ror.org/0161xgx34
Abstracts
Abstract
This article examines the development of the ILO’s Global Strategy on Occupational Safety and Health through the lens of social exclusion. Social exclusion is a transversal concept across the social sciences. The article integrates the study of exclusion as an essential element of institutional analysis in industrial relations. After discussing the treatment of the study of exclusion in labour and employment relations scholarship, it presents an analytic frame using four mechanisms of exclusion taken from sociology: 1- encoding; 2- framing pathways; 3- non-decision making; and 4- mining actualities.
Observations are presented from a qualitative study of 125 preparatory and legal texts created through the development of the Global Strategy between 2000 and 2015. The method of analysis is a socio-historic interpretation following the principles of analysis of primary source documents outlined by Marc Trachtenberg in his book The Craft of International History: A Guide to Method. Exclusionary dynamics are observed in three areas: 1- managing the meaning of OSH policy integration; 2- shaping the role of collective labour rights in OSH policy; and 3- sidestepping the development of specific OSH hazard protections. Comparisons are made at key points with recent normative work by UN human rights bodies, including the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and their General Comment No. 23 on the human right to just and favourable conditions of work. The result is a Global OSH Strategy with promotional strengths, but also neoliberal values interwoven in its policy framework.
Keywords:
- International Labour Organization,
- occupational health and safety,
- social exclusion,
- mobilization of bias
Résumé
Cet article examine le développement de la Stratégie globale en matière de sécurité et de santé au travail de l’Organisation internationale du Travail (OIT) à travers le prisme de l’exclusion sociale. L’exclusion sociale est un concept transversal dans les sciences sociales. L’article intègre l’étude de l’exclusion comme une composante essentielle d’une analyse institutionnelle en relations industrielles. Il présente un cadre analytique en utilisant quatre mécanismes d’exclusion repris de la sociologie : 1- l’encodage ; 2- les voies encadrant ; 3- la non-prise de décision ; et 4- les actualités minées.
Les observations sont présentées à partir d’une étude qualitative de 125 textes juridiques préparatoires rédigés dans le cadre du développement de la Stratégie globale entre 2000 et 2015. Notre méthode s’avère être une interprétation socio-historique suivant les principes de l’analyse des documents primaires articulés par Marc Trachtenberg dans son livre The Craft of International History : A Guide to Method.
Des dynamiques d’exclusion furent observées dans trois domaines : 1- la gestion du sens de l’intégration des politiques en matière de SST ; 2- l’élaboration du rôle des droits collectifs du travail dans la politique en matière de SST ; et 3- le développement des protections spécifiques de danger en matière de SST. Le résultat a donné une Stratégie globale en matière de SST avec des forces de promotion, mais aussi des valeurs néolibérales entrelacées dans le cadre de sa politique.
Mots-clés :
- Organisation Internationale du Travail,
- sécurité et santé au travail,
- mobilisation des biais,
- exclusion sociale
Resumen
Este artículo examina el desarrollo de la Estrategia global en materia de seguridad y salud ocupacional de la Organización internacional del Trabajo (OIT) a través del prisma de la exclusión social. La exclusión social es un concepto transversal en las ciencias sociales. El artículo integra el estudio de la exclusión como un componente esencial de un análisis institucional en relaciones industriales. Después de haber discutido el tratamiento del estudio de la exclusión en la literatura de las relaciones laborales y del empleo, se presenta un marco analítico incluyendo cuatro mecanismos de exclusión inspirados de la sociología : 1- la codificación ; 2- las vías estructurantes ; 3- la ausencia de toma de decisión ; y 4- las realidades socavadas.
Las observaciones presentadas se basan en un estudio cualitativo de 125 textos jurídicos preparatorios redactados en el marco del desarrollo de la Estrategia global entre 2000 y 2015. Nuestro método consiste en una interpretación socio-histórica siguiendo los principios del análisis de documentos primarios articulados por Marc Trachtenberg en su libro The Craft of International Historic: A Guide to Method.
Las dinámicas de exclusión fueron observadas sobre tres áreas : 1- la gestión del sentido de integración de políticas en materia de salud y seguridad ocupacional (SSO) ; 2- la elaboración del rol de derechos colectivos de trabajo en la política de SSO ; y 3- el desarrollo de protecciones específicas de riesgos en materia de SSO. El resultado obtenido es una Estrategia global en materia de SSO con fuerzas de promoción, pero también con valores neoliberales entrelazados en sus esquemas políticos.
Palabras clave:
- OIT,
- salud y seguridad ocupacional,
- movilización de sesgos,
- exclusión social
Appendices
References
- Aalders, Marius and Ton Wilthagen. 1997. “Moving Beyond Command and Control: Reflexivity in the Regulation of Occupational Safety and Health and the Environment.” Law and Policy, 19 (4), 415-443.10.1111/1467-9930.t01-1-00034 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Abbott, Kenneth W and Duncan Snidal. 2000. “Hard and Soft Law in International Governance.” International Organization, 54 (3), 421-456.10.2307/1952796 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Bachrach, Peter and Baratz S. Morton. 1962. “Two Faces of Power.” The American Political Science Review, 56 (4), 947-952.10.2307/1952796 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Bachrach, Peter and Baratz S. Morton. 1963. “Decisions and Nondecisions: An Analytic Framework.” The American Political Science Review, 57 (3), 632-642.10.2307/1952568 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Bandelj, Nina, Kristen Shorette and Elizabeth Sowers. 2011. “Work and Neoliberal Globalization: A Polanyian synthesis.” Sociology Compass, 5 (9), 807-823.10.1111/j.1751-9020.2011.00408.x Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Bartley, Tim. 2007. “Institutional Emergence in an Era of Globalization: The Rise of Transnational Private Regulation of Labor and Environmental Conditions.” American Journal of Sociology, 113 (2), 297-351.10.1086/518871 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Benach, J, A. Vives, M. Amable, C. Vanroelen, G. Tarafa and C. Muntaner. 2014. “Precarious Employment: Understanding an Emerging Social Determinant of Health.” Annual Review of Public Health, 35, 229-253.10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182500 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Blanchard, Francis. 1975. Making Work More Human, Working Conditions and the Environment, Report of the Director-General to the 60th Session of the International Labour Conference. Geneva: International Labour Organization.10.1136/oem.30.1.87 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Blanpain, R. and Michele Colucci. 2004. The Globalization of Labour Standards: The Soft Law Track. The Hague; Frederick, MD: Kluwer Law International; Aspen Publishers.
10.7202/008317ar
Google Scholar
Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Blyton, Paul, Nicolas Bacon, Jack Fiorito and Edmund Heery. 2008. The SAGE Handbook of Industrial Relations. Los Angeles: SAGE.10.1093/law/9780199640133.003.0013 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Bonvin, Jean-Michel. 1998. L’Organisation internationale du travail: étude sur une agence productrice de normes: Presses Universitaires de France.10.4337/9781848445208.00012 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Brigden, Cathy. 2007. “Analysing Internal Power Dynamics in Peak Unions: A Conceptual Framework.” Journal of Industrial Relations, 49 (4), 483-496.10.1177/0022185607080318 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Browne, R.C. 1973. “Safety and Health at Work: The Robens Report.” British Journal of Industrial Medicine, 30 (1), 87-94.10.1136/oem.30.1.87 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Castillo, Carlos Reynoso. 2000. “Les droits collectifs du travail en Amérique latine et au Mexique.” Relations industrielles/Industrial Relations, 55 (1), 59-79.10.1108/01425450210420910 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Charnovitz, Steve. 1987. “Influence of International Labour Standards on the World Trading Regime-A Historical Overview.” International Labour Revue, 126 (5), 565-584.10.7591/cornell/9780801451898.001.0001 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Châtel, Vivianne and Marc-Henry Soulet. 2001. “L’exclusion, la vitalité d’une thématique usée.” Sociologie et sociétés, 33 (2), 175-202.10.7202/008317ar
Google Scholar
Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Coiquaud, Urwana. 2011. “La représentation collective des travailleurs précaires: évolution et défis contemporains.” Relations industrielles/Industrial Relations, 66 (4), 631-654.10.1111/j.1468-232X.1982.tb00221.x Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Committee of Experts on the Application of Conventions and Recommendations. 2009. General Survey on Occupational Safety and Health. 98th Session, Report III, Part 1B. Geneva, International Labour Office.10.1177/0959680114527032 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Committee on Safety and Health at Work. 1972. Safety and Health at Work, Report of the Committee, 1970-1972, Lord Robens, Chairman. Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Employment by Command of Her Majesty. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.10.1177/001979398804100410 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Compa, Lance. 2002. “Pursuing International Labour Rights in US Courts: New Uses for Old Tools.” Relations industrielles/Industrial Relations, 57 (1), 48-76.10.1057/9781137291967 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- D’Amours, Martine. 2009. “Travail précaire et gestion des risques: vers un nouveau modèle social?” Lien social et Politiques, 61 (printemps), 109-121.10.1080/09692290.2013.779591 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Diller, Janelle M. 2013. “Social Justice, Rights, and Labour.” In Dinah Shelton, The Oxford Handbook of International Human Rights Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 295-324.10.1093/law/9780199640133.003.0013 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Eastwood, Lauren E. 2006. “Making the Institution Ethnographically Accessible: UN Document Production and the Transformation of Experience”. In Dorothy E. Smith, Institutional Ethnography as Practice: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, 181-199.10.2190/607H-TTV0-QCN6-YLT4 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Eastwood, Lauren E. 2014. “Negotiating UN Policy: Activating Texts in Policy Deliberations.” In Dorothy E. Smith et al., Incorporating Texts into Institutional Ethnographies. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 64-90.10.1111/j.1467-8543.2009.00744.x Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Elliott, Kimberly Ann and Richard B Freeman. 2003. Can Labor Standards Improve under Globalization? Washington: Peterson Institute for International Economics.10.1111/j.1475-682X.1974.tb01159.x Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Forrest, Anne. 1993. “Women and Industrial Relations Theory: No Room in the Discourse.” Relations industrielles/Industrial Relations, 48 (3), 409-440.10.1111/j.1467-7660.2008.00484.x Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Gaventa, John. 1982. Power and Powerlessness: Quiescence and Rebellion in an Appalachian Valley. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.10.4337/9781849802376 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Godard, John. 2008. “An Institutional Environments Approach to Industrial Relations.” In Charles J. Whalen, New Directions in the Study of Work and Employment: Revitalizing Industrial Relations as an Academic Enterprise. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 68-86.10.4337/9781848445208.00012 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Governing Body (GB). 2000a. Methods of Revision of Instruments concerning Occupational Safety and Health. Working Party on Policy regarding the Revision of Standards. 279th Session. GB.279/LILS/WP/PRS/3. Geneva: International Labour Office.10.7202/029539ar
Google Scholar
Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Governing Body (GB). 2000b. Proposals for the Agenda of the 91st Session (2003) of the Conference. ILO Standards-Related Activities in the Area of Occupational Safety and Health. 279th Session. GB.279/5/2. Geneva: International Labour Organization.10.3138/9781442680432 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Governing Body (GB). 2010a. Plan of Action (2010-2016) to Achieve Widespread Ratification and Effective Implementation of the Occupational Safety and Health Instruments. 307th Session. Geneva: International Labour Office.10.1162/002081800551280 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Governing Body (GB). 2010b. Reports of the Committee on Legal Issues and International Labour Standards. GB.307/10/2(Rev.). Geneva: International Labour Office.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Griffith, Alison I. and Dorothy E. Smith. 2014. Under New Public Management: Institutional Ethnographies of Changing Front-line Work, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Hall, Peter A. and Rosemary C. R. Taylor. 1996. “Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms.” Political Studies, 44 (5), 936-957.10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.x Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Hall, Peter A. and David W. Soskice. 2001. “An Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism”. In Peter A. Hall et al., Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford [England]; New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199247757.003.0001 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Hansen, Lise Lotte. 2002. “Rethinking the Industrial Relations Tradition from a Gender Perspective: an Invitation to Integration.” Employee Relations, 24 (2), 190-210.10.1108/01425450210420910 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Hilgert, Jeffrey. 2013. Hazard or Hardship: Crafting Global Norms on the Right to Refuse Unsafe Work. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.10.7591/cornell/9780801451898.001.0001 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Holgate, Jane, Gail Hebson and Anne McBride. 2006. “Why Gender and ‘Difference’ Matters: A Critical Appraisal of Industrial Relations Research.” Industrial Relations Journal, 37 (4), 310-328.10.1111/j.1468-2338.2006.00406.x Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Hyman, Richard. 1982. “Symposium on Thomas Kochan’s Collective Bargaining and Industrial Relations.” Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 21 (1), 100-114.10.1111/j.1468-232X.1982.tb00221.x Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Ibsen, Christian Lyhne. 2015. “Three approaches to coordinated bargaining: A case for power-based explanations.” European Journal of Industrial Relations, 21 (1), 39-56.10.1177/0959680114527032 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- International Labour Conference. 1981. Convention (No. 155) Concerning Occupational Safety and Health and the Working Environment, 1331 U.N.T.S. 22345.10.7202/006710ar
Google Scholar
Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- International Labour Conference (ILC). 1944. Declaration Concerning the Aims and Purposes of the International Labour Organization (Declaration of Philadelphia). Adopted in Philadelphia, 10 May 1944.10.7202/038477ar
Google Scholar
Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- International Labour Conference (ILC). 1964. Convention (No. 121) Concerning Benefits in the Case of Employment Injury. 607 U.N.T.S. 8718.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- International Labour Conference (ILC). 1980. Record of Proceedings of the 66th Session. Geneva: International Labour Office.10.3138/9781442667082-009 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- International Labour Conference (ILC). 1981a. Recommendation (No. 164) Concerning Occupational Safety and Health and the Working Environment. Adopted at the 67th Session, 22 June 1981. Geneva: International Labour Office.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- International Labour Conference (ILC). 1981b. Record of Proceedings of the 67th Session. Geneva: International Labour Office.10.7202/050871ar
Google Scholar
Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- International Labour Conference (ILC). 1988. Convention (No. 167) Concerning Safety and Health in Construction. 1592 U.N.T.S. 33, No. 27865.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- International Labour Conference (ILC). 1995. Convention (No. 176) Concerning Safety and Health in Mines. 2029 U.N.T.S. 207, No. 35009.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- International Labour Conference (ILC). 2001. Convention (No. 184) Concerning Safety and Health in Agriculture. 2227 U.N.T.S. 241, No. 39591.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- International Labour Conference (ILC). 2003. Global Strategy on Occupational Safety and Health: Conclusions adopted by the International Labour Conference at its 91st Session. Geneva: International Labour Office.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- International Labour Conference (ILC). 2005. Promotional Framework for Occupational Safety and Health. Report IV (2), Fourth item on the agenda of the 93rd Session. Geneva: International Labour Office.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- International Labour Conference (ILC). 2006a. Recommendation (No. 198) Concerning the Employment Relationship. Adopted at the 95th Session, 15 June 2006. 10.3138/9781442619463 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- International Labour Conference (ILC). 2006b. Convention (No. 187) Concerning the Promotional Framework for Occupational Safety and Health. 2564 U.N.T.S. 291, No. 45739.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- International Labour Conference (ILC). 2009. Report of the Committee on the Application of Standards, Provisional Record 16 (Part One, revised), 98th Session. Geneva: International Labour Office.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- International Labour Conference (ILC). 2015a. Recommendation (No. 204) Concerning the Transition from the Informal to the Formal Economy. Adopted at the 104th Session, 12 June 2015. Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- International Labour Conference (ILC). 2015b. The Transition from the Informal to the Formal Economy, Report V(1) to the 104th Session. Geneva, International Labour Office.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- International Labour Office (ILO). 2003. Safety in Numbers: Pointers for a Global Safety Culture at Work. Geneva: International Labour Office.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- International Labour Office (ILO). 2015a. “NORMLEX Information System on International Labour Standards.” Retrieved October 15, 2015, from http://www.ilo.org/normlex.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- International Labour Office (ILO). 2015b. Reports on Unratified Conventions and Recommendations under Article 19 of the Constitution of the International Labour Organization for the 2017 General Survey. Geneva: International Labour Office.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Kirkbride, Paul S., James W. Durcan, Terry L. Leap and David W. Grigsby. 1988. “Communications: Power and the Bargaining Process: A Comment.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 41 (4), 618.10.1177/001979398804100410 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Kott, Sandrine and Joëlle Droux. 2013. Globalizing Social Rights: The International Labour Organization and Beyond, New York: Palgrave Macmillan and the International Labour Office.10.1057/9781137291967 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Locke, Richard M, Ben A Rissing and Timea Pal. 2013. “Complements or Substitutes? Private Codes, State Regulation and the Enforcement of Labour Standards in Global Supply Chains.” British Journal of Industrial Relations, 51 (3), 519-552.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Lowi, Theodore. 2007. Arenas of Power: Reflections on Politics and Policy: Boulder, Colorado: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Lukes, Steven. 1974, 2005. Power: A Radical View. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Mclean, Iain. 1997. “Heartless Bully Who Added to Agony of Aberfan.” The Observer, January 5 Sunday, page 12.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Morgan, Glenn and Marco Hauptmeier. 2014. “Varieties of Institutional Theory in Comparative Employment Relations.” In A. Wilkinson et al., Oxford Handbook of Employment Relations -Comparative Employment Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 190-221.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Murphy, Hannah. 2014. “The World Bank and Core Labour Standards: Between Flexibility and Regulation.” Review of International Political Economy, 21 (2), 399-431.10.1080/09692290.2013.779591 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Ponte, Stefano, Peter Gibbon and Jakob Vestergaard. 2011. Governing Through Standards: Origins, Drivers and Limitations, New York: Palgrave Macmillan Basingstoke.10.1007/978-0-230-34830-1 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Powell, Walter W. and Paul DiMaggio. 1991. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Quinlan, Michael, Claire Mayhew and Philip Bohle. 2001. “The Global Expansion of Precarious Employment, Work Disorganization, and Consequences for Occupational Health: A Review of Recent Research.” International Journal of Health Services, 31 (2), 335-414.10.2190/607H-TTV0-QCN6-YLT4 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Riisgaard, Lone and Nikolaus Hammer. 2011. “Prospects for Labour in Global Value Chains: Labour Standards in the Cut Flower and Banana Industries.” British Journal of Industrial Relations, 49 (1), 168-190.10.1111/j.1467-8543.2009.00744.x Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Scott, W Richard. 2013. Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.10.1111/bjir.12003 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Smith, Dorothy E. 1974. “The Social Construction of Documentary Reality.” Sociological Inquiry, 44 (4), 257-268.10.1111/j.1475-682X.1974.tb01159.x Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Smith, Dorothy E. 2005. Institutional Ethnography: A Sociology for People, Landham: Rowman Altamira.10.1007/978-1-349-02248-9 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Smith, Dorothy E. 2006. “Incorporating Texts into Ethnographic Practice.” In Dorothy E. Smith, Institutional Ethnography as Practice. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers. 65-88.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Smith, Dorothy E. 2009. “Institutional Ethnography.” Innovations in Social Science Research Methods, ESRC National Centre for Research Methods, 32-33.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Smith, Dorothy E and Susan M Turner. 2014. Incorporating Texts into Institutional Ethnographies, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226185941.001.0001 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Smith, George W. 2014. “Policing the Gay Community: An Inquiry into Textually-Mediated Social Relations.” In Dorothy E. Smith et al., Incorporating Texts into Institutional Ethnographies, Toronto: University of Toronto Press. 17-40.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Somavia, Juan. 1999. Decent Work, Report of the Director General to the 87th Session of the International Labour Conference, Geneva: International Labour Office.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Soulet, M-H. 1998. “L’exclusion: usages et mésusages d’un concept.” Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 24 (3), 431-458.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Standing, Guy. 2008. “The ILO: An Agency for Globalization?” Development and Change, 39 (3), 355-384.10.1111/j.1467-7660.2008.00484.x Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Standing, Guy. 2009. Work after Globalization: Building Occupational Citizenship. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.10.4337/9781849802376 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Takala, J., P. Hamalainen, K. L. Saarela, L. Y. Yun, K. Manickam, T. W. Jin, P. Heng, C. Tjong, L. G. Kheng, S. Lim and G. S. Lin. 2014. “Global Estimates of the Burden of Injury and Illness at Work in 2012.”Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 11 (5), 326-337.10.1080/15459624.2013.863131 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Trachtenberg, Marc. 2006. The Craft of International History: A Guide to Method. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Tsogas, George. 2009. “International Labour Regulation: What Have We Really Learnt So Far?” Relations industrielles/Industrial Relations, 64 (1), 75-94.10.7202/029539ar
Google Scholar
Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. 2007. General Comment No. 19 on the Right to Social Security (Article 9 of the Covenant). 39th Sess., U.N. Doc E/C.12/GC/19.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- UN Committee on Economic‚ Social and Cultural Rights. 2000. General Comment No. 14 on the Right to the Highest Attainable Standard of Health (Article 12 of the Covenant). 22nd sess., U.N. Doc 3E/C.12/2000/4.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- UN Committee on Economic‚ Social and Cultural Rights. 2016. General Comment No. 23 on the Right to Just and Favourable Conditions of Work (Article 7 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights), U.N. Doc E/C.12/GC/23.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Vallée, Guylaine. 2005. Pour une meilleure protection des travailleurs vulnérables: des scénarios de politiques publiques. Ottawa: Réseaux canadiens de recherche en politiques publiques.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Vosko, Leah F. 2000. Temporary Work: The Gendered Rise of a Precarious Employment Relationship. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.10.3138/9781442680432 Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Whitfield, Keith and George Strauss. 1998. Researching the World of Work: Strategies and Methods in Studying Industrial Relations. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar
- Xiberras, Martine. 1994. Les théories de l’exclusion. Paris: Méridiens Klincksieck.Google Scholar Search this bibliographic reference on Google Scholar