Abstracts
Résumé
Cet article méthodologique propose d’explorer l’hypnose comme méthode postqualitative de compréhension des affects de la personne qui mène la recherche, dans le cadre d’autoethnographie et d’ethnographie affective. S’appuyant sur les littératures issues du tournant des affects, l’objectif de cette recherche est d’explorer dans quelle mesure l’hypnose permet de prendre en compte les affects de la personne qui mène la recherche et ainsi l’aider à aller plus loin dans sa réflexivité. Pour ce faire, la chercheuse s’est prêtée à une séance d’hypnose enregistrée sous format audio et retranscrite immédiatement dans un journal de bord. L’article propose une grille d’analyse exploratoire des affects de la chercheuse sous hypnose, associant questions, réponses orales, images mentales et ressentis physiques perçus en transe, afin d’appréhender le potentiel de la méthode comme exploration des affects pouvant apporter une dimension critique aux ethnographies futures.
Mots-clés :
- hypnose,
- affects,
- autoethnographie,
- méthodologies,
- réflexivité
Abstract
This methodological article proposes to investigate hypnosis as a post-qualitative method for understanding the researcher's affects within the context of autoethnography and affective ethnography. Building upon literature surrounding the affect turn, the objective of this research is to examine the potential of hypnosis in acknowledging and deepening the researcher's reflexivity by considering their emotional experiences. To this end, the researcher took part in a hypnosis session, which was audio-recorded immediately transcribed into a logbook. The article proposes an exploratory analysis grid for capturing the researcher's affects during hypnosis, integrating inquiries, verbal responses, mental imagery, and physical sensations experienced in trance. This approach aims to uncover the method's potential in exploring affects, thereby contributing a critical dimension to future ethnographic research.
Keywords:
- hypnosis,
- affects,
- autoethnography,
- methodologies,
- reflexivity
Appendices
Bibliographie
- Ashcraft, K. L. (2017). 'Submission' to the rule of excellence: Ordinary affect and precarious resistance in the labor of organization and management studies. Organization, 24(1), 36‑58.
- Ashcraft, K. L. (2018). Critical complicity: The feel of difference at work in home and field. Management Learning, 49(5), 613‑623.
- Ashcraft, K. L. (2019). Feeling Things, Making Waste: Hoarding and the Dis/Organization of Affect. Dans C. Vasquez et T. Kuhn (dir.), Dis/organization as Communication (p. 99-124). Routledge.
- Ashcraft, K. L. (2021). Communication as constitutive transmission? An encounter with affect. Communication Theory, 31(4), 571‑592.
- Ashcraft, K. L. et Kuhn, T. (2017). Agential encounters: Performativity and affect meet communication in the bathroom. Dans The agency of organizing (p. 170‑193). Routledge.
- Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
- Blackman, L. (2012). Immaterial Bodies: Affect, Embodiment, Mediation. SAGE Publications Ltd.
- Brummans, B. H. et Vézy, C. (2022). Adventurous ideas for ethnographic research on the communicative constitution of organizations. Dans J. Basque, N. Bencherki et T. Kuhn (dir.), The Routledge Handbook of the Communicative Constitution of Organization (p. 262‑280). Routledge.
- Caron, I. (2018). Pourquoi jamais : les tréfonds du vécu par la création artistique en collectif [Thèse de doctorat, UQAM]. Archipel. https://archipel.uqam.ca/11369/1/D3422.pdf
- Castro, J. (2018). An Autoethnographic Exploration of Hypnotherapeutic Experience. Nova Southeastern University.
- Clough, P. (2007). The Affective Turn. Duke University Press.
- Clough, P. (2010). Afterword: The future of affect studies. Body & Society, 16(1), 222‑230.
- Deleuze, G. et Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus (Translated by B. Massumi). University of Minnesota Press.
- Denzin, N. K. (2013). Interpretive autoethnography. SAGE Publications Ltd.
- Ellis, C., Adams, T. E. et Bochner, A. P. (2011). Autoethnography: An Overview. Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung, 36(4), 273‑290.
- Ellis, C., et Adams, T. E. (2014). The purposes, practices, and principles of autoethnographic research. Dans P. Leavy (dir.), The Oxford handbook of qualitative research (p. 254-276). Oxford University Press.
- Entwistle, P. A. (2020). Hypnosis as performance autoethnography in qualitative sociological research. Journal of Organizational Ethnography, 9(3), 249‑263.
- Entwistle, P. A. (2016). The use of hypnosis as an auto- ethnographic modality in the exploration and management of overweight and obesity selected case studies. [Thèse de doctorat. Liverpool John Morres University]. LJMU Research Online. https://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/4212/
- Fotaki, M., Kenny, K. et Vachhani, S. J. (2017). Thinking critically about affect in organization studies: Why it matters. Organization, 24(1), 3‑17.
- Fox, N. J. et Alldred, P. (2015). New materialist social inquiry: designs, methods and the research-assemblage. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18(4), 399‑414.
- Gabriel, Y. (2018). Interpretation, reflexivity and imagination in qualitative research. Dans M. Ciesielska et D. Jemielniak (dir.), Qualitative Methodologies in Organization Studies (Volume I: Theories and New Approaches, p. 137‑157). Springer.
- Gergen, K. J. et Gergen, M. M. (2018). Doing things with words: toward evocative ethnography. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 15(2‑3), 272‑286.
- Gergen, M. M. et Gergen, K. J. (2000). Qualitative inquiry: Tensions and transformations. Dans N. K. Denzin et Y. S. Lincoln (dir.), Handbook of qualitative research (2e éd., p. 1025‑1046). SAGE publications Ltd.
- Gherardi, S. (2017). One turn… and now another one: Do the turn to practice and the turn to affect have something in common? Management Learning, 48(3), 345‑358.
- Gherardi, S. (2019). Theorizing affective ethnography for organization studies. Organization, 26(6), 741‑760.
- Gherardi, S. (2023). The fluid affective space of organizational practices. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 18(5), 1‑19.
- Gregg, M. et Seigworth, G. J. (2010). The affect theory reader. Duke University Press.
- Hine, C. (2017). From virtual ethnography to the embedded, embodied, everyday internet. Dans The Routledge companion to digital ethnography (p. 47‑54). Routledge.
- Hine, C. (2020). Ethnography for the internet: Embedded, embodied and everyday. Routledge.
- Jahjah, M. (2022). «T’es intelligent pour un arabe!» Auto-ethnographie d’un corps colonisé. Une épistémologie du mezzé libanais. Itinéraires. Littérature, textes, cultures. https://doi.org/10.4000/itineraires.11748
- Jordan, S., Messner, M. et Becker, A. (2009). Reflection and mindfulness in organizations: Rationales and possibilities for integration. Management Learning, 40(4), 465‑473.
- Kramer, U. (2011). De l’importance de l’approfondissement de l’affect en psychothérapie. Pratiques Psychologiques, 17(1), 93‑102.
- Mahy, I. (2008). « Il était une fois… » Ou la force du récit dans la conduite du changement. Communication et organisation, (33), 50‑60.
- Mahy, I. (2010). Practicing the 3rd eye: Reflexion on a collective visual harvesting process. Dans 28th Standing Conference on Organizational Symbolism SCOS 2010 (p. 1‑12).
- Massumi, B. (1995). The Autonomy of Affect. Cultural Critique, (31), 83‑109.
- Melchior, T. (2002). Communication hypnotique, symptômes et émotions. Cahiers critiques de thérapie familiale et de pratiques de réseaux, 29(2), 123‑138.
- Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945). Phénoménologie de la perception. Gallimard.
- Meyor, C. (2005). La phénoménologie dans la méthode scientifiqueet le problème de la subjectivité. Recherches qualitatives, 25(1), 25.
- Peshkin, A. (1988). In search of subjectivity—one’s own. Educational researcher, 17(7), 17‑21.
- Seigworth, G. J. et Gregg, M. (2010). An inventory of shimmers. The affect theory reader, 1, 25.
- Sewell, G. et Taskin, L. (2015). Out of Sight, Out of Mind in a New World of Work? Autonomy, Control, and Spatiotemporal Scaling in Telework. Organization Studies, 36(11), 1507‑1529.
- Shouse, E. (2005). Feeling, Emotion, Affect. M/C Journal, 8(6). https://doi.org/10.5204/mcj.2443.
- Spry, T. (2006). Performing autoethnography. Dans S. N. Hesse-Biber et P. Leavy (dir.), Emergent Methods in Social Research (p. 183-212. SAGE Publications Ltd.
- Spry, T. (2011). Performative autoethnography: Critical embodiments and possibilities. Dans N. K. Denzin et Y. S. Lincoln (dir.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (4e éd., p. 497‑512). SAGE Publications Ltd.
- Spry, T. (2016). Autoethnography and the other: Unsettling power through utopian performatives. Routledge.
- St. Pierre, E. A. (2021). Post qualitative inquiry, the refusal of method, and the risk of the new. Qualitative Inquiry, 27(1), 3‑9.
- St. Pierre, E. A. (2011). Post qualitative research: The critique and the coming after. Dans N. K. Denzin et Y. S. Lincoln (dir.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research. (4e éd., p. 611‑625). SAGE Publications Ltd.
- Stewart, K. (2007). Ordinary affects. Duke University Press.
- Sutcliffe, K. M., Vogus, T. J. et Dane, E. (2016). Mindfulness in organizations: A cross-level review. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3(1), 55‑81.
- Taskin, L. (2006). Télétravail : Les enjeux de la déspatialisation pour le management humain. Revue Interventions économiques. Papers in Political Economy, (34). https://doi.org/10.4000/interventionseconomiques.680
- Vásquez, C. (2020). (In)habitée par le cancer : récits critiques des trajectoires affectives d’un terrain miné d’émotions. Recherches qualitatives, 39(2), 193‑214.
- Vogus, T. J. et Sutcliffe, K. M. (2012). Organizational mindfulness and mindful organizing: A reconciliation and path forward. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(4), 722‑735.
- Weick, K. E. et Sutcliffe, K. M. (2006). Mindfulness and the quality of organizational Attention. Organization Science, 17(4), 514‑524.
10.7202/1085542ar