Abstracts
Résumé
Cet article propose une réflexion sur les enjeux managériaux liés à la gestion quotidienne de la sous-traitance. À partir d’une enquête menée auprès de conducteurs de chantier relevant de grandes entreprises belges de construction, nous montrons comment la gestion quotidienne des sous-traitants conduit à de nombreuses situations d’arbitrage visant à permettre la bonne exécution des projets. Nous détaillons l’évolution des pratiques de gestion quotidiennes, qui visent de plus en plus à attirer et à fidéliser les sous-traitants devenus particulièrement rares et indispensables, dans un contexte de pénurie structurelle de main-d’oeuvre locale spécialisée. Cette analyse nous conduit à une discussion mettant en évidence 1) l’importance du management de proximité dans la gestion et l’entretien des relations de sous-traitance, 2) les interdépendances générées par l’état actuel du marché du travail et 3) les risques de ces évolutions pour les professions de manager de proximité.
Mots-clés :
- Conducteur de chantier,
- Construction,
- Fidélisation,
- Pénurie de main-d’oeuvre,
- Sous-traitance
Abstract
This article reflects on the managerial challenges associated with the day-to-day management of subcontractors. Based on a survey of site managers working for large Belgian construction companies, we show how the day-to-day management of subcontractors leads to numerous arbitration situations aimed at ensuring the successful execution of projects. We detail the evolution of everyday management practices, which are increasingly aimed at attracting and retaining subcontractors who have become particularly scarce and indispensable in the context of structural shortages of skilled local labor. This analysis leads us to a discussion highlighting 1) the importance of local management in the management of subcontractor relationships, 2) the interdependences generated by the current state of the labor market, and 3) the risks of these developments for local management professions.
Appendices
Références
- Addis M. Boyd D., & Raiden A. (2016). Theorizing Expertise in Construction. Construction management and economics, 34(7-8), 433-438.10.1080/01446193.2016.1204801 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Ahlstrand R. (2022). Structures of subcontracting: Work organisation, control, and labour in the Swedish building sector (Doctoral dissertation, Lund University).Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Alberti G. (2014). Mobility strategies, ‘mobility differentials’ and ‘transnational exit’: the experiences of precarious migrants in London’s hospitality jobs. Work, Employment and Society, 28(6), pp. 865–881.10.1177/0950017014528403 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Alberti G. & Danaj S. (2017). Posting and agency work in British construction and hospitality: the role of regulation in differentiating the experiences of migrants. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(21), pp. 3065-3088.10.1080/09585192.2017.1365746 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Berntsen L. & Lillie N. (2016). Hyper-mobile migrant workers and Dutch trade union representation strategies at the Eemshaven construction sites. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 37(1), pp. 171-187.10.1177/0143831X14537357 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Bresnen M. J., Wray K., Bryman A., Beardsworth A. D., Ford J. R. & Keil E. T. (1985). The flexibility of recruitment in the construction industry: Formalisation or re-casualisation? Sociology, 19(1), 108-124.10.1177/0038038585019001009 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Brucker Juricic, B., Galic, M., & Marenjak, S. (2021). Review of the Construction Labour Demand and Shortages in the EU. Buildings, 11(1), 17.10.3390/buildings11010017 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Buckley M., Zendel A., Biggar J., Frederiksen L. & Wells, J. (2016). Migrant work & employment in the construction sector. International Labour Organization.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Caro E., Bernsten L., Lillie N. & Wagner I., 2015, « Posted Migration and Segregation in the European Construction Sector », Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, no. 10, vol.41, pp. 1600‑1620.10.1080/1369183X.2015.1015406 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Causa, O., Soldani, E., Nguyen, M., & Tanaka, T. (2025). Labour shortages and labour market inequalities: Evidence and policy implications (No. 1832). OECD Publishing.10.1787/14e62ec0-en Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- De Wispelaere F. (2020). La lutte contre le travail au noir dans le secteur de la construction en Belgique, Document de discussion, KU Leuven – Institut de recherche sur le travail et la société. Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- De Wispelaere F. (2022). Foreign subcontractors in the Belgian construction sector. A cross-analyses of the challenges and possible solutions. International seminar “From Antwerp to Qatar: The long road to decent work in the construction sector”. Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- De Wispelaere F., De Smedt L., Muñoz M., Gillis D. & Pacolet J. (2022). Posted workers from and to Belgium. Facts and figures. Recherche menée pour le compte d’Actiris (Cahier des charges n° 3-2019) Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Deffontaines P. (2021). Au-delà de l’informel : réputation et normes sur les chantiers de construction en Ukraine. Sociologie du travail, 63(1).10.4000/sdt.38200 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Dimitriadis I. (2022). Migrants and undeclared employment within the European construction sector: Challenging dichotomous approaches to workers’ agency. Work, Employment and Society, 09500170211072777.10.1177/09500170211072777 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Dubois A. & Gadde L. E. (2002). The construction industry as a loosely coupled system: implications for productivity and innovation. Construction management & economics, 20(7), pp. 621-631.10.1080/01446190210163543 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Eccles R. G. (1981). The quasifirm in the construction industry. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2(4), pp. 335-357.10.1016/0167-2681(81)90013-5 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Elbashbishy, T. S., & El-adaway, I. (2024). Assessing the impact of skilled labor shortages on project cost performance. In Construction Research Congress 2024 (pp. 361-370).10.1061/9780784485286.037 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Fellini I., Ferro A., and Fullin G. (2007). Recruitment processes and labour mobility: the construction industry in Europe. Work, employment and society, 21(2), pp. 277-298.10.1177/0950017007076635 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Fellows R. & Liu A. M. (2012). Managing organizational interfaces in engineering construction projects: addressing fragmentation and boundary issues across multiple interfaces. Construction management and economics, 30(8), pp. 653-671.10.1080/01446193.2012.668199 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- FOREM (2022). Difficultés et opportunités de recrutement. Métiers/fonctions critiques et en pénurie. Veille, analyse et prospective du marché de l’emploi.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Forrierre J., Anceaux F., Cegarra J., & Six F. (2011). L’activité des conducteurs de travaux sur les chantiers de construction : ordonnancement et supervision d’une situation dynamique. Le travail humain, 74(3), pp. 283-308.10.3917/th.743.04 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Gioia D. A., Corley K. G. & Hamilton A. L. (2013). Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research: Notes on the Gioia Methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), pp. 15‑31. 10.1177/1094428112452151 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Gjerde, S., & Alvesson, M. (2020). Sandwiched: Exploring role and identity of middle managers in the genuine middle. Human relations, 73(1), 124-151.10.1177/0018726718823243 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Groiss, M., & Sondermann, D. (2025). Help wanted: the drivers and implications of labour shortages. Applied Economics, 57(33), 4882-4896.10.1080/00036846.2024.2364102 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Guffond J. L. & Leconte G. (2001). Le pilotage d’activités distribuées : le cas du chantier. Sociologie du travail, 43(2), pp. 197-214.10.1016/S0038-0296(01)01150-5 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Jansson, H., & Hilmersson, M. (2009). Escaping the trap of low-cost production and high dependency: a case study of the internationalization networks of small subcontractors from the Baltic States. In Research on Knowledge, Innovation and Internationalization (pp. 225-247). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.10.1108/S1745-8862(2009)0000004015 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Jounin N. (2008). Chantier interdit au public. Enquête parmi les travailleurs du bâtiment, Paris : La Découverte, 274 p. (coll. « textes à l’appui »). 10.3917/dec.jouni.2009.01 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Jounin N. & Paternoster L. (2009). Un patron peut en cacher un autre : Sous-traitance et intérim dans les secteurs du bâtiment et du nettoyage. Savoir/Agir, 10, pp.13-22.10.3917/sava.010.0013 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Kirov V., Markova E. & Peycheva D. (2016). « Hybrid work organisation in the construction sector in Bulgaria: employees or sub-contractors? », Emecon Employment and economy in Central and Eastern Europe, no. 1, vol. 6, pp. 1-16.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Koolwijk, J., van Oel, C., & Bel, M. (2022). The interplay between financial rules, trust and power in strategic partnerships in the construction industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 29(3), 1089-1108.10.1108/ECAM-09-2020-0713 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Lillie N. (2012). Subcontracting, posted migrants and labour market segmentation in Finland. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 50(1), pp. 148-167.10.1111/j.1467-8543.2011.00859.x Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Martin, L., & Benson, L. (2021). Relationship quality in construction projects: A subcontractor perspective of principal contractor relationships. International journal of project management, 39(6), 633-645.10.1016/j.ijproman.2021.05.002 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Neo H. (2010). Geographies of subcontracting. Geography Compass, 4(8), pp. 1013-1024.10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00349.x Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Nicolini D. (2002). In search of ‘project chemistry’. Construction Management & Economics, 20(2), pp. 167-177.10.1080/01446190110101217 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Neuville, J. P. (1997). La stratégie de la confiance : le partenariat industriel observé depuis le fournisseur. Sociologie du travail, 297-319.10.3406/sotra.1997.2321 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Omotayo, T. S., Danvers-Watson, O., & Oyegoke, A. S. (2023). Subcontractor trust issues on payment and valuation practices in UK private projects. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 28(1), 64-90.10.1108/JFMPC-07-2021-0048 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Pink S., Tutt D., Dainty A., & Gibb A. (2010). Ethnographic methodologies for construction research: knowing, practice and interventions. Building Research & Information, 38(6), pp. 647-659.10.1080/09613218.2010.512193 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Purcell K. P. J. (1998). In-sourcing, outsourcing, and the growth of contingent labour as evidence of flexible employment strategies. European journal of work and organizational psychology, 7(1), pp. 39-59.10.1080/135943298398952 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Six F. (2016). L’ergonome et le chantier, Toulouse : Octares Editions. Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Strati A. (2003). Knowing in practice: aesthetic understanding and tacit knowledge. Knowing in organizations, A practice-based approach, pp. 53-75.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Styhre A. (2011). The overworked site manager: gendered ideologies in the construction industry. Construction management and economics, 29(9), pp. 943-955.10.1080/01446193.2011.588955 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Thévenot N. (2012). Formes de mobilisation du travail et responsabilité de l’emploi : le cas de la sous-traitance en France. Idées économiques et sociales, (4), pp. 41-46.10.3917/idee.170.0041 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Thiel D. (2010). Contacts and contracts: Economic embeddedness and ethnic stratification in London’s construction market. Ethnography, 11(3), pp. 443-471.10.1177/1466138110370496 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Thiel D. (2013). Builders: Class, gender and ethnicity in the construction industry. London : Routledge.10.4324/9780203119082 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Tinel B., Perraudin C., Thèvenot N. & Valentin J. (2007). La sous-traitance comme moyen de subordination réelle de la force de travail. Actuel Marx, (1), 153-164.10.3917/amx.041.0153 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Weil D. (2014). The fissured workplace. Cambridge : Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674726123 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Winch G. (1998). The growth of self-employment in British construction. Construction Management & Economics, 16(5), pp. 531-542.10.1080/014461998372079 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Wuidar S. (2023). Pourquoi l’État peine à endiguer le phénomène du dumping social ? Enquête au coeur de l’inspection du travail dans le secteur de la construction. Travail, Emploi, Formation, 17 : 11-27.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Wuidar, S. (2024). Flexibilité et Pénurie de L’emploi Sous Tension : Une Analyse par la Régulation du Travail Dans le Secteur Belge de la Construction (Doctoral dissertation, Universite de Liege (Belgium)).Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Xhauflair V., Deflandre D., & De Schampheleire J., (2006). « Le secteur de la construction vu par les entrepreneurs », Courrier hebdomadaire du CRISP, no. 12, vol. 1917, pp. 5-52.10.3917/cris.1917.0005 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar