., 2008, Involving patients in decisions during psychiatric consultations, The British Journal of Psychiatry, 193, 5, 416-421.10.1192/bjp.bp.107.048728 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Gray, J. E., Shone, M. A., Liddle, P. F., 2008, Canadian Mental Health Law and Policy, LexisNexis, Markham, Ontario.10.1016/j.ijlp.2007.11.010 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Grosse Holtforth, M., Reubi, I., Ruckstuhl, L., Berking, M., Grawe, K., 2004, The value of treatment-goal themes for treatment planning and outcome evaluation of psychiatric inpatients, The International Journal of Social Impact of Decisional Capacity Psychiatry, 50, 1, 80-91.10.1080/09638230410001729825 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Hargrave v. Vermont, __ F.3d __, 2003 WL 21770957 (2nd Cir. 2003)10.1037/10550-000 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Health Care Consent Act, 1996 S.O. 1996, c. 2 Schedule A (HCCA).10.1016/S0160-2527(98)00017-X Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Henderson, C., Swanson, J. W., Szmukler, G., Thornicroft, G., Zinkler, M., 2008, A typology of advance statements in mental health care, Psychiatric Services, 59, 1, 63-71.10.1176/appi.ps.59.1.63 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Ho, A., 2008, Relational autonomy or undue pressure ? Family’s role in medical decision-making, Scandinavian Journal of Caring Science, 22, 1, 128-135.10.1111/j.1471-6712.2007.00561.x Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Joshi, K. G., 2003, Psychiatric advance directives, Journal of Psychiatric Practice, 9, 4, 303-306.10.1097/00131746-200307000-00005 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Kalis, A., Mojzisch, A., Schweizer, T. S., Kaiser, S., 2008, Weakness of will, akrasia, and the neuropsychiatry of decision making : An interdisciplinary perspective. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 8, 4, 402-417.10.3758/CABN.8.4.402 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Kim, M. M., Scheyett, A. M., Elbogen, E. B., Van Dorn, R. A., McDaniel, L. A., Swartz, M. S., Swanson, J.W., Ferron J., 2008, Front Line Workers’Attitudes towards Psychiatric Advance Directives, Community Mental Health Journal, 44, 1, 28-46.10.1007/s10597-007-9104-9 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Kirby, M., 2004, Mental Health, Mental Illness and Addiction : Issues and Options for Canada, Report 3.10.1176/appi.ps.58.9.1157 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Linhorst, D. M., Hamilton, G., Young, E., Eckert, A., 2002, Opportunities and barriers to empowering people with severe mental illness through participation in treatment planning, Social Work, 47, 4, 425-434.10.1093/sw/47.4.425 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Mazzei v. British Columbia (Director of Adult Forensic Psychiatric Services), 2006, 1 S.C.R. 326 (Supreme Court of Canada).10.1176/appi.ajp.163.11.1943 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Mental health commission of Canada, 2009, available at : http://www. mentalhealthcommission.ca/english/pages/default.aspx.10.1080/14999013.2003.10471180 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Molloy, D. W., Guyatt, G. H., Russo, R., Goeree, R., O’Brien, B. J., Bedard, M., 2000, Systematic implementation of an advance directive program in nursing homes : a randomized controlled trial, Jama, 283, 11, 1437-1444.10.1001/jama.283.11.1437 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Mueser, K. T., Corrigan, P. W., Hilton, D. W., Tanzman, B., Schaub, A., Gingerich, S., et al., 2002, Illness management and recovery : a review of the research, Psychiatric Services, 53, 10, 1272-1284.10.1176/appi.ps.53.10.1272 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Mueser, K. T., Meyer, P. S., Penn, D. L., Clancy, R., Clancy, D. M., Salyers, M. P., 2006, The Illness Management and Recovery program : rationale, development, and preliminary findings, Schizophrenia Bulletin, 32, Suppl 1, S32-43.10.1093/schbul/sbl022 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Nelson, W. A., 2007, The ethics of patient preferences. Autonomy has limitations when contrary to medical judgment, illegal or unethical, Healthcare Executive, 22, 5, 34, 36-37.10.1037/0003-066X.37.7.762 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
O’Connell, M. J., Stein, C. H., 2005, Psychiatric advance directives : perspectives of community stakeholders, Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 32, 3, 241-265.10.1007/s10488-004-0843-4 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
O’Reilly, R. L., 2008, The capacity to execute an advance directive for psychiatric treatment, International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 31, 1, 66-71.10.1016/j.ijlp.2007.11.010 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Papageorgiou, A., Janmohamed, A., King, M., Davidson, O., Dawson, J., 2004, Advance directives for patients compulsorily admitted to hospital with serious mental disorders : Directive content and feedback from patients and professionals, Journal of Mental Health, 13, 4, 379-388.10.1080/09638230410001729825 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Patterson, C., Molloy, D. W., Guyatt, G. H., Bedard, M., North, J., Hassard, J., et al., 1997, Systematic implementation of an advance health care directive in the community, Canadian Journal of Nursing Administration, 10, 2, 96-108.10.1590/S0034-89102006000500021 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Pinel, P., 1806, A Treatise on Insanity, London, United Kingdom, Messers Cadell and Davies, Strand.10.1037/10550-000 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Preference Collaborative Review Group, 2008, Patients’preferences within randomised trials : systematic review and patient level meta-analysis, British Medical Journal, 337, a1864.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Re C (Adult : Refusal of Treatment), [1994] 1 WLR 290, Family Division, England.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Ritchie, J., Sklar, R., Steiner, W., 1998, Advance directives in psychiatry : Resolving issues of autonomy and competence, International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 21, 3, 245-260.10.1016/S0160-2527(98)00017-X Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Rogers, E. S., Chamberlin, J., Ellison, M. L., Crean, T., 1997, A consumer-constructed scale to measure empowerment among users of mental health services, Psychiatric Services, 48, 8, 1042-1047.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Rogers, A., Day, J., Randall, F., Bentall, R. P., 2003, Patients’understanding and participation in a trial designed to improve the management of anti-psychotic medication : a qualitative study, Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 38, 12, 720-727.10.1007/s00127-003-0693-5 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Samanta, A., Samanta, J., 2006, Advance directives, best interests and clinical judgement : shifting sands at the end of life, Clinical Medicine, 6, 3, 274-278.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Scheyett A., 2008, Psychiatric advance directives : benefits and barriers, Current Psychiatry Reviews, 4, 3, 137-144.10.2174/157340008785829940 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Scheyett, A. M., Kim, M. M., Swanson, J. W., Swartz, M. S., 2007, Psychiatric advance directives : a tool for consumer empowerment and recovery, Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 31, 1, 70-75.10.2975/31.1.2007.70.75 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Schurhofer, M., Peschl, M., 2005, Autonomy : starting point and goal of personal and social change : A constructivist perspective on knowledge management in empowerment processes, Kybernetes, 34, 1/2, 261.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Singer, P. A., Choudry, S., Armstrong, J., 1993, Public opinion regarding consent to treatment, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 41, 2, 112-116.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Singer, P. A., Choudry, S., Armstrong, J., Meslin, E. M., Lowy, F. H., 1995, Public opinion regarding end-of-life decisions : influence of prognosis, practice and process, Social Science and Medicine, 41, 11, 1517-1521.10.1016/0277-9536(95)00057-E Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Sklar, R., 2007, Starson v. Swayze : The Supreme Court speaks out (not all that clearly) on the question of “capacity”, Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 52, 6, 390-395.10.1177/0020764004040955 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Somerville, M. A., 1994, Labels versus contents : variance between philosophy, psychiatry and law in concepts governing decision-making, McGill Law Journal, 39, 179.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Srebnik, D., Brodoff, L., 2003, Implementing psychiatric advance directives : service provider issues and answers, The Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research, 30, 3, 253-268.10.1007/BF02287316 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Srebnik, D., Kim, S. Y., 2006, Competency for creation, use, and revocation of psychiatric advance directives, The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 34, 4, 501-510.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Srebnik, D., Russo, J., 2007, Consistency of psychiatric crisis care with advance directive instructions, Psychiatric Services, 58, 9, 1157-1163.10.1176/appi.ps.58.9.1157 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Starson v. Swayze, 2003, 1 S.C.R. 722 (Supreme Court of Canada).Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Stiggelbout, A. M., Molewijk, A. C., Otten, W., Timmermans, D. R., van Bockel, J. H., Kievit, J., 2004, Ideals of patient autonomy in clinical decision making : a study on the development of a scale to assess patients’ and physicians’ views, Journal of Medical Ethics, 30, 3, 268-274.10.1136/jme.2003.003095 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Swanson, J.W., Swartz, M., Ferron, J., Elbogen, E., Van Dorn, R., 2006, Psychiatric advance directives among public mental health consumers in five U.S. cities : prevalence, demand, and correlates, The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 34, 1, 43-57.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Swanson, J.W., Swartz, M. S., Elbogen, E. B., Van Dorn, R. A., Ferron, J., Wagner, H. R., 2006, Facilitated psychiatric advance directives : a randomized trial of an intervention to foster advance treatment planning among persons with severe mental illness, American Journal of Psychiatry, 163, 11, 1943-1951.10.1176/appi.ajp.163.11.1943 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Swanson, J.W., Swartz, M. S., Hannon, M. J., Elbogen, E. B., Wagner, H. R., McCauley, B. J., et al., 2003, Psychiatric advance directives : a survey of persons with schizophrenia, family members, and treatment providers, International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 2, 1, 73-86.10.1080/14999013.2003.10471180 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Swanson, J.W., Van McCrary, S., Swartz, M. S., Van Dorn, R. A., Elbogen, E. B., 2007, Overriding psychiatric advance directives : factors associated with psychiatrists’ decisions to preempt patients’ advance refusal of hospitalization and medication, Law and Human Behavior, 31, 1, 77-90.10.1007/s10979-006-9032-1 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Swartz, M. S., Swanson, J. W., 2007, Commentary : psychiatric advance directives and recovery-oriented care, Psychiatric Services, 58, 9, 1164.10.7861/clinmedicine.6-3-274 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Swartz, M. S., Swanson, J. W., Ferron, J., Elbogen, E. B., Van Dorn, R., Kim, M., 2005, Psychiatrists’views and attitudes about psychiatric advance directives, International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 4, 2, 107-117.10.1080/14999013.2005.10471217 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Sutherby, K., Szmukler, G. I., Halpern, A., Alexander, M., Thornicroft, G., Johnson, C., 1999, A study of ‘crisis cards’ in a community psychiatric service, Acta Psychiatra Scandinavica, 100, 1, 56-61.10.1111/j.1600-0447.1999.tb10914.x Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Szasz, T. S., 1982, The psychiatric will — A new mechanism for protecting persons against “psychosis” and psychiatry, American Psychologist, 37, 7, 762-770.10.1037/0003-066X.37.7.762 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Van Dorn, R. A., Swanson, J. W., Swartz, M. S., Elbogen, E., Ferron, J., 2008, Reducing barriers to completing psychiatric advance directives, Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 35, 6, 440-448.10.1007/s10488-008-0187-6 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Van Dorn, R. A., Swartz, M. S., Elbogen, E. B., Swanson, J. W., Kim, M., Ferron, J., 2006, Clinicians’attitudes regarding barriers to the implementation of psychiatric advance directives, Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 33, 4, 449-460.10.1007/s10488-005-0017-z Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
van Willigenburg, T., Delaere, P., 2005, Protecting autonomy as authenticity using Ulysses contracts, The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 30, 4, 395-409.10.1080/03605310591008595 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Wagner, L. C., Fleck, M. P., Wagner, M., Dias, M. T., 2006, Autonomy of long-stay psychiatric inpatients, Revisita de Saude Publica, 40, 4, 699-705.10.1590/S0034-89102006000500021 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Widdershoven, G., 2007, Empirical Ethics in Psychiatry, Oxford University, Oxford.10.1176/ps.2007.58.9.1164 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
-
Wilder, C. M., Elbogen, E. B., Swartz, M. S., Swanson, J. W., Van Dorn, R. A., 2007, Effect of patients’ reasons for refusing treatment on implementing psychiatric advance directives, Psychiatric Services, 58, 10, 1348-1350.10.1176/appi.ps.58.10.1348 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
