ror.org/03606hw36
Abstracts
Abstract
Information is central to modern economics, but mostly treated in a disembodied form. The paper suggests a semiotic approach to information that interprets information in terms of thermodynamic information theory. This builds on C. S. Peirce’s concept of finality, relating final causes to energetic transformations in the economy, which operate in the efficient-causal mode. I substantiate this argument in a semiotic analysis of design as mediating such transformations via technology.
Keywords:
- Semantic Information,
- Thermodynamics,
- Peirce,
- Final Causes,
- Technological Design
Résumé
L’information est au coeur de l’économie moderne, mais elle est le plus souvent traitée sous une forme désincarnée. L’auteur propose une approche sémiotique qui interprète l’information à l’aide de la théorie thermodynamique. Cette approche s’appuie sur le concept de finalité de C. S. Peirce, qui relie les causes finales aux transformations énergétiques dans l’économie, lesquelles fonctionnent sur le mode efficacité-causalité. Cet argument est étayé par une analyse sémiotique du design comme médiateur de ces transformations par la technologie.
Mots-clés :
- Information sémantique,
- thermodynamique,
- Peirce,
- causes finales,
- design technologique
Appendices
Bibliography
- ADRIAANS, P. (2019) “Information”. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2019 Edition), E.N. Zalta (Ed.), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2019/entries/information
- ANNILA, A., and SALTHE, S.N. (2010) “Physical Foundations of Evolutionary Theory”. In Journal of Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics (35) : 301-321.
- ARTHUR, W. B. (2009) The Nature of Technology : What It Is and How It Evolves. New York, NY : Free Press.
- ATKINS, P. (2007) Four Laws That Drive the Universe. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
- AZEVEDO, I.M.L. (2014) “Consumer End-Use Energy Efficiency and Rebound Effects”. In Annual Review of Environment and Resources (39) : 393-418.
- AYRES, R.U. (1994) Information, Entropy, and Progress : A New Evolutionary Paradigm. New York, NY : AIP Press.
- AYRES, R.U., and WARR, B. (2009) The Economic Growth Engine : How Energy and Work Drive Material Prosperity. Cheltenham : Edward Elgar.
- BAKER, V. (1999) “Presidential Address : Geosemiotics”. In GSA Bulletin (111)5 : 633-645.
- BEJAN, A., and LORENTE, S. (2010) “The Constructal Law of Design and Evolution in Nature”. In Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B (365) : 1335-1347.
- BEN JACOB, E., SHAPIRA Y. and TAUBER A. I. (2006) “Seeking the Foundations of Cognition in Bacteria : From Schrödinger’s Negative Entropy to Latent Information”. In Physica A (359) : 495-524.
- BRIER, S. (2008) Cybersemiotics : Why Information Is Not Enough! Toronto : University of Toronto Press.
- BROOKS, D.R., and WILEY, E.O. (1988) Evolution as Entropy : Toward a Unified Theory of Biology. Chicago, IL : Chicago University Press.
- CHAISSON, E.J. (2001) Cosmic Evolution : The Rise of Complexity in Nature. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.
- COLLIER, J. (1996) “Causation Is the Transfer of Information”. In Causation, Natural Laws and Explanation. H. Sankey (Ed.), Dordrecht : Kluwer : 279-331.
- DEACON, T.W. (2013) Incomplete Nature : How Mind Emerged from Matter. New York, NY : Norton.
- DEWAR, R.C. (2005) “Maximum-Entropy Production and Non-Equilibrium Statistical Mechanics”. In Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics and the Production of Entropy : Life, Earth, and Beyond. A. Kleidon & R. Lorenz (Eds.), Heidelberg : Springer : 41-55.
- DEWAR, R.C. (2009) “Maximum Entropy Production as an Inference Algorithm that Translates Physical Assumptions into Macroscopic Predictions : Don’t Shoot the Messenger”. In Entropy (11) : 931-944.
- DEWAR, R.C. (2010) “Maximum Entropy Production and Plant Optimization Theories”. In Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B (365) : 1429-1435.
- EL-HANI, C.N., QUEIROZ, J., and EMMECHE, C. (2006) “A Semiotic Analysis of the Genetic Information System”. In Semiotica (160) : 1-68.
- ELITZUR, A.C. (2005) “When Form Outlasts Its Medium : A Definition of Life Integrating Platonism and Thermodynamics”. In Life as We Know It. J. Seckbach (Ed.), Dordrecht : Kluwer : 607-620.
- EMMECHE, C. (2002) “The Chicken and the Orphan Egg : On the Function of Meaning and the Meaning of Function”. In Sign System Studies (30)1 : 15-32.
- ERESHEFSKY, M. (2017) “Species”. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2017 Edition), E.N. Zalta (Ed.), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2017/entries/species/ (accessed, April 25, 2020).
- FATH, B., PATTEN, B.C., and CHOI, J.S. (2001) “Complementarity of Ecological Goal Functions”. In Journal of Theoretical Biology (208) : 493-506.
- FLORIDI, L. (2019) “Semantic Conceptions of Information”. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2019 Edition), E.N. Zalta (Ed.), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2019/entries/information-semantic/ (accessed, April 25, 2020).
- GEORGESCU-ROEGEN, N. (1971) The Entropy Law and the Economic Process. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.
- HAFF, P.K. (2012) “Technology and Human Purpose : The Problem of Solids Transport on the Earth’s Surface”. In Earth System Dynamics (3) : 149-156.
- HAFF, P.K. (2014) “Maximum Entropy Production by Technology”. In Beyond the Second Law. Entropy Production in Non-equilibrium Systems. R.C. Dewar, C.H. Lineweaver, R.K. Niven, & K. Regenauer-Lieb (Eds.), Heidelberg : Springer : 397-414.
- HERRMANN-PILLATH, C. (2013) Foundations of Economic Evolution : A Treatise on the Natural Philosophy of Economics. Cheltenham : Edward Elgar.
- HERRMANN-PILLATH, C. (2014) “Energy, Growth and Evolution : Towards a Naturalistic Ontology of Economics”. In Ecological Economics (119) : 432-442
- HERRMANN-PILLATH, C. (2018) “The Case for a New Discipline : Technosphere Science”. In Ecological Economics (149) : 212-225.
- HERRMANN-PILLATH, C. (2019) “The Art of Co-creation : An Intervention in the Philosophy of Ecological Economics”. In Ecological Economics, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106526 (accessed September 2020).
- HERRMANN-PILLATH, C. and SALTHE, S.N. (2011) “Triadic Conceptual Structure of the Maximum Entropy Approach to Evolution”. In BioSystems (103) : 315-330.
- HIDALGO, C.A. (2016) Why Information Grows : The Evolution of Order, from Atoms to Economies. London : Penguin.
- HIEDANPÄÄ, J., and BROMLEY, D.W. (2016) Environmental Heresies : The Quest for Reasonable. London : Palgrave Macmillan.
- HULSWIT, M. (2002) From Cause to Causation : a Peircean Perspective. Dordrecht : Kluwer.
- INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY (2020) “Digitalisation : Making Energy Systems More Connected, Efficient, Resilient and Sustainable”, https://www.iea.org/topics/digitalisation (accessed April 30, 2020).
- JAYNES, E.T. (1982) “Comments on ‘Natural Resources : The Laws of Their Scarcity’ by N. Georgescu-Roegen”. http://bayes.wustl.edu/etj/articles/natural.resources.pdf (accessed April 26, 2020).
- JAYNES, E.T. (2003) Probability Theory : The Logic of Science. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
- KÅBERGER, T. and MÅNSSON, B. (2001) “Entropy and Economic Processes : Physics Perspectives”. In Ecological Economics (36) : 165-179.
- KÅHRE, J. (2002) The Mathematical Theory of Information. Boston, MA : Dordrecht & London : Kluwer.
- KAUFFMAN, S.A. (2000) Investigations. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
- KLEIDON, A. (2009) “Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics and Maximum Entropy Production in the Earth System : Applications and Implications”. In Naturwissenschaften (96) : 653-677.
- KLEIDON, A. (2016) Thermodynamic Foundations of the Earth System. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
- KOLCHINSKY, A. and WOLPERT, D.H. (2018) “Semantic Information, Autonomous Agency and Non-Equilibrium Statistical Physics”. In Interface Focus (8) : 20180041
- KÜMMEL, R. (2013) The Second Law of Economics. Energy, Entropy, and the Origins of Wealth. Heidelberg : Springer.
- LADYMAN, J., and ROSS, D., with SPURRETT, D. and COLLIER J. (2007) Every Thing Must Go : Metaphysics Naturalized. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
- LATOUR, B. (2015) Face à Gaïa : Huit conférences sur le nouveau régime climatique. Paris : Découverte.
- LEVINSON, P. (1988) Mind at Large : Knowing in the Technological Age. Greenwich, CT : JAI Press.
- LLAVADOR, H., ROEMER, J.E., and SILVESTRE, J. (2015) Sustainability for a Warming Planet. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.
- LLOYD, S. (2006) Programming the Universe : A Quantum Computer Scientist Takes on the Cosmos. New York, NY : Knopf.
- LLOYD, S. (1922a) “Contribution to the Energetics of Evolution”. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (8) : 147-151.
- LLOYD, S. (1922b) “Natural Selection as a Physical Principle”. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Science (8) : 151-154.
- MARAN, T., TØNNESSEN, M., TÜÜR, K., MAGNUS, R., RATTASEPP, S., MÄEKIVI, N. (2016) “Methodology of Zoosemiotics : Concepts, Categorisations, Models”. In Animal Umwelten in a Changing World : Zoosemiotic Perspectives, T. Maran et al. (Eds.). Tartu : University of Tartu Press.
- MARONEY, O. (2009) “Information Processing and Thermodynamic Entropy”. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2009 Edition), E.N. Zalta (Ed.), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2009/entries/information-entropy/ (accessed April 27, 2020).
- MARTYUSHEV, L. M. (2020) “Life and Evolution in Terms of the Maximum Entropy Production Principle”. In Preprints 2020, 2020050017 (doi : 10.20944/preprints202005.0017.v1).
- MARTYUSHEV, L. M., and SELEZNEV, V.D. (2006) “Maximum Entropy Production Principle in Physics, Chemistry and Biology”. In Physics Reports (426) : 1-45.
- MORTON, T. (2013) Hyperobjects : Philosophy and Ecology after the End of the World. Minneapolis, MI : Minneapolis University Press.
- NEANDER, K. (2006) “Content for Cognitive Science”. In Teleosemantics : New Philosophical Essays. G. Macdonald & D. Papineau (Eds.), Oxford : Oxford University Press : 167-194.
- ODUM, H.T. (2007) Environment, Power, and Society for the Twenty-First Century : The Hierarchy of Energy. New York, NY : Columbia University Press.
- OYAMA, S. (2001) The Ontogeny of Information : Developmental Systems and Evolution. Durham, NC : Duke University Press.
- PARMENTIER, R.J. (1985) “Signs’ Place in Medias Res : Peirce’s Concept of Semiotic Mediation”. In Semiotic Mediation, E. Mertz & R.J. Parmentier (Eds.). Orlando, FL : Academic Press : 23-48.
- PETROSKI, H. (1996) Invention by Design : How Engineers Get From Thought to Think. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.
- POPPER, K.R. (1972) Objective Knowledge. An Evolutionary Approach. Oxford : Clarendon.
- POPPER, K.R. (1993) Development and Evolution : Complexity and Change in Biology. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
- POPPER, K.R. (2007) “Meaning in Nature : Placing Biosemiotics in Pansemiotics”. In Biosemiotics : Information, Codes and Signs in Living Systems. M. Barbieri (Ed.), New York, NY : Nova Publishers : ch. 10.
- POPPER, K.R. (2009) “The System of Interpretance : Meaning as Finality”. In Biosemiotics (1) : 285-294.
- SCIUBBA, E. (2011) “What Did Lotka Really Say? A Critical Assessment of the ‘Maximum Power Principle’”. In Ecological Modelling (222) : 1347-1353.
- SEARLE, J. R. (1995) The Construction of Social Reality. New York, NY : Free Press.
- SHORT, T. L. (2007) Peirce’s Theory of Signs. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
- VOLKENSTEIN, M.V. (2009) Entropy and Information. Basel : Birkhäuser.
- WAINWRIGHT, J., and MANN, G. (2018) Climate Leviathan : A Political Theory of Our Planetary Future. London : Verso.
- WHEELER, W. (2016) Expecting the Earth : Life, Culture, Biosemiotics. London : Lawrence & Wishart.
- WOLPERT, D.H. (2001) “Computational Capabilities of Physical Systems”. In Physical Review E (65) : 016128.
- ZIMAN, J. (Ed.) (2000) Technological Innovation as an Evolutionary Process. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
- ZUREK, W. H. (1989) “Algorithmic Randomness and Physical Entropy“. In Physical Review A (40)8 : 4731-4751.