Abstracts
Résumé
Cette critique appartient à une série de trois articles de la section Forum sur le livre de Barnes (2016), Are They Rich Because They’re Smart? Elle comprend quatre parties consacrées respectivement aux commentaires de Barnes concernant The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life, à l’absence de biais culturel dans les tests d’intelligence (QI), à ses propos sur l’éducation et à une donnée ignorée par Barnes.
Abstract
This critique is one of three book reviews of Barnes’ (2016) book, Are They Rich Because They’re Smart?, that appears in this issue’s MJE Forum. It is comprised of four parts respectively devoted to Barnes’ commentary regarding The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American, to the absence of cultural bias in intelligence tests (IQ), to his remarks on education, and to a fact ignored by Barnes.
Appendices
Bibliographie
- Anastasi, A. et Urbina, S. (1997). Psychological testing (7e éd.). New Jersey, NY : Prentice-Hall.
- Bangerter, A. (2008). La diffusion des croyances populaires. Le cas de l’Effet Mozart. Grenoble, France : Presses universitaires de Grenoble.
- Barnes, J. (2016). Are they rich because they’re smart? Class, privilege and learning under capitalism. New York, NY : Pathfinder.
- Brown, R. T., Reynolds, C. R. et Whitaker, J. S. (1999). Bias in mental test since Bias in mental testing. School Psychology Quarterly, 14(3) 208-238.
- Ceci, S. J. (1990). On intelligence…more or less. A bio-ecological treatise on intellectual development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice Hall.
- Flynn, J. R. (2007). What is intelligence? Beyond the Flynn effect. New York, NY : Cambridge University Press.
- Helms, J. E. (1992). Why is there no study of cultural equivalence in standardized cognitive ability testing? American Psychologist, 47, 1083-1101.
- Helms, J. E. (1997). Implications of Behrens for the validity of the White racial identity attitude scale. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 44(1), 13-16.
- Herrnstein, R. J. et Murray, C. (1994). The bell curve: Intelligence and class structure in American Life. New York, NY : Free Press.
- Hilliard, A. G., III. (1992). IQ and the courts: Larry P. v Wilson Riles and PASE v. Hannon. Dans A. K. H. Burlew, W. C. Banks, H. P. McAdoo et D. A. Azibo (dir.), African American psychology: Theory, research, and practice (p. 199-218). Newbury Park, CA : Sage.
- Hou, F. et Myles, J. (2007). L’évolution du rôle de l’éducation dans le choix du conjoint : homogamie éducationnelle au Canada et aux Etats-Unis depuis les années 1970. Ottawa, ON : Statistiques Canada.
- Jensen, A. R. (1980). Bias in mental testing. New York, NY : Free Press.
- Kaufman, A. S., Engi Raiford, S. et Coalson, D. L. (2016). Intelligent testing with the WISC-V. Hoboken, NJ : Wiley.
- Larivée, S. (2008). (dir.). Le Quotient intellectuel. Ses déterminants et son avenir. Québec, QC : MultiMondes.
- Larivée, S. et Gagné, F. (2007). Les biais culturels des tests de QI : la nature du problème. Psychologie Canadienne, 48(4), 221-239.
- Lemann, N. (1999). The big test: The secret history of the American meritocracy. New York, NY : Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
- Loehlin, J. C., Lindzey, G. et Sphuler, J. N. (1975). Race differences in intelligence. San Francisco, CA : Freeman.
- Mackintosh, N. J. (2004). QI et intelligence humaine. Paris, France : DeBoeck.
- Michaels W. B. (2009). La diversité contre l’égalité. Paris, France : Raisons d’agir.
- Muller, J. (2013). Capitalism and inequality. What the right and the left get wrong. Foreign Affairs, 92(2), 30-51.
- Ortiz, S. O. et Dynda, A. M. (2005). Use of intelligence tests with culturally and linguistically diverse populations. Dans D. P. Flanagan et P. L. Harrison (dir.), Contemporary intellectual assessment (p. 545-556). New York, NY : The Guilford Press.
- Reynolds, C. R. (1982). The problem of bias in psychological assessment. Dans C. R. Reynolds et T. B. Gutkin (dir.), The handbook of school psychology (p. 178-208). New York, NY : Wiley.
- Reynolds, C. R. (2000). Why is psychometric research on bias in mental testing so often ignored? Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 6, 144-150.
- Reynolds, C. R. et Kaïser, B. M. (1990). Bias in assessment of aptitude. Dans C. R. Reynolds et R. W. Kamphaus (dir.), Handbook of psychological and educational assessment of children: Personality, behavior and context (p. 611-653). New York, NY : The Guilford Press.
- Rhodes, R. L., Ochoa, S. H., Ortiz, S. O. (2005). Assessing culturally and linguistically diverse students: A pratical guide. New York, NY : Guildford Press.
- Scarr, S. (1992). Developmental theories for the 1990s: Development and individual differences. Child Development, 63, 1-7.
- Strenze, T. (2007). Intelligence and socioeconomic success: A meta‐analytic review of longitudinal research. Intelligence, 35(5), 401-426.
- Strenze, T. (2015). Intelligence and success. Dans S. Goldstein, D. Princiotta et J. A. Naglieri (dir.), Handbook of intelligence: Evolutionary theory, historical perspective and current concepts (p. 405-413). New York, NY : Springer Science + Business Media.
- Suzuki, L. A. et Valencia, R. R. (1997). Race-ethnicity and measured intelligence: Educational implications. American Psychologist, 52(10), 1103-1114.
- Toga, A. W. et Thompson, P. M. (2005). Genetics of brain structure and intelligence. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 28, 1-23.
- Turkheimer, E., Haley, A., Waldron, M., D’Onofrio, B. et Gottesman, I. I. (2003). Socioeconomic status modifies heritability of IQ in young children. Psychological Science, 14(6), 623-628.