Abstracts
Abstract
Research collaboration is now the norm in the academic community. The literature has widely discussed the benefits and costs of research collaboration and compared across collaboration types (intranational, international). A discussion is still missing about collaboration in business and management as a separate discipline in the French context characterized by a separation between private business schools and public universities. The literature has rarely examined how international and intranational collaborations differ in terms of scale, scope, and impact. The purpose of this study is to address these two gaps through the notion of trade-off by using bibliometric measures of co-authorship.
Keywords:
- collaboration in research,
- intranational versus international,
- trade-off,
- bibliometrics,
- co-author
Résumé
La collaboration en recherche est maintenant la norme dans les communautés académiques. La littérature a beaucoup discuté des avantages et des coûts de la collaboration en recherche selon les types de collaboration (intranationale, internationale). Toutefois une analyse de la collaboration en gestion comme discipline distincte dans le contexte français caractérisé par la séparation encore marquante entre écoles de commerce privées et universités publiques. La littérature a rarement examiné comment les collaborations intranationales et internationales diffèrent en termes d’échelle, de portée et d’impact. Le but de cette étude est de combler ces lacunes en utilisant le cadre des trade‑offs et les outils bibliométriques.
Mots-clés :
- collaboration en recherche,
- intranational versus international,
- trade-off,
- bibliométrie,
- co-auteur
Resumen
La colaboración en investigación es ahora la norma en la comunidad académica. La literatura ha discutido ampliamente los beneficios y costos de la colaboración investigativa y los ha comparado según dos categorías (intranacional, internacional). En el contexto francés, caracterizado por una separación entre las escuelas de negocios privadas y las universidades públicas, se requiere un examen detallado sobre tal colaboración en el área específica de negocios y gestión. En estas disciplinas, la literatura rara vez ha examinado cómo las colaboraciones internacionales e intranacionales difieren en términos de escala, alcance e impacto. El propósito de este estudio es abordar estas dos brechas a través de la noción de trade-off, haciendo uso de medidas bibliométricas de co-autoría
Palabras clave:
- colaboración en investigación,
- intranacional versus internacional,
- trade-off,
- bibliometria,
- coautor
Appendices
Bibliography
- Abdessemed, T.; Bueno-Merio, P. B. (2016). “À propos d’impact de la recherche-Les injonctions paradoxales des écoles de management françaises”, Revue française de gestion, Vol. 42, N° 261, p. 55–76. https://doi.org/10.3166/rfg.2016.00098
- Abramo, G.; D’Angelo, C. ; Di Costa, F. (2014). “Research collaboration and productivity: is there correlation?”, Higher education, Vol. 57, N° 2, p. 155–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9139-z
- Adams, J. (2013). «Collaborations: The fourth age of research», Nature, Vol. 497, N° 7451, p. 557-560. https://doi.org/10.1038/497557a
- Barney, J. (1991). «Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage», Journal of Management, Vol. 17, N° 1, p. 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063910170010
- Blanchard, M. (2011). «Développer la recherche et maintenir la professionnalisation. Des Écoles Supérieures de Commerce françaises face aux transformations de l’enseignement supérieur européen», Cahiers de la recherche sur l’éducation et les savoirs, Hors-série N° 3, p. 61-76. http://journals.openedition.org/cres/110
- Bozeman, B. ; Boardman, C. (2014). A research collaboration and team science: A state-of-the-art review and agenda, Londres: Springer, eBook packages.
- CEFDG (2005). Principes et Orientation, 23 novembre 2005.
- Chen, K.; Zhang, Y.; and Fu, X. (2019). “International research collaboration: an emerging domain of innovation studies?”, Research Policy, Vol. 48, N° 1, p. 149–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.005
- Courpasson D. and Guedri Z. (2007). “Les professeurs-chercheurs en management face à la performance scientifique”, Revue française de gestion, Vol. 2007/9–10, N° 178–179 p. 173–194. https://doi.org/10.3166/rfg.178-179.173-194
- Didegah, F.; Thelwall, M. (2013). “Which factors help authors produce the highest impact research? Collaboration, journal and document properties», Journal of Informetrics, Vol. 7, N° 4, p. 861-873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2013.08.006
- Dubois S. ; Walsh I. (2017). “The globalization of research highlighted through the research networks of management education institutions: the case of French business schools”, M@n@gement, Vol. 20, N° 5, p. 435–462. https://doi.org/10.3917/mana.205.0435
- Etzkowitz, H.; Webster, A.; Gebhardt, C.; Terra, B. R. C. (2000). «The future of the university and the university of the future: Evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm», Research Policy, Vol. 29, N° 2, p. 313-330. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00069-4
- Fauconnier, P. (2006). «UNIVERSITES, GRANDES ÉCOLES: Réflexions sur un douloureux divorce français», Revue des deux mondes, avril, p. 89-96. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44191668
- Franceschet, M. ; Costantini, A. (2010). «The effect of scholar collaboration on impact and quality of academic papers», Journal of Informetrics, Vol. 4, N° 4, p. 540-553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.06.003
- Goulard, F. (2006). «Universités, grandes écoles, rapprochez-vous!», Le Monde, 14/07/2006.
- Hsiehchen, D. ; Espinoza, M.; Hsieh, A. (2015). «Multinational teams and diseconomies of scale in collaborative research», Science advances, Vol. 1, N° 8, e1500211. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1500211
- Jeong, S.; Choi, J.; Kim, J. (2011). «The determinants of research collaboration modes: exploring the effects of research and researcher characteritics on co-authorship», Scientometrics, Vol. 89, N° 3, p. 967-983. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0474-y
- Jeong, S. ; Choi, J.; Kim, J. (2014). “On the drivers of international collaboration: the impact of informal communication, motivation, and research resources”, Science and Public Policy, Vol. 41, N° 1, p. 520–531. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/sct079
- Jones, B. F.; Wuchty, S.; Uzzi, B. (2008). «Multi-university research teams: Shifting impact, geography, and stratification in science», Science, Vol. 322, N° 5905, p. 1259-1262. DOI: 10.1126/science.1158357
- Katz, J.; Martin, B. (1997). «What is Research Collaboration?», Research Policy, Vol. 26, N° 1, p. 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00917-1
- Kwiek, M. (2018). «International research collaboration and international research orientation: Comparative findings about European academics», Journal of Studies in International Education, Vol. 22, N° 2, p. 136-160. https://doi.org/10.1177/10283153177470
- Kwiek, M. (2019). «Social stratification in Higher Education: What it means at the micro-level of the individual academic scientist», Higher Education Quarterly, Vol. 73, N° 4, p. 419-444. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12221
- Kwiek, M. (2020a). «Internationalists and locals: international research collaboration in a resource‑poor system», Scientometrics, Vol. 124, N° 3, p. 57-105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03460-2
- Kwiek, M. (2020b). “What large-scale publication and citation data tell us about international research collaboration in Europe: changing national patterns in global contexts”, Studies in Higher Education, Vol. 46, N° 12, p. 2629–2649. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1749254
- Kyvik, S.; Reymert, I. (2017). “Research collaboration in groups and networks: differences across academic fields”, Scientometrics, Vol. 113, N° 2, p. 951–967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2497-5
- Landry, R.; Traore, N.; Godin, B. (1996). “An econometric analysis of the effect of collaboration on academic research productivity”, Higher education, Vol. 32, N° 3, p. 283–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138868
- Lee, S.; Bozeman, B. (2005). “The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity”, Social Studies of Science, Vol. 35, N° 5, p. 673–702. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312705052359
- Lewis, J.; Ross, S.; Holden, T. (2012). “The how and why of academic collaboration: disciplinary differences and policy implications”, Higher education, Vol. 64, N° 5, p. 693–708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9521-8
- Mangematin, V.; Belkhouja, M. (2015). «A note on the evolution of the French management scholarship1994-2014», M@n@gement, Vol. 18, n° 3, p. 194-204. https://doi.org/10.3917/mana.183.0194
- March, J. G. (1991). «Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning», Organization science, Vol. 2, N° 1, p. 71-87. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2634940
- Menger P. M. ; Marchika C. ; Hanet D. (2015). «La concurrence positionnelle dans l’enseignement supérieur», Revue économique, Vol. 66, N° 1, p. 237-288. https://doi.org/10.3917/reco.661.0237
- Meyer, M. (2000). «Does Science push technology? Patents citing scientific literature”, Research Policy, Vol. 29, N° 3, p. 409–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00040-2
- Meyer, M.; Sinilainen, T.; Timm Utecht, J. (2003). «Towards hybrid triple helix indicators: A study of university-related patents and a survey of academic inventors», Scientometrics, Vol. 58, N° 2, p. 321-350. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026240727851
- Narin, F.; Whitlow, E. S. (1990). «Measurement of scientific cooperation and coauthorship in CEC-related areas of science», Report EUR 12900. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
- Oh, D.; Kim, Y.; Ahn, H. (2010). «An analysis of international cooperation in the public research and development programs of Korea», Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, Vol. 18, N° 2, p. 43-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2010.9668692
- Penrose, E. G. (1959). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, New York: Wiley.
- Picavet, E. (2007). «Universités et «grandes écoles»: une impasse française», Cités, Vol. 2007/3, N° 31, p. 173-178. https://doi.org/10.3917/cite.031.0173
- Ponds, R. (2009). «The limits to internationalization of scientific research collaboration», Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol. 34, N° 1, p. 76-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-008-9083-1
- Singh, J. (2005). “Collaborative networks as determinants of knowledge diffusion patterns”, Management Science, Vol. 51, N° 5, p. 756–770. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20110371
- Slaughter, S.; Leslie, L. (1997). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies and the entrepreneurial university, Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.
- Sooryamoorthy, R. (2009). “Do types of collaboration change citation? Collaboration and citation patterns of South African science publications», Scientometrics, Vol. 81, N° 1, p. 177-193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-2126-z
- Teng, B. S. ; Cummings, J. L. (2002). «Trade-offs in managing resources and capabilities», Academy of Management Perspectives, Vol. 16, N° 2, p. 81-91. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2002.7173548
- Van Raan, A. F. J. (1998). “The influence of international collaboration on the impact of research result”, Scientometrics, Vol. 42, N° 3, p. 423–428. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02458380
- Wernerfelt, B. (1984). “A resource-based view of the Firm”, Strategic management Journal, Vol. 5, N° 2, p. 171–180. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2486175
- West, J. D.; Jacquet, J.; King, M. M.; Correll, S. J.; Bergstrom, C. T. (2013). “The Role of Gender in Scholarly Authorship”, PLOS ONE, Vol. 8, N° 7, p. e66212. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066212
- Wuchty, S.; Jones B. F.; Uzzi B. (2007). «The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge», Science, Vol. 316, N° 5827, p. 1036-1039. DOI: 10.1126/science.1136099
- Xie, Y.; Killewald, A. A. (2012). Is American science in decline?, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
- Zhao, X. G.; Yang, Y. S.; Feng, T. T.; Yang, Y. H. (2013). “International cooperation on renewable energy electricity in China–A critical analysis”, Renew Energy, Vol. 55, p. 410–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2012.11.039
- Zitt, M.; Bassecoulard, E.; Okubo, Y. (2000). «Shadows of the past in international cooperation: collaboration profiles of the top five producers of science», Scientometrics, Vol. 47, N° 3, p. 627‑657. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005632319799