Abstracts
Résumé
La transformation numérique de nos organisations et de nos sociétés entraîne d’énormes défis dont la complexité n’est pas à minimiser. Considérant également la fragilisation des chaînes d’approvisionnement ainsi que les nouveaux joueurs de l’économie collaborative, nous constatons plusieurs changements dans l’écosystème de diverses industries. Nous abordons, dans le présent article, quelques pistes de réflexion pour les dirigeants et les États, ces derniers en tant que parties prenantes importantes d’un écosystème entrepreneurial.
Mots-clés :
- Transformation numérique,
- pérennité MPME,
- économie collaborative,
- chaînes d'approvisionnement,
- transformation système social
Abstract
The digital changes brought upon our organizations and companies leads to enormous challenges with complexity that must not be underestimated. Considering weakened supply chains and new players from the collaborative economy, we are witnessing several changes in the ecosystem of different industries. This article is a discussion of thoughts for states and organizations, as they are key stakeholders of an entrepreneurial ecosystem.
Keywords:
- digital transformation,
- MSME's sustainability,
- sharing economy,
- supply chains,
- social system transformation
Appendices
Bibliographie
- Acquier, A., Daudigeos, T. et Pinkse, J. (2017). Promises and paradoxes of the sharing economy: An organizing framework. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 125, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.07.006
- Banque de développement du Canada. (s. d.). La responsabilité sociale d’entreprise (RSE) : la RSE consiste notamment à apporter une valeur à la collectivité et à produire un impact positif. https://www.bdc.ca/fr/articles-outils/boite-outils-entrepreneur/gabarits-documents-guides-affaires/glossaire/responsabilite-sociale-d-entreprise
- Basden, A. et Wood-Harper, A. T. (2006). A philosophical discussion of the root definition in soft systems thinking: An enrichment of CATWOE. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 23, 61-87. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.689
- Bernstein, J. H. (2015). Transdisciplinarity: A review of its origins, development and current issues. Journal of Research Practice, 11(l), Rl. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282285072_Transdisciplinarity_A_Review_of_Its_Origins_Development_and_Current_Issues
- Conklin, J. (2005). Dialogue mapping: Building shared understanding of wicked problems. John Wiley & Sons.
- Credo. (2018). Boîte à outils pour entrepreneures et entrepreneurs d’impact : intégrer l’impact social au cœur des stratégies et décisions d’entreprise. Credo. https://www.credoimpact.com/boite-a-outils
- Dumont, M.-A, McAlpine, A. et Noreau, J. (2022, 10 août). Les chaînes d’approvisionnement : le pire est-il derrière nous? Desjardins. https://www.desjardins.com/ressources/pdf/pv220810-f.pdf
- Frederico, G. F. (2021). Towards a supply chain 4.0 on the post-COVID-19 pandemic: A conceptual and strategic discussion for more resilient supply chains. Rajagiri Management Journal, 15(2), 94-104. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/RAMJ-08-2020-0047/full/html
- Gharajedaghi, J. (2006). Systems thinking: Managing chaos and complexity – A platform for designing business architecture. Elsevier.
- Hao, K. et Freischlad, N. (2022, 21 avril). The gig workers fighting back against the algorithms. MIT Technology Review. https://www.technologyreview.com/2022/04/21/1050381/the-gig-workers-fighting-back-against-thealgorithms
- Harvey, P.-L. (2014). Design communautique appliqué aux systèmes sociaux numériques : fondements communicationnels, théories et méthodologies. PUQ.
- Jahn, T., Bergmann, M. et Keil, F. (2012). Transdisciplinarity: Between mainstreaming and marginalization. Ecological Econ-omies, 79, 1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.017
- Joseph, J. (2016). Governing through failure and denial: The new resilience agenda. Millennium: Journal of International Stud-ies, 44(3), 370-390. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0305829816638l66
- Maasen, S. et Lieven, O. (2006). Transdisciplinarity: A new mode of governing science? Science and Public Policy, 33(6), 399-410. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154306781778803
- Madni, A. M. (2010). Transdisciplinary system science: Implications for healthcare and other problem of global significance. Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering & Science, 1(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.22545/2010/0008
- Nicolescu, B. et Ertas, A. (2013). Transdisciplinary: Theory & practice. Atlas Publishing.
- Ozdemir, D., Sharma, M., Dhir, A. et Daim, T. (2022). Supply chain resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic. Technology in Society, 68, 101847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101847
- Rojanakit, P., Torres de Oliveira, R. et Dulleck, U. (2022). The sharing economy: A critical review and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 139, 1317-1334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.10.045
- Rousseau, D. et Wilby, J. (2014). Moving from disciplinarity to transdisciplinarity in the service of thrivable systems. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 31(5), 666-677. http://dx.doi.org/l0.100’.2/srcs.2314
- Saleheen, F. et Habib, M. M. (2022). Global supply chain disruption management post-COVID-19. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 12, 376-389. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2022.123021
- Styhre, A. (2002). Non-linear change in organizations: Organization change management informed by complexity theory. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 23(6), 343-351. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730210441300
- Weitzner, D. (2007). Deconstruction revisited: Implications of theory over methodology. Journal of Management Inquiry, 16(1), 43-54. https://doi.org/10.1177 /1056492606294523