Abstracts
Résumé
Alors que le tatouage connaît une démocratisation croissante en France, notamment chez les jeunes générations, son acceptation dans le monde professionnel demeure ambivalente. La question de l’inclusion des personnes tatouées émerge dans de nombreuses organisations, mais la littérature académique, principalement anglo-saxonne, reste encore limitée et contradictoire sur le sujet. Notre étude s’ancre dès lors dans une double tradition théorique : d’une part, les tensions entre les approches dites « aveugles » et « conscientes » de l’inclusion (Konrad & Linnehan, 1995), et d’autre part, le rôle structurant de la sécurité psychologique (Edmondson, 1999) dans le management inclusif. Nos résultats, basés sur deux enquêtes quantitatives menées en 2023 (n=123) et 2024 (n=283) auprès de personnes tatouées travaillant en France, révèlent un sentiment de discrimination significatif, malgré une évolution normative de la société. Cette stigmatisation, bien que souvent implicite, se traduit par une vigilance accrue et des stratégies de dissimulation, surtout dans les contextes de forte exposition au public. Notre étude montre notamment une incidence significative sur l’engagement des jeunes, pour qui le tatouage constitue un marqueur identitaire fort et une revendication d’authenticité. Notre étude met également en évidence le rôle modérateur de la sécurité psychologique : en favorisant un climat d’ouverture, d’entraide et de droit à l’erreur, elle atténue les effets de la discrimination et renforce l’engagement des collaborateurs tatoués. Cette dynamique apparaît essentielle dans les premières phases du ressenti de discrimination, soulignant ainsi l’importance de renforcer la sécurité psychologique pour favoriser l’inclusion des personnes tatouées au travail. Notre recherche contribue ainsi à renforcer la littérature sur la sécurité psychologique et le management inclusif en abordant un sujet encore trop peu exploré. Elle invite également à repenser les pratiques managériales pour permettre aux individus d’exprimer leur identité tout en consolidant leur engagement professionnel.
Mots-clés :
- tatouage,
- discrimination,
- inclusion,
- sécurité psychologique,
- France
Abstract
While tattooing is becoming increasingly popular in France, particularly among younger generations, its acceptance in the professional world remains ambivalent. Inclusion of tattooed individuals is emerging issue in many organizations, but academic literature, mainly Anglo-Saxon, remains limited and contradictory on the subject. Our study is therefore rooted in a dual theoretical tradition: on the one hand, the tensions between the so-called “blind” and “conscious” approaches to inclusion (Konrad & Linnehan, 1995), and on the other hand, the structuring role of psychological safety (Edmondson, 1999) in inclusive management. Our results, based on two quantitative surveys conducted in 2023 (n=123) and 2024 (n=283) among tattooed people working in France, reveal a significant sense of discrimination, despite a normative shift in society. This stigmatization, although often implicit, translates into increased vigilance and concealment strategies, especially in contexts of high public exposure. Our study shows a significant impact on the engagement of young people, for whom tattoos are a strong marker of identity and a claim to authenticity. Our study also highlights the moderating role of psychological safety: by promoting a climate of openness, mutual support, and the right to make mistakes, it mitigates the effects of discrimination and strengthens the commitment of tattooed employees. This dynamic appears to be essential in the early stages of experiencing discrimination, underscoring the importance of strengthening psychological safety to promote the inclusion of tattooed people in the workplace. Our research thus contributes to the literature on psychological safety and inclusive management by addressing a subject that has yet to be fully explored. It also invites us to rethink managerial practices to allow individuals to express their identity while strengthening their professional commitment.
Keywords:
- tattoos,
- discrimination,
- inclusion,
- psychological safety,
- France
Appendices
Bibliographie
- Albrecht, S. L., Bakker, A. B., Gruman, J. A., Macey, W. H., & Saks, A. M. (2015). Employee engagement, human resource management practices and competitive advantage: An integrated approach. Journal of organizational effectiveness: People and performance, 2(1), 7-35.10.1108/JOEPP-08-2014-0042 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Alves, S., Alves, E. et Meyer, V. (2024). Tatouage et inclusion, être authentiquement soi au travail, Revue Internationale de Psychosociologie et de gestion des Comportements Organisationnels (RIPCO), 30(81). https://doi.org/10.3917/rips1.081.011910.3917/rips1.081.0119 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Antonellis, P., Berry, G., et Silsbee, R. (2017). Employment Interview Screening: Is The Ink Worth It?. Global Journal of Human Resource Management, 5(2), 38-53. works.merrimack.edu/mgt_facpub/39 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Antonellis, P., et Silsbee, R. (2018). Employment interview screening: Time to face the ink. Journal of Business & Economic Policy, 5(4), 44-53. mgt_facpub/55 10.30845/jbep.v5n4a6 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Arndt, A., McCombs, G., Tolle, S., et Cox, C. (2017). Why are health care managers biased against hiring service providers with tattoos? Services Marketing Quarterly, 38(2), 88-99. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332969.2017.1289789 10.1080/15332969.2017.1289789 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Baillargeon, S. (2019). Comment expliquer la popularité exponentielle du tatouage ? Le Devoir. https://www.ledevoir.com/societe/561401/comment-expliquer-la-popularite-exponentielle-du-tatouage Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Balducci, C., Fraccaroli, F., et Schaufeli, W. (2010). Psychometric properties of the Italian version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-9). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 26(2). https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000020 10.1027/1015-5759/a000020 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Barnicaud, J. (2023). L’aveu du corps : la marginalité révélée de la femme tatouée dans trois romans du XIXᵉ siècle. Droit et cultures. Revue internationale interdisciplinaire, (85).10.4000/droitcultures.9053 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Barth, I. (2024). Manager la diversité : De la lutte contre les discriminations au management inclusif. Dunod.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Barth, I., et Wagner, A.L. (2019). L’apparence physique : une discrimination trop invisible. In Chanlat Jean-François et Ozbilgin Mustafa (coordinateurs), Management et diversité, Tome 2 (151-178). Ste-Foy, Les presses de l’université Laval. 10.2307/j.ctv1g2464g.10 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Bauman, Z. (2001). Identité et mondialisation. Lignes, (3), 10-27. https://doi.org/10.3917/lignes1.006.0009 10.3917/lignes1.006.0009 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Baumann, C., Timming, A., et Gollan, P. (2016). Taboo tattoos? A study of the gendered effects of body art on consumers' attitudes toward visibly tattooed front line staff. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, (29), 31-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.11.00510.1016/j.jretconser.2015.11.005 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Beatty, J., et Kirby, S. (2006). Beyond the legal environment: How stigma influences invisible identity groups in the workplace. Employee responsibilities and rights journal, (18), 29-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-005-9003-6 10.1007/s10672-005-9003-6 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Bosmans, K., Mousaid, S., De Cuyper, N., Hardonk, S., Louckx, F., et Vanroelen, C. (2016). Dirty work, dirty worker? Stigmatisation and coping strategies among domestic workers. Journal of Vocational Behavior, (92), 54-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2015.11.008 10.1016/j.jvb.2015.11.008 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Boubakary, B., et Peretti, J.M. (2023). Management inclusif et performance durable de l’entreprise : une revue systématique de la littérature. Revue Management & Innovation, (3), 55-75.10.3917/rmi.207.0055 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Bourguignon, D. et Herman, G. (2007). Chapitre 3. Au coeur des groupes de bas statut : la stigmatisation. Dans G. Herman Travail, chômage et stigmatisation : Une analyse psychosociale (p. 99-144). De Boeck Supérieur. https://doi-org.em-normandie.idm.oclc.org/10.3917/dbu.herma.2007.01.0099. 10.3917/dbu.herma.2007.01.0099 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Boutet-Diéye, A., et Seznec, A. (2022). Les représentations des tatouages connectés : enjeux de l’acceptabilité et relation à l’imaginaire. tic&société, 15(2-3), 101-125. https://doi.org/10.4000/ticetsociete.6427 10.4000/ticetsociete.6427 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Brookes, K. (2023). Au fait, pour qui votent les tatoués ? Le Point. https://www.lepoint.fr/politique/au-fait-pour-qui-votent-les-tatoues-07-09-2023-2534507_20.php#11 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Broussard, K., et Harton, H. (2018). Tattoo or taboo? Tattoo stigma and negative attitudes toward tattooed individuals. The Journal of social psychology, 158(5), 521-540. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2017.1373622 10.1080/00224545.2017.1373622 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Bruna, M.G., Chanlat, J.F., et Chauvet, M. (2018). Du portage d’une politique de diversité comme levier de changement au management de la diversité comme clé de la performance d’une organisation. In Chanlat J.F. et Özbilgin M. (coordinateurs), Management et diversité : approches thématiques (39-64). Ste-Foy, Les presses de l’université Laval. 10.2307/j.ctv1g2464g.6 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Clair, M. (2018). Core Concepts in Sociology. Scholars Harvard.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Clark, T.R. (2020). The 4 stages of psychological safety: Defining the path to inclusion and innovation. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Défenseur des droits (2024). 17e baromètre sur la perception des discriminations dans l’emploi.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Dillingh, R., Kooreman, P., et Potters, J. (2020). Tattoos, lifestyle, and the labor market. Labour, 34(2), 191-214. https://doi.org/10.1111/labr.1216710.1111/labr.12167 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Edmondson, A.C., et Bransby, D.P. (2023). Psychological safety comes of age: Observed themes in an established literature. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10(1), 55-78. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-055217 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-055217 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Edmondson, A.C. (2022). L'entreprise sereine : La sécurité psychologique, levier d'une organisation performante, apprenante et innovante. Pearson.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Edmondson, A.C., et Lei, Z. (2014). Psychological safety: The history, renaissance, and future of an interpersonal construct. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav., 1(1), 23-43.10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091305 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative science quarterly, 44(2), 350-383. https://doi.org/10.2307/266699910.2307/2666999 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Flanagan, J., et Lewis, V. (2019). Marked inside and out: an exploration of perceived stigma of the tattooed in the workplace. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion, 38(1), 87-106. https://doi.org/10.1108/EDI-06-2018-0101 10.1108/EDI-06-2018-0101 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Ford, K., Penton-Voak, I., et Pound, N. (2022). Justice is (not so) blind: Effects of facial masculinity and agreeableness on perceptions of criminal guilt. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 16(1), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/ebs0000246 10.1037/ebs0000246 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Foulke, M., et Romo, L. (2021). An examination of how young adults manage verbal disclosure of their tattoo (s). Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 22(1), 39-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/17459435.2020.1817771 10.1080/17459435.2020.1817771 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Fourquet J., (2024). Métamorphoses françaises, État de la France en infographies et en images. Seuil, 208 pages.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Frazier, M.L., Fainshmidt, S., Klinger, R.L., Pezeshkan, A., et Vracheva, V. (2017). Psychological safety: A meta‐analytic review and extension. Personnel psychology, 70(1), 113-165.10.1111/peps.12183 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- French, M., Mortensen, K., et Timming, A. (2019). Are tattoos associated with employment and wage discrimination? Analyzing the relationships between body art and labor market outcomes. Human Relations, 72(5), 962-987. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718782597 10.1177/0018726718782597 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Girard, M., Laflamme, S., et Vautier, C. (2019). Représentations du tatouage : le paradoxe de la différenciation et de l’assimilation. Nouvelles perspectives en sciences sociales, 15(1), 93-171. https://doi.org/10.7202/1068181ar
10.7202/1068181ar
Google Scholar
Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Goffman, Erwing (1997). Selections from stigma. In Lennard J.D. Ed, The disability studies reader (131-140). Routledge. Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Henle, C., Shore, T., Murphy, K., et Marshall, A. (2022). Visible tattoos as a source of employment discrimination among female applicants for a supervisory position. Journal of Business and Psychology, 37(1), 107-125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-021-09731-w 10.1007/s10869-021-09731-w Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Henle, C. A., Shore, T. H., & Marshall, A. (2018). Body art as a source of employment discrimination. Academy of Management Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2018.12589abstract10.5465/AMBPP.2018.12589abstract Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Hidri Neys, O., et Remichi, Y. (2015). “Privé versus Public ». Le poids des apparences dans le recrutement du personnel d’accueil. La nouvelle revue du travail, (7). https://doi.org/10.4000/nrt.2398 10.4000/nrt.2398 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Higgins, M.C., Dobrow, S.R., Weiner, J.M., et Liu, H. (2022). When is psychological safety helpful in organizations? A longitudinal study. Academy of Management Discoveries, 8(1), 77-102. https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2018.0242 10.5465/amd.2018.0242 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Jackson J.S., Williams D.R. (2002). Detroit area study, 1995: Social influence on health: Stress, racism, and health protective resources. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR03272.v1 10.3886/ICPSR03272.v1 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- John, O. P., Donahue, E. M., et Kentle, R. L. (1991). The Big Five Inventory--Versions 4a and 54. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/t07550-000 10.1037/t07550-000 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Jones, E., Farina, A., Hastorf, A., Markus, H., Milller, D., Scott, R. (1984). Social Stigma: the Psychology of Marked to Relationships. New York: W.H. Freeman & Co.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Jones, C. (2000). Stigma and tattoo. In Caplan, Jane, Written on the body: The tattoo in European and American history (1-16). Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691238258-003 10.1515/9780691238258-003 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Jones, K., et King, E. (2014). Managing concealable stigmas at work: A review and multilevel model. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1466-1494. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313515518 10.1177/0149206313515518 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Kahn, W. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724. https://doi.org/10.5465/256287 10.2307/256287 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Karmali, F., et Kawakami, K. (2023). Posing while black: The impact of race and expansive poses on trait attributions, professional evaluations, and interpersonal relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 124(1), 49–68. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000313 10.1037/pspa0000313 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- King, M., Dinos, S., Shaw, J., Watson, R., Stevens, S., Passetti, F., Weich S. et Serfaty, M. (2007). The Stigma Scale: development of a standardised measure of the stigma of mental illness. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 190(3), 248-254. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.106.024638 10.1192/bjp.bp.106.024638 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Kluger, N. (2015). Tatoués, qui êtes-vous ? Caractéristiques démographiques et comportementales des personnes tatouées. Annales de dermatologie et de vénéréologie, 142(6-7), 410-420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annder.2015.03.014 10.1016/j.annder.2015.03.014 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Konrad, A.M., et Linnehan, F. (1995). Formalized HRM structures: coordinating equal employment opportunity or concealing organizational practices?. Academy of management journal, 38(3), 787-820.10.2307/256746 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Larsen, G., Patterson, M., & Markham, L. (2014). A deviant art: Tattoo‐related stigma in an era of commodification. Psychology & Marketing, 31(8), 670-681. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20727 10.1002/mar.20727 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Le Breton, D. (2010). Ingénieurs de soi : technique, politique et corps dans la production de l’apparence. Sociologie et sociétés, 42(2), 139-151. https://doi.org/10.7202/045359ar 10.7202/045359ar
Google Scholar
Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Li, T. et Tang, N. (2022). Inclusive leadership and innovative performance: A multi-level mediation model of psychological safety. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 934831. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.93483110.3389/fpsyg.2022.934831 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Lichy, J., Dutot, V., et Stokes, P. (2024). Navigating the boundaries between technology and social change—evaluating acceptance of visible tattoos in the workplace: the French exception? International Studies of Management & Organization, 54(4), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00208825.2024.2332581 10.1080/00208825.2024.2332581 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Lodder, M. (2022). Painted People: Humanity in 21 Tattoos. HarperCollins UKGoogle Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Maillet, S., et Marcoux, G. (2023). La sécurité psychologique au travail : une perspective théorique. Ad machina, (7), 304-322. https://doi.org/10.1522/radm.no7.1670 10.1522/radm.no7.1670 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Marchiondo, L., Gonzales, E., et Ran, S. (2016). Development and validation of the workplace age discrimination scale. Journal of Business and Psychology, 31, 493-513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-015-9425-6 10.1007/s10869-015-9425-6 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Meier, O. (2016). Management interculturel-6e éd. Dunod.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Nembhard, I.M., et Edmondson, A.C. (2006). Making it safe: The effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(7), 941–966. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.41310.1002/job.413 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Ozanne, M., Tews, M., et Mattila, A. (2019). Are tattoos still a taboo? The effect of employee tattoos on customers’ service failure perceptions. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 31(2), 874-889. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-09-2017-056510.1108/IJCHM-09-2017-0565 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Pinho, M., et Colston, B. (2024). Gender differences in organizational fairness, diversity and inclusion: the mediating role of psychological safety in affective commitment. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion. https://doi.org/10.1108/EDI-08-2023-0284 10.1108/EDI-08-2023-0284 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Raymer, M., Reed, M., Spiegel, M., & Purvanova, R. (2017). An examination of generational stereotypes as a path towards reverse ageism. The Psychologist-Manager Journal, 20(3), 148-175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/mgr0000057 10.1037/mgr0000057 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Renault, J.E. (2009). La Loi et la Croix : L'écriture de la Croix dans l'écriture de la Loi. Kinor.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Rosanvallon, P. (2011). La société des égaux (Vol. 427). Paris, Seuil.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Ruffle, B., et Wilson, A. (2018). The truth about tattoos. Economics letters, (172), 143-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2018.08.024 10.1016/j.econlet.2018.08.024 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Ruggs, E., et Hebl, M. (2022). Do employees' tattoos leave a mark on customers' reactions to products and organizations?. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 43(6), 965-982. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.261610.1002/job.2616 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Sherf, E. N., Parke, M. R., & Isaakyan, S. (2021). Distinguishing voice and silence at work: Unique relationships with perceived impact, psychological safety, and burnout. Academy of Management Journal, 64(1), 114-148. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2018.1428 10.5465/amj.2018.1428 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Siyal, S. (2023). Inclusive leadership and work engagement: Exploring the role of psychological safety and trust in leader in multiple organizational context. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 32(4), 1170-1184. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.1255610.1111/beer.12556 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Smith, I., et Griffiths, A. (2022). Microaggressions, everyday discrimination, workplace incivilities, and other subtle slights at work: A meta-synthesis. Human Resource Development Review, 21(3), 275-299. https://doi.org/10.1177/15344843221098756 10.1177/15344843221098756 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Stone, C., Snowden, E., Tym, E., Van Betlehem, A., et Pirone, S. (2023). Life as a Work of Art: The Impact of Tattoos on Lived Experience. Journal of Undergraduate Studies at Trent (JUST), 7(2), 77-91. https://ojs.trentu.ca/index.php/just/issue/view/15 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Stone-Romero, E. F. (2013). Personality-based stigmas and unfair discrimination in work organizations. In Discrimination at Work (pp. 255-280). Psychology Press.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Summers, J., Howe, M., McElroy, J., Buckley R., Pahng, P., et Cortes‐Mejia, S. (2018). A typology of stigma within organizations: Access and treatment effects. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(7), 853-868. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2279 10.1002/job.2279 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Timming, A. (2017). Body art as branded labour: At the intersection of employee selection and relationship marketing. Human Relations, 70(9), 1041-1063. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872671668165410.1177/0018726716681654 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Timming, A., Nickson, D., Re, D., et Perrett, D. (2017). What do you think of my ink? Assessing the effects of body art on employment chances. Human Resource Management, 56(1), 133-149. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.2177010.1002/hrm.21770 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Tremblay, M., Brière, S., et Poroli C. (2020). Déconstruire les mythes pour mieux accompagner une diversité d’entrepreneures. Presses de l'Université Laval.10.1515/9782763747170 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Wang, Y.M., Ahmad, W., Arshad, M., Yin, H.L., Ahmed, B., et Ali, Z. (2021). Impact of coordination, psychological safety, and job security on employees’ performance: The moderating role of coercive pressure. Sustainability, 13(6), 3175. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063175 10.3390/su13063175 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Woods, A., Zajac, S. A., Middleton, E. D., Cavanaugh, K. J., Hayes, W. C., Johnson, S. K., & Holladay, C. L. (2024). Doing the work: The role of inclusive leadership in promoting psychological safety and openness to diversity through diversity, equity, and inclusion practices. Psychology of Leaders and Leadership, 27(1), 115–142. https://doi.org/10.1037/mgr000015810.1037/mgr0000158 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Zestcott, C., Tompkins, T.L., Kozak Williams, M., Livesay, K., et Chan, K.L. (2018). What do you think about ink? An examination of implicit and explicit attitudes toward tattooed individuals. The Journal of Social Psychology, 158(1), 7-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2017.129728610.1080/00224545.2017.1297286 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Zhang, R., Wang, M., Toubiana, M., et Greenwood, R. (2021). Stigma beyond levels: Advancing research on stigmatization. Academy of Management Annals, 15(1), 188-222. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2019.003110.5465/annals.2019.0031 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar