Abstracts
Résumé
L’ouvrage collectif de Chkair et Wagnon (2023) réagit à l’adoption de la Loi 23, qui fonde un Institut national d’excellence en éducation (INEE). Pour diffuser les pratiques pédagogiques efficaces dans le système scolaire québécois, l’INEE s’appuie sur le cadre des résultats probants, surtout critiqué par l’ouvrage de Chkair et Wagnon. Avec ce texte, nous rappelons la nature et la fonction du cadre des résultats probants, défendons son adoption pour répondre à un type précis de question et terminons en reprenant certaines inquiétudes émises pas l’ouvrage recensé.
Mots-clés :
- cadre des résultats probants,
- épistémologie,
- méthodologie,
- méthodes quantitatives,
- politiques éducatives
Abstract
The collective work by Chkair and Wagnon (2023) reacts to the adoption of Bill 23, which establishes a National Institute for Excellence in Education (NIEE). To disseminate effective pedagogical practices in the Quebec school system, the NIEE relies on an evidence-based framework, mostly criticized by Chkair and Wagnon. In this article, we look back on the nature and function of the evidence-based framework, defend its adoption to answer a specific type of question, and conclude by rectifying some of the concerns raised in the reviewed work.
Keywords:
- evidence-based framework,
- epistemology,
- methodology,
- quantitative methods,
- educational policies
Resumen
El libro colectivo de Chkair y Wagnon (2023) responde a la adopción de la Ley 23, que establece un Instituto Nacional de Excelencia en Educación (INEE). Para difundir prácticas pedagógicas eficaces en el sistema escolar de Quebec, el INEE se basa en el marco de las evidencias científicas (‘données probantes’), el cual es objeto de críticas en la obra de Chkair y Wagnon. En este texto, recordamos la naturaleza y función de dicho marco, defendemos su adopción para responder a un tipo específico de cuestión y concluimos abordando algunas de las preocupaciones planteadas en el libro reseñado.
Palabras clave:
- marco de evidencias científicas (‘données probantes’),
- epistemología,
- metodología,
- métodos cuantitativos,
- políticas educativas
Zusammenfassung
Das von Chkair und Wagnon (2023) herausgegebene Sammelwerk reagiert auf die Verabschiedung der Loi 23 (Anm. d. Übers.: Gesetzesentwurf Nr. 23 der Provinz Québec), welche ein Institut national d’excellence en éducation (INEE; Institut der nationalen Bildungsexzellenz) gründet. Um wirksame pädagogische Praktiken in Québecs Bildungssystem zu verbreiten, stützt sich das INEE auf den faktengestützten Bildungsrahmen—der im Band von Chkair und Wagnon meist kritisch betrachtet wird. In diesem Text gehen wir auf den Kern und die Funktionen des faktengestützten Bildungsrahmens ein; verteidigen die Verabschiedung dieses Rahmens als Lösung für eine spezifische Art von Problemen; und übernehmen abschließend einige der Sorgen, die im besprochenen Sammelwerk geäußert werden.
Stichworte:
- faktengestützter Bildungsrahmen,
- Epistemologie,
- Methodologie,
- quantitative Methoden,
- Bildungspolitiken
Appendices
Bibliographie
- Bourque, J. (2016). Réflexion sur l’ancrage ontologique des méthodes quantitatives en sciences sociales. McGill Journal of Education / Revue des sciences de l’éducation de McGill, 51(1), 563-574. https://doi.org/10.7202/1037359ar
10.7202/1037359ar
Google Scholar
Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Bridges, D. (1999). Educational research: Pursuit of truth or flight into fancy? British Educational Research Journal, 25(5), 597-616. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192990250503 10.1080/0141192990250503 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Bridges, D. et Watts, M. (2008). Educational research and policy: Epistemological considerations. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 42(1, suppl.), 41-62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9752.2008.00628.x 10.1111/j.1467-9752.2008.00628.x Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Chkair, S. et Wagnon, S. (dir.) (2023). Les données probantes et l’éducation. De Boeck.10.3917/dbu.sylva.2023.01.0097 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Cobern, W. W. et Loving, C. C. (2008). An essay for educators: Epistemological realism really is common sense. Science and Education, 17(4), 425-447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-007-9095-5 10.1007/s11191-007-9095-5 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Davies, P. (1999). What is evidence-based education? British Journal of Educational Studies, 47(2), 108-121. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3122195 10.1111/1467-8527.00106 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Dekker, S., Lee, N. C., Howard-Jones, P. et Jolles, J. (2012). Neuromyths in education: Prevalence and predictors of misconceptions among teachers. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, article 429, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00429 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00429 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Duffy, M. et Chenail, R. J. (2009). Values in qualitative and quantitative research. Counseling and Values, 53(1), 22-38. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-007 X.2009.tb00111.x10.1002/j.2161-007X.2009.tb00111.x Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Howard-Jones, P. A. (2014). Neuroscience and education: Myths and messages. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 15, 817-824. https://doi:10.1038/nrn3817 10.1038/nrn3817 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions (3e éd.). University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226458106.001.0001 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Lacey, H. (1999). Scientific understanding and the control of nature. Science and Education, 8(1), 13-35. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008678413285 10.1023/A:1008678413285 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Lakatos, I. (1978). The methodology of scientific research programmes: Philosophical papers (1re éd., vol. 1). Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511621123 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Lenoir, Y., Bourque, J., Hasni, A., Nagy, R. et Priolet, M. (dir.). (2020). Les finalités éducatives scolaires. Pour une étude critique des approches théoriques, philosophiques et idéologiques. Conceptions des finalités et des disciplines scolaires chez des enseignants du primaire. Une étude comparative internationale (tome 2). Éditions cursus universitaire.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Phillips, D. C. et Burbules, N. C. (2000). Postpositivism and educational research. Rowan & Littlefield.10.5040/9798216410935 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. Routledge.10.1063/1.3060577 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Popper, K. R. (1963). Conjectures and refutations. Routledge.10.1063/1.3050617 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Slavin, R. E. (2002). Evidence-based education policies: Transforming educational practice and research. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 15-21. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X031007015 10.3102/0013189X031007015 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Wiliam, D. (2008). Comments on Bulterman-Bos: What should education research do, and how should it do it? Educational Researcher, 37(7), 432-438. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08325678 10.3102/0013189X08325678 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar