Abstracts
Abstract
We examined how home-based teleworkers perceived managerial control in an Italian context in order to gain insight into some of the organizational changes brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic. Drawing on studies of changes to managerial control over the past few decades, we show how workers have experienced the reconfiguration and hybridization of control practices and methods in home telework. Our results cast doubt on the widely held belief that telework is revolutionizing managerial control and work procedures. Organizational and power dynamics at work are key to determining how telework affects employee experiences.
Summary
We investigated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on labour relations, specifically by examining how teleworkers perceived control within various occupations in an Italian context. Telework has long been touted as having the power to displace traditional managerial control structures in favour of less hierarchical forms of supervision. However, scholars are still divided over whether it promotes greater employee autonomy or, on the contrary, results in greater managerial control. Research has frequently been influenced by specific circumstances. In earlier decades, the low prevalence of telework encouraged neither thorough research nor the ability to compare various organizational structures. Additionally, there has been a long-standing tendency to treat teleworkers as a homogeneous group, with little regard for within-group differences. Disparities among workers and among organizations can lead to inconsistent results.
Our study was conducted mainly during the first waves of the pandemic in Italy, with a view to understanding if, how, to what extent and on what basis telework modifies managerial control processes and systems. We looked at how workers experienced managerial control in various occupations that differ in organizational form and managerial culture.
In line with Storey’s (1985) concept of “layers of control” and, more generally, with studies on transformations of managerial control in labour processes, we argue that the emergency restructuring due to home telework caused a transfer of organizational conditions, these being a combination of existing methods, standards and forms of control. Our findings show how employees dealt with the hybridization, overlapping and differentiation of various forms of control during a time of widespread telework. In this way, we cast doubt on the simplistic association between telework and reduction of control, as well as on the potential of telework to bring fundamental change to organizational processes.
Keywords:
- telework,
- managerial control,
- pandemic,
- worker’s experiences
Résumé
Cet article étudie les changements dans les relations de travail provoqués par la pandémie de Covid 19 par l’examen des perceptions de contrôle des télétravailleurs dans diverses professions en Italie. Le télétravail a longtemps été présenté comme ayant le pouvoir de déplacer les structures traditionnelles de contrôle managérial en faveur de formes de supervision moins hiérarchiques. Cependant, les chercheurs sont toujours divisés sur la question : le télétravail favorise-t-il une plus grande autonomie des employés ou, au contraire, s'il entraîne un plus grand contrôle de la part des managers? La faible prévalence du télétravail au cours des dernières décennies n'a pas favorisé les recherches approfondies et la capacité à comparer différentes structures organisationnelles. En outre, il existe une tendance de longue date à traiter les télétravailleurs comme un groupe homogène, en accordant peu d'attention aux différences internes. La recherche critique, quant à elle, a démontré comment les disparités entre les travailleurs et les organisations peuvent être liées à des résultats d'étude incohérents.
Cet article est basé sur les résultats empiriques d'une recherche qualitative menée principalement au cours des premières vagues de la pandémie en Italie, visant à comprendre si, comment, dans quelle mesure et sur quelle base le télétravail modifie les processus et les régimes de contrôle managérial. Nous avons étudié la manière dont le contrôle managérial était vécu par les travailleurs dans différentes professions, qui reflétaient différentes formes d'organisation et cultures managériales.
Dans la lignée théorique de la notion de "couches de contrôle" de Storey (1985) et, plus généralement, des études sur les transformations du contrôle managérial dans les processus de travail, l'article affirme que la restructuration d'urgence par le biais du télétravail à domicile implique un transfert des conditions organisationnelles par le biais d'une combinaison de méthodes, de normes et de formes de contrôle existantes. Les résultats empiriques illustrent la manière dont les employés ont géré l'hybridation, le chevauchement et la différenciation de diverses formes de contrôle dans le contexte du télétravail généralisé. Nous remettons ainsi en question l'association simpliste entre le télétravail et la réduction du contrôle, ainsi que le potentiel du télétravail à modifier fondamentalement les processus organisationnels.
Mots-Clefs:
- télétravail,
- contrôle managérial,
- pandémie,
- expériences des travailleurs
Appendices
References
- Albano, Roberto, Ylenia Curzi, Tania Parisi, and Lia Tirabeni (2018). “Perceived autonomy and discretion of mobile workers”, Studi Organizzativi XX (2), pp.31–61.10.3280/SO2018-002002 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Aloisi, Antonio and Valerio De Stefano (2022). “Essential jobs remote work and digital surveillance addressing the COVID pandemic panopticon”, International Labour Review, 161(2), pp. 289–313. 10.1111/ilr.12219 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Alvesson, Mats (1990). “On the Popularity of Organizational Culture”, Acta Sociologica, 33(1), pp. 31–49.10.1177/000169939003300103 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Campolongo, Francesco and Francesco E. Iannuzzi (2021). Controllo manageriale e lavoro da remoto. Una ricerca nel contesto pandemico. In: Peruzzi, Marco and Devi Sacchetto (Eds.), Il lavoro da remoto. Aspetti Giuridici e Sociologici. Turin: Giappichelli, pp.57–72.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Bailey, Diane E. and Nancy B. Kurland (2002). “A review of telework research: findings, new directions, and lessons for the study of modern work”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(4), pp. 383–400. 10.1002/job.144 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Barrett, Rowena. (2004). “Working at webboyz: An analysis of control over the software development labour process”, Sociology, 38(4), pp. 777–794.10.1177/0038038504045864 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Biron, Michael and Marc Van Veldhoven (2016). “When control becomes a liability rather than an asset: Comparing home and office days among part-time teleworkers”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37, pp.1317–1337. 10.1002/job.2106 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Boell, Sebastian K., Dubravka Cecez-Kecmanovic and John Campbell (2016). “Telework paradoxes and practices: the importance of the nature of work”, New Technology, Work and Employment, 31(2), pp. 114–131. 10.1111/ntwe.12063 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Bryant, Susan (2000). “At home on the electronic frontier: Work, gender and the information highway”, New Technology, Work and Employment, 15(1), pp.19–33. 10.1111/1468-005X.00062 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Callaghan, George and Paul Thompson (2001). “Edwards revisited: Technical control and call centres”, Economic and Industrial Democracy, 22(1), pp.13–37.10.1177/0143831X01221002 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Della Porta, Donatella (2010). L’intervista qualitativa. Bari: LaterzaGoogle Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Depickere, Astrid (1999). Managing Virtual Working: Between Commitment and Control? In: Paul Jackson (Eds.), Virtual Working. Social and Organizational Dynamics. London: Routledge, pp.99–120Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Dimitrova, Dimitrina (2003). “Controlling teleworkers: Supervision and flexibility revisited”, New Technology, Work and Employment, 18(3), pp.181–195. 10.1111/1468-005X.00120 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Edwards, Richard (1979). Contested Terrain. The Transformation of the Workplace in the Twentieth Century. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Elliott, Christopher S, and Gary Long (2016). “Manufacturing rate busters: Computer control and social relations in the labour process”, Work, Employment & Society, 30(1), pp.135–151.10.1177/0950017014564601 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Ellison, Nicole B. (1999). “Social impacts: New perspectives on telework”. Social Science Computer Review, 17(3), pp.338–356. 10.1177/089443939901700308 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Fana, Marta, Massimo, Francesco. S., and Angelo Moro (2022) “Autonomy and Control in Mass Remote Working during the COVID-19 Pandemic. A Cross-Occupational Comparison”, Relations Industrielles, 77(3). https://doi.org/10.7202/1094210ar
10.7202/1094210ar Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Fana, Marta., et al., (2020). Telework, work organisation and job quality during the COVID-19 crisis - A qualitative study, JRC Technical Report. https://joint-research-centre.ec.europa.eu/publications/telework-work-organisation-and-job-quality-during-covid-19-crisis-qualitative-study_enGoogle Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Felstead, Alan, Jewson Nick and Walters Sally (2003). “Managerial control of employees working at home”, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 41(2), pp.241–264. 10.1111/1467-8543.00271 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Gandini, Alessandro (2019). “Labour process theory and the gig economy”, Human Relations, 72(6), pp. 1039–1056. 10.1177/0018726718790002 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Gandini, Alessandro and Emma Garavaglia (2023). “Another work routine is possible: everyday experiences of (unexpected) remote work in Italy”, Culture and Organization, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2023.220100310.1080/14759551.2023.2201003 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Garrahan, Philip and Paul Stewart (1992). Management control and a new regime of subordination: Post-Fordism and the local economy. Fordism and flexibility. In: Gilbert, Niger, Burrows Roger and Anna Pollert (Eds), Fordism and Flexibility. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.107-117.10.1007/978-1-349-13526-4_7 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Gordon, Gil E. (1988). The dilemmas of telework: Technology vs. tradition. In: Korte Werner, Robinson Simon and Wolfgang Steinle (Eds.), Telework: Present situation and future development of a new form of work organisation. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp.113–136.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Hodder, Andy (2020). “New Technology, Work and Employment in the era of COVID-19: reflecting on legacies of research”, New Technology, Work and Employment, 35(3), pp.262–275. 10.1111/ntwe.12173 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Hyman, Richard (1987). “Strategy or structure? Capital, labour and control”. Work Employment & Society, 1(1), pp.25–55. 10.1177/0950017087001001004 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Istat (2020). Il mercato del lavoro 2020. https://www.istat.it/it/files//2021/02/Il-Mercato-del-lavoro-2020-1.pdfGoogle Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Kunda, Gideon (1992). Engineering culture: Control and commitment in a high-tech corporation. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Kurland, Nancy B. and Cecily D. Cooper (2002). “Manager control and employee isolation in telecommuting environments”, Journal of High Technology Management Research, 13(1), pp.107–126. 10.1016/S1047-8310(01)00051-7 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Marglin, Stephan (1974). “What Do Bosses Do? The origins and functions of hierarchy in capitalist production”, The Review of Radical Political Economics, 6(2), pp.60–112.10.1177/048661347400600206 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Mazmanian, Melissa, Orlikowski Wanda J, and JoAnne Jates (2013). “The autonomy paradox: The implications of mobile email devices for knowledge professionals”, Organization Science. 24, (5), pp.1337-1357.10.1287/orsc.1120.0806 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Olson, Margrethe H. (1982). “New Information Technology and Organizational Culture”, MIS Quarterly, 6, pp.71-92 10.2307/248992 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Pettigrew Adrew M. (1979). “On Studying Organizational Cultures”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4), pp. 570–581. 10.2307/2392363 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Rubin, Herbert and Irene Rubin (2005). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Samek Lodovici, Manuela (2021). The impact of teleworking and digital work on workers and society. European Union. European Parliament's Committee on Employment and Social Affairs, April, 1–174. https://www.aszhirportal.hu/storage/files/files/elemzesek/2021/tavmunka_20210108.pdf?download=true%0Ahttps://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/IPOL_STU(2021)662904Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Sewell, Graham and Laurent Taskin (2015). “Out of Sight, Out of Mind in a New World of Work? Autonomy, Control, and Spatiotemporal Scaling in Telework”, Organisation Studies, 36(11), pp.1507–1529. 10.1177/0170840615593587 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Stanworth, Celia (1998). “Telework and the information age”, New Technology, Work and Employment, 13(1), pp. 51–62. 10.1111/1468-005X.00038 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Storey, John (1985) “The means of management control”, Sociology, 19(2), pp.193–211. 10.1177/0038038585019002004 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Taskin, Laurent and Paul Edwards (2007). “The possibilities and limits of telework in a bureaucratic environment: Lessons from the public sector”, New Technology, Work and Employment, 22(3), pp.195–207. 10.1111/j.1468-005X.2007.00194.x Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Thompson, Edward P. (1967). “Time, Work-Discipline, and Industrial Capitalism”, Past and Present, 38(1), pp.56–97. 10.1093/past/38.1.56 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Thompson, Paul and Diane van den Broek (2010). “Managerial control and workplace regimes: An introduction”, Work, Employment and Society, 24(3), pp.1–12. 10.1177/0950017010384546 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Toffler, Alvin (1980). The Third Wave. New York: Morrow & Company.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Vallas, Steven P. (2006). “Empowerment Redux: Structure, Agency, and the Remaking of Managerial Authority”, American Journal of Sociology, 111(6), pp. 1677–1717. 10.1086/499909 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Vieira da Cunha, João, Carugati Andrea, and Aurelie Leclercq‐Vandelannoitte (2015) “The dark side of computer‐mediated control”, Information Systems Journal, 25(4), pp.319-354.10.1111/isj.12066 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Wicks, David (2002). “Successfully increasing technological control through minimising workplace resistance: understanding the willingness to telework”, Management Decision, 40(7), pp.672–681.10.1108/00251740210438508 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Willmott, Hugh (1993). “Strength Is Ignorance; Slavery Is Freedom: Managing Culture in Modern Organizations”, Journal of Management Studies, 30(4), pp. 515–552. 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1993.tb00315.x Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
