Abstracts
Résumé
Les multiples conceptualisations de l’évaluation des apprentissages ont conduit à une grande variété de pratiques et il est difficile de déterminer celles permettant de favoriser les apprentissages des élèves. Le but de cette recherche consiste à tenter d’identifier les meilleures pratiques en évaluation formative dans le contexte de l’enseignement primaire et secondaire. Une revue systématique ayant permis d’identifier et d’analyser 35 articles révèle cinq pratiques reconnues probantes pour favoriser les apprentissages des élèves en situation de classe. Deux autres pratiques semblent prometteuses, mais nécessiteront davantage de recherches. Les implications pour les politiques, les pratiques et la recherche sont discutées.
Mots-clés :
- pratiques évaluatives,
- évaluation des apprentissages,
- évaluation formative,
- données probantes,
- enseignement primaire et secondaire
Abstract
The multiple conceptualizations of learning assessment have led to a wide variety of practices, and it is difficult to determine which ones promote student learning. The purpose of this research is to attempt to identify best practices in formative assessment in the context of elementary and secondary education. A systematic review, which identified and analyzed 35 articles, revealed five practices that are recognized as being effective in promoting student learning in the classroom. Two other practices appear promising but require further research. Implications for policies, practices and research are discussed.
Keywords:
- assessment practices,
- assessment of learning,
- formative assessment,
- evidence,
- elementary and secondary education
Resumen
Las múltiples conceptualizaciones de la evaluación de los aprendizajes han llevado a una gran variedad de prácticas y es difícil determinar cuáles permiten favorecer los aprendizajes de los alumnos. El objetivo de esta investigación consiste en intentar identificar las mejores prácticas en evaluación formativa en el contexto de la enseñanza primaria y secundaria. Nuestro análisis sistemático ha permitido identificar y analizar 35 artículos, revelando cinco prácticas reconocidas como probatorias para favorecer los aprendizajes de los alumnos en clase. Otras dos prácticas parecen prometedoras, pero necesitarán más investigaciones. Finalmente, discutimos las implicaciones para las políticas, las prácticas y la investigación.
Palabras clave:
- prácticas evaluativas,
- evaluación de los aprendizajes,
- evaluación formativa,
- datos probatorios,
- enseñanza primaria y secundaria
Appendices
Bibliographie
- *Andersson, C. et Palm, T. (2017). The impact of formative assessment on student achievement: A study of the effects of changes to classroom practice after a comprehensive professional development program. Learning and instruction, 49, 92-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.12.006
- *Antoniou, P. et James, M. (2014). Exploring formative assessment in primary school classrooms: Developing a framework of actions and strategies. Educational assessment, evaluation and accountability, 26(2), 153-176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-013-9188-4
- *Babinčáková, M., Ganajová, M., Sotáková, I. et Bernard, P. (2020). Influence of formative assessment classroom techniques (FACTs) on student’s outcomes in chemistry at secondary school. Journal of Baltic science education, 19(1), 36-49. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/20.19.36
- Bearman, M., Smith, C. D., Carbone, A., Slade, S., Baik, C., Hughes-Warrington, M. et Neumann, D. L. (2012). Systematic review methodology in higher education. Higher education research & development, 31(5), 625-640. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2012.702735
- Bissonnette, S., Gauthier, C. et Péladeau, N. (2010). Un objet qui manque à sa place : les données probantes dans l’enseignement et la formation. Dans B. Wentzel et M. Mellouki (dir.), Actes de la recherche de la HEP-BEJUNE : no 8. Recherche et formation à l’enseignement – Spécificités et interdépendance (p. 107-133). Haute école pédagogique – BEJUNE.
- *Black, P. et Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in education: Principles, policy & practice, 5(1), 7-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
- *Boumediene, A. et Hamzaoui-Elachachi, H. (2017). The effects of formative assessment on Algerian secondary school pupils’ text comprehension. Arab world English journal, 8(3), 172-190. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol8no3.12
- Broadfoot, P. et Black, P. (2004). Redefining assessment? The first ten years of assessment in education. Assessment in education: Principles, policy & practice, 11(1), 7-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594042000208976
- *Burner, T. (2014). The potential formative benefits of portfolio assessment in second and foreign language writing contexts: A review of the literature. Studies in educational evaluation, 43, 139-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2014.03.002
- *Burner, T. (2016). Formative assessment of writing in English as a foreign language. Scandinavian journal of educational research, 60(6), 626-648. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2015.1066430
- *Burns, M. K., Klingbeil, D. A. et Ysseldyke, J. (2010). The effects of technology-enhanced formative evaluation on student performance on state accountability math tests. Psychology in the schools, 47(6), 582-591. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20492
- *Butler, Y. G. et Lee J. (2010). The effects of self-assessment among young learners of English. Language testing, 27(1), 5-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532209346370
- *Büyükkarci, K. (2014). Assessment beliefs and practices of language teachers in primary education. International journal of instruction, 7(1), 107-120.
- *Chang, C. C., Liang, C. et Chen, Y. H. (2013). Is learner self-assessment reliable and valid in a Web-based portfolio environment for high school students? Computers & education, 60(1), 325-334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.05.012
- Chouinard, R., Bowen, F., Cartier, S. C., Desbiens, N., Laurier, M., Plante, I. et Butler, D. (2005). L’effet de différentes approches évaluatives sur l’engagement et la persévérance scolaires dans le contexte du passage du primaire au secondaire. Rapport de recherche pour la subvention 2003-PS-94321. Université de Montréal.
- Clanet, J. et Talbot, L. (2012). Analyse des pratiques d’enseignement. Éléments de cadrages théoriques et méthodologiques. Phronesis, 1(3), 4-18. https://doi.org/10.7202/1012560ar
- Dagenais, P. (dir.), Martin, V. et Renaud, J. (2013). Les normes de production des revues systématiques. Guide méthodologique. Institut national d’excellence en santé et en services sociaux (INESSS).http://www.inesss.qc.ca/fileadmin/doc/INESSS/DocuMetho/INESSS_Normes_production_revues_systematiques.pdf
- Deaudelin, C., Desjardins, J., Dezutter, O., Thomas, L., Corriveau, A., Lavoie, J., Bousadra, F. et Hébert, M. (2007). L’évaluation formative en contexte de renouveau pédagogique au primaire : analyse de pratiques au service de la réussite. Nouveaux cahiers de la recherche en éducation, 10(1), 27-45. https://doi.org/10.7202/1016856ar
- *Dunn, K. E. et Mulvenon, S. W. (2009). A critical review of research on formative assessment: The limited scientific evidence of the impact of formative assessment in education. Practical assessment, research, and evaluation, 14(7), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.7275/jg4h-rb87
- Farza, L. (2018). La carte conceptuelle comme outil favorisant l’apprentissage de la modélisation des bases de données. Revue internationale de pédagogie de l’enseignement supérieur, 34(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.4000/ripes.1296
- Gough, D. (2007). Weight of Evidence: A framework for the appraisal of the quality and relevance of evidence. Research papers in education, 22(2), 213-228. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671520701296189
- Grangeat, M. et Lepareur, C. (2019). Rôle du feedback enseignant sur l’autorégulation des apprentissages. Évaluer : journal international de recherche en éducation et formation – e₋JIREF, 5(2), 5-28. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12162/3545
- Hattie, J. et Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of educational research, 77(1), 81-112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
- *Heitink, M. C., Van der Kleij, F. M., Veldkamp, B. P., Schildkamp, K. et Kippers, W. B. (2016). A systematic review of prerequisites for implementing assessment for learning in classroom practice. Educational research review, 17, 50-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.12.002
- *Kingston, N. et Nash, B. (2011). Formative assessment: A meta-analysis and a call for research. Educational measurement: Issues and practice, 30(4), 28-37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2011.00220.x
- *Kirton, A., Hallam, S., Peffers, J., Robertson, P. et Stobart, G. (2007). Revolution, evolution or a Trojan horse? Piloting assessment for learning in some Scottish primary schools. British educational research journal, 33(4), 605-627. https://www.jstor.org/stable/30032767
- Landry, R., Becheikh, N., Amara, N., Ziam, S., Idrissi, O. et Castonguay, Y. (2008). La recherche, comment s’y retrouver ? Revue systématique des écrits sur le transfert des connaissances en éducation. Gouvernement du Québec. http://www.education.gouv.qc.ca/fileadmin/site_web/documents/PSG/statistiques_info_decisionnelle/LaRechercheCommentSYRetrouver.pdf
- Larose, F., Couturier, Y., Bédard, J. et Charette, S. (2011). Entre discipline et profession : la question des bonnes pratiques guidées par les résultats probants de la recherche (evidence-based practice) en formation à l’enseignement. Les Sciences de l’éducation. Pour l’Ère nouvelle, 44(2), 31-48. https://doi.org/10.3917/lsdle.442.0031
- Laurier, M. D., Tousignant, R. et Morissette, D. (2005). Les principes de la mesure et de l’évaluation des apprentissages (3e édition). Gaëtan Morin.
- Leclerc, K. (2013). Analyse comparative des politiques d’évaluation des apprentissages canadiennes francophones : Manitoba, Nouveau-Brunswick, Ontario et Québec [mémoire de maitrise, Université Laval].
- *Lee, I. (2007). Feedback in Hong Kong secondary writing classrooms: Assessment for learning or assessment of learning? Assessing writing, 12(3), 180-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2008.02.003
- *Leong, W. S., Ismail, H., Costa, J. S. et Tan, H. B. (2018). Assessment for learning research in East Asian countries. Studies in educational evaluation, 59, 270-277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.09.005
- *Mak, P. et Wong, K. (2018). Self-regulation through portfolio assessment in writing classrooms. ELT journal, 72(1), 49-61. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccx012
- *McLaren, S. (2012). Assessment is for learning: Supporting feedback. International journal of technology and design education, 22, 227-245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-011-9195-z
- *McMillan, J. H., Venable, J. C. et Varier, D. (2013). Studies of the effect of formative assessment on student achievement: So much more is needed. Practical assessment, research, and evaluation, 18(2), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.7275/tmwm-7792
- McQueen, D. V. et Anderson, L. M. (2000). Données probantes et évaluation des programmes en promotion de la santé. Ruptures, revue transdisciplinaire en santé, 7(1), 79-98.
- Ministère de l’Éducation du Québec (2003). Politique d’évaluation des apprentissages : être évalué pour mieux apprendre, décroche tes rêves. Gouvernement du Québec. http://www.education.gouv.qc.ca/fileadmin/site_web/documents/dpse/evaluation/13-4602.pdf
- Morrissette, J. et Nadeau, M. (2011). Une typologie du savoir-faire enseignant en matière d’évaluation formative. Mesure et évaluation en éducation, 34 (3), 5-25. https://doi.org/10.7202/1024793ar
- Mottier Lopez, L. (2015). Évaluations formative et certificative des apprentissages : enjeux pour l’enseignement. De Boeck.
- Munn, Z., Stern, C., Aromataris, E., Lockwood, C. et Jordan, Z. (2018). What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences. BMC medical research methodology, 18(5), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0468-4
- *Ní Chróinín, D. et Cosgrave, C. (2013). Implementing formative assessment in primary physical education: Teacher perspectives and experiences. Physical education and sport pedagogy, 18(2), 219-233. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2012.666787
- *Noonan, B. et Duncan, C. R. (2005). Peer and self-assessment in high schools. Practical assessment, research, and evaluation, 10(17), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.7275/a166-vm41
- Organisation de coopération et de développement économiques (2005). L’évaluation formative : pour un meilleur apprentissage dans les classes secondaires. OCDE et CERI. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264007420-fr
- *Panadero, E. et Jonsson, A. (2013). The use of scoring rubrics for formative assessment purposes revisited: A review. Educational research review, 9, 129-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.002
- *Panadero, E., Tapia, J. A. et Huertas, J. A. (2012). Rubrics and self-assessment scripts effects on self-regulation, learning and self-efficacy in secondary education. Learning and individual differences, 22(6), 806-813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.04.007
- *Parr, J. M. et Timperley, H. S. (2010). Feedback to writing, assessment for teaching and learning and student progress. Assessing writing, 15(2), 68-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2010.05.004
- *Perels, F., Dignath, C. et Schmitz, B. (2009). Is it possible to improve mathematical achievement by means of self-regulation strategies? Evaluation of an intervention in regular math classes. European journal of psychology of education, 24(1), 17-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173472
- *Phelan, J., Choi, K., Vendlinski, T., Baker, E. et Herman, J. (2011). Differential improvement in student understanding of mathematical principles following formative assessment intervention. Journal of educational research, 104(5), 330-339. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2010.484030
- *Polly, D., Wang, C., Martin, C., Lambert, R. G., Pugalee, D. K. et Middleton, C. W. (2017). The influence of an Internet-based formative assessment tool on primary grades students’ number sense achievement. School science and mathematics, 117(3/4), 127-136. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12214
- Rey, O. (2014). Entre laboratoire et terrain : comment la recherche fait ses preuves en éducation. Dossier de veille de l’IFÉ, (89), 1-28. https://edupass.hypotheses.org/13
- Rust, C., O’Donovan, B. et Price, M. (2005). A social constructivist assessment process model: How the research literature shows us this could be best practice. Assessment & evaluation in higher education, 30(3), 231-240. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930500063819
- *Sadler, P. M. et Good, E. (2006). The impact of self- and peer-grading on student learning. Educational assessment, 11(1), 1-31.
- *Saeed, M., Tahir, H. et Latif, I. (2018). Teachers’ perceptions about the use of classroom assessment techniques in elementary and secondary schools. Bulletin of education and research, 40(1), 115-130.
- *Sanchez, C. E., Atkinson, K. M., Koenka, A. C., Moshontz, H. et Cooper, H. (2017). Self-grading and peer-grading for formative and summative assessments in 3rd through 12th grade classrooms: A meta-analysis. Journal of educational psychology, 109(8), 1049-1066. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/edu0000190
- *Sebba, J., Crick, R. D., Yu, G., Lawson, H., Harlen, W. et Durant, K. (2008). Systematic review of research evidence of the impact on students in secondary schools of self and peer assessment. Report no. 1614. EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.
- Slavin, R. E. (2020). How evidence-based reform will transform research and practice in education. Educational psychologist, 55(1), 21-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2019.1611432
- *Stevenson, M. P., Hartmeyer, R. et Bentsen, P. (2017). Systematically reviewing the potential of concept mapping technologies to promote self-regulated learning in primary and secondary science education. Educational research review, 21, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.02.002
- Stiggins, R. J. (2002). Assessment crisis: The absence of assessment FOR learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(10), 758-765. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170208301010
- *Vandergrift, L. (2000). Setting students up for success: Formative evaluation and FLES. Foreign language annals, 33(3), 290-304. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2000.tb00607.x
- *Vásquez, A., Nussbaum, M., Sciarresi, E., Martínez, T., Barahona, C. et Strasser, K. (2017). The impact of the technology used in formative assessment: The case of spelling. Journal of educational computing research, 54(8), 1142-1167. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633116650971
- Wiliam, D. (2011). What is assessment for learning? Studies in educational evaluation, 37(1), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.001
- Yorke, M. (2003). Formative assessment in higher education: Moves towards theory and the enhancement of pedagogic practice. Higher education, 45, 477-501. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023967026413
Les références précédées d’un astérisque font partie du corpus utilisé pour la recherche.
10.7202/1012560ar